Vancomycin Graft Presoaking in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Is Associated with a Lower Risk of Graft Rerupture as Compared With No Vancomycin Presoaking: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether there is any difference in graft rerupture rates and clinical outcomes between cases having vancomycin graft presoaking vs. no vancomycin presoaking in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched. Full published studies reporting on the relation between vancomycin graft presoaking and rates of graft rerupture and/or clinical outcomes in ACLR surgery vs. no vancomycin graft presoaking were included. Data extraction and quality appraisal were performed. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. The study's protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021290608). RESULTS: The literature search identified 907 records. After removing duplicates and those not meeting inclusion criteria, 8 studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that the estimated risk of hamstring graft rerupture was lower in cases presoaked with vancomycin vs. those having no presoaking (3.2% vs. 6.2% rerupture rate, risk ratio [RR] = 0.507, 95% CI, 0.39-0.737, p < 0.001). Similarly, the estimated risk of graft rerupture was lower in cases presoaked with vancomycin vs. those having no presoaking when the analysis included various ACL graft types (2.7% vs. 3.9% rerupture rate, RR = 0.557, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.403-0.771, p < 0.001). Meta-analysis also showed that vancomycin graft presoaking was associated with similar International Knee Documentation Committee scores as compared with no presoaking when looking at hamstring grafts (estimated mean difference 0.112, 95% CI, -2.359 to 2.582, p = 0.929) or when considering various graft types (estimated mean difference 0.933, 95% CI, -0.140 to 2.006, p = 0.088). CONCLUSION: Vancomycin graft presoaking is a safe practice and does not compromise ACL graft rerupture rates or clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does correction of carpal malalignment influence the union rate of scaphoid nonunion surgery?

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the relation between carpal malalignment correction and radiological union rates in surgery for scaphoid nonunions. A total of 59 scaphoid waist fracture nonunions treated with open reduction and palmar tricortical autograft were divided according to their pre- and postoperative scapholunate (SL) and radiolunate (RL) angles. We found that carpal malalignment failed to correct in 32 of 59 (54.2%) patients despite meticulous surgical technique and placement of an appropriately sized wedge-shaped graft. In total, 43 (72.9%) fractures united at a mean of 4.47 months (range 3-11). Of the 27 fractures with postoperative SL and RL angles within the normal range, 21 united, whereas 22 of the 32 remaining fractures that failed to achieve postoperative angles within the normal range went on to union. The postoperative SL and RL angles were not related to union. Our findings suggest that in scaphoid fracture nonunion surgery, carpal malalignment may not be corrected in a substantial proportion of patients, but such correction may not be essential for bony union. Our findings also show that there is no marked collapse of the scaphoid graft in the early postoperative period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Cementing Techniques In Knee Surgery (CeTIKS): a UK expert consensus study.

Aims: Aseptic loosening is the most common cause of failure following cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and has been linked to poor cementation technique. We aimed to develop a consensus on the optimal technique for component cementation in TKA. Methods: A UK-based, three-round, online modified Delphi Expert Consensus Study was completed focusing on cementation technique in TKA. Experts were identified as having a minimum of five years' consultant experience in the NHS and fulfilling any one of the following criteria: a 'high volume' knee arthroplasty practice (> 150 TKAs per annum) as identified from the National joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man; a senior author of at least five peer reviewed articles related to TKA in the previous five years; a surgeon who is named trainer for a post-certificate of comletion of training fellowship in TKA. Results: In total, 81 experts (round 1) and 80 experts (round 2 and 3) completed the Delphi Study. Four domains with a total of 24 statements were identified. 100% consensus was reached within the cement preparation, pressurization, and cement curing domains. 90% consensus was reached within the cement application domain. Consensus was not reached with only one statement regarding the handling of cement during initial application to the tibial and/or femoral bone surfaces. Conclusion: The Cementing Techniques In Knee Surgery (CeTIKS) Delphi consensus study presents comprehensive recommendations on the optimal technique for component cementing in TKA. Expert opinion has a place in the hierarchy of evidence and, until better evidence is available these recommendations should be considered when cementing a TKA.

High rate of radiolucent lines following the cemented original design of the ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty.

Aims: Loosening of components after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be associated with the development of radiolucent lines (RLLs). The aim of this study was to assess the rate of formation of RLLs in the cemented original design of the ATTUNE TKA and their relationship to loosening. Methods: A systematic search was undertaken using the Cochrane methodology in three online databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Studies were screened against predetermined criteria, and data were extracted. Available National Joint Registries in the Network of Orthopaedic Registries of Europe were also screened. A random effects model meta-analysis was undertaken. Results: Of 263 studies, 12 were included with a total of 3,861 TKAs. Meta-analysis of ten studies showed high rates of overall tibial or femoral RLLs for the cemented original design of the ATTUNE TKA. The overall rate was 21.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.7% to 33.7%) for all types of design but was higher for certain subgroups: 27.4% (95% CI 13.4% to 47.9%) for the cruciate-retaining type, and 29.9% (95% CI 15.6% to 49.6%) for the fixed-bearing type. Meta-analysis of five studies comparing the ATTUNE TKA with other implants showed a significantly higher risk of overall tibial or femoral RLLs (odds ratio (OR) 2.841 (95% CI 1.219 to 6.623); p = 0.016) for the ATTUNE. The rates of loosening or revision for loosening were lower, at 1.2% and 0.9% respectively, but the rates varied from 0% to 16.3%. The registry data did not report specifically on the original ATTUNE TKA or on revision due to loosening, but 'all-cause' five-year revision rates for the cemented ATTUNE varied from 2.6% to 5.9%. Conclusion: The original cemented ATTUNE TKA has high rates of RLLs, but their clinical significance is uncertain given the overall low associated rates of loosening and revision. However, in view of the high rates of RLLs and the variation in the rates of loosening and revision between studies and registries, close surveillance of patients who have undergone TKA with the original ATTUNE system is recommended.

Higher rate of progesterone receptor positivity in skeletal metastases of breast cancer with a pathological fracture vs those without fracture.

Identifying risk factors for fracture occurrence in breast cancer (BC) skeletal metastases (SM) may guide the management of such bone deposits. There is sparse evidence regarding receptor status in SM and their relationship to fracture occurrence. Our study aimed to determine the relationship between estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and HER2 receptor status and Ki-67 index and fracture occurrence in SM of BC. Exactly 152 samples of SM of BC obtained from individual patients were evaluated. The status of the aforementioned receptors and Ki67 index were determined in SMs samples. Their expression was compared between SM that did and did not develop a fracture. Ninety-one cases sustained a pathological fracture at the SM site, and 61 did not. Patients who sustained a pathological fracture had a higher rate of PR positivity at their SMs as compared to those with no fracture. There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning ER, HER2+ or Ki67 status. SMs secondary to BC with a fracture are more likely to be PR positive than those with no fracture. Determining the receptor status in SMs may identify high-risk groups for fracture occurrence, and determining the PR status may also guide surgical and hormonal therapy.

Anatomic Monopolar Press-fit Radial Head Arthroplasty; High Rate of Loosening at Mid-Term Follow Up.

Introduction: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is used for the management of unstable or unreconstructable injuries of the radial head. Our aim was to investigate clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients treated with the Acumed anatomic radial head press-fit system for trauma. Methods: Clinical and radiographic assessment of RHAs undertaken for trauma with minimum 2-year follow-up. Results: 16 consecutive patients, mean age 53 (21-82) and 66 month ± 27 (26-122) clinical follow-up were included. There were marked radiographic changes with 11/16 showing periprosthetic lucent lines and 13/16 showing subcollar osteolysis. Radiographic changes occurred early post-surgery. Stem loosening was associated with larger cantilever quotients (0.47 vs 0.38, p = 0.004). Overall survivability was 81.2%, with 3 RHAs removed. Clinical outcomes for the retained RHAs were acceptable with mean flexion 134°, extension deficit of 10°, pronation of 82°, and supination of 73°. Mean VAS scores were 8.5 ± 14.4, QuickDASH 13.8 ± 18.9, Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were 91.5 ± 12.5 with no poor scores. Conclusion: Mid-term clinical functional outcomes following the Acumed anatomic RHA are acceptable in most cases. However, in view of the extensive periprosthetic lucencies and surgical removal due to loosening, patients should be cautioned when consented for implantation of the prosthesis, especially if a large collar is anticipated.

Additional Imaging is of Limited Value in Traumatic Hip Fractures With a History of Distant Malignancy and No Suspicious Lesion on Plain Radiographs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of obtaining additional preoperative imaging in patients with a traumatic hip fracture and a history of malignancy in whom plain radiographs show no lesion suspicious for metastases. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Teaching NHS Trust in the United Kingdom, over an 8-year period treating 4421 hip fractures. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred sixty-seven patients with hip fracture and a history of malignancy at a site distant to the hip. Three hundred thirty patients had a history of trauma and no lesion on the plain radiograph suspicious for metastases. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS: Whether obtaining additional imaging preoperatively (MRI, CT, and bone scan) identified metastases or affected management. RESULTS: 32/330 patients had further preoperative imaging, none of which demonstrated a pathological fracture secondary to malignancy. On follow-up, 3/330 (0.9%) cases were found to have occult metastasis at the hip fracture site. All 3 had only plain radiographs before surgery. In 2, this was identified on histological examination of intraoperative samples, and in 1, radiologically as a metastatic metaphyseal lesion 18 months after a hemiarthroplasty. Only in the latter case, preoperative identification of hip metastasis could have altered surgical management. Patients undergoing further preoperative imaging waited significantly longer for surgery (35 ± 26 vs. 51 ± 26 hours, P = 0.0011). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of a suspicious metastatic lesion on initial plain radiographs, further preoperative imaging is unlikely to identify a lesion that will affect management and confers significant delays to surgery. Sending intraoperative histological samples may help guide postoperative oncological management, but further work is needed to prove its utility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Editorial Commentary: Double-Pulley Remplissage Using Transtendon Anchors: Keep It Simple.

A large Hill-Sachs lesion that engages the glenoid rim and predisposes to recurrent anterior instability confers a substantial management challenge. Arthroscopic remplissage, either in isolation or combined with anterior labral repair, gives the arthroscopic surgeon a tool to stabilize the shoulder without reverting to more extensive open procedures or bone block reconstructions. In arthroscopic remplissage, the posterior capsule and infraspinatus are sutured into the humeral defect to limit such engagement between the HilleSachs lesion and the glenoid rim. The double-pulley technique using 2 transtendon anchors makes arthroscopic remplissage technically simpler, and potentially more reproducible, than earlier techniques. As we refine remplissage techniques, we need to further explore issues such as the optimal distance between the 2 anchors (and hence the resultant tendon bridge) as this distance-along with the pliability of the tendon-potentially determines how much compression against the bone can be achieved. Furthermore, as remplissage techniques are proven to be effective in restoring shoulder stability and conferring successful clinical function, there is even more need for high-quality comparative studies to define their role versus that of more extensive open stabilization procedures. Mechanistic studies are also needed to define the fill-effect versus the possible check-rein and neuromuscular control activation components of remplissage.

Comparison of Acorn and Fluted Reamers on Tibial Tunnel Outer Aperture Dimensions in ACL Reconstruction.

The aim of this study was to determine if the type of reamer used in tibial tunnel creation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction influences the dimensions of the tunnel's outer aperture. Tibial tunnels were created in tibial saw bones by reaming over a guidewire using an 8 mm acorn or fluted reamer in an antegrade manner. Reaming was aimed either in line with the guidewire, or with 10-degree inferior/superior deviation in relation to the wire. The shape and size of the outer aperture of the tibial tunnel were compared between the two reamers. When using the acorn reamer, a 10-degree deviation in relation to the guidewire resulted in minimal change in outer aperture length (mean 13.6 vs. 15.6 mm, p = 0.11) and width (11.6 vs. 11.1 mm, p = 0.51). However, when using the fluted reamer, although the aperture width showed no substantial change with reamer/guidewire deviation (11.4 vs. 11.2 mm, p = 0.71), the mean length almost doubled (14.7 vs. 28.1 mm, p = 0.002). The use of a fluted reamer when reaming the tibial tunnel creates a distal aperture which is inconsistently sized, larger, and of oblong shape compared with an acorn-shaped reamer. This should be taken in consideration when using a fluted reamer for creating the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction.

Rate of Insufficient Ipsilateral Hamstring Graft Harvesting in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, using an ipsilateral hamstring graft, may necessitate an alternative graft source if the obtained graft is insufficient with regards to length or diameter. The study aims to determine the rate of insufficient ipsilateral hamstring graft harvesting in primary ACL reconstruction. Retrospective review of 50 consecutive primary ACL reconstructions performed by a single surgeon in the United Kingdom. In 3 of 50 cases, there was insufficient ipsilateral hamstring graft harvesting and a contralateral hamstring graft was used. In two cases, this was due to premature division of the ipsilateral hamstring tendons (3/100 harvested tendons). In one case, an adequate length of semitendinosus was obtained, but its central portion was too thin. Retrospective review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging identified the thin part of the tendon in the latter case. Insufficient ipsilateral hamstring graft harvesting is a recognized, yet unusual intraoperative complication in primary ACL reconstruction. Presurgical planning as to how to manage such complications is essential.

Relationship Between Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Chondral Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, the optimal timing of ACL reconstruction and the influence of this timing on chondral damage remain unclear. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of timing of ACL reconstruction on the presence of chondral injuries via a systematic review and meta-analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Two reviewers independently performed systematic literature searches of 5 online databases using the Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews. Eligibility criteria were any comparative study of patients aged >16 years that assessed the relationship between timing of primary ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of chondral injuries. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: After screening, 14 studies (n = 3559 patients) out of 2363 titles met the inclusion criteria: 3 randomized controlled trials (n = 272), 3 prospective cohort studies (n = 398), and 8 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2889). In analysis of the studies, chondral injury rates were compared between ACL reconstructions performed before and after 3 time points: 3, 6, and 12 months after injury (eg, ≤3 vs >3 months). The rates of chondral injury increased with each time point. The increase was mostly due to low-grade injuries at 3 months (estimated odds ratio, 1.914; 95% CI, 1.242-2.949; P = .003), with the increase in high-grade injuries becoming predominant after 12 months (estimated odds ratio, 3.057; 95% CI, 1.460-6.40; P = .003). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that delaying ACL reconstruction surgery results in a higher rate of chondral injuries and the severity of these lesions worsens with time. These findings are comparable with those of our previously published study, which demonstrated a higher risk of meniscal tears associated with delayed ACL surgery. When ACL reconstruction is indicated, surgery ≤3 months after injury is associated with a lower risk of intra-articular damage. REGISTRATION: CRD42016032846 (PROSPERO).

Perioperative Hypothermia Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Mortality in Hip Fracture Patients in the United Kingdom: Α Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the relationship between perioperative hypothermia and mortality after surgery for hip fracture. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases was performed using the Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews with no publication year limit. Only studies available in the English language were included. STUDY SELECTION: Predetermined inclusion criteria were patients of any age with a hip fracture, exposure was their body temperature and outcome was mortality rate. Any comparative study design was eligible. DATA EXTRACTION: The quality of selected studies was assessed according to each study design with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) used for all the retrospective comparative studies. The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. DATA SYNTHESIS: A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: The literature search identified 1016 records. After removing duplicates and those not meeting inclusion criteria, 3 studies measuring 30-day mortality were included. All included studies were carried out in the United Kingdom. The mortality rate was higher in the hypothermic groups as compared with the normothermic group in all the studies, with the difference being significant in 2 of the studies (P < 0.0001). The meta-analysis showed that low body temperature was associated with an increased mortality risk (estimated odds ratio: 2.660; 95% confidence interval: 1.948-3.632; P < 0.001) in patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that low body temperature in hip fracture patients is associated with an increased 30-day mortality risk in the United Kingdom. Randomized control trials are required to determine whether the association between perioperative hypothermia in hip fracture patients and mortality is causal. Nevertheless, based on this analysis, we urge the maintenance of normal body temperature in the perioperative period to be included in national hip fracture guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Relationship With Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common, but the ideal timing for ACL reconstruction after injury is unclear with regard to meniscal insult. PURPOSE: To determine whether there is a relationship between timing from ACL rupture to ACL reconstruction and development of meniscal tears within this period. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic literature search was undertaken independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane method for systematic reviews in 5 online databases. The reviewers performed independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study quality. The search included any comparative study, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies of an adult population, that assessed the relationship between timing of ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of meniscal tears. RESULTS: After screening, 12 studies (No. of participants = 3042) out of 3390 records were included for analysis: 3 RCTs (n = 272), 2 prospective cohort studies (n = 307), and 7 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2463). In analysis of these studies, rates of reported meniscal tears were compared for ACL procedures performed at 3 and 6 months after injury. Meta-analysis of 5 studies (n = 2012) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >3 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 3 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.235; 95% CI, 1.183-4.223; P = .013) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Similarly, meta-analysis of 4 studies (n = 990) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >6 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 6 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.487; 95% CI, 1.241-4.984; P = .01) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that delay of ACL reconstruction surgery >3 months after injury is associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears within this prereconstruction time frame. Further high-quality prospective studies may help determine whether this is a causal effect. However, based on current evidence, in those patients for whom ACL reconstruction is indicated, ACL reconstruction within 3 months of injury may be recommended. REGISTRATION: CRD42016032846 (PROSPERO).

Comparison of Surgical Site Infection Risk Between Warfarin, LMWH, and Aspirin for Venous Thromboprophylaxis in TKA or THA: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Infection following arthroplasty can have devastating effects for the patient and necessitate further surgery. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is required to minimize the risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Anticoagulation has been demonstrated to interfere with wound-healing and increase the risk of infection. We hypothesized that different anticoagulation regimes will have differing effects on rates of periprosthetic joint infection. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical site infection risk between the use of warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and aspirin for VTE prophylaxis following total knee or hip arthroplasty. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in November 2018 using the PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases to identify studies that compared warfarin, LMWH, and/or aspirin with regard to surgical site infection rates following hip or knee arthroplasty. Meta-analyses were performed to compare the infection and VTE risks between groups. RESULTS: Nine articles involving 184,037 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that warfarin prophylaxis was associated with a higher risk of deep infection (or infection requiring reoperation) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.929, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.197 to 3.109, p = 0.007) and surgical site infection overall (OR = 1.610, 95% CI = 1.028 to 2.522, p = 0.038) compared with aspirin in primary total joint arthroplasty, with similar findings also seen when primary and revision procedures were combined. There was no significant difference in infection risk between warfarin and LMWH and between LMWH and aspirin. There was a nonsignificant trend for VTE risk to be higher with warfarin compared with aspirin therapy for primary procedures (OR = 1.600, 95% CI = 0.875 to 2.926, p = 0.127), and this was significant when both primary and revision cases were included (OR = 2.674, 95% CI = 1.143 to 6.255, p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: These findings caution against the use of warfarin for VTE prophylaxis for hip and knee arthroplasty. Further randomized head-to-head trials and mechanistic studies are warranted to determine how specific anticoagulants impact infection risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgical treatments compared with early structured physiotherapy in secondary care for adults with primary frozen shoulder: the UK FROST three-arm RCT.

BACKGROUND: Frozen shoulder causes pain and stiffness. It affects around 10% of people in their fifties and is slightly more common in women. Costly and invasive surgical interventions are used, without high-quality evidence that these are effective. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three treatments in secondary care for adults with frozen shoulder; to qualitatively explore the acceptability of these treatments to patients and health-care professionals; and to update a systematic review to explore the trial findings in the context of existing evidence for the three treatments. DESIGN: This was a pragmatic, parallel-group, multicentre, open-label, three-arm, randomised superiority trial with unequal allocation (2 : 2 : 1). An economic evaluation and a nested qualitative study were also carried out. SETTING: The orthopaedic departments of 35 hospitals across the UK were recruited from April 2015, with final follow-up in December 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with unilateral frozen shoulder, characterised by restriction of passive external rotation in the affected shoulder to < 50% of the opposite shoulder, and with plain radiographs excluding other pathology. INTERVENTIONS: The inventions were early structured physiotherapy with a steroid injection, manipulation under anaesthesia with a steroid injection and arthroscopic capsular release followed by manipulation. Both of the surgical interventions were followed with post-procedural physiotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome and end point was the Oxford Shoulder Score at 12 months post randomisation. A difference of 5 points between early structured physiotherapy and manipulation under anaesthesia or arthroscopic capsular release or of 4 points between manipulation under anaesthesia and arthroscopic capsular release was judged clinically important. RESULTS: The mean age of the 503 participants was 54 years; 319 were female (63%) and 150 had diabetes (30%). The primary analyses comprised 473 participants (94%). At the primary end point of 12 months, participants randomised to arthroscopic capsular release had, on average, a statistically significantly higher (better) Oxford Shoulder Score than those randomised to manipulation under anaesthesia (2.01 points, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 3.91 points; p = 0.04) or early structured physiotherapy (3.06 points, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 5.41 points; p = 0.01). Manipulation under anaesthesia did not result in statistically significantly better Oxford Shoulder Score than early structured physiotherapy (1.05 points, 95% confidence interval -1.28 to 3.39 points; p = 0.38). No differences were deemed of clinical importance. Serious adverse events were rare but occurred in participants randomised to surgery (arthroscopic capsular release,n = 8; manipulation under anaesthesia,n = 2). There was, however, one serious adverse event in a participant who received non-trial physiotherapy. The base-case economic analysis showed that manipulation under anaesthesia was more expensive than early structured physiotherapy, with slightly better utilities. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for manipulation under anaesthesia was £6984 per additional quality-adjusted life-year, and this intervention was probably 86% cost-effective at the threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Arthroscopic capsular release was more costly than early structured physiotherapy and manipulation under anaesthesia, with no statistically significant benefit in utilities. Participants in the qualitative study wanted early medical help and a quicker pathway to resolve their shoulder problem. Nine studies were identified from the updated systematic review, including UK FROST, of which only two could be pooled, and found that arthroscopic capsular release was more effective than physiotherapy in the long-term shoulder functioning of patients, but not to the clinically important magnitude used in UK FROST. LIMITATIONS: Implementing physiotherapy to the trial standard in clinical practice might prove challenging but could avoid theatre use and post-procedural physiotherapy. There are potential confounding effects of waiting times in the trial. CONCLUSIONS: None of the three interventions was clearly superior. Early structured physiotherapy with a steroid injection is an accessible and low-cost option. Manipulation under anaesthesia is the most cost-effective option. Arthroscopic capsular release carries higher risks and higher costs. FUTURE WORK: Evaluation in a randomised controlled trial is recommended to address the increasing popularity of hydrodilatation despite the paucity of high-quality evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN48804508. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 71. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Frozen shoulder occurs when the soft tissue envelope around the shoulder joint becomes inflamed, scarred and contracted, making movement painful and stiff. It affects around 1 in 10 people and is more common in women. Most patients are treated in the community. Those who do not improve are offered treatments in hospital. This includes costly and invasive surgical options. It is unclear which treatment provides the best patient outcomes and is cost-effective. UK FROST (UK FROzen Shoulder Trial) comprised 503 patients (from 35 UK hospitals) who randomly received one of three commonly offered treatments for frozen shoulder: early physiotherapy to restore movement, including a steroid injection for pain reliefmanipulation under anaesthesia, to stretch and tear the tight capsule to restore movement, and a steroid injection followed by physiotherapyarthroscopic capsular release, which uses keyhole surgery, including manipulation, to restore movement, followed by physiotherapy with pain medication. No important differences were found between the three treatments in shoulder function or pain at 12 months. Fewer patients who received arthroscopic capsular release required further treatment, and patients who received arthroscopic capsular release had slightly better shoulder function and pain outcomes than those who received the manipulation procedure or early physiotherapy. This improvement, however, was unlikely to be of clinical benefit to patients. Arthroscopic capsular release had slightly higher risks and substantially higher costs. Six serious complications were reported in patients who received arthroscopic capsular release (mostly owing to co-existing health problems) and two were reported in patients who received manipulation under anaesthesia. Physiotherapy was the least expensive treatment, but patients who received manipulation under anaesthesia had slightly better general health than those who received physiotherapy. Early physiotherapy with steroid injection could be accessed quicker than the surgical alternatives. Manipulation under anaesthesia cost more than physiotherapy but provided the best value for money. Patients in the study wanted early access to medical help to improve their shoulder problems.

Management of adults with primary frozen shoulder in secondary care (UK FROST): a multicentre, pragmatic, three-arm, superiority randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Manipulation under anaesthesia and arthroscopic capsular release are costly and invasive treatments for frozen shoulder, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. We compared these two surgical interventions with early structured physiotherapy plus steroid injection. METHODS: In this multicentre, pragmatic, three-arm, superiority randomised trial, patients referred to secondary care for treatment of primary frozen shoulder were recruited from 35 hospital sites in the UK. Participants were adults (≥18 years) with unilateral frozen shoulder, characterised by restriction of passive external rotation (≥50%) in the affected shoulder. Participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive manipulation under anaesthesia, arthroscopic capsular release, or early structured physiotherapy. In manipulation under anaesthesia, the surgeon manipulated the affected shoulder to stretch and tear the tight capsule while the participant was under general anaesthesia, supplemented by a steroid injection. Arthroscopic capsular release, also done under general anaesthesia, involved surgically dividing the contracted anterior capsule in the rotator interval, followed by manipulation, with optional steroid injection. Both forms of surgery were followed by postprocedural physiotherapy. Early structured physiotherapy involved mobilisation techniques and a graduated home exercise programme supplemented by a steroid injection. Both early structured physiotherapy and postprocedural physiotherapy involved 12 sessions during up to 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS; 0-48) at 12 months after randomisation, analysed by initial randomisation group. We sought a target difference of 5 OSS points between physiotherapy and either form of surgery, or 4 points between manipulation and capsular release. The trial registration is ISRCTN48804508. FINDINGS: Between April 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2017, we screened 914 patients, of whom 503 (55%) were randomly assigned. At 12 months, OSS data were available for 189 (94%) of 201 participants assigned to manipulation (mean estimate 38·3 points, 95% CI 36·9 to 39·7), 191 (94%) of 203 participants assigned to capsular release (40·3 points, 38·9 to 41·7), and 93 (94%) of 99 participants assigned to physiotherapy (37·2 points, 35·3 to 39·2). The mean group differences were 2·01 points (0·10 to 3·91) between the capsular release and manipulation groups, 3·06 points (0·71 to 5·41) between capsular release and physiotherapy, and 1·05 points (-1·28 to 3·39) between manipulation and physiotherapy. Eight serious adverse events were reported with capsular release and two with manipulation. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year, manipulation under anaesthesia had the highest probability of being cost-effective (0·8632, compared with 0·1366 for physiotherapy and 0·0002 for capsular release). INTERPRETATION: All mean differences on the assessment of shoulder pain and function (OSS) at the primary endpoint of 12 months were less than the target differences. Therefore, none of the three interventions were clinically superior. Arthoscopic capsular release carried higher risks, and manipulation under anaesthesia was the most cost-effective. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Distal biceps tendon ruptures - the relation of radiological retraction and chronicity to the ability of tendon reattachment and long-term functional outcomes.

AIMS: To assess whether the degree of radiological retraction and chronicity of distal biceps tendon ruptures are related to the ability to reattach the tendon and long-term functional outcomes. METHODS: Analysis of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for distal biceps tendon ruptures by a single surgeon. Measurements regarding the site and degree of tendon retraction in relation to anatomical landmarks following rupture were correlated with intraoperative findings. Postoperative functional outcomes were assessed in cases with >12 months follow-up. RESULTS: 24 cases of distal biceps tendon ruptures treated surgically were identified. Mean tendon retraction was 6.0 cm (range 1.2-9.5) from the radial tuberosity. 22 cases were reattached successfully. 2 required ligament augmentation/bridging using a synthetic ligament. In 2 cases the tendon could not be reattached due to poor quality of the tendon stump. Ability to reattach the tendon was unrelated to degree of radiological retraction or chronicity of rupture. Degree of retraction was not related to rupture chronicity. All reattachments healed with no re-rupture at follow-up with no substantial motion loss. In 17 cases >12months follow-up the DASH and OES were not related to retraction or chronicity of rupture. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological retraction and chronicity are not related to the ability to reattach distal biceps tendon ruptures or their clinical outcomes, hence should not discourage surgical exploration and attempted reattachment. Substantial tendon retractions can occur acutely and reattachment in considerable flexion did not produce any significant motion loss. Some cases will need augmentation or gap bridging and augmentation devices need to be available at surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Retrospective Study Defined.

Diabetes mellitus does not increase the risk of knee stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 7 studies including 246 053 cases.

PURPOSE: The association of diabetes mellitus with knee stiffness after total knee arthroplasty is still being debated. The aim of this study was to assess through meta-analysis the impact of diabetes mellitus on the prevalence of postoperative knee stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We conducted a literature search for terms regarding postoperative knee stiffness and diabetes mellitus on Embase, CINAHL, and PubMed NCBI. RESULTS: Of 1142 articles, seven were suitable for analysis. Meta-analysis showed that diabetes mellitus does not confer an increased risk of primary or revision total knee arthroplasty-induced postoperative knee stiffness when compared to nondiabetic patients (primary total knee arthroplasty, estimated odds ratio [OR] 1.474 and 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-2.23; primary and revision total knee arthroplasty, OR 1.340 and 95% CI 0.97-1.83). CONCLUSION: There is no strong evidence that diabetes mellitus increases the risk of knee stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. The decision to proceed with total knee arthroplasty, discussion as part of the consent process, and subsequent rehabilitation should not differ between patients with and without diabetes mellitus with regards to risk of stiffness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (meta-analysis).

Arthroscopic Excision of Medial Knee Plica: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.

PURPOSE: A meta-analysis was performed to assess the outcomes following surgical intervention for medial knee plica. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed using relevant key words. The primary outcome was patient-reported postoperative scores of "good" and "excellent". Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model. RESULTS: The literature search identified 731 articles. After removing duplicates and those not meeting the inclusion criteria, 12 articles reporting on a total of 643 knees were included for analysis, and of these, 7 articles including 235 knees were used for meta-analysis. The overall rate of good and excellent outcomes following surgery was estimated at 84.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.8-91.4). In those cases that had non-surgical therapy prior to surgery, the rate of good and excellent outcomes of surgery was estimated at 76.1% (95% CI, 60.1-87). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic surgical management of symptomatic medial knee plica results in favourable outcomes. Our results suggest that arthroscopic surgical excision should be considered as a treatment modality in patients with pathological medial plica disease of the knee either as a first-line treatment or when symptoms have not responded to non-surgical interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

United Kingdom Frozen Shoulder Trial (UK FROST), multi-centre, randomised, 12 month, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of Early Structured Physiotherapy versus manipulation under anaesthesia versus arthroscopic capsular release for patients referred to secondary care with a primary frozen shoulder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Frozen shoulder (also known as adhesive capsulitis) occurs when the capsule, or the soft tissue envelope around the ball and socket shoulder joint, becomes scarred and contracted, making the shoulder tight, painful and stiff. It affects around 1 in 12 men and 1 in 10 women of working age. Although this condition can settle with time (typically taking 1 to 3 years), for some people it causes severe symptoms and needs referral to hospital. Our aim is to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two invasive and costly surgical interventions that are commonly used in secondary care in the National Health Service (NHS) compared with a non-surgical comparator of Early Structured Physiotherapy. METHODS: We will conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of 500 adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of frozen shoulder, and who have radiographs that exclude other pathology. Early Structured Physiotherapy with an intra-articular steroid injection will be compared with manipulation under anaesthesia with a steroid injection or arthroscopic (keyhole) capsular release followed by manipulation. Both surgical interventions will be followed with a programme of post-procedural physiotherapy. These treatments will be undertaken in NHS hospitals across the United Kingdom. The primary outcome and endpoint will be the Oxford Shoulder Score (a patient self-reported assessment of shoulder function) at 12 months. This will also be measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months after randomisation; and on the day that treatment starts and 6 months later. Secondary outcomes include the Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, the EQ-5D-5 L score, pain, extent of recovery and complications. We will explore the acceptability of the different treatments to patients and health care professionals using qualitative methods. DISCUSSION: The three treatments being compared are the most frequently used in secondary care in the NHS, but there is uncertainty about which one works best and at what cost. UK FROST is a rigorously designed and adequately powered study to inform clinical decisions for the treatment of this common condition in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register, ID: ISRCTN48804508 . Registered on 25 July 2014.