Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 220: 49-55, 2024 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580038

RESUMO

On July 31, 2023, the Trifecta valve was withdrawn from the market after concerns regarding early (≤5 years) structural valve deterioration (SVD), mainly as aortic regurgitation (AR). Our aim was to determine the timing, mechanism, and impact of bioprosthetic SVD in patients who underwent redo aortic valve replacement (redo-AVR) with either redo-SAVR or valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using Trifecta versus other bioprosthetic valves. Patients who underwent redo-AVR for SVD at our institution were categorized into 2 groups based on the valve type: Trifecta versus non-Trifecta. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare mortality. A total of 171 patients were included; 58 (34%) had previous SAVR with a Trifecta valve and 113 (66%) with non-Trifecta valve. A total of 103 patients (60%) underwent valve-in-valve TAVR and 68 redo-SAVR (40%). The age, gender, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score were similar between Trifecta and non-Trifecta groups. In patients with bioprosthetic valves requiring redo-AVR, Trifecta valves had an earlier onset of greater than moderate AR (4.5 vs 11.9 years, p <0.001) and earlier time to redo-AVR (5.5 vs 12 years, p <0.001). AR was more common as the mechanism of SVD in Trifecta versus non-Trifecta valves (55.2% vs 30.1%, p = 0.006). All-cause adjusted mortality from index SAVR was higher in the Trifecta than in non-Trifecta group (hazard ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 11.5, p = 0.007). In conclusion, compared with non-Trifecta valves, Trifecta valves exhibit early SVD primarily as AR and progress rapidly to significant SVD requiring redo-AVR. Mortality is significantly higher with Trifecta than in non-Trifecta valves, potentially impacting the results of SAVR versus TAVR studies.


Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica , Bioprótese , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Desenho de Prótese , Falha de Prótese , Reoperação , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Humanos , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Masculino , Feminino , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos
2.
Curr Cardiol Rev ; 19(3): e310522205428, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35642110

RESUMO

Cardiotoxicity from chemotherapy regimens has been long reported. However, the understanding of cardiac side effects of biological therapies is rapidly evolving. With cancer patients achieving higher life expectancy due to the use of personalized medicine and novel targeted anticancer agents, the occurrence of cardiotoxicity is becoming more significant. Novel biological therapies include anti-HER2 antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, bruton kinase inhibitors, antivascular endothelial growth factors, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulator drugs, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Potential cardiovascular toxicities linked to these anticancer agents include hypertension, arrhythmias, QT prolongation, myocardial ischemia and infarction, left ventricular dysfunction, congestive heart failure, and thromboembolism. Cardiac biomarkers, electrocardiography, echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging are common diagnostic modalities used for early detection of these complications and timely intervention. This review discusses the various types of cardiotoxicities caused by novel anticancer biologic agents, their molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms, risk factors, and diagnostic and management strategies that can be used to prevent, minimize, and treat them.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Cardiotoxicidade/diagnóstico , Cardiotoxicidade/etiologia , Cardiotoxicidade/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Coração , Terapia Biológica/efeitos adversos
3.
Ophthalmol Retina ; 4(5): 494-497, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32063517

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare visual acuity (VA) and OCT outcomes in patients with idiopathic macular telangiectasia (IMT) type 2 who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) surgery for full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) versus those who elected to be medically managed (MM) without surgery. DESIGN: Comparative retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with IMT type 2 and FTMH. METHODS: We reviewed records within an 11-year period and collected data on VA, OCT changes, development of choroidal neovascularization, and length of follow-up. The VA measurements were standardized from Snellen to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units for statistical analysis. Two-sample t tests were used to analyze VA data. OCT changes were assessed by a single masked retinal specialist. RESULTS: There were 12 eyes in the PPV group and 26 eyes in the MM group. There was no statistically significant VA improvement in either group between initial VA recording and last follow-up. The PPV group had no significant change in VA between the preoperative visit and the visits at 3 or 12 months. OCT scans improved by 1 step in 10 patients in the PPV group. None of the patients in the MM group had OCT improvement. Choroidal neovascularization developed in 1 eye in the PPV group and 5 eyes in the MM group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant change in VA in patients who opted to have PPV to treat their IMT type 2 and FTMH compared with those who did not undergo surgery. OCT scans improved by qualitative judgment in patients who underwent surgery compared with those who opted for medical management.


Assuntos
Perfurações Retinianas/cirurgia , Telangiectasia Retiniana/complicações , Acuidade Visual , Vitrectomia/métodos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Retina/patologia , Perfurações Retinianas/diagnóstico , Perfurações Retinianas/etiologia , Telangiectasia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Telangiectasia Retiniana/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng ; 62(7): 1667-82, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25993698

RESUMO

Widely used medical imaging systems in clinics currently rely on X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, computed tomography, and positron emission tomography. The aforementioned technologies provide clinical data with a variety of resolution, implementation cost, and use complexity, where some of them rely on ionizing radiation. Microwave sensing and imaging (MSI) is an alternative method based on nonionizing electromagnetic (EM) signals operating over the frequency range covering hundreds of megahertz to tens of gigahertz. The advantages of using EM signals are low health risk, low cost implementation, low operational cost, ease of use, and user friendliness. Advancements made in microelectronics, material science, and embedded systems make it possible for miniaturization and integration into portable, handheld, mobile devices with networking capability. MSI has been used for tumor detection, blood clot/stroke detection, heart imaging, bone imaging, cancer detection, and localization of in-body RF sources. The fundamental notion of MSI is that it exploits the tissue-dependent dielectric contrast to reconstruct signals and images using radar-based or tomographic imaging techniques. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the active MSI for various medical applications, for which the motivation, challenges, possible solutions, and future directions are discussed.


Assuntos
Engenharia Biomédica/métodos , Micro-Ondas/uso terapêutico , Tomografia/métodos , Humanos , Imagens de Fantasmas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA