Hepatitis C virus antigen detection is an appropriate test for screening and early diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection in at-risk populations and immunocompromised hosts.

Early diagnosis remains key for effective prevention and treatment. Unfortunately, current screening with anti-hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV Ab) test may have limited utility in the diagnosis of HCV infection and reinfection. This is of special concern to at-risk population, such as immunocompromised hosts and end-stage renal failure patients on hemodialysis. HCV antigen (Ag) could be useful in identifying the ongoing infection in such clinical scenarios. Hence, we aimed to study the utility of HCV Ag testing for the diagnosis of acute and chronic hepatitis C. Of 89 samples studied, 19 were from acute hepatitis C patients who were immunocompromised or were on hemodialysis, 43 were from active chronic hepatitis C patients and 27 were from patients treated for chronic hepatitis C. All samples were tested for HCV Ag using the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay. HCV Ag was reactive in 19/19 samples from acute hepatitis C patients and 42/43 samples from active chronic hepatitis C patients. It was nonreactive in all samples from treated patients. The test showed a sensitivity and specificity of 98.4% and 100.0%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 100.0% and 96.4%, respectively. The HCV antigen test has high clinical sensitivity and specificity and is useful for the diagnosis of acute and chronic hepatitis C infection in at-risk and immunocompromised patients. Its short turnaround time and relatively low cost are advantageous for use in patients on hemodialysis and other at-risk patients who require monitoring of HCV infection and reinfection.

Adenoviral Infections in Singapore: Should New Antiviral Therapies and Vaccines Be Adopted?

BACKGROUND: A number of serious human adenovirus (HAdV) outbreaks have been recently reported: HAdV-B7 (Israel, Singapore, and USA), HAdV-B7d (USA and China), HAdV-D8, -D54, and -C2 (Japan), HAdV-B14p1 (USA, Europe, and China), and HAdV-B55 (China, Singapore, and France). METHODS: To understand the epidemiology of HAdV infections in Singapore, we studied 533 HAdV-positive clinical samples collected from 396 pediatric and 137 adult patients in Singapore from 2012 to 2018. Genome sequencing and phylogenetic analyses were performed to identify HAdV genotypes, clonal clusters, and recombinant or novel HAdVs. RESULTS: The most prevalent genotypes identified were HAdV-B3 (35.6%), HAdV-B7 (15.4%), and HAdV-E4 (15.2%). We detected 4 new HAdV-C strains and detected incursions with HAdV-B7 (odds ratio [OR], 14.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-52.0) and HAdV-E4 (OR, 13.6; 95% CI, 3.9-46.7) among pediatric patients over time. In addition, immunocompromised patients (adjusted OR [aOR], 11.4; 95% CI, 3.8-34.8) and patients infected with HAdV-C2 (aOR, 8.5; 95% CI, 1.5-48.0), HAdV-B7 (aOR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.2-10.9), or HAdV-E4 (aOR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.1-8.9) were at increased risk for severe disease. CONCLUSIONS: Singapore would benefit from more frequent studies of clinical HAdV genotypes to identify patients at risk for severe disease and help guide the use of new antiviral therapies, such as brincidofovir, and potential administration of HAdV 4 and 7 vaccine.

Epidemiology and risk factors for cytomegalovirus infection in glomerular diseases treated with immunosuppressive therapy.

AIM: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are associated with morbidity and mortality. We aimed to describe the epidemiology, risk factors and outcomes of CMV infection among patients with glomerulonephritis (GN) who received potent immunosuppressants (IS). METHODS: Single-centre retrospective study of adults with biopsy-proven GN prescribed methylprednisolone (MP), cyclophosphamide (CYC) or rituximab (RTX). Primary endpoint was CMV infection defined by significant CMV antigenaemia (>10 positive cells in 106 cells) or viraemia (>2000 copies/mL). Death was related to CMV if CMV infection occurred within the same hospitalization as death. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were studied. CYC was prescribed in 65% and MP in 71% of the cohort. Only two patients received RTX and 15 patients received plasma exchanges (PEX). Median follow up was 31.9 (IQR: 13.7, 53.6) months. CMV infection occurred in 13 patients (13.8%) at 1.3 (0.6, 3.0) months from biopsy. Patients with CMV infection had higher serum creatinine [404 (272, 619) vs. 159 (93, 317) µmol/L, P < 0.001] and greater proteinuria [UPCR 7.5, (4.8, 11.8) vs. 4.2 (2.3, 8.4) g/g, P = 0.02] than those who did not have CMV infection. Also, more patients received CYC (92% vs. 60%, P = 0.03), RTX (15% vs. 0, P = 0.02) and PEX (38% vs. 12%, P = 0.01) than those who did not have CMV infection. Two patients had CMV-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Cytomegalovirus infection is common in GN patients receiving potent IS. Surveillance and possibly anti-viral prophylaxis should be considered for high-risk patients.