Overall Survival and Exploratory Biomarker Analyses of Abemaciclib plus Trastuzumab with or without Fulvestrant versus Trastuzumab plus Chemotherapy in HR+, HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: The monarcHER trial has shown that abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, combined with fulvestrant and trastuzumab, improves progression-free survival (PFS) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-positive (HER2+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) compared with standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy combined with trastuzumab. We report the final overall survival (OS) analysis, updated safety and efficacy data, and exploratory biomarker results from monarcHER. PATIENTS AND METHODS: monarcHER (NCT02675231), a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial, enrolled 237 patients across Arm A (abemaciclib, trastuzumab, fulvestrant), Arm B (abemaciclib, trastuzumab), and Arm C (SOC chemotherapy, trastuzumab). Following the statistical plan, OS and PFS were estimated in all arms. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed on archival tissue. RESULTS: Median OS was 31.1 months in Arm A, 29.2 months in Arm B, and 20.7 months in Arm C [A vs. C: HR, 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.48-1.05; nominal two-sided P value 0.086; B vs. C: HR 0.83 (95% CI, 0.57-1.23); nominal two-sided P value 0.365]. Updated PFS and safety findings were consistent with previous results. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, neutrophil count decrease, and anemia. In exploratory RNA-seq analyses, Luminal subtypes were associated with longer PFS [8.6 vs. 5.4 months (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38-0.79)] and OS [31.7 vs. 19.7 months (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-1.00)] compared with non-Luminal. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase II trial, abemaciclib + trastuzumab ± fulvestrant numerically improved median OS in women with HR+, HER2+ ABC compared with SOC chemotherapy + trastuzumab.

Associations between R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score and survival outcomes in renal tumours.

OBJECTIVE: The radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score could be used to predict surgical outcomes and renal tumour aggressiveness. We aimed to analyse its associations with survival outcomes. METHODS: We included 1368 patients with sporadic, unilateral and non-metastatic renal tumours who received curative nephrectomy in Zhongshan Hospital from January 2009 to September 2019. Radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores were assigned by three urologists based on preoperative CT/MRI scans. Correlations between parameters or sum of radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores, overall survival and recurrence-free survival were analysed by Kaplan-Meier analyses and the multivariate Cox regression model. We further compared survival outcomes between patients who received partial nephrectomy and patients who received radical nephrectomy. RESULTS: We observed statistically significant associations between all components of radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores and oncologic outcomes, including R (radius) (overall survival, P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival , P < 0.001), E (exophytic/endophytic) (overall survival, P = 0.003; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001), N (nearness) (overall survival, P = 0.063; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001), A (anterior/posterior) (overall survival, P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival, P = 0.005), L (location) (overall survival, P = 0.008; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001) and suffix 'h' (overall survival, P = 0.237; recurrence-free survival, P = 0.034). Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were significantly different when stratified by radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score complexity group (overall survival, P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001). After adjusting for tumour stage and grade, radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score as continuous variables was an adverse independent risk factor for survival outcomes [P = 0.027, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.151 (1.016-1.303)] and recurrence-free survival [P < 0.001, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.299 (1.125-1.501)]. For tumours with radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores of 4 and 5, partial nephrectomy showed a survival benefit than radical nephrectomy. CONCLUSION: Both components and complexity groups of the radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score are associated with survival outcomes in renal tumour patients.

Abemaciclib plus trastuzumab with or without fulvestrant versus trastuzumab plus standard-of-care chemotherapy in women with HR+, HER2+ advanced breast cancer: plain language summary of the monarcHER study.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This article summarizes the results of a study called monarcHER. The study included participants with a certain type of aggressive breast cancer called HR+, HER2+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) that had their disease worsen or return after multiple previous therapies. This summary intends to help you understand the impact of a non-chemotherapy treatment called abemaciclib in people with HR+, HER2+ ABC. When the study was planned, HER2-targeted therapy (ie trastuzumab) was standard treatment and was typically combined with chemotherapy and endocrine therapy (ie fulvestrant). However drug resistance can develop when HER2+ targeted therapy is used for a long time, making it less effective and allowing cancer to grow or spread to other parts of the body. When this happens, few chemotherapy-free options are available. Because of the chemotherapy side effects, this is not desirable. There is an urgent need to develop new, effective, safe, and tolerable treatment options for patients with HR+, HER2+ ABC. The monarcHER study compared the effects of abemaciclib plus trastuzumab with or without fulvestrant compared to the standard of care treatment. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: Group A (abemaciclib, trastuzumab and fulvestrant), Group B (abemaciclib and trastuzumab), or Group C (trastuzumab and standard of care chemotherapy). The study compared the length of time patients took study treatments without worsening or dying from their breast cancer. This is called the progression free survival (PFS). Participants in Group A had a longer median PFS than those in groups B and C (8.3 months, 5.7 months and 5.7 months respectively). There was no notable difference in PFS between participants in Groups B and C. Additionally, the study looked at the side effects with each treatment group. The most common side effect which is considered severe or lifethreatening was neutropenia, defined as decreased white blood cell levels. Neutropenia may lead to an increased risk of getting infections. However, the percentage of patients experiencing neutropenia was similar in all groups A, B and C (27%, 22% and 26%, respectively). Patients in groups A (79%) and B (78%) who received abemaciclib experienced similar rates of diarrhea. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: The data from the monarcHER study suggest that the combination of abemaciclib, trastuzumab, and fulvestrant may offer a chemotherapy-free option for patients with HR+, HER2+ ABC who have experienced worsening of disease despite multiple prior therapies.

Blood biomarkers in the application of diagnosis and prediction of overall survival for 1089 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Previous studies have indicated that some blood metrics play a crucial role in the diagnostic and prognostic values of various solid tumours. However, their comprehensive and unbiased comparison for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has not been performed. Twenty blood metrics evaluated in tumours or noncancerous diseases were selected. We selected 1089 patients with NPC and analyzed the relationship between these metrics, clinical characteristics, and overall survival (OS). The albumin and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) exhibited a high area under the curve (AUC) value (> 0.7) together with high "sensitivity (Sen) + specificity (Spe) (> 1.5)" or Youden index (> 0.5) when compared to healthy populations. In comparing NPC and nasal polyps, 9 of 20 blood metrics showed a high AUC value (> 0.7). However, only the PNI and international normalised ratio show a sufficiently high Sen + Spe or Youden Index. None of them could distinguish the status of the TNM classification well. Only the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) could predict the OS of patients with NPC (cut-off, 4.91; p = 0.0069). Blood metrics as non-invasive biomarkers are valuable tools for clinical management. Among these indicators, PNI is the most ideal indicator to distinguish NPC from healthy and nasal polyps. The LMR has good prognostic value.

Designing a Compact Filtering Quasi-Yagi Antenna with Multiple Radiation Nulls Using Embedded Resistor-Loaded Arms.

In this paper, a compact quasi-Yagi antenna with embedded resistor-loaded arms is proposed to obtain a filtering response with four radiation nulls. The embedded resistor-loaded arms achieve two additional radiation nulls caused by reverse currents and absorb the unwanted out-of-band resonant points brought by themselves. The director close to the driver provides a resonant point and a radiation null caused by opposite currents between the driver and the director. Compared with other filtering quasi-Yagi antennas, the proposed one can achieve a filtering response with a compact size along the endfire direction. For demonstration, a balun-integrated prototype covering the 5G band N78 (3.3-3.8 GHz) is designed with the size along the endfire direction (without ground) of 0.13 λ0 (λ0 is the wavelength in the free space at center frequency), and the measured results show a 10 dB impedance-matching bandwidth of 22.9% (3.21-4.04 GHz), four radiation nulls, and a peak gain of 4.73 dBi.

Abemaciclib in combination with pembrolizumab for HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer: Phase 1b study.

This nonrandomized, open-label, multi-cohort Phase 1b study (NCT02779751) investigated the safety and efficacy of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab with/without anastrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) without prior CDK4 and 6 inhibitor exposure. Patients were divided into two cohorts: treatment naïve (cohort 1) and pretreated (cohort 2). Patients received abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab with (cohort 1) or without (cohort 2) anastrozole over 21-day cycles. The primary objective was safety, and secondary objectives included efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK). Cohort 1/2 enrolled 26/28 patients, respectively. Neutropenia (30.8/28.6%), AST increase (34.6/17.9%), ALT increase (42.3/10.7%), and diarrhea (3.8/10.7%) were the most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events in cohort 1/2, respectively. A total of two deaths occurred, which investigators attributed to treatment-related adverse events (AEs), both in cohort 1. Higher rates of all grade and grade ≥3 interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis were observed compared to previously reported with abemaciclib and pembrolizumab monotherapy. The PK profiles were consistent between cohorts and with previous monotherapy studies. In cohorts 1/2, the overall response rate and disease control rate were 23.1/28.6% and 84.6/82.1%, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survivals were 8.9 (95% CI: 3.9-11.1) and 26.3 months (95% CI: 20.0-31.0) for cohort 2; cohort 1 data are immature. Abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity, but high rates of ILD/pneumonitis and severe transaminase elevations occurred with/without anastrozole compared to the previous reporting. Benefit/risk analysis does not support further evaluation of this combination in the treatment of HR+, HER2- MBC.

An open label, randomized phase 2 trial assessing the impact of food on the tolerability of abemaciclib in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Abemaciclib, a CDK4 & 6 inhibitor, is indicated for advanced breast cancer treatment. Diarrhea is a frequently associated adverse event of abemaciclib. The study objective was to investigate if food intake impacts local gastrointestinal toxicity. METHODS: This Phase 2 study (I3Y-MC-JPCP, NCT03703466) randomized 72 patients 1:1:1 to receive abemaciclib 200 mg monotherapy twice daily (1) with a meal, (2) in a modified fasting state or (3) without regard to food. Primary endpoints included: incidence of investigator assessed severe (≥ Grade 3), prolonged (> 7 days) Grade 2 diarrhea, treatment discontinuation, dose modifications, and loperamide utilization during the first 3 cycles of treatment. Patient outcomes were captured via a daily electronic diary. Pharmacokinetics (PK) are reported. RESULTS: Incidence of investigator assessed severe diarrhea (Grade ≥ 3) was 1.4% (1 patient in Arm 1). Median duration of Grade 3 diarrhea was 1 day by both investigator assessment (1 patient in Arm 1) and patient-reported assessment (1 patient each in Arms 1 and 3). Median duration of investigator-assessed Grade 2 diarrhea was 2 days overall. No patient discontinued treatment due to diarrhea. Nine patients (12.7%) had a dose reduction, and 7 patients (9.9%) had a dose omission due to diarrhea. Ninety-four percent of patients used loperamide at least once. Abemaciclib PK was comparable across the 3 arms. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that diarrhea incidence associated with abemaciclib was unrelated to timing of food intake, was predominantly low grade, of short duration and well managed with loperamide and dose modifications.

nextMONARCH Phase 2 randomized clinical trial: overall survival analysis of abemaciclib monotherapy or in combination with tamoxifen in patients with endocrine-refractory HR + , HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Resistance to endocrine therapy poses a major clinical challenge for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR +), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We present the preplanned 24-month final overall survival (OS) results, alongside updated progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) results. METHODS: nextMONARCH is an open-label, controlled, randomized, Phase 2 study of abemaciclib alone or in combination with tamoxifen in women with endocrine-refractory HR + , HER2- MBC previously treated with chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to: abemaciclib 150 mg and tamoxifen 20 mg (A + T), abemaciclib 150 mg (A-150), or abemaciclib 200 mg and prophylactic loperamide (A-200). OS was the main prespecified secondary endpoint. PFS, ORR, and safety at 24 months were compared to previously reported primary analysis results. RESULTS: Of the 234 patients enrolled, 12 were receiving study treatment at data cutoff (28Jun2019). Median follow-up was 27.2 months. Median OS was 24.2 months in the A + T arm, 20.8 months in A-150, and 17.0 months in A-200 (A + T versus A-200: HR 0.62; 95%CI [0.40, 0.97], P = 0.03 and A-150 versus A-200: HR 0.96; 95%CI [0.64, 1.44], P = 0.83). PFS and ORR results at 24 months were consistent with the primary analysis. The safety profile corresponded with previous reports. CONCLUSION: The addition of tamoxifen to abemaciclib demonstrated greater OS benefit than monotherapy. This study confirmed the single-agent activity of abemaciclib in heavily pretreated women with endocrine-refractory HR + , HER2- MBC, as well as the previously reported primary PFS and ORR results, with no new safety signals observed. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02747004.

Abemaciclib in Combination With Pembrolizumab for Stage IV KRAS-Mutant or Squamous NSCLC: A Phase 1b Study.

INTRODUCTION: Abemaciclib is an oral, selective small-molecule CDK 4 and 6 inhibitor. In preclinical models, abemaciclib synergized with programmed cell death protein-1 blockade to enhance antitumor efficacy. Here, we report the safety and anticancer activity of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab in two cohorts with NSCLC. METHODS: This nonrandomized, open-label, phase 1b study included patients with previously untreated programmed death-ligand 1-positive, KRAS-mutant nonsquamous metastatic NSCLC (cohort A); squamous NSCLC after one previous platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease (cohort B); and two breast cancer cohorts (disclosed separately). Patients received 150 mg abemaciclib every 12 hours plus 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously on day 1 every 21 days. The primary objective was safety; secondary objectives included objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Clinical Trial Number: NCT02779751. RESULTS: Each cohort enrolled 25 patients. Grades greater than or equal to 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in cohorts A and B were reported by 20 (80%) and 19 patients (76%), respectively. Six patients in cohort A (24.0%) and two patients in cohort B (8.0%) had a confirmed partial response; disease control rate was 56% and 64%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 7.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-not estimable) and 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.4-5.2); median overall survival was 27.8 months (95% CI: 9.9-not estimable) and 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.7-13.1) in cohorts A and B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of abemaciclib and pembrolizumab in stage IV NSCLC resulted in greater toxicity compared with that previously reported for each individual treatment. Risk-benefit profile does not warrant further evaluation of the combination in this population.

Lower Background Infusion of Oxycodone for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia, Combined with Ropivacaine Intercostal Nerve Block, in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of a lower dose background infusion of oxycodone for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with the conventional dose, following intercostal nerve block, for the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. In total, 155 patients scheduled for elective radical lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopy were recruited from December 2018 to July 2019, of whom 140 were ultimately included in the study population. Patients were randomized to receive either oxycodone 0.25 mg/h (low-dose group, n=70) or oxycodone 0.5 mg/h (control group, n=70) as a background infusion for PCIA, following ropivacaine intercostal nerve block, for postoperative pain management. The primary endpoints were rest and dynamic visual analogue scale (VAS) scores within 72 h of the operation. The secondary endpoints were patient satisfaction scores, consumption of postoperative analgesics, times of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and adverse events. RESULTS: All 140 enrolled patients completed the study requirements and were included in the final analysis. The rest and dynamic VAS scores at 4 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h postoperative were comparable between the low-dose group and the control group (P>0.05). However, the low-dose group had statistically significantly higher patient satisfaction scores (P<0.001) and lower postoperative analgesic consumption (P<0.001) as well as lower incidence of nausea and vomiting (P<0.05). The times of PCA was not statistically significantly different between the two groups, and no serious adverse events occurred in either group (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: A low-dose background infusion of oxycodone for postoperative PCIA can achieve a comparable analgesic effect to the conventional dose after thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Furthermore, the low-dose regimen was associated with reduced consumption of oxycodone and increased patient satisfaction.

The value of hemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio (Hb/RDW), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal cancer.

ABSTRACT: The clinical significance of hemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width (Hb/RDW) for the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) has not been reported yet. This study aimed to evaluate the value of preoperative Hb/RDW, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for the diagnosis of NPC.A total of 180 NPC patients (NPC group) and 149 healthy subjects (control group) were recruited to assess the value of Hb/RDW, NLR, and PLR for the diagnosis of NPC.It was noted that NLR and PLR were significantly higher in the NPC group than those in the control group (P < .001); however, Hb/RDW was lower in the NPC group compared with that in the control group (P < .001). NLR was also remarkably different between patients of stage I+II and those of stage III+IV (P = .043), and that was different in patients with lymph node metastases or not (P = .030). Besides, PLR was significantly different in patients with serosal invasion or not (P = .031). In receiver operating characteristic curve, compared with Hb/RDW alone (sensitivity, 66.67%; specificity, 85.23%), the sensitivity (67.78%, 72.78%) and specificity (89.62%, 90.6%) of Hb/RDW with NLR and PLR were both increased. Furthermore, Hb/RDW combined with NLR area under the ROC (AUC), 0.824; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.779-0.864, P = .0080) or PLR (AUC: 0.851, 95% CI: 0.808-0.888, P = .0002) had a greater AUC value for the diagnosis of NPC compared with Hb/RDW alone (AUC: 0.781, 95% CI: 0.732-0.824).Hb/RDW can be used as a valuable indicator for auxiliary diagnosis of NPC. Preoperative Hb/RDW combined with NLR or PLR is of great significance in the auxiliary diagnosis and pathological staging of NPC.

The Values of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Localized Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic values of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Between January 2014 and December 2019, 117 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and 278 patients with localized PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) were included in this study. The inflammatory markers including SII, NLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), lymphocyte ratio (LR), neutrophil ratio (NR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and red cell distribution (RDW) of these two groups were examined and analyzed. ROC curve analysis was performed to assess the discriminative ability of inflammatory markers and their combination with tPSA for PCa. The binary logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between significant inflammatory markers and risk of PCa. RESULTS: The pathological results from RP specimen comprised 72 (25.90%) patients with pT1, 168 (60.43%) patients with pT2, and 38 (13.67%) patients with pT3. According to Student's t test, patients with PCa had higher NLR (p = 0.034), SII (p = 0.008), and NR (p = 0.004), and lower LR (p = 0.025), MPV (p = 0.003), and TPV (p = 0.022) compared with patients with BPH; the distribution of age, PLR, LMR, RDW, f/t PSA ratio, and BMI did not show any significant differences. The AUC for NLR, SII, NR, and tPSA was 0.697 (p = 0.015), 0.719 (p < 0.001), 0.647 (p = 0.009), and 0.708 (p < 0.001), with threshold values of 1.6, 471.86, 65.15%, and 12.89 ng/ml, respectively. Patients were divided into two groups according to the threshold values, respectively. By using the multivariable logistic regression models, NLR ≥ 1.6 (OR, 2.731; 95% CI, 0.937-7.961, p = 0.042), SII ≥ 471.86 (OR, 1.274; 95% CI 0.473-3.433; p = 0.033), and PSA ≥ 12.89 ng/ml (OR, 1.443; 95% CI, 0.628-3.944; p = 0.014) were independent risk factors associated with PCa. The AUC for combination of NLR, SII, and NR with tPSA was 0.705 (p < 0.001), 0.725 (p < 0.001), and 0.704 (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that SII, NLR, and NR were all independent risk factors of PCa. These factors alone could provide better screen methods for PCa before biopsy. In addition, SII is a more powerful tool among these three inflammatory markers associated with PCa. Besides, combination of SII and NLR with tPSA had not much advantage compared with themselves alone.

A Phase II Study of Abemaciclib in Patients with Brain Metastases Secondary to Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: The primary objective was to evaluate intracranial objective response rate (iORR) in patients receiving abemaciclib with brain or leptomeningeal metastases (LM) secondary to hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Secondary objectives evaluated extracranial response, abemaciclib pharmacokinetics, brain metastases tissue exposure, and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This nonrandomized, phase II study (NCT02308020) enrolled patients in tumor subtype-specific cohorts A-D: A (HR+, HER2- MBC), B (HR+, HER2+ MBC), C (HR+ MBC LM), and D (brain metastases surgical resection). Abemaciclib 200 mg was administered twice daily as monotherapy or with endocrine therapy, or 150 mg twice daily with trastuzumab. Cohorts A and B used a Simon two-stage design. RESULTS: In cohort A (n = 58), 3 patients were confirmed responders resulting in an iORR of 5.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.0-10.9], and the intracranial clinical benefit rate (iCBR) was 24% (95% CI, 13.1-35.2). Median overall survival (OS) was 12.5 months (95% CI, 9.3-16.4). A volumetric decrease in target intracranial lesions was experienced by 38% of patients. In cohort B (n = 27), there were no confirmed intracranial responses. An iCBR of 11% (95% CI, 0.0-23.0) was observed. Median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI, 4.2-14.3). A volumetric decrease in target intracranial lesions was experienced by 22% of patients. In cohort C (n = 10), one confirmed complete parenchymal response was observed. In cohort D (n = 9), unbound brain metastases concentrations of total active abemaciclib analytes were 96- [cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4)] and 19-fold (CDK6) above in vitro IC50. Safety was consistent with prior studies. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not meet its primary endpoint. Abemaciclib was associated with an iCBR of 24% in patients with heavily pretreated HR+, HER2- MBC. Abemaciclib achieved therapeutic concentrations in brain metastases tissue, far exceeding those necessary for CDK4 and CDK6 inhibition. Further studies are warranted, including assessing novel abemaciclib-based combinations.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2, and Osteopontin for Gastrointestinal Cancers.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers for early diagnosis and follow-up of cancers are still underutilized in clinical management. Thus, seeking new biomarkers with better sensitivity and specificity is still a challenge. VEGF, VEGFR2, and OPN are newly emerging biomarkers with clinical potential. METHODS: ELISA was used to analyze serum VEGF, VEGFR2, and OPN from 75 gastrointestinal cancer patients and 75 control subjects. The correlation of pre-operative serum VEGF, VEGFR2, and OPN levels with CEA, Ki-67 as well as clinical features (age, gender, tumor size, TNM stage, tumor stage, lymph node involvement, metastasis, and histological grading) in these patients. RESULTS: The pre-operative and post-operative serum VEGF and VEGFR2 levels and the post-operative OPN level in patients were significantly higher than in controls (p = 0.000, for all mentioned). The post-operative VEGF and OPN levels were significantly higher than that of pre-operative (p = 0.000 and 0.007, respectively). There was no correlation between pre-operative serum VEGF, VEGFR2, and OPN levels and serum CEA concentration. The pre-operative serum VEGF level was significantly correlated with the tumor Ki-67 scores; however, there was no correlation between serum VEGFR2 and OPN and Ki-67 scores. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that serum VEGF level was significantly higher in patients with advanced TNM (III - IV) stage and with lymph node involvement than in patients with low TNM stage (I - II) and with no lymph node involvement. High OPN level was correlated with metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis results showed that serum VEGF and VEGFR2 were the two most important factors for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancers in this study (p = 0.000, for both). Combinatorial analysis of the biomarkers improved the performance of the assays. CONCLUSIONS: Serum VEGF and VEGFR2 are potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastrointestinal cancers, while serum OPN is a potential biomarker for the prognostication of gastrointestinal cancers.

Subthreshold micropulse laser photocoagulation therapy in a case of bilateral retinal astrocytic hamartomas with tuberous sclerosis complex: A case report.

RATIONALE: Report a case of bilateral multiple retinal hamartomas (RAHs) in a patient with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and introduced a new method (subthreshold micropulse laser photocoagulation) for the treatment of RAHs. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 20-year-old man with TSC complained of decreased vision and metamorphosia in both eyes for 2 months. At presentation, visual acuity (VA) was 20/32 in the right eye and 20/40 in the left eye. Fundus photographs, optical coherence tomography, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), and indocyanine green angiography indicated multiple RAHs in both eyes. DIAGNOSES: Bilateral retinal astrocytic hamartomas. INTERVENTIONS: In the right eye, 577 nm photocoagulation was adopted to treat the RAHs with obvious fluorescein leakage in FFA. The paramacular RAHs were treated by subthreshold micropulse mode to minimize the damage to macula. Photocoagulation therapy was administrated in the left eye after 1 dose of intravitreal ranibizumab treatment. OUTCOMES: After photocoagulation therapy (including subthreshold micropulse laser photocoagulation for the paramacular RAHs in both eyes), the VA improved to 20/25 OD and 20/32 OS with no recurrence of exudation. LESSONS: About 577 nm photocoagulation for the peripheral RAHs in combination with subthreshold micropulse laser photocoagulation for RAHs in the macular zone is a good option for multiple RAHs in patients with TSC.

Alteration of Serum 25(OH) Vitamin D, Vitamin D Binding Protein, and C-reactive Protein Levels in Acute Leukemia Patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute leukemia is a common hematologic malignancy with poorly differentiated leukocytes. Alteration of circulating vitamin D (VD) and its carrier vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) have been reported in certain types of cancers and may play a role in the course of the disease. Understanding of the status of serum VD and VDBP, as well as the acute phase protein C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in pre- and post-treatment of acute leukemia patients, may be helpful in the management of acute leukemia. METHODS: Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescence immunoassay, and immunofluorescent assay were used to analyze the 25(OH) vitamin D (25(OH)D), VDBP, and CRP in the serum of a cohort of leukemia patients. RESULTS: Serum 25(OH)D levels in patients (pre- and post-treatment) were significantly lower than in control subjects. There was no significant difference in 25(OH)D levels between pre- and post-treatment. Serum VDBP level was raised in both pre- and post-treatment of acute leukemia patients, with that of pre-treatment being higher. The average serum VDBP was reduced in post-treatment; however, no significant difference was found. Elevated serum CRP levels in both pre- and post-treatment patient groups have been observed but were reduced significantly after treatment. Results also revealed that serum VDBP levels in acute myeloid leukemia patients were significantly higher than in acute lymphoid leukemia patients, while 25(OH)D levels in acute myeloid leukemia were significantly lower than in acute lymphoid leukemia. No significant difference between the serum CRP levels of acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoid leukemia was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Serum 25(OH)D, VDBP, and CRP may be used together and could be potential indicators of the disease course of acute leukemia and assist in its management which merits further investigation.

Utility Analysis of Vision-related Quality of Life in Patients With Glaucoma and Different Perceptions from Ophthalmologists.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-perceived quality of life with glaucoma and to assess whether ophthalmologists fully appreciate patients' perceptions through utility analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Utility values were obtained from 87 glaucoma patients by linear rating scale (RS), standard gamble for blindness (SG), and time trade-off (TTO) methods. Identical questionnaires were delivered to ophthalmologists (n=26) at the same center, who were asked to assume they had mild (MD in better-seeing eye ≥-6 dB) or moderate to severe (MD in better-seeing eye <-6 dB) glaucoma. Responses from patients and ophthalmologists were compared. RESULTS: Patients with mild glaucoma gave a utility value of 0.70±0.14, 0.85±0.14, and 0.77±0.14 with RS, SG, and TTO method, respectively. Those with moderate to severe glaucoma generated corresponding utilities of 0.56±0.20, 0.75±0.20, and 0.78±0.11. RS and SG utilities were affected by disease severity and history of glaucoma surgery, whereas TTO utility was mainly related with education level and employment status of the patients. Ophthalmologists reported higher utility values than their patients when mild glaucoma was assumed (0.81±0.14, 0.96±0.05, and 0.95±0.05 for RS, SG, and TTO methods, respectively; P<0.05). Given the scenario of moderate to severe glaucoma, ophthalmologists gave significantly lower RS (0.35±0.21, P<0.001), but similar SG (0.74±0.27, P=0.84) and TTO (0.82±0.13, P=0.40) utility values, than the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Utility values are considerably decreased in Chinese patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmologists tend to substantially underestimate the impact of mild glaucoma on patients' quality of life. Better understanding patients' perceptions of glaucoma would be helpful for the establishment of shared decision making and patient-centered care.

Long-term intraocular pressure fluctuation of primary angle closure disease following laser peripheral iridotomy/iridoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Many studies indicated that short-term and long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations in primary open angle glaucoma patients might lead to glaucomatous progression. However, seldom study has evaluated the long-term fluctuation of IOP in primary chronic angle closure diseases. The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term IOP fluctuation of primary angle closure diseases and its associations following laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) with or without laser peripheral iridoplasty. METHODS: A total of 158 patients with primary angle closure suspect (PACS, n = 21), primary angle closure (PAC, n = 81) and primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG, n = 55) had been treated by LPI with or without laser peripheral iridoplasty and followed up for more than 12 months. IOP was measured with Goldman applanation tonometer. Multivariate linear regression with generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models was used to evaluate the association of long-term IOP fluctuation (maximum IOP minus minimum IOP) with gender, age, baseline IOP, baseline peripheral anterior synechia (PAS), baseline vertical cup/disc ratio (VCDR), baseline mean deviation (MD), need for IOP-lowering medications. RESULTS: IOP fluctuation during follow-up in PACS, PAC and PACG groups were (4.83 ± 2.90), (5.67 ± 3.35), and (9.40 ± 7.14) mmHg, respectively. IOP fluctuation was strongly correlated with baseline IOP (r = 0.356, P < 0.001), PAS (r = 0.374, P < 0.001). IOP fluctuation was higher in patients with higher baseline IOP (0.18 mmHg per unit increase, 95%CI: 0.05 - 0.31 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term IOP fluctuation in PACG group was larger than that in PACS or PAC group. Eyes with higher baseline IOP were observed to have larger long-term IOP fluctuation.