The Role of Trublue Laser in Cholesteatoma Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of TruBlue laser application in cholesteatoma surgeries. METHODS: All cholesteatoma surgeries conducted from January 2018 to January 2022 in two tertiary referral hospitals in Hong Kong, with and without use of TruBlue laser, were included. Pure tone audiogram was done pre- and post-operatively to assess hearing. Disease extent was graded with ChOLE score and ChOLE staging. Residual disease was determined clinically, radiologically, or surgically with second look operation. RESULTS: One hundred twenty cholesteatoma cases were identified. There are 39.2% (n = 47) of the cholesteatoma surgeries that utilized TruBlue laser, while 60.8% (n = 73) did not. Overall follow-up duration was 21 ± 12.4 months, ranging from 2 to 47 months. Both groups were similar in demographics, pre-operative hearing and ChOLE staging. The length of stay was comparable in both groups (2 ± 2 days in nonlaser, 1 ± 1 day in laser, p = 0.31). There was no facial nerve injury related to surgery in both groups, and overall complication rates were similar (4.1% in nonlaser, 4.3% in laser, p = 0.97). The postoperative hearing was comparable with good hearing preservation in both groups. Residual cholesteatoma occurred in 17.8% (n = 13) in nonlaser group, and 21.3% (n = 10) in laser group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.64). Seventy percent of the cholesteatoma residual in laser group occurred at area that TruBlue LASER cannot be applied. CONCLUSION: TruBlue LASER was safe in cholesteatoma surgeries, though no added benefits were shown in reducing cholesteatoma residual rate. A larger controlled study is warranted to discern the true effect of TruBlue LASER. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with dysphagia after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in post-irradiated patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 31 NPC and 12 control patients completed questionnaires for GERD/LPR before esophageal manometry and 24-h pH monitoring. The DeMeester score and reflux finding score (RFS) were used to define GERD and LPR, respectively. Risk factors were identified. RESULTS: 51.6% of NPC and 8.3% of control patients, and 77.4% of NPC and 33% of control patients, were GERD-positive and LPR-positive, respectively. The GERD/LPR questionnaire failed to identify either condition in patients with NPC. No parameter differences in esophageal manometry or pneumonia incidence were noted between GERD/LPR-positive and GERD/LPR-negative patients. Post radiotherapy duration, high BMI, lack of chemotherapy, and dysphagia were positive risk factors for GERD/LPR. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of GERD/LPR in patients with post-irradiated NPC exists, but reflux symptoms are inadequate for diagnosis.

A Hybrid Auricular Framework of Autologous Rib Cartilage and a Porous Polyethylene Implant for Reconstruction of Congenital Microtia: A Modification of Nagata's Technique.

Background: An implant (porous polyethylene) is an alternative to rib cartilage for microtia reconstruction but carries a risk of extrusion. Objective: To evaluate the outcome of a hybrid framework of implant with rib cartilage for microtia reconstruction. Methods: Patients who underwent Nagata's technique for microtia reconstruction were reviewed for complications and aesthetic score. In stage 1, a rib cartilage framework or a hybrid framework of implant with rib cartilage was used. In stage 2, the framework was elevated and supported by an implant for projection. Postoperative outcomes were reported for both groups. Results: Forty-four ears of 40 patients underwent surgery. Eleven ears received a rib auricular framework and 33 ears a hybrid auricular framework. The mean postoperative follow-up for the rib and hybrid groups was 76.3 and 43.1 months, respectively. No supporting postauricular implant extruded, whereas stainless-steel wires extruded in seven ears (15.9%). Five (15.2%) hybrid frameworks were removed due to infection or extrusion. Mean operating time was 2 h shorter in the hybrid group. Aesthetic outcomes were similar for both groups. Conclusion: A hybrid framework of rib and implant that requires less harvested cartilage is feasible for microtia reconstruction, but caution should be used due to its higher explantation rate.

Transcanal endoscopic assisted skull base endolymphatic sac tumor resection: A rare disease with advanced technology.

Endolymphatic sac tumors (ELSTs) are rare, papillary adenomatous tumors that arise from the endothelium of the endolymphatic sac. We demonstrate a difficult case of endolymphatic sac tumor and how it is managed via transcanal endoscopic assisted technique, with discussion of feasibility of transcanal approach to lateral skull base tumor.