RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the association between lateral femoral condyle ratio (LFCR) measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rerupture after anatomic ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and to compare the diagnostic accuracy between MRI and radiograph measurements. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent anatomic ACLR in our institution between 2015 and 2018. Patients who experienced rerupture after ACLR were identified and matched 1:1 with control patients who showed no evidence of graft failure during a minimum 48-month follow-up. The matching criteria included age, sex, and body mass index. LFCR was measured on MRI scans and radiographs of the affected limb. Patients' characteristics, surgical features, and anatomic measurements were compared between groups. Conditional logistic regression was performed to investigate whether MRI-measured LFCR is a risk factor for ACL rerupture. The optimal cutoff value was determined by receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). Delong's test was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy between MRI and radiograph measurements. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients who sustained ACL rerupture were included and matched with 72 control subjects. Compared to patients with intact ACLR, those who sustained ACL rerupture showed a significant increase in LFCR on MRI scans (63.38% ± 2.26% [95% CI, 62.84%-63.91%] vs 61.10% ± 2.19% [95% CI, 60.59%-61.61%], P < .001). An MRI-measured LFCR >62.18% was set as the cutoff point to discern patients at a higher risk of graft failure after anatomic ACLR, with sensitivity and specificity of 75.0% and 70.8%, respectively. MRI-measured LFCR demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy during ROC curve analysis, achieving a higher area under the curve compared to radiograph-measured LFCR (0.783 ± 0.051 vs 0.668 ± 0.060, P = .041). CONCLUSIONS: The study found that MRI-measured LFCR was associated with ACL rerupture. A cutoff value of 62.18% was determined, which can help identify patients at a higher risk of rerupture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted double-bundle medial patellofemoral complex reconstruction (MPFC-R). METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out among adult patients who experienced at least 2 patellar dislocations and underwent primary arthroscopically assisted MPFC-R between January 2014 and November 2019. Dejour classification, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, and patellar height (with Insall-Salvati index) were measured. Pre- and postoperative patellar tilt were compared. Information on outcome scores, ability to return to sports, postoperative recurrent dislocations, and complications was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 42 MPFC-Rs in 39 patients were included. Mean age at surgery was 22.2 ± 7.6 years; 69.2% of patients were female. Mean follow-up was 47.3 ± 20.2 months. Seventy-four percent of cases had Dejour B (19.0%), C (33.3%), and D (21.4%) trochlear dysplasia; mean TT-TG distance was 19.6 ± 3.5 mm, and mean Insall-Salvati index was 1.21 ± 0.17. Mean patellar tilt decreased from 27.6 ± 11.6° to 9.4 ± 6.5° (P < .001). All patients had statistically significant (P < .001) improvement in mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (44.9 ± 18.2 to 87.5 ± 6.9), Lysholm (61.4 ± 16.6 to 94.1 ± 6.4), Kujala (56.0 ± 16.8 to 92.9 ± 5.3), and Tegner score (2.7 ± 1.3 to 4.6 ± 1.4). The majority of patients (96.9%) returned to sports, with 90.3% returning to the same or greater level of activity. No postoperative dislocations or subluxations were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopically assisted double-bundle MPFC-R is a promising procedure to treat recurrent patellar instability at 2- to 7-year mid-term follow-up, despite the presence of trochlear dysplasia, elevated TT-TG distance and patellar alta. The improvement of IKDC score exceeded the minimal clinically important difference in 95.2% patients, and 66.7% surpassed the patient acceptable symptomatic state based on postoperative IKDC score with no redislocations being reported at latest follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series, retrospective.