Extracranial arteriovenous malformation mimicking a peripheral nerve tumor: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are vascular malformations that are more commonly found intracranially, followed by the head, neck, limbs, and trunk. Extracranially, AVMs can mimic peripheral nerve tumors, leading to misdiagnosis. OBSERVATIONS: A 19-year-old female, who presented with left lateral lower leg pain, was preoperatively thought to have a peripheral nerve tumor; at surgery, however, she was found to have an extracranial AVM. The distinct margins of the tumor on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging suggested that the patient might have a peripheral nerve tumor; however, the clinical symptoms of focal pain at rest and the absence of Tinel's sign should have raised questions about this diagnosis. LESSONS: This case highlights the difficulty in differentiating a peripheral nerve tumor from an extracranial AVM in certain clinical scenarios. It is important to use a multifaceted diagnostic approach to get a correct preoperative diagnosis and plan treatment appropriately.

Pineal Dysgerminoma: A Misleading Clinical Course With Potential Life-Threatening Consequences.

Pineal dysgerminomas are sporadic pediatric intracranial tumors that usually grow as midline lesions around the third ventricle, most frequently the pineal gland and the pituitary regions of the brain. The severity of symptoms is dependent on the location of the lesion and can present with increased intracranial symptoms. We report a 20-year-old man who presented with new-onset headaches over the past month that would wake him from his sleep at night. The headaches, however, resolved completely one week prior to his first neurological evaluation. A thorough neurological examination was normal. A careful review of the literature does not show a case of a pineal tumor presenting with spontaneous regression of intracranial pressure, and therefore we would like to raise awareness among clinicians about this potential course. A delay in obtaining imaging could have been life-threatening; thus, we recommend a high index of suspicion when patients present with recent symptoms suggesting increased intracranial pressure. Our patient had an excellent outcome two years after his presentation, with appropriate management including drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.

Amyloidosis in the head and neck: CT findings with clinicopathological correlation.

PURPOSE: To characterize the CT imaging features of head and neck amyloidosis and correlate with extent of disease and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 80 patients with head and neck amyloidosis who underwent soft tissue neck CT imaging between November 2003 and April 2018. The CT imaging features including lesion distribution, morphology (focal, diffuse/circumferential, or combined), presence and pattern of calcification, (punctate or diffuse), and thickness of airway lesion were evaluated and compared with the extent of amyloidosis (localized or systemic), and clinical course (stable, no recurrence, or progression requiring repeated surgical treatment). RESULTS: Localized disease (83.8%, 67/80) was most common with AL type (97.6%, 41/42) representing nearly all cases of head and neck amyloidosis. The larynx was the most frequently affected organ (60.0%, 48/80), specifically the glottis (43.8%, 35/80). Calcification was seen in 65.0% of cases (52/80). Non-airway or tongue lesions were significantly associated with systemic (92.3%, 12/13) as opposed to localized amyloidosis (4.5%, 3/67; P < 0.001). Repeated surgical treatment was significantly associated with laryngeal amyloidosis (35.3%, 12/34; P = 0.002) and multi-centric disease (33.3%, 10/30; P = 0.048). Airway wall thickness in patients who required repeated surgical treatment was significantly greater than in patients with stable or no recurrent disease (P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the imaging features of head and neck amyloidosis can aid the diagnosis, disease monitoring, and prediction of patients requiring repeated surgical intervention.

Tratamiento de las convulsiones neonatales / Treatment of neonatal seizures

Las convulsiones neonatales están entre las manifestaciones más dramáticas de enfermedad neurológica y deben ser consideradas una emergencia. La incidencia es 3.5 por cada 100 nacidos a término y en prematuros asciende a 58 por cada 100 nacidos vivos. Las convulsiones neonatales son una manifestación clínica de disfunción cortical no específica que puede dar lugar a daño permanente del cerebro. La etiología es multifactorial y requiere una evaluación cuidadosa de cada escenario clínico. El diagnóstico es más complejo por el hecho de que la mayoría de convulsiones son sub-clínicas o sutiles y a veces no tienen correlación con el electroencefalograma. Aunque la identificación temprana y el tratamiento son críticos, el diagnóstico se complica por algunos factores como la variedad de presentaciones clínicas, diferentes etiologías y varias alternativas de tratamiento. De todas maneras, los estudios de investigación y la evidencia clínica disponible han demostrado que el tratamiento precoz con fármacos anticonvulsivantes puede mejorar el pronóstico.

Neonatal seizures are among the most dramatic manifestations of acute central nervous system dysfunction. The incidence is much higher in very low weight neonates than in full term infants (~58 and 3.5 per 100 live births, respectively). Neonatal seizures represent the clinical manifestation of a non-specific cortical cerebral dysfunction which can lead to permanent brain injury. The etiology is multifactorial and requires a judicious assessment for each clinical scenario. The diagnosis is further complicated by the fact that most neonatal seizures are subclinical, that is, may display very subtle or no clinical changes and the diagnosis may just be based on EEG findings. The treatment depends on the etiology, but an early and opportune intervention prevents further brain damage, thus improving prognosis. Although early identification and treatment are critical, the diagnosis of neonatal seizures is complicated by several factors such as different clinical presentations, possible etiologies and several treatment options. Nevertheless, research studies and clinical evidence have shown that early treatment with anti-seizure medications can change the outcome.

Incidentaloma suprarrenal, patología emergente en la era de los avances imaginológicos / Adrenal Incidentaloma, Emerging Pathology in the Age of the Imaging Advances

El incidentaloma adrenal es una masa encontrada de forma incidental durante un estudio de imagen, con múltiples implicaciones clínicas según su etiología; por esto es importante discutir su abordaje diagnóstico y el manejo médico correspondiente. Se presenta el caso de un paciente masculino de 64 años de edad, hospitalizado por cuadro clínico de síncope, hipertensión no controlada e hiperglucemia, a quien además se le había detectado previamente una masa suprarrenal en estudio ambulatorio de imagen. Durante su estancia se realizaron estudios imaginológicos y laboratorios para determinar la etiología de esta masa, su relación con el cuadro clínico actual y su tratamiento. Se concluye que el incidentaloma adrenal es una entidad frecuente cuyo reto diagnóstico consiste en establecer si se trata de una entidad maligna o benigna y si es funcionante o no, con el fin de determinar si requiere manejo quirúrgico o solo observación.

Introduction: Adrenal incidentaloma is a mass found incidentally during an imaging study with multiple clinical implications according etiology. For this reason, it is important to discuss the diagnostic approach and appropriate medical management. Case: 64 year old male patient, hospitalized for clinical symptoms of syncope, uncontrolled hypertension and hyperglycemia; in addition, a suprarenal mass was previously detected in an outpatient image study. During his stay, imaging and laboratory studies were conducted to determine the etiology of this mass, relative to the current clinical condition and treatment. Conclusion: The adrenal incidentaloma is a frequent diagnosis. Its challenge is to determine whether it is malignant or a benign entity and whether it is functioning or not, in order to determine if it requires surgical treatment or if it only requires observation.