Comparing patient global impression of severity and patient global impression of change to evaluate test-retest reliability of depression, non-small cell lung cancer, and asthma measures.

PURPOSE: Score reproducibility is an important measurement property of fit-for-purpose patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. It is commonly assessed via test-retest reliability, and best evaluated with a stable participant sample, which can be challenging to identify in diseases with highly variable symptoms. To provide empirical evidence comparing the retrospective (patient global impression of change [PGIC]) and current state (patient global impression of severity [PGIS]) approaches to identifying a stable subgroup for test-retest analyses, 3 PRO Consortium working groups collected data using both items as anchor measures. METHODS: The PGIS was completed on Day 1 and Day 8 + 3 for the depression and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) studies, and daily for the asthma study and compared between Day 3 and 10. The PGIC was completed on the final day in each study. Scores were compared using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for participants who reported "no change" between timepoints for each anchor. RESULTS: ICCs using the PGIS "no change" group were higher for depression (0.84 vs. 0.74), nighttime asthma (0.95 vs. 0.53) and daytime asthma (0.86 vs. 0.68) compared to the PGIC "no change" group. ICCs were similar for NSCLC (PGIS: 0.87; PGIC: 0.85). CONCLUSION: When considering anchor measures to identify a stable subgroup for test-retest reliability analyses, current state anchors perform better than retrospective anchors. Researchers should carefully consider the type of anchor selected, the time period covered, and should ensure anchor content is consistent with the target measure concept, as well as inclusion of both current and retrospective anchor measures.

Macrophage Activation Syndrome in a Case of Myasthenia Gravis with Concurrent Cytomegalovirus Infection.

OBJECTIVE: Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) or reactive hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) refers to a set of clinical symptoms caused by the excessive activation and proliferation of macrophages. It was linked with autoimmune disease such as systemic-onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and dermatomyositis, etc. Herein we report a case of myasthenia gravis (MG) with concurrent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection developed MAS. CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old female with history of MG for 2 years under stable control with azathioprine and prednisolone. She presented with persistent high fever for 2 weeks after an upper respiratory infection. Lab data revealed pancytopenia, elevated triglyceride, ferritin and C-reactive protein (CRP). A bone marrow aspiration confirmed hemophagocytosis. Investigation for occult infection revealed her plasma was positive for CMV IgG and IgM, and high for CMV viral load. She was then treated with 5 sessions of plasmapheresis and pulse steroid. Azathioprine was discontinued and replaced with cyclosporine. Gancylovir was given for her concurrent CMV infection. After 2 weeks of treatment, her fever gradually subsided, and her blood cell count, hepatobiliary enzymes, ferritin and CRP have returned to normal range. She was discharged in good recovery. CONCLUSION: MAS is a rare complication of systemic autoimmune disease with poor prognosis, which may be precipitated by concurrent infection. Early recognition of this syndrome and prompt immune modulation therapy is crucial for successful treatment.

Bitter melon seed oil increases mitochondrial content in gastrocnemius muscle and improves running endurance in sedentary C57BL/6J mice.

The α-eleostearic acid (α-ESA) in bitter melon seed oil (BMSO) is efficiently converted by the body into rumenic acid. The objective of this study was to investigate effects of BMSO on skeletal muscle fiber-type switch and endurance capacity in mice, with or without exercise training. In a 3×2 factorial design, C57BL/6J mice were fed a 30% high-fat diet composed of soybean oil, butter or a 1:1 mixture of BMSO and soybean oil, i.e., SB, BT and BM diets, respectively, and were allocated to be sedentary or undergo exercise (Ex). The Ex groups received a 15-min training regimen on a motorized treadmill 5 times a week. After 3-week intervention, endurance capacity was evaluated (total running time and distance until exhaustion). Mice fed a BM diet had significantly less body fat, with increased muscle percentage and improved endurance capacity. Combining sedentary and Ex groups, mice fed a BM diet ran 33% longer and 50% further than those fed SB, or 25% longer and 36% further than those fed BT (P<.01). The BM-diet-increased gastrocnemius cytochrome c protein and mitochondrial DNA content was more prominent in sedentary than in trained mice. Histochemical staining shows sedentary BM-fed mice had a higher succinate dehydrogenase activity among groups. Based on a reporter assay, rumenic acid, rather than α-ESA itself, activated PPARδ ligand binding domain. We concluded that BMSO improved endurance capacity via stimulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and function, potentially influencing muscle metabolism and fiber-type composition in sedentary mice.

The anti-adiposity effect of bitter melon seed oil is solely attributed to its fatty acid components.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is the leading chronic disease affecting people of all ages. The objective of this study was to optimize composition of a bitter melon seed oil (BMSO) product to maximize its anti-adiposity effect. METHODS: Bleaching oil, saponifiables and non-saponifiables were prepared from BMSO, with α-eleostearic acid (α-ESA) content in BMSO maintained in bleaching oil and saponifiables. C57BL/6 J mice were allocated into five groups (n = 10/group) to receive diet C [30% soybean oil (SBO)], BM [25% SBO + 5% BMSO], BMS, BMNS or BMD. For the three latter diets, saponifiables (hydrolyzed fatty acids from BMSO), non-saponifiables (excluding fatty acids from BMSO) or bleaching oil (excluding pigments from BMSO), respectively, were added in amount equivalent to their content in 5% BMSO and SBO was added to bring total fat to 30%. After 14 wk., indices associated with adiposity and safety, as well as lipid metabolic signaling in white adipose tissue (WAT), were measured. RESULTS: The body fat percentage of mice in group BM, BMS, BMNS, and BMD were 90 ± 26, 76 ± 21, 115 ± 30 and 95 ± 17% of that in group C. Based on body fat percentage and plasma leptin concentrations, an anti-adiposity effect was evident in groups BM, BMS and BMD (greatest effect in BMS). Histologically, inguinal fat had smaller adipocytes in groups BM, BMS and BMD (P < 0.05), but not in group BMNS, relative to group C. There were no differences among groups in blood pressure or heart rate. Moreover, Sirt1 mRNA levels in inguinal fat were significantly greater in groups BM, BMS and BMD than group C. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the anti-adiposity function of BMSO was solely attributed to the fatty acid fraction, with the free fatty acid form having the greatest effect.

Focusing on Core Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Symptomatic Adverse Events, Physical Function, and Disease-Related Symptoms.

Cancer clinical trials have relied on overall survival and measures of tumor growth or reduction to assess the efficacy of a drug. However, benefits are often accompanied by significant symptomatic toxicities. The degree to which a therapy improves disease symptoms and introduces symptomatic toxicity affects how patients function in their daily lives. These concepts are important contributors to health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In this article, we discuss patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment in cancer trials and challenges relying solely on static multi-item HRQOL instruments. We propose focusing on three separate measures of well-defined concepts: symptomatic adverse events, physical function, and disease-related symptoms, which are key contributors to the effect of a therapy on HRQOL. Separate measures of these three concepts may facilitate the incorporation of emerging contemporary instruments that can tailor the PRO assessment strategy to different trial contexts. Irrespective of the PRO measures used, continued improvement in trial design and conduct is crucial to decrease missing data and optimize the quality of PRO information. International stakeholder collaboration and continued research into optimal practices for PRO and other clinical outcome assessments are necessary to advance a common framework for generating and reporting rigorous patient-centered data from cancer clinical trials.

Immunocapture couples with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for rapid detection of type 1 dengue virus.

A facile method for accurate detection of type 1 dengue virus (DV1) infection from complex biological mixtures, using type specific immunocapture coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), was developed. The biological mixtures were treated with magnetic particles coated with a monoclonal antibody directly against type 1 dengue virus. After immunocapture purification, the DV1 was eluted with 30% acetic acid, directly spotted with seed-layer method, and analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS for DV1 capsid protein. The detection limit of the assay was ∼10(5)pfu/mL by MALDI-TOF MS. The immunocapture could unambiguously differentiate the DV1 from other serotypes of the dengue viruses and Japanese encephalitis virus, and could be used as a specific probe to detect DV1 from complex biological mixtures.

Measuring patient experiences in Fabry disease: validation of the Fabry-specific Pediatric Health and Pain Questionnaire (FPHPQ).

INTRODUCTION: Common symptoms for children with Anderson-Fabry Disease (FD) such as acroparaesthesia and gastrointestinal manifestations can only be objectively assessed in patients using a valid instrument. To date, no such instrument exists. METHODS: A preliminary 40-item measure of symptoms and experience with FD, the Fabry-specific Paediatric Health and Pain Questionnaire (FPHPQ) was developed, but lacked a formal assessment of its measurement properties. The FPHPQ was used in the Fabry Outcome Survey (FOS), a registry for all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of FD who are receiving agalsidase alfa, or are treatment naïve and who are managed by physicians participating in FOS. After an item analysis to explore how items performed and combined into domains, a battery of psychometric analyses was performed to assess the measurement properties of this new instrument. RESULTS: Eighty-seven children (ages 4-18 years) completed the questionnaire. Twenty-three items in three subscales of the questionnaire emerged: pain associated with heat or exertion, pain associated with cold, and abdominal pain and fatigue symptoms. Internal consistency reliability for all three subscales was good (Cronbach alpha ≥ 0.84). Reliability was equally high for all age groups (4-7, 8-12, and 13-18). Test-retest reliability was high for all three subscales (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.74). Construct validity was demonstrated by moderate correlation with brief pain inventory (BPI), KINDL, and EQ-5D. Known group validity showed all subscales were able to discriminate between Fabry disease severity groups as classified by above or below median of the FOS MSSI (Mainz Severity Score Index) grade. The heat or exertion subscale was responsive to change in symptoms between responders and non-responders as defined by change in EQ-5D index scores between the first and second visit. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results indicate that the measurement properties of FPHPQ are valid and reliable for assessing patient-reported symptoms of FD. The questionnaire could be a useful tool for clinicians to understand the progression of disease and monitor treatment effects. FPHPQ will be further validated and refined as the FOS registry is continuously adding more patients.

Development and validation of a composite score based on clinically meaningful events for the opioid-related symptom distress scale.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a composite score based on clinically meaningful events (CMEs) for the opioid-related symptom distress scale (OR-SDS) that would be appropriate for use in postoperative clinical trials. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from 2 multi-site Phase III randomized clinical safety trials: a general surgery trial (N = 1,050) and a coronary artery bypass graft surgery trial (N = 1,636). Validating measures include daily opioid consumption and physician and patient global evaluations of study medication. We empirically defined CMEs for each symptom, using factor analysis and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic analysis of the severity and frequency items of the OR-SDS. Construct validity was examined by testing hypotheses of relationships between composite CME scores and opioid consumption and physician and patient evaluations of study medication. RESULTS: Hypotheses supporting the construct validity of the CME-based composite score were confirmed. Significant associations were found between higher numbers of CMEs with greater opioid consumption and lower likelihood of a positive evaluation of the study medication. CONCLUSIONS: The OR-SDS CME-based composite score demonstrates evidence of construct validity and appears appropriate for use in evaluating patients' opioid-related side effect burden in future postoperative clinical trials.

Reduction in opioid-related adverse events and improvement in function with parecoxib followed by valdecoxib treatment after non-cardiac surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal pain therapy including cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors can result in optimal pain management with decreased opioid use and fewer opioid-related adverse events. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) help identify benefits in reduced opioid use and increased pain control. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, patients (n = 1062) undergoing major non-cardiac elective surgery received either parenteral parecoxib for 3 days or placebo then oral valdecoxib or placebo for a total of 10 days, with both arms being allowed additional opioid analgesia. Clinically meaningful opioid-related adverse events were assessed daily using the Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS). Pain severity and interference with function were evaluated daily using the modified Brief Pain Inventory exploratory form (mBPI-e). Additional validation work was undertaken to understand the psychometric properties of the two PROs. Detailed clinical results were reported elsewhere. RESULTS: Patients receiving parecoxib/valdecoxib achieved significantly better pain control and consumed 37% and 28% less opioid medication than the placebo group on day 2 and day 3, respectively. Over the 10-day treatment period, patients receiving parecoxib/valdecoxib consumed 31% less opioid medication. This coincided with significantly fewer (p < 0.0001) OR-SDS clinically meaningful events (CMEs) and lower mBPI-e scores from days 2-10 in the parecoxib/valdecoxib group compared with the placebo group. On day 3, the percentage of patients reporting one, two or three CMEs in the parecoxib/valdecoxib versus placebo group was 11.6% versus 13.0%, 2.3% versus 5.1%, and 0.8% versus 2.3%, respectively. The mean (+/- standard error) mBPI-e pain severity scores over days 2-10 were 2.47 +/- 0.04 for the parecoxib/valdecoxib group and 3.01 +/- 0.04 for the placebo group, and the mean mBPI-e pain interference scores were 1.73 +/- 0.04 and 2.19 +/- 0.04, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving parecoxib/valdecoxib had less pain interference on physical functioning, required less opioid medication and experienced fewer clinically meaningful opioid-related adverse events than patients receiving placebo.

Linking pain items from two studies onto a common scale using item response theory.

This study examined two approaches to linking items from two pain surveys to form a single item bank with a common measurement scale. Secondary analysis of two independent surveys: Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials Survey with Main Survey (959 chronic pain patients; 42 pain items) and Pain Module (n=148; 36 pain items), and Center on Outcomes, Research and Education Survey (400 cancer patients; 43 pain items). There were common items included among the three data sets. In the first approach, all items were calibrated to an item response theory (IRT) model simultaneously, and in the second approach, items were calibrated separately and then the scales were transformed to a common metric. The two approaches produced similar linking results across the two sets of pain interference items because there was sufficient number of common items and large enough sample size. For pain intensity, simultaneous calibration yielded more stable results. Separated calibration yielded an unsatisfactory linking result for pain intensity because of a single common item with small sample size. The results suggested that a simultaneous IRT calibration method produces the more stable item parameters across independent samples, and hence, should be recommended for developing comprehensive item banks. Patient-reported health outcome surveys are often limited in sample sizes and the number of items owing to the difficulty of recruitment and the burden to the patients. As a result, the surveys either lack statistical power or are limited in scope. Using IRT methodology, survey data can be pooled to lend strength to each other to expand the scope and to increase the sample sizes.