The effect of human papillomavirus status on prognosis and local treatment strategies of T1-2N0 oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer.

Purpose: To explore the effect of human papillomavirus (HPV) status on prognosis and further investigate whether human papillomavirus (HPV) status has an impact on the local treatment strategies for T1-2N0 oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC) patients. Methods: Patients diagnosed with T1-2N0 OPSCC between 2010 and 2015 were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Data were analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM), Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox multivariable analyses. Results: A total of 1,004 patients were identified, of whom 595 (59.3%) had HPV-related tumors. Of all the patients, 386 (38.4%) and 618 (61.6%) received definitive radiotherapy and radical surgery, respectively. HPV status had no significant effect on local treatment strategies for early-stage OPSCC (P = 0.817). The 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were 89.6 and 80.1%, respectively. Compared to those with HPV-negative diseases, patients with HPV-positive diseases had better CSS and OS. A total of 222 pairs of patients were completely matched after PSM. The results of multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that patients with HPV-positive disease had significantly better CSS (P = 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001) compared to those with HPV-negative tumors. However, local treatment strategy was not associated with survival outcomes after PSM (CSS, P = 0.771; OS, P = 0.440). The subgroup analysis showed comparable CSS and OS between those treated with radical surgery and definitive radiotherapy regardless of HPV status. Conclusions: HPV status is an independent prognostic factor for the survival of stage T1-2N0 OPSCC patients. Local treatment strategies had no significant effect on the survival of early-stage OPSCC regardless of HPV status. Patients with early-stage OPSCC should be informed regarding the pros and cons of definitive radiotherapy or radical surgery.

Efficacy and adverse effects of transdermal fentanyl and sustained-release oral morphine in treating moderate-severe cancer pain in Chinese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analysis suggested that transdermal fentanyl was not inferior to sustained-release oral morphine in treating moderate-severe cancer pain with less adverse effects. Now, we updated the data and performed a systematic review. METHODS: Updated cohort studies on transdermal fentanyl and oral morphine in the treatment of cancer pain were searched in electronic databases including CBMdisc, CNKI, VIP, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Primary end points assessed by meta-analysis were remission rate of pain and incidence of adverse effects. Quality of life was assessed by systematic review, which was the second end point. RESULTS: 32 cohort studies, which included 2651 patients, were included in present study. The remission rate in transdermal fentanyl group and sustained-release oral morphine group were 86.60% and 88.31% respectively, there was no significant difference [RR = 1.13, 95% CI (0.92, 1.38), P = 0.23]. Compared with oral morphine group, there were less adverse effects in terms of constipation [RR = 0.35, 95% CI (0.27, 0.45), P < 0.00001], nausea/vomiting [RR = 0.57, 95% CI (0.49, 0.67), P < 0.00001], and vertigo/somnolence [RR = 0.59, 95% CI (0.51, 0.68), P < 0.00001] in transdermal fentanyl group. Six of selected trials supported either transdermal fentanyl or sustained-release oral morphine improved QOL of cancer patients and one of them showed more patients got better QOL after sustained-release oral morphine transferred to transdermal fentanyl. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed again that both transdermal fentanyl and oral morphine had the same efficacy in the treatment of moderate-severe cancer pain in Chinese population, but the former might have less adverse effects and better quality of life.

Gemcitabine-based cytotoxic doublets chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: updated subgroup meta-analyses of overall survival.

OBJECTIVE: Previous meta-analyses showed a survival advantage with gemcitabine (GEM)-based combinations over GEM in advanced pancreatic cancer. Therefore, it would be valuable to explore the specific active regimens based on a subgroup meta-analysis. METHODS: Updated data by comprehensive search of the literature from databases and conference proceedings. Subgroup meta-analysis compared GEM with GEM-based doublets chemotherapy in terms of 6-month overall survival (OS) and 1-year OS. RESULTS: Eighteen randomized controlled trials with 4237 patients were included, which were divided into five subgroups: GEM/capecitabine, GEM/cisplatin, GEM/5-fluorouracil, GEM/irinotecan and GEM/oxaliplatin. In each subgroup, risk ratios (RRs) for 6-month OS were 0.85 (P = 0.04), 0.99 (P = 0.88), 0.95 (P = 0.46), 1.03 (P = 0.77) and 0.80 (P = 0.001), respectively, and RRs for 1-year OS were 0.94 (P = 0.14), 0.99 (P = 0.75), 0.96 (P = 0.19), 1.00 (P = 0.97) and 0.93 (P = 0.05), respectively. A meta-analysis of the trials with adequate information on performance status (PS) was performed in four trials with 1325 patients. Patients with a good PS did not show a survival benefit when receiving combination chemotherapy. RRs for 6-month and 1-year OS were 0.82 (P = 0.18) and 0.93 (P = 0.08). In contrast, application of combination chemotherapy to patients with a poor PS appeared to be harmful. RRs were 1.17 (P = 0.04) for 6-month OS and 1.09 (P = 0.04) for 1-year OS. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis indicated a significant survival benefit when GEM was either combined with capcitabine or oxaliplatin. On the basis of a preliminary subgroup analysis, pancreatic cancer patients with a poor PS appeared to have a worse survival benefit from GEM-based cytotoxic doublets.