Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Prev Med Rep ; 26: 101699, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35145838

RESUMO

Smoking cessation rates are low in safety-net settings. We conducted a retrospective analysis using electronic health record (EHR) data on adults with at least three primary care visits from 2016 to 2019 in the San Francisco Health Network (SFHN), a network of clinics serving publicly insured and uninsured San Francisco residents. We used multivariable regression to identify factors associated with 1) any cessation attempt, defined as smoking status change from "current smoker" at the index visit to "former smoker" at visit 2 or 3, and 2) a sustained cessation attempt, defined as smoking status change from "current smoker" at the index visit to "former smoker" at visits 2 and 3. We identified 7,388 adults currently smoking at the index visit; 26% (n = 1,908) made any cessation attempt, and 9% (n = 650) made a sustained cessation attempt. Factors associated with greater odds of any and sustained cessation attempts included Latinx/Hispanic ethnicity, American Indian/Alaskan Native race, and Spanish as the primary language. Meanwhile, older age, Medicaid insurance, and Chinese (i.e., Cantonese/Mandarin) as the primary language were associated with lower odds of both outcomes. Patient factors such as older age, Medicaid insurance, and speaking Chinese represent targets for improving cessation rates. Targeting interventions for these specific factors could further improve smoking cessation rates for lower cessation groups.

2.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 20(6): 1326-1333.e4, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34280552

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Reports of mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach effectiveness over time are minimal. We aimed to better evaluate a mailed FIT program with longitudinal metrics. METHODS: A total of 10,771 patients aged 50 to 75 years not up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening were randomized to intervention or usual care. The intervention arm received an advanced notification call and informational postcard prior to a mailed FIT. Usual care was at the discretion of the primary care provider. Patients were followed for up to 2.5 years. The primary outcome was the difference in cumulative proportion of completed FIT screening between arms. Screening was further examined with the proportion of time up-to-date, consistency of adherence, and frequency of abnormal FIT. RESULTS: The cumulative proportion of FIT completion was higher in the outreach intervention (73.2% vs 55.1%; P < .001). The proportion of time covered by screening was higher in the intervention group (46.8% vs 27.3%; Δ19.6%; 95% confidence interval, 18.2%-20.9%). Patients assigned to FIT outreach were more likely to consistently complete FITs (2 completed of 2 offered) (50.1% vs 21.8%; P < .001). However, for patients who did not complete the FIT during the first cycle, only 17.1% completed a FIT during the second outreach cycle. The number and overall proportion of abnormal FIT was significantly higher in the outreach intervention (6.9% Outreach vs 4.1% Usual Care; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Organized mailed FIT outreach significantly increased colorectal cancer screening over multiple years in this safety-net health system. Although mailing was overall effective, the effect was modest in patients who did not complete FIT in first cycle of intervention. (ClincialTrials.gov, NCT02613260).


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Sangue Oculto , Serviços Postais
3.
Dig Dis Sci ; 66(3): 768-774, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32236885

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: How clinical teams function varies across sites and may affect follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results. AIMS: This study aimed to identify the characteristics of clinical practices associated with higher diagnostic colonoscopy completion after an abnormal FIT result in a multi-site integrated safety-net system. METHODS: We distributed survey questionnaires about tracking and follow-up of abnormal FIT results to primary care team members across 11 safety-net clinics from January 2017 to April 2017. Surveys were distributed at all-staff clinic meetings and electronic surveys sent to those not in attendance. Participants received up to three reminders to complete the survey. RESULTS: Of the 501 primary care team members identified, 343 (68.5%) completed the survey. In the four highest-performing clinics, nurse managers identified at least two team members who were responsible for communicating abnormal FIT results to patients. Additionally, team members used a clinic-based registry to track patients with abnormal FIT results until colonoscopy completion. Compared to higher-performing clinics, lower-performing clinics more frequently cited competing health issues (56% vs. 40%, p = 0.03) and lack of patient priority (59% vs. 37%, p < 0.01) as barriers and were also more likely to discuss abnormal results at a clinic visit (83% vs. 61%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest organized and dedicated efforts to communicate abnormal FIT results and track patients until colonoscopy completion through registries is associated with improved follow-up. Increased utilization of electronic health record platforms to coordinate communication and navigation may improve diagnostic colonoscopy rates in patients with abnormal FIT results.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/normas , Colonoscopia/normas , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sangue Oculto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fluxo de Trabalho
5.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 112(3): 305-313, 2020 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31187126

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains underused, especially in safety-net systems. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness, costs, and cost-effectiveness of organized outreach using fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) compared with usual care. METHODS: Patients age 50-75 years eligible for CRC screening from eight participating primary care safety-net clinics were randomly assigned to outreach intervention with usual care vs usual care alone. The intervention included a mailed postcard and call, followed by a mailed FIT kit, and a reminder phone call if the FIT kit was not returned. The primary outcome was screening participation at 1 year and a microcosting analysis of the outreach activities with embedded long-term cost-effectiveness of outreach. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: A total of 5386 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 5434 to usual care. FIT screening was statistically significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (57.9% vs 37.4%, P < .001; difference = 20.5%, 95% confidence interval = 18.6% to 22.4%). In the intervention group, FIT completion rate was higher in patients who had previously completed a FIT vs those who had not (71.9% vs 35.7%, P < .001). There was evidence of effect modification of the intervention by language, and clinic. Outreach cost approximately $23 per patient and $112 per additional patient screened. Projecting long-term outcomes, outreach was estimated to cost $9200 per quality-adjusted life-year gained vs usual care. CONCLUSION: Population-based management with organized FIT outreach statistically significantly increased CRC screening and was cost-effective in a safety-net system. The sustainability of the program and any impact of economies of scale remain to be determined.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
6.
Prev Med Rep ; 15: 100907, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31193606

RESUMO

Smoking rates are high among low-income populations who seek care in safety-net clinics. While most safety-net clinics screen for cigarette smoking, there are substantial disparities in the delivery of smoking cessation counseling in these systems. We conducted a mixed method study between July 2016 and April 2017 to examine receipt of smoking cessation counseling and estimate recent cessation attempts among primary care patients in four safety-net clinics in San Francisco. We used the electronic health record (EHR) to examine receipt of cessation services and estimate cessation attempts, defined as transition from current to former smoking status during the 9-month study period. We conducted interviews with 10 staff and 16 patients to assess barriers to and facilitators of providing cessation services. Of the 3301 smokers identified via EHR, the majority (95.6%) received some type of cessation counseling during at least one clinical encounter, and 17.6% made a recent cessation attempt. Recent smoking cessation attempts and receipt of smoking cessation services differed significantly by clinic after adjusting for demographic factors. We identified patient and staff-level pre-disposing, reinforcing and enabling factors to increase delivery of cessation care, including increasing access to cessation medications and higher intensity counseling using a team-based approach. The EHR presents a useful tool to monitor patients' recent cessation attempts and access to cessation care. Combining EHR data with qualitative methods can help guide and streamline interventions to improve quality of cessation care and promote quit attempts among patients in safety-net settings.

7.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 112(2): 375-382, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28154400

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is contingent on colonoscopy completion in patients with an abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Understanding system and patient factors affecting follow-up of abnormal screening tests is essential to optimize care for high-risk cohorts. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in an integrated safety-net system comprised of 11 primary-care clinics and one Gastroenterology referral unit and included patients 50-75 years, with a positive FIT between April 2012 and February 2015. RESULTS: Of the 2,238 patients identified, 1,245 (55.6%) completed their colonoscopy within 1-year of the positive FIT. The median time from positive FIT to colonoscopy was 184 days (interquartile range 140-232). Of the 13% of FIT positive patients not referred to gastroenterology, 49% lacked documentation addressing their abnormal result or counseling on the increased risk of CRC. Of the patients referred but who missed their appointments, 62% lacked documentation following up on the abnormal result in the absence of a completed colonoscopy. FIT positive patients never referred to gastroenterology or who missed their appointment after referrals were more likely to have comorbid conditions and documented illicit substance use compared with patients who completed a colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite access to colonoscopy and a shared electronic health record system, colonoscopy completion after an abnormal FIT is inadequate within this safety-net system. Inadequate follow-up is in part explained by inappropriate screening, but there is an absence of clear documentation and systematic workflow within both primary care and GI specialty care addressing abnormal FIT results.


Assuntos
Colonoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Fezes/química , Gastroenterologia , Hemoglobinas/análise , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Asiático , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Aconselhamento , Documentação , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Idioma , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estado Civil/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , São Francisco/epidemiologia , Fatores Sexuais , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , População Branca
8.
J Gen Intern Med ; 25 Suppl 4: S610-4, 2010 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20737236

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Team care can improve management of chronic conditions, but implementing a team approach in an academic primary care clinic presents unique challenges. OBJECTIVES: To implement and evaluate the Teamlet Model, which uses health coaches working with primary care physicians to improve care for patients with diabetes and/or hypertension in an academic practice. DESIGN: Process and outcome measures were compared before and during the intervention in patients seen with the Teamlet Model and in a comparison patient group. PARTICIPANTS: First year family medicine residents, medical assistants, health workers, and adult patients with either type 2 diabetes or hypertension in a large public health clinic. INTERVENTION: Health coaches, in coordination with resident primary care physicians, met with patients before and after clinic visits and called patients between visits. MEASUREMENTS: Measurement of body mass index, assessment of smoking status, and formulation of a self-management plan prior to and during the intervention period for patients in the Teamlet Model group. Testing for LDL and HbA1C and the proportion of patients at goal for blood pressure, LDL, and HbA1C in the Teamlet Model and comparison groups in the year prior to and during implementation. RESULTS: Teamlet patients showed improvement in all measures, though improvement was significant only for smoking, BMI, and self-management plan documentation and testing for LDL (p = 0.02), with a trend towards significance for LDL at goal (p = 0.07). Teamlet patients showed a greater, but non-significant, increase in the proportion of patients tested for HbA1C and proportion reaching goal for blood pressure, HgbA1C, and LDL compared to the comparison group patients. The difference for blood pressure was marginally significant (p = 0.06). In contrast, patients in the comparison group were significantly more likely to have had testing for LDL (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Teamlet Model may improve chronic care in academic primary care practices.


Assuntos
Aconselhamento Diretivo/métodos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Modelos Educacionais , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Índice de Massa Corporal , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Doença Crônica , Diabetes Mellitus/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Hipertensão/prevenção & controle , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Fumar
9.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 82(4): 1517-9, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16996971
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA