Heparosan-coated liposomes for drug delivery.

Liposomal encapsulation is a useful drug delivery strategy for small molecules, especially chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin. Doxil® is a doxorubicin-containing liposome ("dox-liposome") that passively targets drug to tumors while reducing side effects caused by free drug permeating and poisoning healthy tissues. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the hydrophilic coating of Doxil® that protects the formulation from triggering the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS). Evading the MPS prolongs dox-liposome circulation time thus increasing drug deposition at the tumor site. However, multiple doses of Doxil® sometimes activate an anti-PEG immune response that enhances liposome clearance from circulation and causes hypersensitivity, further limiting its effectiveness against disease. These side effects constrain the utility of PEG-coated liposomes in certain populations, justifying the need for investigation into alternative coatings that could improve drug delivery for better patient quality of life and outcome. We hypothesized that heparosan (HEP; [-4-GlcA-ß1-4-GlcNAc-α1-]n) may serve as a PEG alternative for coating liposomes. HEP is a natural precursor to heparin biosynthesis in mammals. Also, bacteria expressing an HEP extracellular capsule during infection escape detection and are recognized as "self," not a foreign threat. By analogy, coating drug-carrying liposomes with HEP should camouflage the delivery vehicle from the MPS, extending circulation time and potentially avoiding immune-mediated clearance. In this study, we characterize the postmodification insertion of HEP-lipids into liposomes by dynamic light scattering and coarse-grain computer modeling, test HEP-lipid immunogenicity in rats, and compare the efficacy of drug delivered by HEP-coated liposomes to PEG-coated liposomes in a human breast cancer xenograft mouse model.

Thermodynamic Switch in Binding of Adhesion/Growth Regulatory Human Galectin-3 to Tumor-Associated TF Antigen (CD176) and MUC1 Glycopeptides.

A shift to short-chain glycans is an observed change in mucin-type O-glycosylation in premalignant and malignant epithelia. Given the evidence that human galectin-3 can interact with mucins and also weakly with free tumor-associated Thomsen-Friedenreich (TF) antigen (CD176), the study of its interaction with MUC1 (glyco)peptides is of biomedical relevance. Glycosylated MUC1 fragments that carry the TF antigen attached through either Thr or Ser side chains were synthesized using standard Fmoc-based automated solid-phase peptide chemistry. The dissociation constants (Kd) for interaction of galectin-3 and the glycosylated MUC1 fragments measured by isothermal titration calorimetry decreased up to 10 times in comparison to that of the free TF disaccharide. No binding was observed for the nonglycosylated control version of the MUC1 peptide. The most notable feature of the binding of MUC1 glycopeptides to galectin-3 was a shift from a favorable enthalpy to an entropy-driven binding process. The comparatively diminished enthalpy contribution to the free energy (ΔG) was compensated by a considerable gain in the entropic term. (1)H-(15)N heteronuclear single-quantum coherence spectroscopy nuclear magnetic resonance data reveal contact at the canonical site mainly by the glycan moiety of the MUC1 glycopeptide. Ligand-dependent differences in binding affinities were also confirmed by a novel assay for screening of low-affinity glycan-lectin interactions based on AlphaScreen technology. Another key finding is that the glycosylated MUC1 peptides exhibited activity in a concentration-dependent manner in cell-based assays revealing selectivity among human galectins. Thus, the presentation of this tumor-associated carbohydrate ligand by the natural peptide scaffold enhances its affinity, highlighting the significance of model studies of human lectins with synthetic glycopeptides.

Glycosylation of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 affects its activity and inhibition.

ADAM17 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17) is believed to be a tractable target in various diseases, including cancer and rheumatoid arthritis; however, it is not known whether glycosylation of ADAM17 expressed in healthy cells differs from that found in diseased tissue and, if so, whether glycosylation affects inhibitor binding. We expressed human ADAM17 in mammalian and insect cells and compared their glycosylation, substrate kinetics, and inhibition profiles. We found that ADAM17 expressed in mammalian cells was more heavily glycosylated than its insect-expressed analog. To determine whether differential glycosylation modulates enzymatic activity, we performed kinetic studies with both ADAM17 analogs and various TNFα-based substrates. The mammalian form of ADAM17 exhibited 10- to 30-fold lower kcat values than the insect analog, while the KM was unaffected, suggesting that glycosylation of ADAM17 can potentially play a role in regulating enzyme activity in vivo. Finally, we tested ADAM17 forms for inhibition by several well-characterized inhibitors. Active-site zinc-binding small molecules did not exhibit differences between the two ADAM17 analogs, while a non-zinc-binding exosite inhibitor of ADAM17 showed significantly lower potency toward the mammalian-expressed analog. These results suggest that glycosylation of ADAM17 can affect cell signaling in disease and might provide opportunities for therapeutic intervention using exosite inhibitors.

Production methods for heparosan, a precursor of heparin and heparan sulfate.

Heparin and heparan sulfate belong to the glycosaminoglycan family. Heparin which is known as a powerful anticoagulant has been also described to have potential in therapeutic applications such as in the treatment against cancer and prevention of virus infections. Heparan sulfate, an analog of heparin, which is not used for medical purposes yet, was reported to have the same pharmaceutical potential as heparin. Both heparin and heparan sulfate share a common precursor molecule known as heparosan. Heparosan determines the polymer chain length and the sugar unit backbone composition, which are determinant structural parameters for the biological activity of heparin and heparan sulfate. In this review we give an overview of the different methods used to synthesize heparosan, and we highlight the pro and cons of each method in respect to the synthesis of bioengineered heparin-like molecules. Advancements in the field of the synthesis of bioengineered heparin are also reported.