RESUMO
The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its benefits in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and small tumors are unclear. This study aims to compare survival differences between clinical T1 TNBC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Data for patients with clinical T1 TNBC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were categorized according to whether they received chemotherapy before or after surgery. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to minimize the influence of confounding factors. OS and BCSS were compared between the two treatment sequences using Kaplan-Meier and univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. The study included 6249 women with T1 TNBC. In multivariate analysis, compared with that in the AC group, the hazard ratio for death in the NAC group was 1.54 (95% confidence interval 1.26-1.89, p < 0.001). NAC offers no additional benefits in any age group or T, N subgroups. Our findings suggest that NAC does not provide additional benefit to patients with clinical T1 TNBC, even in the presence of lymph node metastasis, or T1c.
Assuntos
Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas , Humanos , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia , Feminino , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Programa de SEER , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos de Riscos ProporcionaisRESUMO
PURPOSE: Many T1-2N0-1M0 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) do not receive breast-conserving therapy (BCT) due to concerns about non-pCR or lymph node metastasis presence. METHODS: T1-2N0-1M0 TNBC patients who underwent NAC between 2010 and 2017 were collected from the SEER database. Factors affecting surgical modalities were analyzed by multinomial logistic regression. The overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Further stratified subgroup analyses were performed based on the response to NAC and N-stage. Adjusted-hazard ratios were also calculated to exclude potential bias. RESULTS: A total of 1112 patients were enrolled (median follow-up: 81 months), 58.5% received BCT, 23.6% received reconstruction and 17.9% received mastectomy. Response to NAC and N-stage not only influenced the choice of surgical modality but also were independent predictors for OS and BCSS. The surgery-induced survival differences mainly affect OS. Survival analyses demonstrated that the 10-year OS of BCT was superior or equal to that of mastectomy even in patients with partial response (PR) (77.4% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.013), no response (NR) (44.9% vs. 64.2%, P = 0.33), or N1 stage (75.7% vs. 57.4%, P = 0.0021). In the N1-PR cohort, mastectomy may lead to worse OS (P = 0.0012). Besides, between reconstruction and BCT, there was no statistical difference in OS or BCSS (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study reveals the necessity of breast surgical de-escalation. Besides, physicians should actively recommend reconstruction for individuals who strongly desire mastectomy.
Assuntos
Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas , Humanos , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/mortalidade , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Mastectomia/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Programa de SEER , Estudos Retrospectivos , Quimioterapia AdjuvanteRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: For HR-positive/HER2-negative patients who can undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS) but have a tumor size of 2-5 cm or 1-3 lymph node metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is still controversial. METHODS: Patients with T2N0-1M0 HR-positive/HER2-negative BC who underwent BCS between 2010 and 2017 were selected from the SEER database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize the influence of confounding factors. The overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of patients were estimated by KaplanâMeier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Independent prognostic factors were included to construct a nomogram prediction model. RESULTS: A total of 6475 BC patients were enrolled, of whom 553 received NAC and 5922 received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). In the T2N0-1M0 population and T2N1M0 subgroup, AC patients before PSM had better OS and BCSS than NAC patients. After PSM, there was no significant difference in OS or BCSS between the two groups. However, in the T2N0M0 subgroup, there was no difference in survival between the AC and NAC groups before and after PSM. Stratified analysis revealed that for complete response (CR) patients, survival was roughly equivalent between the NAC and AC groups. However, the survival of no response (NR) and partial response (PR) patients was significantly worse than that of AC patients. Cox analysis revealed that radiotherapy after BCS was an independent protective factor for OS. NAC is an independent risk factor for NR and PR patients. The nomogram has good prediction efficiency. CONCLUSION: NAC before BCS is not necessary for T2N0-1M0 HR-positive/HER2-negative BC patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mastectomia Segmentar , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Receptor ErbB-2 , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Programa de SEERRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) is vital in the management of HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Nevertheless, the indications for NAST in tumors <2 cm remain controversial. METHOD: A total of 7961 patients were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database. Independent prognostic factors were identified using multivariate Cox analysis. Subgroup analyses and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to simulate whether NAST would provide a survival benefit with different high-risk characteristics. Nomograms were constructed, and an internal validation cohort was employed. RESULTS: Of the 7961 included patients, 1137 (14.3%) underwent NAST. In the total population, NAST was associated with poorer overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (OS: P = 0.00093; BCSS: P < 0.0001). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that NAST markedly affected the prognosis of enrolled patients. Besides, a direct association between T, N, age, subtype, and prognosis was observed. Subgroup analyses yielded in these three subgroups, T1c, hormone receptor-negative, and 61-69 years of age, NAST and AST had comparable OS, while NAST possessed worse BCSS. Notably, even in the N3, we still did not observe any additional benefit of NAST. The calculated C-index of 0.72 and 0.73 confirmed the predictability of the nomograms. The AUCs exhibit consistency in the training and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that NAST does not provide additional benefit to patients with T1 HER2+ breast cancer, even in the presence of lymph node metastasis, T1c, or hormone receptor negativity. This study facilitates the implementation of individualized management strategies.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Nomogramas , Receptor ErbB-2 , Programa de SEER , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Idoso , Prognóstico , Adulto , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Taxa de Sobrevida , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Currently, research on the prognostic factors of unilateral breast cancer (UBC) patients receiving contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) is limited. This study aimed to construct a new nomogram to predict these patients' overall survival (OS). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 88,477 patients who underwent CPM or unilateral mastectomy (UM) were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the difference in the impact of the 2 surgical methods on the prognosis. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to determine the best prognostic variable and construct a nomogram. The concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate the discrimination capability and clinical effectiveness of the nomogram. RESULTS: The prognosis of patients receiving CPM and UM was significantly different. The DCA curves indicated that the nomogram could provide more excellent clinical net benefits for these patients. The NRI and IDI of the nomogram demonstrated that its performance was better than that of the classical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. CONCLUSION: This study developed and validated a practical nomogram to predict the OS of UBC patients undergoing CPM, which provided a beneficial tool for clinical decision-making management.
Assuntos
Nomogramas , Mastectomia Profilática , Programa de SEER , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mastectomia Profilática/métodos , Mastectomia Profilática/estatística & dados numéricos , Prognóstico , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias Unilaterais da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias Unilaterais da Mama/patologia , Idoso , Mastectomia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Curva ROC , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Gene mutations drive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) heterogeneity, in turn affecting prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy. PIK3CA is the most frequently mutated gene in breast cancer (BC), yet its relevance to BC prognosis remains controversial. Herein, we sought to determine the impact of PIK3CA mutation-driven immune genes (PDIGs) on BC prognosis in relation to TIME heterogeneity. METHODS: PIK3CA mutation characteristics were compared and verified between the TCGA-BRCA dataset and a patient cohort from our hospital. PIK3CA mutation-driven differentially expressed genes were identified for consensus clustering and weighted gene co-expression network analysis to select the modules most relevant to the immune subtype. Thereafter, the two were intersected to obtain PDIGs. Univariate Cox, LASSO, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were sequentially performed on PDIGs to obtain a PIK3CA mutation-driven immune signature (PDIS), which was then validated using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differences in functional enrichment, mutation landscape, immune infiltration, checkpoint gene expression, and drug response were compared between different risk groups. RESULTS: PIK3CA mutation frequencies in the TCGA and validation cohorts were 34.49% and 40.83%, respectively. PIK3CA mutants were significantly associated with ER, PR, and molecular BC subtypes in our hospital cohort. The PDIS allowed for effective risk stratification and exhibited prognostic power in TCGA and GEO sets. The low-risk patients exhibited greater immune infiltration, higher expression of common immune checkpoint factors, and lower scores for tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion. CONCLUSION: The PDIS can be used as an effective prognostic model for predicting immunotherapy response to guide clinical decision-making.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Prognóstico , Classe I de Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases/genética , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Análise por Conglomerados , Microambiente Tumoral/genéticaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The survival benefit of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with radiation, and ALND combined with radiation remains unclear in breast cancer (BC) patients with 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). This study aims to rigorously evaluate the prognostic impact of these axillary evaluation modalities on BC patients with varying T-stages and to construct a survival prediction nomogram. METHODS: Following screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria, data pertaining to BC patients were extracted from the SEER database. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model among patients with different stages who underwent various axillary evaluation modalities. A nomogram was constructed to predict the probability of OS and BCSS. RESULTS: A total of 20,283 patients were included, comprising 9626 who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and 10,657 who underwent mastectomy. In the T4 stage stratified analysis, both BCS and mastectomy groups exhibited superior OS and BCSS with ALND compared to SLNB combined with radiation. Further, ALND combined with radiation improved OS. However, for T1-3 stages, patients treated with ALND experienced similar or worse survival compared to those treated with SLNB combined with radiation. The calibration curve and C-index (0.746-0.794) of the nomogram demonstrated the efficacy of the survival prediction model. CONCLUSION: In T1-3 BC patients with 1-2 metastatic SLNs, SLNB combined with radiation is a safe alternative to ALND. Conversely, for T4 patients, ALND combined with radiation may offer a preferable choice.
Assuntos
Axila , Neoplasias da Mama , Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Nomogramas , Programa de SEER , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Linfonodo Sentinela , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Idoso , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Linfonodo Sentinela/cirurgia , Adulto , Prognóstico , Mastectomia , Mastectomia Segmentar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among women. Nicotinamide (NAM) metabolism regulates the development of multiple tumors. Herein, we sought to develop a NAM metabolism-related signature (NMRS) to make predictions of survival, tumor microenvironment (TME) and treatment efficacy in BC patients. Methods: Transcriptional profiles and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed. NAM metabolism-related genes (NMRGs) were retrieved from the Molecular Signatures Database. Consensus clustering was performed on the NMRGs and the differentially expressed genes between different clusters were identified. Univariate Cox, Lasso, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were sequentially conducted to develop the NAM metabolism-related signature (NMRS), which was then validated in the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) database and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) single-cell RNA-seq data. Further studies, such as gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT, SubMap, and Immunophenoscore (IPS) algorithm, cancer-immunity cycle (CIC), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and drug sensitivity were performed to assess the TME and treatment response. Results: We identified a 6-gene NMRS that was significantly associated with BC prognosis as an independent indicator. We performed risk stratification according to the NMRS and the low-risk group showed preferable clinical outcomes (P < 0.001). A comprehensive nomogram was developed and showed excellent predictive value for prognosis. GSEA demonstrated that the low-risk group was predominantly enriched in immune-associated pathways, whereas the high-risk group was enriched in cancer-related pathways. The ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT algorithms revealed that the low-risk group had a higher abundance of anti-tumor immunocyte infiltration (P < 0.05). Results of Submap, IPS, CIC, TMB, and external immunotherapy cohort (iMvigor210) analyses showed that the low-risk group were indicative of better immunotherapy response (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The novel signature offers a promising way to evaluate the prognosis and treatment efficacy in BC patients, which may facilitate clinical practice and management.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Mama , Imunoterapia , Prognóstico , Niacinamida , Microambiente Tumoral/genéticaRESUMO
RATIONALE: Pancreatic mixed serous neuroendocrine neoplasm (PMSNN) is an extremely rare disease. Only a few cases on the surgical treatment of PMSNN have been reported in the literature, and it is unclear whether there is invasion of important peripancreatic vessels. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report the case of a 39-year-old female patient with PMSNN accompanied by invasion of important peripancreatic vessels. She underwent surgery and achieved satisfactory recovery. DIAGNOSIS: Abdominal enhanced CT images showed an enhanced mass with a nonenhanced cyst involving the head and body of the pancreas, which invaded important peripancreatic vessels. The lesion had been misdiagnosed and mistreated as a metastatic carcinoma before admission. INTERVENTIONS: CT 3-dimensional (3D) visualization reconstruction images showed intact peripancreatic vessels. Radical pancreatoduodenectomy was successfully performed and confirmed that the main blood vessels around the pancreas were only compressed or even wrapped by the mass, but not penetrated. OUTCOMES: The patient recovered well and was discharged on the 19th day after surgery. Pathological examination reported the diagnosis of PMSNN with the collision type combination and the well-differentiated grade 2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. She was followed up for 18 months without any abnormalities. LESSONS: This case demonstrates that surgical treatment of PMSNN with invasion of peripancreatic vessels can be successful. Preoperative abdominal CT 3D visualization reconstruction is helpful in determining the degree of invasion of important peripancreatic vessels, and plays a key role in formulating an accurate surgical plan and improving patient outcome.