RESUMO
A 65-year-old man was admitted to our hospital complaining of reflux for more than 20 years. After endoscopy and barium-swallow examination, he was diagnosed with achalasia as well as a squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) combined with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed simultaneously. During the procedure, a mucosal erosion with a clear boundary was shown in the middle segment of the esophagus. ESD was first performed and the lesion was removed en-bloc. Subsequent POEM therapy was performed after marking the left esophageal wall 10cm above the cardia. After submucosal injection, the submucosal plane was created through a length 2cm longitudinal incision, then the muscle was cut a length of 10 cm into the esophagus and 2 cm below the cardia, and finally the incision was closed by clips. Pathological examination revealed high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of squamous epithelium (carcinoma in situ) with a negative margin. The patient was recovered without complication four days after the procedure. The endoscopy showed perfect healing of the esophageal lesions during two-months follow-up , and the reflux symptom was resolved.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection remains an effective method for the treatment of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) (≤ 10 mm). Moreover, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with double band ligation (EMR-dB), a simplified modification of EMR with band ligation, is an alternative strategy to remove small rectal NETs. AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of EMR-dB for the treatment of small rectal NETs (≤ 10 mm). METHODS: A total of 50 patients with small rectal NETs, without regional lymph node enlargement or distant metastasis confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound, computerized tomography scan, or magnetic resonance imaging, were enrolled in the study from March 2021 to June 2022. These patients were randomly assigned into the EMR-dB (n = 25) group or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) group (n = 25). The characteristics of the patients and tumors, procedure time, devices cost, complete resection rate, complications, and recurrence outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 25 patients (13 males, 12 females; age range 28-68 years old) in the EMR-dB group, and the ESD group contained 25 patients (15 males, 10 females; age range 25-70 years old). Both groups had similar lesion sizes (EMR-dB 4.53 ± 1.02 mm, ESD 5.140 ± 1.74 mm; P = 0.141) and resected lesion sizes(1.32 ± 0.52 cm vs 1.58 ± 0.84 cm; P = 0.269). Furthermore, the histological complete resection and en bloc resection rates were achieved in all patients (100% for each). In addition, there was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups. However, the procedure time was significantly shorter and the devices cost was significantly lower in the EMR-dB group. Besides, there was no recurrence in both groups during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The procedure time of EMR-dB was shorter compared with ESD, and both approaches showed a similar curative effect. Taken together, EMR-dB was a feasible and safe option for the treatment of small rectal NETs.