Twenty-one years of experience with resected solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: a retrospective single-institutional cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is <2% of the incidence of pancreatic tumor, the prevalence seems to be increasing. SPNs are mostly benign. However, they also show malignant features. This study aimed to identify the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent surgery for SPN at a single center. METHODS: Data on 217 patients with SPN who underwent surgery in Samsung Medical Center between 2000 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Herein, the mean age of the 217 patients was 40.0 ± 12.6 years, with a female predominance (80.6%). Most patients had no comorbidity. The mean tumor size was 4.4 ± 3.1 cm. The tumor was located at the pancreatic head in 36 patients (16.6%), the body of the pancreas in 69 patients (31.8%), and the pancreatic tail in 96 patients (44.2%). Of note, 35 patients (16.1%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies, 148 patients (68.2%) had distal pancreatectomies, and the other patients had subtotal /total pancreatectomy (9.7%) or enucleation/mass excision (6.0%). No patient had lymph node (LN) metastasis. Moreover, 6 patients (2.8%) had a recurrence in the liver or regional LNs. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 96.8%. The only factor affecting recurrence was tumor size (P = .007). CONCLUSION: Because SPN predominates in relatively young women, patients often hesitate to undergo surgery. Nevertheless, as size is the prognostic factor, early resection is recommended for a better prognosis in the case of surgically feasible, young age, and healthy patients.

Survival Comparison of Different Operation Types for Middle Bile Duct Cancer: Bile Duct Resection versus Pancreaticoduodenectomy Considering Complications and Adjuvant Treatment Effects.

BACKGROUND: Margin status is one of the most significant prognostic factors after curative surgery for middle bile duct (MBD) cancer. Bile duct resection (BDR) is commonly converted to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) to achieve R0 resection. Additionally, adjuvant treatment is actively performed after surgery to improve survival. However, the wider the range of surgery, the higher the chance of complications; this, in turn, makes adjuvant treatment impossible. Nevertheless, no definitive surgical strategy considers the possible complication rates and subsequent adjuvant treatment. We aimed to investigate the appropriate surgical type considering the margin status, complications, and adjuvant treatment in MBD cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2017, 520 patients diagnosed with MBD cancer at the Samsung Medical Center were analyzed retrospectively according to the operation type, margin status, complications, and adjuvant treatment. The R1 group was defined as having a carcinoma margin. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate for patients who underwent R0 and R1 resection was 54.4% and 33.3%, respectively (p = 0.131). Prognostic factors affecting the overall survival were the age, preoperative CA19-9 level, T stage, and N stage, but not the operation type, margin status, complications, or adjuvant treatment. The complication rates were 11.5% and 29.8% in the BDR and PD groups, respectively (p < 0.001). We observed no significant difference in the adjuvant treatment ratio according to complications (p = 0.675). Patients with PD who underwent R0 resection and could not undergo chemotherapy because of complications reported better survival rates than those with BDR who underwent R1 resection after adjuvant treatment (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The survival outcome of patients with R1 margins who underwent BDR did not match those with R0 margins after PD, even after adjuvant treatment. Due to improvements in surgical techniques and the ability to resolve complications, surgical complications exert a marginal effect on survival. Therefore, surgeons should secure R0 margins to achieve the best survival outcomes.

Different Oncologic Outcomes According to Margin Status (High-Grade Dysplasia vs. Carcinoma) in Patients Who Underwent Hilar Resection for Mid-Bile Duct Cancer.

Margin positivity after hilar resection (HR) for bile duct cancer is commonly observed due to its longitudinal spread along the subepithelial plane; nevertheless, we cannot draw conclusions regarding the prognostic effects of margins with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or carcinoma. We aimed to investigate the oncologic effect according to the margin status after HR, particularly between the R1 HGD and the R1 carcinoma. From 2008 to 2017, 149 patients diagnosed with mid-bile duct cancer in Samsung Medical Center, South Korea, were divided according to margin status after HR and retrospectively analyzed. Recurrence patterns were also analyzed between the groups. There were 126 patients with R0 margins, nine with R1 HGD, and 14 with R1 carcinoma. The mean age of the patients was 68.3 (±8.1); most patients were male. The mean age was higher in R1 carcinoma patients than in R1 HGD and R0 patients (p = 0.014). The R1 HGD and R1 carcinoma groups had more patients with a higher T-stage than R0 (p = 0.079). In univariate analysis, the prognostic factors affecting overall survival were age, T- and N-stage, CA19-9, and margin status. The survival rate of R0 was comparable to that of R1 HGD, but the survival rate of R0 was significantly better compared to R1 carcinoma (R0 vs. R1 HGD, p = 0.215, R0 vs. R1 carcinoma, p = 0.042, respectively). The recurrence pattern between the margin groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.604). Extended surgery should be considered for R1 carcinoma; however, in R1 HGD, extended operation may not be necessary, as it may achieve oncologic outcomes similar to R0 margins with HR.