Development and validation of an UHPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of ibrutinib and its dihydrodiol-metabolite in human cerebrospinal fluid.

Ibrutinib is an orally administered first-in-class irreversible Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) covalent inhibitor for the treatment of patients with B-cell malignancies. Several isolated clinical observations reported its efficacy in central nervous system dissemination. Herein, we described the development and validation of an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) procedure for the quantification of ibrutinib and its active metabolite PCI-45227 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This is the first complete validated method for quantification of ibrutinib and PCI-45227 in CSF. The compounds were eluted on a Waters BEH C18 column (50.0 × 2.1 mm; 1.7 µm) using a gradient elution with a mobile phase composed of ammonium formate buffer 5 mM pH 3.2 and acetonitrile +0.1% formic acid with a flow rate of 400 µL·min-1. Two deuterated internal standards were used to obtain the most accurate quantification. The CSF samples were prepared by a simple and rapid dilution. The method was validated by testing the selectivity, response function, intra-day and inter-day precisions, trueness, limits of detection (LOD) and lower limits of quantification (LLOQ). The validation results proved that the methods were suitable to quantify ibrutinib and PCI-45227 in real biological CSF samples from 0.50 (ibrutinib) or 1.00 (PCI-45227) to 30.00 ng·mL-1. Furthermore, the developed method was adapted to allow the quantification of both compounds in plasma and the results were compared to those reported in literature. The plasmatic samples were treated by protein precipitation and the method was validated to quantify ibrutinib and PCI-45227 in real biological plasmatic samples from 5.00 to 491 ng·mL-1. Lastly, for both matrices, accuracy profiles were plotted from the trueness and precision results using a 20% α-risk (ß = 80%) and the tolerance intervals were comprised within the acceptance limits fixed at ±25% for the LLOQ and ±15% for the other concentrations. Finally, these methods were successfully applied to quantify ibrutinib and PCI-45227 in real human CSF and plasma samples.

Inhibition of OCT2, MATE1 and MATE2-K as a possible mechanism of drug interaction between pazopanib and cisplatin.

We hypothesized that pazopanib is an inhibitor of cisplatin renal transporters OCT2, MATE1 and MATE2-K based on previous studies demonstrating an interaction between tyrosine kinase inhibitors and these transporters. Because several combinations of targeted therapies and cytotoxics are currently in development for cancer treatment, such an interaction is worth investigating. Experiments on HEK293 cells stably transfected to express OCT2, MATE1, MATE2-K or an empty vector (EV) were conducted. The inhibitory effect of pazopanib on these transporters was measured using the uptake of fluorescent substrate ASP+ and cisplatin in the different cell lines. The effect of pazopanib on cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity was also evaluated. A decrease of ASP+ uptake was observed in OCT2-HEK, MATE1-HEK and MATE2K-HEK cell lines after addition of pazopanib at increasing concentrations. Pazopanib inhibited cisplatin specific uptake in OCT2-HEK, MATE1-HEK and MATE2K-HEK lines. Cytotoxicity experiments showed that co-incubation of cisplatin with pazopanib multiplied up to 2.7, 2.4 and 1.6 times the EC50 values of cisplatin in OCT2-HEK, MATE1-HEK and MATE2K-HEK cell lines respectively, reaching about the same values as in EV-HEK cells. To conclude, pazopanib inhibits OCT2, MATE1 and MATE2-K, which are involved in cisplatin secretion into urine. The combination of these two drugs may lead to an interaction and increase the cisplatin-induced systemic toxicity. Given the wide variability of plasma pazopanib concentrations observed in vivo, the interaction may occur in a clinical setting, particularly in overexposed patients. The existence of a drug-drug interaction should be investigated when pazopanib is associated with a substrate of these transporters.

Genotyping of a family with a novel deleterious DPYD mutation supports the pretherapeutic screening of DPD deficiency with dihydrouracil/uracil ratio.

Despite the growing evidence that dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency (DPD, encoded by the DPYD gene) confers a higher risk of developing severe toxicity, most patients are not screened for DPD deficiency before fluoropyrimidine treatment. We report here the genetic and phenotypic analyses of DPD in a family related to a patient who died after a first cycle of 5-fluorouracil and in 15 additional retrospective patients having a partial DPD deficiency (as measured by plasma dihydrouracil/uracil ratio). The patient with lethal toxicity was found to be a compound heterozygote for two DPYD mutations: a novel 8-bp duplication (c.168_175dupGAATAATT, p.Phe59Ter) and c.1679T>G (Ile560Ser). The patient's dihydrouracil/uracil ratio indicates complete DPD deficiency. The novel mutation was found in two members of the patient's family. Deleterious DPYD mutations were identified in 9 out of the 15 patients. The relationship between genotype and dihydrouracil/uracil values in the 22 patients of the present study was significant (P = 0.01).

Dose banding as an alternative to body surface area-based dosing of chemotherapeutic agents.

BACKGROUND: Dose banding is a recently suggested dosing method that uses predefined ranges (bands) of body surface area (BSA) to calculate each patient's dose by using a single BSA-value per band. Thus, drugs with sufficient long-term stability can be prepared in advance. The main advantages of dose banding are to reduce patient waiting time and improve pharmacy capacity planning; additional benefits include reduced medication errors, reduced drug wastage, and prospective quality control. This study compares dose banding with individual BSA dosing and fixed dose according to pharmacokinetic criteria. METHODS: Three BSA bands were defined: BSA<1.7 m(2), 1.7 m(2)≤ BSA<1.9 m(2), BSA ≥ 1.9 m(2) and each patient dose was calculated based on a unique BSA-value per band (1.55, 1.80, and 2.05 m(2), respectively). By using individual clearance values of six drugs (cisplatin, docetaxel, paclitaxel, doxorubicin, irinotecan, and topotecan) from 1012 adult cancer patients in total, the AUCs corresponding to three dosing methods (BSA dosing, dose banding, and fixed dose) were compared with a target AUC for each drug. RESULTS: For all six drugs, the per cent variation in individual dose obtained with dose banding compared with BSA dosing ranged between -14% and +22%, and distribution of AUC values was very similar with both dosing methods. In terms of reaching the target AUC, there was no significant difference in precision between dose banding and BSA dosing, except for paclitaxel (32.0% vs 30.7%, respectively; P<0.05). However, precision was significantly better for BSA dosing compared with fixed dose for four out of six drugs. CONCLUSION: For the studied drugs, implementation of dose banding should be considered as it entails no significant increase in interindividual plasma exposure.

[Pharmacological bases of intraperitoneal chemotherapy]. / Bases pharmacologiques de la chimiothérapie intrapéritonéale.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a very attractive therapeutic alternative in the treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma, due to its intraperitoneal spreading. Pharmacokinetic rational was described 30 years ago: a drug administered within the peritoneal cavity diffuse through the peritoneum towards the plasmatic compartment, depending on both its molecular weight and its lipid solubility. A slow output of the drug from the peritoneal cavity and a high plasma clearance are associated with a great pharmacokinetic advantage, illustrated by the area under the concentration time curve ratio. Then it is possible to increase the amount of drug directly delivered at the tumor site, while controlling the systemic toxicity. The agent administered in a large fluid volume come into direct contact with the tumor nodules, into which it penetrates from the free surface while it also reaches them by blood flow. The peripheral penetration being however limited to the first cellular layers, this way of delivery is interesting only for small residual disease. The most active drugs in the treatment of ovarian cancer, paclitaxel and platinum agents, are particularly convenient for this way of administration. The most optimal administration modality still remains to be defined and the development of the targeted therapies still opens new perspectives.

[Hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): evaluation, prevention and policies to avoid occupational exposure for operating room personnel]. / Chimiohyperthermie intrapéritonéale : évaluation, prévention et gestion des risques professionnels au bloc opératoire.

To develop a treatment strategy for peritoneal carcinomatosis using a combination of extended peritoneal resections, local destructive procedures and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy creates great concern between healthcare workers involved in these procedures. New professional risks exist: risk of exposure to cytotoxic drugs, environmental risks (inhalation of smoke, aerosolization of chemotherapy agents). Information, education and training of healthcare workers is mandatory in order to ensure proper evaluation, prevention, and management of professional exposure risks in coordination with the occupational health office.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic determinants of the activity and toxicity of irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

This study aims at establishing relationships between genetic and non-genetic factors of variation of the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites; and also at establishing relationships between the pharmacokinetic or metabolic parameters and the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan. We included 49 patients treated for metastatic colorectal cancer with a combination of 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan; a polymorphism in the UGT1A1 gene (TA repeat in the TATA box) and one in the CES2 gene promoter (830C>G) were studied as potential markers for SN-38 glucuronidation and irinotecan activation, respectively; and the potential activity of CYP3A4 was estimated from cortisol biotransformation into 6beta-hydroxycortisol. No pharmacokinetic parameter was directly predictive of clinical outcome or toxicity. The AUCs of three important metabolites of irinotecan, SN-38, SN-38 glucuronide and APC, were tentatively correlated with patients' pretreatment biological parameters related to drug metabolism (plasma creatinine, bilirubin and liver enzymes, and blood leukocytes). SN-38 AUC was significantly correlated with blood leukocytes number and SN-38G AUC was significantly correlated with plasma creatinine, whereas APC AUC was significantly correlated with plasma liver enzymes. The relative extent of irinotecan activation was inversely correlated with SN-38 glucuronidation. The TATA box polymorphism of UGT1A1 was significantly associated with plasma bilirubin levels and behaved as a significant predictor for neutropoenia. The level of cortisol 6beta-hydroxylation predicted for the occurrence of diarrhoea. All these observations may improve the routine use of irinotecan in colorectal cancer patients. UGT1A1 genotyping plus cortisol 6beta-hydroxylation determination could help to determine the optimal dose of irinotecan.

Pharmacokinetics of heated intraperitoneal oxaliplatin.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic inter-patient variability of 30-min hyperthermic intraperitoneal oxaliplatin chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from 24 patients who were treated according to two procedures of heated intra-operative intraperitoneal oxaliplatin. For the first procedure (12 patients), the solution instilled within the peritoneal cavity contained oxaliplatin, and a delay of 8-10 min was necessary to reach a temperature of 42-43 degrees C. For the second procedure (12 patients), the cavity was initially filled only with the dextrose solution, and oxaliplatin was added to the peritoneal instillate when temperature reached 42-43 degrees C. Plasma and peritoneal fluid oxaliplatin concentrations were analyzed according to a population pharmacokinetic approach using NONMEM. RESULTS: Peritoneal and total plasma data were simultaneously analyzed according to a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model. The peritoneal half-life ranged between 18 and 42 min. The mean peritoneal clearance was 5.47 L/h (+/-21%), and the mean plasma clearance was 3.71 L/h (+/-47%). The heated intra-operative procedure did not have any impact on oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSION: The inter-individual variability was larger for plasma pharmacokinetic parameters than that for peritoneal parameters. However, the percentage of oxaliplatin dose absorbed during a 30-min hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may vary from 40 to 68%. The present pharmacokinetic model will be useful to implement pharmacokinetic evaluation of further clinical trials of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy based on platinum compounds' administration.

Renal insufficiency in elderly cancer patients: International Society of Geriatric Oncology clinical practice recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Elderly cancer patients commonly have renal function decline. This warrants particular caution during the administration of renally excreted cancer drugs or those with established nephrotoxicity. DESIGN: An International Society for Geriatric Oncology task force was formed to discuss treatment recommendations for this group of patients. RESULTS: Before drug therapy, the assessment and optimization of hydration status and evaluation of renal function is required. Serum creatinine alone is insufficient as a means of evaluating renal function, and creatinine clearance should at least be calculated in every patient by the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease or Cockcroft-Gault equations. In the extremes of obesity and cachexia and at very high and low creatinine values, no single tool is really accurate. In these patients, the best estimate of glomerular filtration rate is provided by direct methods such as (51)Cr-EDTA or inulin measurement. Within each drug class, preference may be given to agents less likely to be influenced by renal clearance, which are minimally nephrotoxic, or for which appropriate methods of prevention for renal toxicity exist. Coadministration of known nephrotoxic drugs should be avoided or minimized. CONCLUSIONS: Future trials should be designed to present data in a way that allows evaluation of the contribution of renal function to toxicity and efficacy.

Evaluation of a peptide ELISA for the detection of rituximab in serum.

Pharmacokinetic studies of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies necessitate the measurement of their biologically active fraction. The aim of this work was to develop an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, based on its binding to a 20-mer peptide (P20) derived from the extracellular loop of human CD20 (residues 165-184). Derivatives of P20 were prepared by conjugation to bovine serum albumin (BSA-P20ACM) or biotin (Biot-P20ACM). Interactions of P20 and its derived peptides with rituximab were analyzed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and by ELISA. A monoclonal anti-idiotype antibody (MB2A4) was used as the reference in each case. SPR analysis showed that P20 (conjugated or unconjugated) had a lower affinity for rituximab than MB2A4. ELISA methods based on P20 or MB2A4 were both highly accurate and reproducible for rituximab measurement in spiked samples, but the MB2A4-based assay had a lower limit of quantification. Interestingly, discrepant results were obtained with the two ELISA methods when analyzing pharmacokinetic samples, with the rituximab concentrations obtained with the MB2A4-based method being systematically higher than those determined by the P20-based method. Possible interference of circulating CD20 with the P20-based method was supported by competition experiments. Rituximab aggregation in the bloodstream may also account for the bias observed in samples from healthy mice. The P20-based ELISA is far less sensitive than the MB2A-based ELISA, thus limiting its utility for pharmacokinetic studies. However, the discrepancy observed between two different approaches for rituximab measurement indicates that data from different studies should be interpreted with care.

Clinical pharmacodynamic factors in docetaxel toxicity.

Neutropenia is the main dose-limiting toxicity occurring in docetaxel treatment. The objective of this study was to identify pharmacodynamic (PD) factors responsible for the neutropaenia caused by docetaxel. Data were obtained from 92 patients treated with docetaxel as a monochemotherapy in two different treatment centres. A semiphysiological population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model was applied to describe the time course of neutrophils and the neutropaenic effect of docetaxel. The plasma docetaxel concentration was assumed to inhibit the proliferation of neutrophil precursors through a linear model: Drug effect=Slope x Conc. Slope corresponds to the patients' sensitivity to the neutropaenic effect of docetaxel. Covariate analysis was performed by testing the relationship between the patients' characteristics and Slope using the program NONMEM. The neutropaenic effect of docetaxel showed a high interindividual variability. Three significant PD covariates were identified: serum alpha1-acid glycoprotein levels (AAG), level of chemotherapy pretreatment, and treatment centre. Extensive pretreatment was associated with an increase in Slope values meaning a higher haematotoxicity. An increase in AAG was associated with a decrease of both Slope and docetaxel plasma clearance. Patients treated in one centre had both higher Slope and docetaxel clearance. The centre effect (most likely due to a bias in the PK part of the study between the two centres) reveals the robustness of the PK/PD model. Individual dosing of docetaxel should be based on previous chemotherapy but not on the AAG level since it has a similar influence on PD and PK docetaxel parameters. This methodology should be applied to further investigate elderly patients and to identify more precisely the characteristics of previous chemotherapy that contribute to the cumulative myelotoxicity.

Vinorelbine/docetaxel combination treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a phase I study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the combination of vinorelbine (VRL) alternating intravenous (i.v.) and oral in combination with docetaxel (DCT) as first-line chemotherapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tested doses were 60 or 70 mg m(-2) given on day 1 for DCT, 20 to 25 mg m(-2) for i.v. VRL on day 1, 60 mg m(-2) on day 8 or day 15 for oral VRL. Day 1 was administered every 3 weeks. Three to six patients were treated per dose level. RESULTS: The median age of the 30 treated patients was 60 years. Four patients were non evaluable for the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and were replaced. Reported dose-limiting toxicities were 11 omissions of oral VRL for neutropenia, two cases of febrile neutropenia and two grade 4 neutropenia >or=7 days. Dose levels using DCT doses >60 mg m(-2) and/or i.v. VRL doses >20 mg m(-2) met the criteria for MTD. Most frequent toxicities were febrile neutropenia in seven patients and neutropenic infection in four patients (one fatal). Therefore, the recommended schedule was established at i.v. VRL 20 mg m(-2) with DCT 60 mg m(-2) on day 1 and oral VRL 60 mg m(-2) given on day 15 every 3 weeks. At this recommended schedule, only one of six patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Among 22 patients evaluable for tumour response, 2 complete and 10 partial responses were reported. Pharmacokinetics of combined VRL and DCT demonstrated the absence of mutual interaction. CONCLUSIONS: This phase I study established the recommended doses and schedules of the combination alternating i.v. and oral VRL with DCT, this recommended regimen being further explored in a phase II study.

Dexamethasone as a probe for CYP3A4 metabolism: evidence of gender effect.

BACKGROUND: A study was conducted to evaluate prospectively the correlation between docetaxel clearance and pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone previously obtained in 21 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dexamethasone pharmacokinetics were performed in 17 patients 24 h before docetaxel treatment as monochemotherapy. Dexamethasone and docetaxel plasma concentrations were determined by HPLC methods. Determination of docetaxel unbound fraction in plasma was performed using microequilibrium dialysis. RESULTS: Significant correlation was observed between observed plasma docetaxel clearances (CL(docetaxel)) and values predicted from dexamethasone plasma clearance (CL(dexa)), unbound plasma docetaxel fraction estimated from serum alpha1-acid glycoprotein level (fu(alpha1-AAG)), and hepatic metastasis status. However, after splitting of the prospective data set according to gender, no correlation was observed for males (R(2) = 0.08, NS, n = 10), then strong correlation was observed for females (R(2) = 0.78, P < 0.01, n = 7). Multivariate analysis was performed from data obtained in the women included in the first study and those of this prospective study (n = 18). Docetaxel CL was significantly correlated with CL(dexa) (P = 0.001) and fu(alpha1-AAG) (P = 0.01) according to the relationship (with +/-95% confidence intervals): CL(docetaxel) (l/h) = 1.92 (+/-0.94) x CL(dexa) (l/h) + 2.68 (+/-1.95) x fu(alpha1-AAG) (%) (R(2) = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone may be used to predict docetaxel clearances in females, but not in males.

Selective inhibition of HER2 inhibits AKT signal transduction and prolongs disease-free survival in a micrometastasis model of ovarian carcinoma.

Although first-line chemotherapy induces complete clinical remission in many cases of epithelial ovarian cancer, relapse usually occurs 18-28 months from diagnosis owing to micrometastases. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of trastuzumab on disease-free and overall survival in a specially designed murine model of ovarian cancer (OVCAR-3), which mimicked the natural history of human micrometastatic disease. Trastuzumab can cure the mice if started soon after induction chemotherapy. It can modestly inhibit the proliferation through mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction and clearly inhibit AKT phosphorylation, which is involved in survival pathway. As OVCAR-3 cell lines show no HER2 amplification or overexpression, these results warrant further studies to assess the efficacy of trastuzumab in the early stage of relapse in cancer models other than those overexpressing HER2.

A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine (Xeloda) and irinotecan combination therapy (XELIRI) in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal tumours.

Capecitabine is a highly active oral fluoropyrimidine that is an attractive alternative to 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer treatment. The current study, undertaken in 27 patients with gastrointestinal tumours, aimed to assess the toxicity and potential for significant pharmacokinetic interactions of a combination regimen incorporating capecitabine with 3-weekly irinotecan (XELIRI). Irinotecan (200 and 250 mg m(-2)) was administered as a 90-min infusion on day 1 in combination with escalating capecitabine doses (700-1250 mg m(-2) twice daily) administered on days 2-15 of a 3-week treatment cycle. Pharmacokinetics were characterised on days 1 and 2 of the first two cycles. A total of 103 treatment cycles were administered. The principal dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhoea and neutropenia. Capecitabine 1150 mg m(-2) twice daily with irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) was identified as the maximum-tolerated dose and capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) with irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) was identified as the recommended dose for further study. Analyses confirmed that there were no significant pharmacokinetic interactions between the two agents. The combination was clinically active, with complete and partial responses achieved in heavily pretreated patients. This study indicates that XELIRI is a potentially feasible and clinically active regimen in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer.

Factors affecting pharmacokinetic variability of oral topotecan: a population analysis.

The aim of this study was to characterise the pharmacokinetics of the anticancer agent topotecan, and explore the influence of patient covariates and interoccasion variability on drug disposition. Data were obtained from 190 patients who received the drug as a 30-min infusion (N=72) or orally (N=118). The population model was built with the use of NONMEM to identify candidate covariates, and obtain models for clearance (CL) and volume of distribution. The final models were based on first-order absorption with lag-time (oral data), and a two-compartment model with linear elimination from the central compartment. The Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CrCl) and WHO performance status (PS) were the only significant covariates: CL=(12.8+2.1 x CrCl) x (1-0.12 x PS). For the volume of distribution, a correlation was found between body weight and the central volume (V1)=0.58 x body weight. Based on the structural models, a limited-sampling strategy was developed with minor bias and good precision that can be applied a posteriori using timed samples obtained at 1.5, and 6 h after the administration of topotecan. In conclusion, a population pharmacokinetic model for topotecan has been developed that incorporates measures of renal function and PS to predict CL. In combination with drug monitoring, the limited sampling strategy allows individualised treatment for patients receiving oral topotecan.

Phase I and pharmacological study of an oxaliplatin and carboplatin combination in advanced malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Phase I and pharmacokinetic study to determine the maximal tolerated dose and the recommended dose, as well as the optimal sequence of a carboplatin/oxaliplatin combination delivered every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received either carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC)-based individually calculated dose (starting dose AUC 4 mg.min/ml), 1 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion] followed by oxaliplatin (110 mg/m(2), 2 h i.v. infusion), every 3 weeks, or the reverse sequence. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included and only one dose level was assessed. In group A, 10 patients received 23 cycles of carboplatin followed by oxaliplatin. In group B, 6 patients received 20 cycles with the reverse sequence. Delayed recovery from hematological toxicities was treatment-limiting, with mainly moderate thrombocytopenia and neutropenia as dose-limiting toxicities for group A (5 of 10 patients for each) and thrombocytopenia for group B (3 of 6 patients). No febrile neutropenia or grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity occurred. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed similar mean total platinum AUCs for the two groups: 37.2 +/- 13.7 and 33.6 +/- 9.9 mg.h/l, respectively. One complete response and two partial responses (World Health Organization-International Union Against Cancer criteria, response rate 18.8%) were seen in ovarian, Fallopian and neuroendocrine carcinomas, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This platinum combination appears feasible and active at the dose of AUC 4 mg.min/ml for carboplatin (Chatelut formula) and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2); however, it does not allow a significant increase in platinum dose-intensity delivery.

Individual dosing of carboplatin based on drug monitoring in children receiving high-dose chemotherapy.

Individual dosing of carboplatin based on drug monitoring was performed within a multi-centric phase I study based on high AUC-levels in children. Twelve patients (aged 3-17 years old) have been included: 3, 5, and 4 patients at the overall target ultrafilterable carboplatin AUC of 20, 25, or 30 mg/ml x min, respectively. Carboplatin was administered as a daily 60-min infusion, repeated on five consecutive days. The initial daily dose corresponding to the three first days was calculated according to the carboplatin clearance (CL) predicted from patients' characteristics (body weight, serum creatinine and nephrectomy status). Three blood samples were taken per patient. The individual CL were estimated by MAP (maximum a posteriori approach) Bayesian method implemented in the MP-K program. The doses for day 4 and 5 was adjusted in order to obtain the overall target AUC. Drug monitoring led to a change in the carboplatin dose (overall administered dose versus overall dose planned) ranging from -41% to +45%. Pharmacokinetics were performed at day 5 for 7/12 children: mean relative change between day 1 and day 5 was -11% showing a statistically significant, but limited, decrease of CL from day 1 to day 5. The percentage of difference between the observed and target overall AUC ranged between -7% and +14%. Three patients (one at each AUC level) who were previously treated with cisplatin experienced dose-limiting hearing loss. In conclusion, drug monitoring and dose adjustment is needed for the control of carboplatin plasma exposure when administering high doses of carboplatin in children.