RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aims at constructing a staging system incorporating tumor regression grade and ypN-category (TRG-N) in patients with neoadjuvant therapy before esophagectomy. It is hypothesized that this would prognosticate better than the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) postneoadjuvant therapy (ypTNM) stage groups. BACKGROUND: Conventional pathological T-category is defined by the depth of invasion, and may lose prognostic relevance after neoadjuvant therapy. TRG defines treatment response by the degree of tumor regression, and when combined with ypN-category may be more prognostic than AJCC postneoadjuvant therapy (ypTNM) stage groups. METHODS: A training cohort of 210 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and who had had neoadjuvant therapy before esophagectomy were studied. A validation cohort comprised 107 patients from another hospital. Resected esophagi were assessed by ypT-category and TRG, the latter assigned according to the Becker 4-tier system. These categories were grouped with ypN-category into a TRG-N system. Patients' survival was compared between the current AJCC postneoadjuvant therapy (ypTNM) stage groups and this TRG-N system. RESULTS: In the training cohort, 5-year survival rates according to ypTNM stage I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA were 53%, 39.4%, 47%, 18.3%, and 0%, respectively. For TRG-N stages I, II, III, and IV, the respective figures were 59.6%, 43.5%, 23.8%, and 15.6%. TRG-N stage showed better fit in survival than ypTNM stage groups, indicated by lower Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion values. Similar results were found in the validation cohort. Multivariate analysis showed that TRG-N stage ( P =0.02), age ( P =0.006), and sex ( P =0.005) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: TRG-N stage shows better prognostication than the AJCC postneoadjuvant therapy (ypTNM) stage groups.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Teorema de Bayes , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/terapia , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is increasingly being adopted as the preferred surgical treatment for esophageal cancer, as it is superior to open esophagectomy and a good alternative to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy. This paper addresses the technical details of the thoracoscopic phase of RAMIE, including the operating room set-up, patient positioning, port placement, and surgical steps.
Assuntos
Boehmeria , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Dissecação , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente InvasivosRESUMO
Positive proximal resection margins are strongly associated with anastomotic recurrence in esophageal cancer. However, the prognostic significance of dysplastic proximal resection margins remains unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the dysplastic proximal resection margin can predict anastomotic recurrence and overall survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Between 2000 and 2014, patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received a nonpalliative resection and survived the perioperative period were included. Two expert pathologists independently reviewed the proximal resection margin status, which was classified as negative, dysplastic, or positive. The kappa statistic was used to test interobserver reliability. Anastomotic recurrence and overall survival served as the main outcome measures. The study cohort consisted of 469 patients (445 males and 27 females). There was an excellent interobserver agreement for negative (kappa = 0.88), dysplastic (kappa = 0.88), and positive (kappa = 1) proximal resection margins-which were identified in 418 (89.1%), 37 (7.9%), and 14 (3.0%) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 21.6 months, 30 (6.4%) patients developed an anastomotic recurrence. Compared with patients with negative proximal resection margins (24/418, 5.7%), the occurrence of anastomotic recurrence was more commonly observed in those with positive proximal resection margins (3/14, 21.4%, P = 0.017) but not in those with dysplastic proximal resection margins (3/37, 8.1%, P = 0.56). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified positive proximal resection margins (hazard ratio: 5.93, P = 0.010) and advanced clinical stage (hazard ratio: 12.04, P = 0.023) as independent risk factors for anastomotic recurrence. Dysplastic proximal resection margins were not retained in the model as an independent predictor (hazard ratio: 1.38, P = 0.602). The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with negative (38.2%) and dysplastic margins (27.0%) were similar (P = 0.814), and significantly higher than that observed in those with positive proximal resection margins (9.5%, P = 0.015). In conclusion, dysplastic proximal resection margins can be identified in at least 7.9% of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, but neither they are associated with an increased risk of anastomotic recurrence nor they portend a poor overall survival.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/cirurgia , Esôfago/patologia , Esôfago/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/terapia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasia Residual , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
The utility of induction therapy (IT) in patients with resectable esophageal cancer remains controversial, especially when clinical evidence of nodal metastases is lacking. We sought to compare the survival impact of IT versus upfront surgery (US) in patients with cT3N0 esophageal cancer. We searched the Taiwan Cancer Registry for patients with cT3N0 esophageal cancer who underwent US or IT between 2008 and 2013. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the potential benefits of IT in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Of the 11752 patients with esophageal cancer included in the nationwide database, 762 (6.5%) had cT3N0 disease. Most cases (720 [94.5%]) had a histological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. Of them, 135 received IT (the IT group) and 237 received surgery first (the US group). In the US group, pretreatment clinical staging was accurate in 47.9% of patients. Twenty-one (8.97%) were clinically overstaged (pT1-2N0), whereas 101 (43.17%) were clinically understaged (pT4N0 or pTanyN1-3). The presence of unexpected nodal metastases was identified in 92.1% of clinically understaged patients. In the IT group, 28 (20.74%) patients did not proceed to surgery after IT. The use of IT was associated with higher R0 resection rates and fewer pathological nodal metastases, despite unexpected M1 disease being more common (all P< 0.05). The 5-year OS rate was significantly higher (42%) in the IT group than in the US group (33%, P= 0.032). Similar findings were observed in terms of 5-year DFS (37% in the IT group versus 29% in the US group, P= 0.009). Multivariate analysis identified US (hazard ratio: 1.42, P= 0.03) and non-R0 resection (hazard ratio: 1.58, P= 0.03) as independent adverse prognostic factors. We found that 43.17% of patients with cT3N0 disease undergoing primary surgery had their disease understaged. The use of IT before esophagectomy significantly improves OS and DFS in patients with clinical T3N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Quimioterapia de Indução , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esofagectomia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , TaiwanRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of perineural invasion (PNI) in patients with esophageal cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) remains unclear. METHODS: A thorough pathological review of PNI was performed on post-nCRT esophagectomy specimens obtained from non-ypT0 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). When PNI was identified, it was classified according to the presence or absence of penetration through the nerve sheath (i.e., PNI surrounding the nerve sheath [PNI-SS] versus PNI penetrating through the nerve sheath [PNI-TS]). The impact of PNI on overall survival (OS) was assessed in combination with clinical and pathological risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 177 eligible patients were identified between 1998 and 2008. PNI was identified in 43.5% (77/177) of participants. Of them, 33 and 44 had PNI-SS and PNI-TS, respectively. The 5-year OS rate of patients with PNI-TS was significantly lower (6.7%) than that observed in those without PNI (30.6%, P < 0.001). However, the 5-year OS observed in the latter group did not differ significantly from that of patients with PNI-SS (26%, P = 0.68). Multivariate analysis identified PNI-TS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.965, P = 0.02), LVI (HR = 1.514, P = 0.048), and ypN2 stage (HR = 2.39, P = 0.007) as independent adverse prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of PNI-TS after nCRT is associated with poor survival. A thorough assessment of distinct PNI patterns (i.e., PNI-TS versus PNI-SS) should be part of the routine post-nCRT histopathological work-up of ESCC patients.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
We retrospectively reviewed 102 patients with esophageal cancer (97.1% squamous cell carcinoma, 96.1% stage III) received FDG-PET staging and were treated by chemoradiotherapy with or without resection to assess whether the pretreatment [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes can predict the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to find the cutoff values for primary tumor SUVmax and nodal SUVmax. The influence of clinical factors including primary tumor SUVmax and nodal SUVmax on local progression-free survival, nodal progression-free survival (NPFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. A total of 40 patients received esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (trimodality), while 62 patients received definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). The median follow-up was 26.4 months. The SUVmax of primary tumor had no significant predictive value on all outcomes, while the SUVmax of metastatic lymph nodes had predictive value on several outcomes. High nodal SUVmax (≥7) predicted for worse outcomes than low nodal SUVmax (<7) in the patients who received dCRT (two-year DMFS, 17% vs. 92%, P < 0.001; NPFS, 14% vs. 81%, P = 0.001; OS, 21% vs. 50%, P = 0.003), but not in those received trimodality. On multivariate analysis of patients receiving dCRT, nodal SUVmax was the strongest independent predictor on DMFS (hazard ratio [HR] 13.93, P < 0.001), NPFS (HR 3.99, P = 0.026), PFS (HR 2.90, P = 0.003), and OS (HR 3.80, P = 0.001). High pretreatment nodal SUVmax predicts worse treatment outcomes for the patients treated with dCRT.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/estatística & dados numéricos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Esofagectomia/métodos , Esofagectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Valores de Referência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognosis and its predictors in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who achieve major histopathological response (MaHR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). METHODS: We examined a total of 187 ESCC patients who achieved MaHR following nCRT and survived the perioperative period. MaHR was defined as either absence or <10% vital residual tumor cells (VRTC) in the resected esophagus without nodal involvement. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors significantly associated with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: At the time of analysis, 113 patients (60.4%) were dead (5-year OS = 48%; median survival time = 54.8 months). The amount of VRTC (1-10% versus 0% VRTC; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.9, P < 0.001) and the thoroughness of histopathological examination (standard [≤ 4 tumor blocks] versus thorough [> 4 tumor blocks], HR = 1.57; P = 0.013) were independent predictors of OS in multivariate analysis. A stepwise increase in OS was observed in the following groups: patients with 1-10% VRTC identified by the standard protocol, patients with 1-10% VRTC identified by the thorough protocol, patients with 0% VRTC identified by the standard protocol, and patients with 0% VRTC identified by the thorough protocol (5-year OS rates = 20%, 40%, 50%, and 62%, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In ESCC patients who achieve MaHR after nCRT, the presence of microscopical residual disease and the thoroughness of histopathological examination are associated with survival.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A 'surgery as needed' strategy has been proposed for patients with oesophageal cancer who truly achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). However, the ability to detect residual disease remains problematic. This study investigated the anatomical locations and pathological characteristics of residual cancer in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who achieved a near pCR following nCRT. METHODS: Patients with oesophageal SCC who achieved a near pCR after nCRT were eligible. Near pCR was defined as residual cancer in the resection specimen representing less than 10 per cent of the apparent original tumour area. RESULTS: Detailed histopathological reassessment of 76 consecutive patients (mean age 54·4 years) with a near pCR was undertaken. Some 32 patients (42 per cent) with a near pCR had no detectable mucosal lesions. Residual tumour was identified most frequently in the submucosal layer (54, 71 per cent), followed by the mucosa (44, 58 per cent), muscle layer (36, 47 per cent) and adventitia (22, 29 per cent) (P < 0·001). Among patients without ypT1a disease, increasing depth of tumour invasion correlated negatively with the likelihood of mucosal involvement. Of patients with ypT3 disease, 16 of 22 had no detectable cancer located in the mucosa, compared with six of 29 with ypT1b disease (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Better tools for predicting pCR are required before considering a 'surgery as needed' approach in the management of oesophageal cancer.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasia Residual/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The College of American Pathologists guidelines recommend examining at least four representative tumor blocks for determining pathological T stage in patients with primarily resected esophageal cancer. Whether the same pathological requirements are adequate in patients undergoing esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) remains unclear. We hypothesized that current examination protocols may underestimate the presence of microscopical residual disease after nCRT, potentially leading to under-staging. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with esophageal squamous cancer (ESCC) who were diagnosed as having pathological complete response (pCR) following nCRT. The thoroughness of the pathological examination in pCR patients was examined using (i) the number of blocks examined in suspicious tumor area (≤4 vs. >4), and (ii) the block quotient (calculated as the pretreatment tumor length divided by the number of blocks examined in suspicious tumor area). A total of 91 patients were enrolled. The mean number of blocks used to confirm pCR was 4.8 (range: 2-14). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the entire cohort were 55% and 65%, respectively. Multivariate analyses identified the block quotient as the only independent predictor of OS and DFS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated an optimal cutoff value of 1.4 for the block quotient. Among the patients who achieved pCR, the 5-year DFS differed significantly between subjects with a low (≤1.4) or high (>1.4) block quotient (76% vs. 47%, respectively, P = 0.03). The block quotient (calculated by the pretreatment tumor length divided by the number of blocks) - which reflects the meticulousness of the histopathological examination for confirming pCR - is associated with survival in ESCC patients.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Quimiorradioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esofagectomia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual , Patologia Clínica/normas , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
The optimal treatment for patients with local esophageal cancer (cT2N0 disease) has not yet been defined. We sought to determine whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can improve prognosis compared with direct esophagectomy in this patient group. Between 1994 and 2005, patients with cT2N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent either neoadjuvant CRT or surgery as first-line treatment were retrospectively reviewed. We collected information on their demographic characteristics, staging modality, clinical and pathological stages, perioperative course, and survival. The study endpoints included tumor recurrence, disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival rate. Of the 71 eligible patients, 14 received an esophagectomy first, whereas the remaining 57 received neoadjuvant CRT first. Despite the high pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 37% after neoadjuvant CRT, routine neoadjuvant CRT did not translate into better survival compared to direct surgery (5-year DSS: 39% vs. 68%, P= 0.17). The dramatic survival difference between pCR and non-pCR patients (5-year DSS: 85% vs. 4%, P < 0.001) accounts for these unsatisfactory results. In our series, the administration of neoadjuvant CRT to patients with clinical stage T2N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma did not significantly improve outcomes compared with direct esophagectomy.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esofagectomia , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS: To investigate the survival benefit and preoperative risk factors for hospital mortality of salvage surgery in esophageal cancer patients who had locoregional residual/recurrent tumor after definitive chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the esophageal cancer patients who presented at our hospital from 1997 to 2004. Forty-seven patients who had squamous cell cancer and developed locoregional recurrent/persistent disease after primary definitive chemoradiotherapy were elected. Twenty-seven of them received salvage esophagectomy (group 1) and the other 20 underwent non-operative treatment only (group 2). In order to assess the surgery-related mobility and mortality in group 1, 191 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by operation during the same time period were also enrolled (group 3). RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival of group 1 patients was 25.4%. In contrast, all of the patients in the group 2 died within 16.7 months. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.0029). In comparison with group 3, group 1 patients had significantly more surgery-related complications and hospital mortality. In univariate analysis for preoperative risk factors, a low albumin or hemoglobulin level was associated with high hospital mortality in group 1 (p=0.004 and 0.003, respectively). After multivariate analysis, only the low albumin level remained borderline significance. As for disease specific survival after salvage surgery, R0 resection was the only independent prognosticator (p=0.049). CONCLUSION: Salvage surgery provides survival benefit in esophageal cancer patients with locoregional persistent or recurrent disease after primary definitive chemoradiotherapy. Preoperative albumin and hemoglobulin levels are associated with hospital mortality and may aid in selecting suitable patient for salvage surgery.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Terapia de Salvação , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
To assess the antitumor effects in atopic asthmatics versus healthy adults, we designed this study using in vitro mononuclear cells (MNC) culture as an immunity model with human leukemic U937 cells as the target. MNCs were collected from asthmatic subjects and healthy controls. Conditioned media from the MNC cultures (MNC-CM) were collected after stimulation with various concentrations of phytohemagglutinin (PHA). We treated U937 cells with these MNC-CMs, then assayed their proliferation and differentiation after 5 days of culture. At lower PHA doses (1.25 microg/ml), as well as in absence of PHA, the asthmatic MNC-CMs inhibited U937 cells growth to a slightly greater extent than did the MNC-CMs from controls. In contrast, when higher doses of PHA were used (5, 10 microg/ml), this growth-inhibiting effect was dramatically reversed. The dual effect of MNC-CM in these two groups was also shown in U937 cell differentiation assay, assessed as follows: morphological change by Liu's staining, functional change by NBT reduction test and CD 14 expression by flow cytometric detection. We suggest that the antileukemic effects of MNCs from asthmatic patients result from a slightly immunopotentiated status. This immunity may be dramatically reversed, however, after marked activation of MNCs.