Online training resources to aid therapeutic radiographers in engaging in conversations about physical activity and diet: A mixed methods study.

INTRODUCTION: This study explored changes in therapeutic radiographers' (TRs) self-reported knowledge and skills to engage in conversations about physical activity and diet with people living with and beyond cancer following completion of publicly available online courses. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to two of five online courses that aim to support health professionals to engage in conversations about physical activity and diet in the oncology setting. Participants rated their agreement with 18 statements related to the COM-B (capability, opportunity and motivation-behaviour) model components following completion of an online course on healthy diet (n = 16) and physical activity (n = 21). Semi-structured telephone interviews (n = 21) were also conducted. Analysis of the interviews was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS: Overall, the online courses were acceptable and the TRs in this study self-reported improved COM to deliver advice on physical activity and diet. The inclusion of the evidence and scientific rationale on the benefits of diet and physical activity, and also guidance on how to start conversations with patients were highlighted as important features of the courses. Suggestions for adaptations to the nutrition courses included the need for content that accounts for the side effects cancer patients experience while undergoing treatment. To support the implementation of training and the delivery of advice on these topics, multi-disciplinary working, organisational support and guidance around professional role boundaries were highlighted as important. CONCLUSION: Current publicly available online courses on physical activity and diet for oncology health professionals can reduce some barriers among TRs to providing advice to those living with and beyond cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Existing online training courses could be used to support TRs to deliver physical activity and dietary advice in practice. Findings show that these courses can be disseminated within radiotherapy departments. The results also highlight a number of important considerations for the implementation of brief health behaviour advice and online training interventions on physical activity and diet within cancer care.

Therapeutic radiographers supporting individuals undergoing radiotherapy to stop smoking: Testing a training resource in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: This study developed and piloted the first online training package to support implementation and delivery of brief smoking cessation interventions for therapeutic radiographers in four radiotherapy departments in England. METHODS: A previously reported systematic literature review and data analysis from the previously reported pre-focus group questionnaire and focus groups enabled the development of an online training package. The questionnaire was repeated by the participating therapeutic radiographers following completion of the training resource (n = 31). The results of the comparative questions from the pre and post questionnaires were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Version 24). RESULTS: In total, 43 therapeutic radiographer participants completed the pre-questionnaire and 31 participants continued to complete the post questionnaire, having completed the online training package. The previously conducted focus groups identified several barriers to the delivery of smoking cessation, that were addressed through the development of an online training package. Following the completion of the training; therapeutic radiographers had increased knowledge and confidence regarding smoking cessation, the number of therapeutic radiographers who believe that smoking cessation is part of their role increased and therapeutic radiographers more routinely have conversations about smoking cessation. CONCLUSION: The training resource improved therapeutic radiographers' knowledge and confidence and increased awareness of the role of the therapeutic radiographer in the provision of smoking cessation interventions. Challenges remain that continue to prevent some therapeutic radiographers from delivering smoking cessation interventions and strong leadership and implementation of strategy and guidance is essential to ensure wider implementation. Recording and measuring impact of interventions remains an area to be addressed, alongside cultural changes and reassurance around the therapeutic relationship. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This training tool has proven to be effective in the sample within this study and should be disseminated and evaluated more widely across radiotherapy provision within the United Kingdom.

Therapeutic Radiographers' perceptions of the barriers and enablers to effective smoking cessation support.

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco smoking during and post radiotherapy is associated with increased treatment toxicity and increased cancer related mortality. Routine delivery of smoking cessation advice is inconsistent in practice. This study identifies the key barriers and facilitators to the provision of effective smoking cessation conversations in radiotherapy practice. METHODS: A baseline questionnaire (n = 43) was used to identify current practice, barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation in radiotherapy and to inform a topic guide for follow up focus groups (n = 5). Ethical approval was obtained through the 4 NHS trusts and the Health Research Authority. Focus group transcription was coded by two researchers. RESULTS: Therapeutic Radiographers initiate health behaviour conversations with patients; there are a number of factors that facilitate the likelihood of a health behaviour conversation; indication that a patient smokes anatomical site and presence of acute effects. Key barriers to smoking cessation provision include; lack of training, limited knowledge, limitations as a result of poor clinical infrastructure, local culture and perceptions that patients do not prioritise smoking cessation during treatment. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic Radiographers have the motivation to provide smoking cessation advice, however they require further training to develop knowledge and skills in relation to benefits of smoking cessation and cessation strategies. Therapeutic Radiographers also expect that patients will respond negatively to smoking cessation advice, and that this might be damaging to the therapeutic relationship. Departmental culture and trust infrastructure can also significantly inhibit the provision of smoking cessation in radiotherapy practice and further support to implement NICE guidance is required.