Impact of site of occlusion in proximal splenic artery embolisation for blunt splenic trauma.

BACKGROUND: Proximal splenic artery embolisation (PSAE) can be performed in stable patients with Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade III-V splenic injury. PSAE reduces splenic perfusion but maintains viability of the spleen and pancreas via the collateral circulation. The hypothesized ideal location is between the dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) and great pancreatic artery (GPA). This study compares the outcomes resulting from PSAE embolisation in different locations along the splenic artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of PSAE for blunt splenic trauma (2015-2020). Embolisation locations were divided into: Type I, proximal to DPA; Type II, DPA-GPA; Type III, distal to GPA. Fifty-eight patients underwent 59 PSAE: Type I (7); Type II (27); Type III (25). Data was collected on technical and clinical success, post-embolisation pancreatitis and splenic perfusion. Statistical significance was assessed using a chi-squared test. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. Clinical success was 100% for Type I/II embolisation and 88% for Type III: one patient underwent reintervention and two had splenectomies for ongoing instability. Clinical success was significantly higher in Type II embolisation compared to Type III (p = 0.02). No episodes of pancreatitis occurred post-embolisation. Where post-procedural imaging was obtained, splenic perfusion remained 100% in Type I and II embolisation and 94% in Type III. Splenic perfusion was significantly higher in the theorized ideal Type II group compared to Type I and III combined (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The results support the proposed optimal embolisation location as being between the DPA and GPA.

Succinate dehydrogenase mutations: paraganglioma imaging and at-risk population screening.

Paragangliomas are rare vascular tumours of the autonomic nervous system. They can be classified as sympathetic or parasympathetic. Sympathetic paragangliomas, which include phaeochromocytomas, tend to be functional and symptomatic. Parasympathetic paragangliomas are usually non-functional and may present with mass effect. Forty percent of paragangliomas are linked to genetic syndromes, most commonly due to mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme complex and are collectively known as paraganglioma syndromes, of which five are described. Genetic testing is recommended for all patients, and their first-degree relatives, diagnosed with paragangliomas. When SDH mutations are discovered, biochemical screening and imaging surveillance is indicated. There is currently no consensus on imaging surveillance protocols. Most advocate full-body imaging, but the choice of technique and frequency varies. If paragangliomas are demonstrated, functional imaging to look for synchronous tumours or metastases is indicated. 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) is the technique of choice for metastatic evaluation, but [123I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine or [111In]-DTPA-octreotide scintigraphy are also utilised. Current research into emerging positron-emitting radiolabelled somatostatin analogues have yielded promising results, which is likely to be reflected in future guidelines. As genetic testing becomes increasingly prevalent, the need to answer the remaining questions regarding surveillance imaging is paramount.