Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39369437

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Elucidate the representation of Asian and Asian Americans in academic otolaryngology and the influence of race on promotion and leadership opportunities. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Administrative Management Online User System. SETTING: Full-time otolaryngology faculty from all US medical schools from 2020 to 2023. METHODS: Faculty demographics, tenure, and rank were collected. Descriptive statistics, Fischer's exact test, Rank Equity Index (REI), and multivariable logistic and ordinal regressions were used to characterize our cohort and assess the impact of race on academic advancement and leadership, defined as promotion to tenure or full professorship. RESULTS: Asians comprised 20.53% of 9056 faculty over 4 years. Asians were most likely to hold tenure-eligible positions (n = 600, 30.74%) but were significantly less likely than non-Asians to be tenured (43.00% vs 48.65%, P = .015). Asians were slightly above parity in promotion from assistant to associate professor (REI = 1.09) but below parity in promotion from associate professor to professor (REI = 0.78). Relative to whites, Hispanics, and African Americans, Asians reported the lowest associate/professor and assistant/professor REIs. On multivariable regressions, Asian race was not associated with decreased odds of tenure-eligible positions but was associated with decreased odds of tenure (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.64-0.93]) and rank promotion (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = [0.74-0.90]). CONCLUSION: Despite strong overall representation in otolaryngology, Asians are less likely to receive promotion, tenure, or full professorship relative to other racial groups. Future efforts should emphasize equitable advancement opportunities to ensure a diverse otolaryngology leadership.

2.
Laryngoscope ; 134(5): 2252-2257, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37983846

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: With burgeoning popularity of artificial intelligence-based chatbots, oropharyngeal cancer patients now have access to a novel source of medical information. Because chatbot information is not reviewed by experts, we sought to evaluate an artificial intelligence-based chatbot's oropharyngeal cancer-related information for accuracy. METHODS: Fifteen oropharyngeal cancer-related questions were developed and input into ChatGPT version 3.5. Four physician-graders independently assessed accuracy, comprehensiveness, and similarity to a physician response using 5-point Likert scales. Responses graded lower than three were then critiqued by physician-graders. Critiques were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Readability of responses was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level (FKRGL) scales. RESULTS: Average accuracy, comprehensiveness, and similarity to a physician response scores were 3.88 (SD = 0.99), 3.80 (SD = 1.14), and 3.67 (SD = 1.08), respectively. Posttreatment-related questions were most accurate, comprehensive, and similar to a physician response, followed by treatment-related, then diagnosis-related questions. Posttreatment-related questions scored significantly higher than diagnosis-related questions in all three domains (p < 0.01). Two themes of the physician critiques were identified: suboptimal education value and potential to misinform patients. The mean FRE and FKRGL scores both indicated greater than an 11th grade readability level-higher than the 6th grade level recommended for patients. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT responses may not educate patients to an appropriate degree, could outright misinform them, and read at a more difficult grade level than is recommended for patient material. As oropharyngeal cancer patients represent a vulnerable population facing complex, life-altering diagnoses, and treatments, they should be cautious when consuming chatbot-generated medical information. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 134:2252-2257, 2024.


Assuntos
Laringoscópios , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Humanos , Inteligência Artificial , Software , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Escolaridade
3.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 27(2): 183-190, April-June 2023. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1440216

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction Patients at public county hospitals often have poorer access to healthcare with advanced disease on presentation. These factors, along with limited resources at county hospitals, may have an impact on outcomes for patients requiring complex head and neck reconstruction. Objectives To delineate differences in the frequency of complications in two different care settings, a public county hospital and a private university hospital. Methods Retrospective review of otolaryngology patients at a university hospital compared with a publicly-funded county hospital. The main outcome measure was major complications including total flap loss or unplanned reoperation in 30 days. Secondary outcome measures included medical complications, partial flap loss, and unplanned hospital readmission in 30 days. Results In the county hospital sample (n = 58) free flap failure or reoperation occurred in 20.7% of the patients, and minor complications, in 36.2% of the patients. In the university hospital sample (n = 65) flap failure or reoperation occurred in 9.2% of the patients, and minor complications, in 12.3% of the patients. Patients at the private hospital who had surgery in the oropharynx were least likely to have minor complications. Conclusions Patients at the county hospital had a higher but not statistically significant difference in flap failure and reoperation than those at a university hospital, although the county hospital experienced more minor postoperative complications. This is likely multifactorial, and may be related to poorer access to primary care preoperatively, malnutrition, poorly controlled or undiagnosed medical comorbidities, and differences in hospital resources.

4.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 27(2): e183-e190, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37125366

RESUMO

Introduction Patients at public county hospitals often have poorer access to healthcare with advanced disease on presentation. These factors, along with limited resources at county hospitals, may have an impact on outcomes for patients requiring complex head and neck reconstruction. Objective To delineate differences in the frequency of complications in two different care settings, a public county hospital and a private university hospital. Methods Retrospective review of otolaryngology patients at a university hospital compared with a publicly-funded county hospital. The main outcome measure was major complications including total flap loss or unplanned reoperation in 30 days. Secondary outcome measures included medical complications, partial flap loss, and unplanned hospital readmission in 30 days. Results In the county hospital sample ( n = 58) free flap failure or reoperation occurred in 20.7% of the patients, and minor complications, in 36.2% of the patients. In the university hospital sample ( n = 65) flap failure or reoperation occurred in 9.2% of the patients, and minor complications, in 12.3% of the patients. Patients at the private hospital who had surgery in the oropharynx were least likely to have minor complications. Conclusion Patients at the county hospital had a higher but not statistically significant difference in flap failure and reoperation than those at a university hospital, although the county hospital experienced more minor postoperative complications. This is likely multifactorial, and may be related to poorer access to primary care preoperatively, malnutrition, poorly controlled or undiagnosed medical comorbidities, and differences in hospital resources.

5.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 43(6): 103558, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36029622

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aims to elucidate any relationship between prior tonsillectomy and the presence of oropharyngeal HPV DNA found in screening mouth rinses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted using the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants between 40 and 69 were included in the study and medical, surgical, and sexual health history were recorded. Multivariable analyses were conducted to examine factors associated with HPV prevalence in oral rinse samples. RESULTS: A total of 4825 participants were recorded with 21.1 % having a history of tonsillectomy. In the no tonsillectomy group, 8.6 % of respondents had a positive oral rinse for HPV, while 7.2 % of those with a tonsillectomy had a positive rinse sample. There was no association between age and HPV prevalence (OR = 1.04, 95 % CI: [1.00-1.07]). When controlling for demographics, medical history, and sexual behaviors, tonsillectomy history was not shown to have an association with HPV (OR = 0.86, 95 % CI: [0.53-1.40]). However, men, Hispanics, smokers, and those with higher lifetime sexual partners had increased odds of having a positive HPV oral rinse sample which was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that a history of tonsillectomy was not significantly associated with the presence of HPV in an oral rinse. However, a significant relationship was seen between the presence of HPV in oral rinses and certain demographic factors such as male gender, Hispanic race, smoking history, and increased sexual partners.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Antissépticos Bucais , Estudos Transversais , Fatores de Risco , Prevalência
6.
J Ultrasound Med ; 41(9): 2295-2306, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34918364

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for detection of parathyroid adenomas and compare it to those of 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), which has been established as a reliable, effective tool for preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas. METHODS: About 27 patients with suspected parathyroid pathology underwent imaging evaluations with 4DCT and CEUS and 22 patients subsequently underwent surgical resection of parathyroid lesions. 4DCT and CEUS were performed and interpreted by consensus of two expert radiologists with extensive experience in each modality. Assessment for the side, z-axis (craniocaudal axis), and quadrant of the pathologically proven lesion was performed based on the surgical report. RESULTS: For single-gland disease, the accuracy for CEUS localization to the correct quadrant and side were 81.0 and 90.1% respectively. For single-gland disease, the accuracy for 4DCT localization to the correct quadrant and side were 81.0 and 90.5% respectively. 4DCT localization sensitivity and specificity were comparable to those for CEUS. 4DCT allowed for accurate diagnosis in multigland disease in contradistinction to CEUS. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS is a noninvasive, real-time imaging technique that has relatively high diagnostic confidence and accuracy of localization which are comparable to the accuracy of 4DCT for preoperative parathyroid adenoma detection, characterization, and localization. This technique should be considered for primary preoperative diagnosis, especially in younger patients.


Assuntos
Adenoma , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário , Neoplasias das Paratireoides , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenoma/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada Quadridimensional/métodos , Humanos , Glândulas Paratireoides/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias das Paratireoides/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias das Paratireoides/cirurgia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia/métodos
7.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 131(11): 1217-1223, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34852660

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 predominately affects safety net hospitals. Tracheostomies improve outcomes and decrease length of stay for COVID-19 patients. Our objectives are to determine if (1) COVID-19 tracheostomies have similar complication and mortality rates as non-COVID-19 tracheostomies and (2) to determine the effectiveness of our tracheostomy protocol at a safety net hospital. METHODS: Patients who underwent tracheostomy at Los Angeles County Hospital between August 2009 and August 2020 were included. Demographics, SARS-CoV-2 status, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI), length of intubation, complication rates, decannulation rates, and 30-day all-cause mortality versus tracheostomy related mortality rates were all collected. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with COVID-19 and 130 non-COVID-19 patients underwent tracheostomies. Both groups were predominately male with similar BMI and CCI, though the COVID-19 patients were more likely to be Hispanic and intubated for a longer time (P = .034 and P < .0001, respectively). Both groups also had similar, low intraoperative complications at 2% to 3% and comparable long-term post-operative complications. However, COVID-19 patients had more perioperative complications within 7 days of surgery (P < .01). Specifically, they were more likely to have perioperative bleeding at their tracheostomy sites (P = .03) and long-term post-operative mucus plugging (P < .01). However, both groups had similar 30-day mortality rates. There were no incidences of COVID-19 transmission to healthcare workers. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 tracheostomies are safe for patients and healthcare workers. Careful attention should be paid to suctioning to prevent mucus plugging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Traqueostomia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Humanos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Traqueostomia/efeitos adversos
8.
OTO Open ; 5(4): 2473974X211059081, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34805720

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In patients with a history of lymphoma who demonstrate palatine tonsil uptake on posttreatment PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography), tonsillectomy is often performed to evaluate for lymphoma recurrence. However, predictive clinical and imaging factors for true tonsil recurrence in this setting are not well established; this will be explored herein. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Patients treated at a tertiary medical center from January 2008 to May 2020. METHODS: Chart review was performed on all patients with a history of treated lymphoma in clinical remission who presented for evaluation of abnormal PET/CT imaging findings and subsequently underwent tonsillectomy. RESULTS: Among 15 patients who met inclusion criteria, 14 had benign findings on surgical pathology, yielding a false-positive rate of 93%. The patient with malignancy was identified on biopsy after inconclusive surgical pathology and is the only documented case of recurrence in this specific patient population throughout the literature. The patient presented with B symptoms, irregularly shaped tonsils, increased lymph node activity on PET/CT, and uptrending bilateral tonsil activity but with one of the lowest maximum standardized uptake values of the cohort. The singular distinguishing feature for the patient with recurrent disease was a prior tonsil biopsy suspicious for recurrence, which prompted the otolaryngology referral. CONCLUSION: PET/CT lacks specificity in identifying lymphoma recurrence in the oropharynx. Clinical and radiographic features that were previously considered concerning for recurrence are most likely not indicative of malignancy in this patient population. Our findings call into question whether tonsillectomy should be routinely performed in this patient population.

9.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 34(4): 494-501, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32168997

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The urban homeless population has increased exposure to risk factors associated with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, a gap in knowledge of the prevalence of sinonasal symptoms in these demographic limits complete understanding of CRS epidemiology. There is a need to elucidate sinonasal disease burden in this vulnerable patient population to bring awareness to any existing disparities. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence, severity, and associated factors of CRS clinical symptoms and health-care barriers in an urban homeless population. METHODS: Homeless adults completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Level-Visual Analog Scale surveys. Responses were categorized by potential CRS symptoms defined as reporting at least 2 CRS cardinal symptoms. Risk factors associated with potential CRS symptoms were analyzed with multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Fifty-six (16%) out of 341 total subjects reported potential CRS symptoms. Those with potential CRS symptoms had a higher median SNOT-22 score (53 vs 22, P < .001) than those without. Logistic regression models identified history of smoking (odds ratio [OR], 6.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04-21.04) and duration of homelessness over 3 months (OR, 3.46; CI, 1.51-7.94) as factors associated with potential CRS symptoms. Duration of homelessness over 3 months was associated with higher SNOT-22 scores (standardized beta coefficient [ß], 0.48; CI, 0.39-0.57). Among those reporting 2 or more CRS cardinal symptoms, 18% had ever been seen by any physician for their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our study estimates a high prevalence of potential CRS symptoms in the urban homeless population. Longer duration of homelessness was associated with potential CRS symptoms and poor CRS-specific quality of life scores. Disparities in access to care emphasize the need for increased preventive efforts designed for this unique patient group.


Assuntos
Pessoas Mal Alojadas , Seios Paranasais/patologia , Rinite/epidemiologia , Sinusite/epidemiologia , População Urbana , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Saúde Pública , Qualidade de Vida , Rinite/fisiopatologia , Teste de Desfecho Sinonasal , Sinusite/fisiopatologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Oral Dis ; 26(5): 930-940, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32011771

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the differences in oral HPV infection and sexual behaviors by race in the US. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2011-2014 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey during which participants aged 18-69 years completed oral rinse exam for HPV detection (n = 8,229). Logistic regression was used to examine the associations of race with various types of oral HPV infection and sexual behaviors. RESULTS: The prevalence of overall oral HPV infection and HPV type16 infection was 7.5% [95% CI: 6.6-8.4] and 1.1% [95% CI: 0.7-1.3], respectively. Blacks were more likely to have any oral HPV infection [OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.47] and Asian Americans were less likely to have any oral HPV infection [OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.24-0.49] than Whites. In a multivariate model, Whites were less likely to have any oral HPV infections than Blacks while having higher order of impact by the number of lifetime sex partners. Overall, Asian Americans were less likely to have type16 infection [OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.06-0.67] than Whites; however, that difference disappears when adjusting for sexual behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative sample of US adults, the prevalence of overall oral HPV infections was higher among Blacks and lower among Asians in comparison to Whites. Further analysis with sexual behavior data suggested that the racial differences in prevalence are likely due to different sexual behaviors.


Assuntos
Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Comportamento Sexual , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Asiático , População Negra , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Parceiros Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA