Chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors for the first-line treatment of unresectable thymic carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study.

Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare malignant tumor with a poor prognosis, and there is currently limited data on the use of immunotherapy in patients with unresectable TC. In this study, data of patients with unresectable TC diagnosed from January 2017 were retrospectively collected from multiple centers. Treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), survival-independent prognostic factor, and adverse events (AEs) were further analyzed. As a result, a total of 93 patients with unresectable TC were enrolled, of which 54 received first-line chemotherapy, and 39 received chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The objective response rate was 50% (27/54) in the chemotherapy group and 76.9% (30/39) in the chemotherapy plus ICIs group. The chemotherapy plus ICIs group achieved significant median PFS benefit (8.8 vs. 34.9 months, p < .001) and median OS benefit (41.8 months vs. not reached, p = .025). Multivariate analysis showed that ICIs and local therapy were independent prognostic factors for PFS. In addition, 17 patients developed immune-related AEs (IRAEs), of which 15 (38.5%) had Grade 1 or 2 IRAEs and 2 (5.1%) had Grade 3 IRAEs in the chemotherapy plus ICIs group. In conclusion, the efficacy of chemotherapy plus ICIs is superior to chemotherapy, and the adverse effects are manageable in patients with unresectable TC.

Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Efficacy and Immune-Related Adverse Events of First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Background: Currently, there is a lack of well-established markers to predict the efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) are associated with prognosis in several tumors, whereas their predictive role in SCLC remains unclear. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, involving extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) patients who received first-line chemoimmunotherapy between January 2020 and December 2021. Peripheral blood biomarkers were extracted from medical records and their correlation with prognosis and immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) was analyzed. Results: A total of 114 patients were included. Patients with a low PLR, high ALI and high PNI had prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those with a high PLR, low ALI and low PNI. Patients with a low NLR, low PLR, high ALI and high PNI had prolonged overall survival (OS) compared to those with a high NLR, high PLR, low ALI and low PNI. Cox regression model showed that PNI was an independent risk factor for both PFS and OS. ROC curve showed that PNI outperforms NLR, PLR and ALI in predicting both PFS and OS. The PNI-based nomogram demonstrated strong predictive capability for both PFS and OS. In addition, there was a significant correlation between PNI and IRAEs. Conclusion: A high baseline PNI might be associated with improved prognosis and the occurrence of IRAEs in ES-SCLC patients treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy.

QL1706 (anti-PD-1 IgG4/CTLA-4 antibody) plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-cohort, phase II study.

First-line chemoimmunotherapy (with or without bevacizumab) has improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, this open-label, multi-cohort phase II study (NCT05329025) was done to investigate the safety and efficacy of QL1706 (a single bifunctional MabPair product against PD-1 and CTLA-4) and chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in this population. Patients were enrolled into five different cohorts based on genotype (cohorts 1-4, epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] wild-type; cohort 5, EGFR-mutant and progressed on EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs]). Between June 11, 2021 and December 29, 2021, 91 patients were enrolled. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included decreased appetite (60 [65.9%]), anemia (60 [65.9%]), infusion-related reactions (48 [52.7%]), and pruritus (44 [48.4%]). Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 30 (33.0%) patients. Twenty-seven (45%) patients with wild-type EGFR achieved partial response (PR) (objective response rate [ORR] = 45%) and had a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.2-9.7). For 31 patients harboring mutated EGFR, 17 (54.8%) achieved PR (ORR = 54.8%), with an mPFS of 8.5 months (95% CI: 5.72-not evaluable). Overall, QL1706 plus chemotherapy, regardless of having bevacizumab, was generally tolerable and had promising antitumor activity for EGFR wild-type advanced NSCLC in first-line setting. Moreover, QL1706 plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab showed favorable antitumor activity for patients who had EGFR mutated NSCLC but failed in TKI therapy, demonstrating a potential for treating this population.

Cerebrospinal fluid immunological cytokines predict intracranial tumor response to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases.

Background: Immunotherapy has shown intracranial efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases. However, predictive biomarkers for intracranial response to immunotherapy are lacking. This post-hoc analysis aimed to explore the potential of immunological cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to predict intracranial tumor response to immunotherapy in patients with brain metastases. Methods: Treatment-naive NSCLC patients with brain metastases who received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy were enrolled. Paired plasma and CSF samples were prospectively collected at baseline and the first treatment assessment. All samples were analyzed for 92 immuno-oncology cytokines using Olink's panels. Results: A total of 28 patients were included in this analysis. At baseline, most immunological cytokines were significantly lower in CSF than in plasma, whereas a subset comprising CD83, PTN, TNFRSF21, TWEAK, ICOSLG, DCN, IL-8, and MCP-1, was increased in CSF. Baseline CSF levels of LAMP3 were significantly higher in patients with intracranial tumor response, while the levels of CXCL10, IL-12, CXCL11, IL-18, TIE2, HGF, and PDCD1 were significantly lower. Furthermore, the CXCL10, CXCL11, TIE2, PDCD1, IL-18, HGF, and LAMP3 in CSF were also significantly associated with intracranial progression-free survival for immunotherapy. The identified cytokines in CSF were decreased at the first treatment evaluation in patients with intracranial tumor response. The logistic CSF immuno-cytokine model yielded an AUC of 0.91, as compared to PD-L1 expression (AUC of 0.72). Conclusions: Immunological cytokines in CSF could predict intracranial tumor response to immunotherapy in NSCLC patients with brain metastases, and the findings warrant validation in a larger prospective cohort study. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04211090.

Impact of prophylactic dexamethasone on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Baseline corticosteroids exposure is associated with inferior clinical outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) axis blockade. Dexamethasone is a potent corticosteroid used in the prevention of chemotherapy-associated adverse events (CAAEs). OBJECTIVE: Since dexamethasone has immunosuppressive properties, this study attempted to elucidate its effects on the efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous NSCLC. METHODS: The study retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 254 advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients who received front-line treatment with a PD-1 pathway inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy at three academic institutions. The average dosage of prophylactic dexamethasone per chemotherapy cycle was calculated. Patients were divided into three groups based on the dose of dexamethasone: High-d (≥24 mg), Moderate-d (12-24 mg), and Low-d (<12 mg). Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess the correlation between the dosage of dexamethasone and progression-free survival (PFS). Logistic regression was used to assess the correlation between dexamethasone dosage and the occurrence of immune related adverse effects (irAE). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the differences in survival among the different dexamethasone dosage groups. RESULT: The dosage of prophylactic dexamethasone was not significantly correlated with PFS (Spearman's rho = -0.103, P = 0.098). Results from the univariate [hazard ratio (HR)Low-d/High-d, 1.00; P = 0.997; HRModerate-d/High-d, 0.85; P = 0.438] and multivariate (HRLow-d/High-d, 0.71; P = 0.174; HRModerate-d/High-d, 0.87; P = 0.512) analyses showed no significant association between dexamethasone and PFS. Dexamethasone did not have significant effect on the objective response rate, disease control rate or overall survival. The toxicity profiles of irAE were similar across all three groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the use of prophylactic dexamethasone does not have an adverse effect on the clinical outcomes of non-squamous NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 blockade therapy and chemotherapy. Routine use of dexamethasone for preventing CAAEs should be recommended for patients undergoing combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of the proposed bevacizumab biosimilar BAT1706 compared with reference bevacizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind, phase III study.

BACKGROUND: BAT1706 is a proposed biosimilar of bevacizumab (Avastin®). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of BAT1706 with that of EU-sourced reference bevacizumab (EU-bevacizumab) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to BAT1706 plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (BAT1706 arm) or EU-bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (EU-bevacizumab arm) given every 3 weeks for six cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with BAT1706 or EU-bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at week 18 (ORR18 ). Clinical equivalence was demonstrated if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the BAT1706:EU-bevacizumab ORR18 risk ratio was contained within the predefined equivalence margins of 0.75-1.33 (China National Medical Products Administration requirements), or 0.73-1.36 (US Food and Drug Administration), or if the 95% CI of the ORR18 risk difference between treatments was contained within the predefined equivalence margin of -0.12 to 0.15 (EMA requirements). RESULTS: In total, 649 randomized patients (BAT1706, n = 325; EU-bevacizumab, n = 324) received at least one cycle of combination treatment. The ORR18 was comparable between the BAT1706 and EU-bevacizumab arms (48.0% and 44.5%, respectively). The ORR18 risk ratio of 1.08 (90% CI: 0.94-1.24) and the ORR18 risk difference of 0.03 (95% CI: -0.04 to 0.11) were within the predefined equivalence margins, demonstrating the biosimilarity of BAT1706 and EU-bevacizumab. The safety profile of BAT1706 was consistent with that of EU-bevacizumab and no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, BAT1706 demonstrated clinical equivalence to EU-bevacizumab in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity.

The Effects of Drug Exposure and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms on Aaptinib-Induced Severe Toxicities in Solid Tumors.

To investigate the value of drug exposure and host germline genetic factors in predicting apatinib (APA)-related toxicities. METHOD: In this prospective study, plasma APA concentrations were quantified using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and 57 germline mutations were genotyped in 126 advanced solid tumor patients receiving 250 mg daily APA, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor II inhibitor. The correlation between drug exposure, genetic factors, and the toxicity profile was analyzed. RESULTS: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was more prone to APA-related toxicities and plasma concentrations of APA, and its main metabolite M1-1 could be associated with high-grade adverse events (AEs) (P < 0.01; M1-1, P < 0.01) and high-grade antiangiogenetic toxicities (APA, P = 0.034; P < 0.05), including hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome, in the subgroup of NSCLC. Besides, CYP2C9 rs34532201 TT carriers tended to have higher levels of APA (P < 0.001) and M1-1 (P < 0.01), whereas CYP2C9 rs1936968 GG carriers were predisposed to higher levels of M1-1 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Plasma APA and M1-1 exposures were able to predict severe AEs in NSCLC patients. Dose optimization and drug exposure monitoring might need consideration in NSCLC patients with CYP2C9 rs34532201 TT and rs1936968 GG. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Apatinib is an anti-VEGFR2 inhibitor for the treatment of multiple cancers. Though substantial in response, apatinib-induced toxicity has been a critical issue that is worth clinical surveillance. Few data on the role of drug exposure and genetic factors in apatinib-induced toxicity are available. Our study demonstrated a distinct drug-exposure relationship in NSCLC but not other tumors and provided invaluable evidence of drug exposure levels and single nucleotide polymorphisms as predictive biomarkers in apatinib-induced severe toxicities.

N6-Methyladenosine Promotes Translation of VEGFA to Accelerate Angiogenesis in Lung Cancer.

Angiogenesis is hijacked by cancer to support tumor growth. RNA modifications such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A) can regulate several aspects of cancer, including angiogenesis. Here, we find that m6A triggers angiogenesis in lung cancer by upregulating VEGFA, a central regulator of neovasculature and blood vessel growth. m6A-sequencing and functional studies confirmed that m6A modification of the 5'UTR (untranslated region) of VEGFA positively regulates its translation. Specifically, methylation of a 5'UTR internal ribosome entry site (IRES) recruited the YTHDC2/eIF4GI complex to trigger cap-independent translation initiation. Intriguingly, the m6A methylation site A856 of the 5'UTR was located within the conserved upstream open reading frame (uORF) of VEGFA IRES-A, which overcomes uORF-mediated translation suppression while facilitating G-quadruplex-induced translation of VEGFA. Targeted specific demethylation of VEGFA m6A significantly decreased expression of VEGFA and reduced lung cancer cell-driven angiogenesis. In vivo and clinical data confirmed the positive effects of m6A modification of VEGFA on angiogenesis and tumor growth of lung cancer. This study not only reveals that the m6A/VEGFA axis is a potential target for lung cancer therapy but also expands our understanding of the impact of m6A modification of IRES in the 5'UTR of mRNA on translation regulation. SIGNIFICANCE: Methylation of the 5'UTR IRES of VEGFA mRNA increases cap-independent translation via recruitment of the YTHDC2/eIF4GI complex, which stimulates angiogenesis to promote lung tumor growth.

Clinical efficacy and safety of individualized pembrolizumab administration based on pharmacokinetic in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective exploratory clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab is recommended with a fixed dose of 200 mg 3-weekly. We performed this study to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided pembrolizumab administration in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this prospective exploratory study, we enrolled advanced NSCLC patients in Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center. Eligible patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg 3-weekly with or without chemotherapy for four cycles, then for patients without progressive disease (PD), pembrolizumab was administrated in new dose-intervals according to steady state plasma-concentration (Css) of pembrolizumab until PD. We set the effective concentration (Ce) at 15 µg/ml and new dose-intervals (T) was calculated according to Css of pembrolizumab using following equation: Css × 21D = Ce (15 µg/ml) × T. Primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Besides, advanced NSCLC patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg 3-weekly and more than four cycles in our center were defined as the history-controlled cohort. Patients with Css of pembrolizumab underwent genetic polymorphism analysis of variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) region in neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05226728. RESULTS: A total 33 patients received pembrolizumab in new adjusted dose-intervals. The Css of pembrolizumab ranged from 11.01 to 61.21 µg/ml, 30 patients need prolonged intervals (22-80d) and 3 shortened intervals (15-20 d). In PK-guided cohort, the median PFS was 15.1 months and ORR 57.6 %, whereas in history-controlled cohort was 7.7 months and ORR 48.2 %. The immune-related adverse events were 15.2 % and 17.9 % between two cohort. The VNTR3/VNTR3 genotype of FcRn had significantly higher Css of pembrolizumab than VNTR2/VNTR3 (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: PK-guided pembrolizumab administration showed promising clinical efficacy and manageable toxicity. Meanwhile less frequent dosing of pembrolizumab by PK-guided could reduce financial toxicity potentially. This provided an alternative rational therapeutic strategy of pembrolizumab in advanced NSCLC.

Efficacy, Safety, and Health-Related Quality of Life With Camrelizumab Plus Pemetrexed and Carboplatin as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC With Brain Metastases (CAP-BRAIN): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic treatment options for NSCLC with brain metastases (BMs) are scarce. We evaluated the activity and safety of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with BMs. METHODS: This was a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial (NCT04211090) conducted at seven hospitals in China. Eligible patients had treatment-naive metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC and BMs that were asymptomatic or symptoms controlled with dehydration therapy and no previous systemic treatment or local therapy for the target brain lesion. Patients received camrelizumab (200 mg) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 5) intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for four cycles, followed by maintenance with camrelizumab (200 mg) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary end point was confirmed intracranial objective response rate according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, which was primarily analyzed in the efficacy analysis set (EAS). RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were enrolled and treated (full analysis set), with 40 patients having at least one post-baseline tumor assessment (EAS). As of August 30, 2022, median follow-up duration was 12.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.2-17.3). The confirmed intracranial objective response rate was 52.5% (95% CI: 36.1-68.5) in EAS and 46.7% (95% CI: 31.7-62.1) in full analysis set. The extracranial objective response rate was 47.5% (95% CI: 31.5-63.9) and 42.2% (95% CI: 27.7-57.8), respectively. Median intracranial progression-free survival was 7.6 months (95% CI: 4.6-not reached [NR]), median overall progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.4-NR), and median overall survival was 21.0 months (95% CI: 15.9-NR). The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutrophil count decrease (six [13.3%]) and anemia (four [8.9%]). One treatment-related death occurred owing to immune-related pneumonia. Linear mixed-effects model displayed that a positive trend for improvement in cognitive function and quality of life was observed based on Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung scores (p = 0.025, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Camrelizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin was found to have an activity with manageable toxicity and to improve cognitive function and quality of life for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with BMs in the first-line setting.

Survival Benefits of Radiotherapy and Surgery in Lung Cancer Brain Metastases with Poor Prognosis Factors.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy and surgery are the standard local treatments for lung cancer brain metastases (BMs). However, limited studies focused on the effects of radiotherapy and surgery in lung cancer BMs with poor prognosis factors. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 714 patients with lung cancer BMs. Analyses of overall survival (OS) and risk factors for OS were assessed by the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Age ≥ 65 years, a Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≤ 70, anaplastic large-cell lymphoma kinase (ALK)/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild type, and extracranial metastases were related to poor prognosis. Patients were stratified according to these poor prognosis factors. In patients with the ALK/EGFR wild type, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and surgery improved the OS of patients. WBRT and SRS were the independent protective factors for OS. In patients with extracranial metastases, patients who received WBRT plus SRS or WBRT alone had longer OS than those who did not receive radiotherapy. WBRT plus SRS and WBRT were the independent protective factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy and surgery are associated with improved survival for lung cancer BMs with the ALK/EGFR wild type. Radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in lung cancer BMs with extracranial metastases.

Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy vs Gefitinib Alone in Untreated EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients With Brain Metastases: The GAP BRAIN Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study.

Importance: Use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is the standard therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases. Several studies have shown that adding chemotherapy to EGFR-TKIs could improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC; however, the efficacy of these agents in patients with brain metastases remains unclear. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib plus chemotherapy (pemetrexed with platinum) compared with gefitinib alone in patients with untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC brain metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label prospective, multicenter, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted in 6 centers in China from January 13, 2016, to August 27, 2021. The median follow-up time was 21.1 months (IQR, 13.5-31.8 months). Patients with untreated confirmed brain metastases and EGFR-sensitive mutated NSCLC were enrolled. Interventions: The eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive gefitinib plus chemotherapy or gefitinib alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was intracranial PFS; secondary end points included PFS, overall survival (OS), intracranial objective response rate, overall objective response rate, and safety. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Results: A total of 161 patients (87 [54.0%] women; mean [SD] age, 55 [9.8] years; range, 26-80 years) were enrolled and randomized to receive gefitinib (n = 81) or gefitinib plus chemotherapy (n = 80). The median intracranial PFS was 15.6 months (95% CI, 14.3-16.9 months) in the gefitinib plus chemotherapy group vs 9.1 months (95% CI, 8.0-10.2 months) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.53; P < .001). Similarly, the median PFS was significantly longer with gefitinib plus chemotherapy than gefitinib alone (16.3; 95% CI, 14.4-18.2 months vs 9.5; 95% CI, 8.3-10.8 months; P < .001). Gefitinib plus chemotherapy had a better intracranial objective response rate (85.0%; 95% CI, 77.0%-93.0% vs 63.0%; 95% CI, 52.2%-73.7%; P = .002) and overall objective response rate (80.0%; 95% CI, 71.0%-89.0% vs 64.2%; 95% CI, 53.5%-74.9%; P = .03) than gefitinib alone. At data cutoff, the median OS was also significantly longer in the gefitinib plus chemotherapy group vs the gefitinib group (35.0 vs 28.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.99; P = .04). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were more common with gefitinib plus chemotherapy, most of which were manageable. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, gefitinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved intracranial PFS, PFS, and OS compared with gefitinib alone in patients with untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC brain metastases and could be an optional first-line treatment for these patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01951469.

The maximum tumor growth rate predicts clinical outcomes of patients with small-cell lung cancer undergoing first-line chemotherapy plus immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

BACKGROUND: Currently, no biomarkers can accurately predict survival outcomes in patients with SCLC undergoing treatment. Tumor growth rate (TGR; percent size change per month [%/m]) is suggested as an imaging predictor of response to anti-cancer treatment. We aimed to evaluate the predictive role of the maximum TGR (TGRmax) for outcomes of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy plus immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. METHODS: Patients with SCLC receiving first-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy were analyzed within this retrospective study. The X-tile program was used to identify the cut-off value of TGRmax based on maximum progression-free survival (PFS) stratification. The Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of the presence of TGRmax on PFS and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 104 patients were evaluated. Median (range) TGRmax was -33.9 (-65.2 to 21.6) %/m and the optimal cut-off value of TGRmax was -34.3%/m. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with TGRmax > -34.3%/m was associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.81; 95% CI, 1.71-4.63; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.41-7.08; p = 0.005). In patients who received partial response (PR), Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed that superior PFS and OS (p = 0.005 and p = 0.009, respectively) benefit was observed when TGRmax ≤-34.3%/m. CONCLUSIONS: SCLC patients with TGRmax > -34.3%/m had worse PFS and OS in first-line ICI plus platin-based chemotherapy. TGRmax could independently serve as an early biomarker to predict the benefit from chemoimmunotherapy.

Androgen Signaling Contributes to Sex Differences in Cancer by Inhibiting NF-κB Activation in T Cells and Suppressing Antitumor Immunity.

Sex is known to be an important factor in the incidence, progression, and outcome of cancer. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms could help improve cancer prevention and treatment. Here, we demonstrated a crucial role of antitumor immunity in the sex differences in cancer. Consistent with observations in human cancers, male mice showed accelerated tumor progression compared with females, but these differences were not observed in immunodeficient mice. Androgen signaling suppressed T-cell immunity against cancer in males. Mechanistically, androgen-activated androgen receptor upregulated expression of USP18, which inhibited TAK1 phosphorylation and the subsequent activation of NF-κB in antitumor T cells. Reduction of testosterone synthesis by surgical castration or using the small-molecular inhibitor abiraterone significantly enhanced the antitumor activity of T cells in male mice and improved the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Together, this study revealed a novel mechanism contributing to sex differences in cancer. These results indicate that inhibition of androgen signaling is a promising approach to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy in males. SIGNIFICANCE: Androgen signaling induces immunosuppression in cancer by blocking T-cell activity through upregulation of USP18 and subsequent inhibition of NF-κB activity, providing a targetable axis to improve antitumor immunity in males.

Safety and efficacy of immunotherapy rechallenge following checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in advanced lung cancer patients: a retrospective multi-center cohort study.

Background: Checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is one of the most fatal immune-related adverse events (irAE). However, only limited data are available on rechallenge with ICIs after CIP. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of rechallenge after CIP in patients with advanced lung cancer to identify the potential populations that would benefit. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of advanced lung cancer patients who received further ICI treatment (rechallenge) or did not undergo re-administration after grade ≥1 CIP between May 2017 and May 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated from first or second ICI initiation to disease progression (PFS1 and PFS2, respectively), death, or last follow-up (OS1 and OS2, respectively). The recurrence of CIP and new irAEs in these patients after ICI rechallenge were calculated. Results: Among 107 patients afflicted with CIP, 45 (42.1%) received ICI rechallenge. Multivariate analysis showed that severe grade (grades ≥3) and ground-glass opacity of pneumonitis lesions were negatively associated with rechallenge. Following rechallenge, 9 (20.0%) patients developed recurrent pneumonitis, and 11 (24.4%) developed a new irAE. Severe grade of CIP and poor performance status at initial CIP as well as levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP), and absolute white blood cell and neutrophil counts at the time of ICI rechallenge were associated with a higher recurrence rate. The median (95% confidence interval) PFS1 and PFS2 were 17.9 (9.9-24.2) and 15.5 (5.5-25.6) months, respectively. The median (95% confidence interval) OS1 and OS2 were 23.5 (16.5-30.5) and 18.4 (10.1-26.7) months, respectively. Lower OS2 was observed in patients with severe grade of CIP and poor performance status at the initial CIP, recurrence of CIP, and in patients with high levels of CRP and IL-6 at rechallenge. Only IL-6 was found to affect OS2 on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: ICI rechallenge following CIP may be a promising treatment for patients with advanced lung cancer, particularly in those with low-grade of CIP and good performance status at initial CIP, and low levels of IL-6 and CRP at the time of initial challenge. Prospective studies are needed for further verification.

Dynamic monitoring of cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumor DNA to identify unique genetic profiles of brain metastatic tumors and better predict intracranial tumor responses in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a prospective cohort study (GASTO 1028).

BACKGROUND: Due to the blood-brain barrier, plasma is not an ideal source to evaluate the genetic characteristics of central nervous system tumors. Thus, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is becoming an alternative biopsy type to evaluate the genetic landscape of intracranial tumors. We aimed to explore the genetic profiles of CSF-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to predict intracranial tumor responses and monitor mutational evolution during the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 92 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients with brain metastases. Paired CSF and plasma samples were collected at baseline, 8 weeks after treatment initiation, and disease progression. All samples underwent next-generation sequencing of 425 cancer-related genes. RESULTS: At baseline, the positive detection rates of ctDNA in CSF, plasma, and extracranial tumors were 63.7% (58/91), 91.1% (82/90), and 100% (58/58), respectively. A high level of genetic heterogeneity was observed between paired CSF and plasma, while concordance in driver mutations was also observed. A higher number of unique copy number variations was detected in CSF-ctDNA than in plasma. ctDNA positivity of CSF samples at baseline was associated with poor outcomes (HR=2.565, P=0.003). Moreover, patients with ≥ 50% reductions in the concentrations of CSF ctDNA after 8 weeks of treatment had significantly longer intracranial progression-free survivals (PFS) than patients with < 50% reductions in CSF ctDNA concentrations (13.27 months vs 6.13 months, HR=0.308, P=0.017). A ≥ 50% reduction in CSF ctDNA concentrations had better concordance with radiographic intracranial tumor responses than plasma. A ≥ 50% reduction in plasma ctDNA concentrations was also associated with longer extracranial PFS (11.57 months vs 6.20 months, HR=0.406, P=0.033). Based on clonal evolution analyses, the accumulation of subclonal mutations in CSF ctDNA was observed after 8 weeks of treatment. The clonal mutations that remained in more than 80% in CSF after 8 weeks also predicted shorter intracranial PFS (HR=3.785, P=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: CSF ctDNA exhibited unique genetic profiles of brain metastases, and dynamic changes in CSF ctDNA could better predict intracranial tumor responses and track clonal evolution during treatment in NSCLC patients with brain metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03257735.

RNA m1A methylation regulates glycolysis of cancer cells through modulating ATP5D.

Studies on biological functions of RNA modifications such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in mRNA have sprung up in recent years, while the roles of N1-methyladenosine (m1A) in cancer progression remain largely unknown. We find m1A demethylase ALKBH3 can regulate the glycolysis of cancer cells via a demethylation activity dependent manner. Specifically, sequencing and functional studies confirm that ATP5D, one of the most important subunit of adenosine 5'-triphosphate synthase, is involved in m1A demethylase ALKBH3-regulated glycolysis of cancer cells. The m1A modified A71 at the exon 1 of ATP5D negatively regulates its translation elongation via increasing the binding with YTHDF1/eRF1 complex, which facilitates the release of message RNA (mRNA) from ribosome complex. m1A also regulates mRNA stability of E2F1, which directly binds with ATP5D promoter to initiate its transcription. Targeted specific demethylation of ATP5D m1A by dm1ACRISPR system can significantly increase the expression of ATP5D and glycolysis of cancer cells. In vivo data confirm the roles of m1A/ATP5D in tumor growth and cancer progression. Our study reveals a crosstalk of mRNA m1A modification and cell metabolism, which expands the understanding of such interplays that are essential for cancer therapeutic application.