Development and validation of a nomogram for Siewert II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Background: Due to the complex histological type and anatomical structures, there has been considerable debate on the classification of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), especially Siewert II AEG. Furthermore, neither the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) [esophageal adenocarcinoma (E) or gastric cancer (G)] nor the AJCC 8th TNM (E or G) accurately predicted the prognosis of patients with Siewert II AEG. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing the survival and prognosis of patients with Siewert II AEG and establish a new and better prognostic predictive model. Design: A retrospective study. Methods: Patients with Siewert II AEG, retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases, were assigned to the training set. Patients retrieved from a single tertiary medical center were assigned to the external validation set. Significant variables were selected using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to construct the nomogram. Nomogram models were assessed using the concordance index (C-index), a calibration plot, decision curve analysis (DCA), and external validation. Results: Age, tumor grade, and size, as well as the T, N, and M stages, were included in the nomograms. For the SEER training set, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.683 (0.665-0.701). The C-index of the nomogram for the external validation set was 0.690 (0.653-0.727). The calibration curve showed good agreement between the nomogram estimations and actual observations in both the training and external validation sets. The DCA showed that the nomogram was clinically useful. Conclusion: The new predictive model showed significant accuracy in predicting the prognosis of Siewert II AEG.

Incidence of cancer for patients after bariatric surgery: evidence from 33 cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: With the rising prevalence of severe obesity, bariatric surgery has emerged as a crucial treatment option. As the number of surgeries performed worldwide increases, there has been growing interest in the impact of bariatric surgery on cancer incidence. While several studies have examined this relationship, the topic remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: We conducted this systematic review of cohort studies with meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery versus nonsurgical treatment on overall cancer incidence. However, the effects may vary when focusing on specific cancer types, surgical procedures, or gender, so we conducted additional subgroup analyses. SETTING: A meta-analysis. University hospital. METHODS: The Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies from 1 January 2000 to 1 December 2022. Meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the pooled effect and further implemented subgroup analysis stratified by cancer type, operation type, and sex. RESULTS: All cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis from 18,216 studies. The overall cancer incidence demonstrated a significant decrease in the group with bariatric surgery (odds ratios [OR] = .56, P = .000, 95% CI .46 to .68). In subgroup analysis, similar decrease effect was found in 9 cancers. Furthermore, the incidence of cancer decreased significantly in male (OR = .66, P = .001, 95% CI .51 to .85) and female patients (OR = .63, P = .000, 95% CI .57 to .69) and patients undergoing gastric bypass (OR = .46, P = .000, 95% CI .33 to .63) or sleeve gastrectomy (OR = .44, P = .001, 95% CI .27 to .70). CONCLUSIONS: In the overall analysis, bariatric surgery could reduce the incidence of cancer significantly. Further large-scale well-matched studies are needed to verify the protective effect of bariatric surgery on cancer incidence.

Association between circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood and the prognosis of gastric cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Background: Research on the correlation between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and gastric cancer (GC) has increased rapidly in recent years. However, whether CTCs are associated with GC patient prognosis is highly controversial. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the value of CTCs to predict the prognosis of GC patients. Design: A meta-analysis. Data Sources and Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that reported the prognostic value of CTCs in GC patients before October 2022. The association between CTCs and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of GC patients was assessed. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sampling times (pre-treatment and post-treatment), detection targets, detection method, treatment method, tumor stage, region, and HR (Hazard Ratio) extraction methods. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing individual studies to assess the stability of the results. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots, Egger's test, and Begg's test. Results: We initially screened 2000 studies, of which 28 were available for further analysis, involving 2383 GC patients. The pooled analysis concluded that the detection of CTCs was associated with poor OS (HR = 1.933, 95% CI 1.657-2.256, p < 0.001), DFS/RFS (HR = 3.228, 95% CI 2.475-4.211, p < 0.001), and PFS (HR = 3.272, 95% CI 1.970-5.435, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the subgroup analysis stratified by tumor stage (p < 0.01), HR extraction methods (p < 0.001), detection targets (p < 0.001), detection method (p < 0.001), sampling times (p < 0.001), and treatment method (p < 0.001) all showed that CTC detection was associated with poor OS and DFS/RFS for GC patients. Furthermore, the study showed that CTCs were associated with the poor DFS/RFS of GC when CTCs were detected for patients from Asian or No-Asian regions (p < 0.05). In addition, higher CTCs predicted poorer OS for GC patients who are from Asian regions (p < 0.001), but without statistical difference for GC patients from No-Asian regions (p = 0.490). Conclusion: CTC detection in peripheral blood was associated with poor OS, DFS/RFS, and PFS in patients with GC.

A Gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer patients with or without preserving celiac branches of vagus nerves: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve-preserving gastrectomy is increasingly popular in treating gastric cancer in the early stage, however the long and short-term outcomes after gastrectomy while preserving the celiac branch of the vagus nerve are not well defined. We aimed to summarize and compare perioperative and longer-term outcomes after celiac branch vagus nerve-preserving gastrectomy (CBP, preserving both the celiac and hepatic branches of the vagus nerve), compared to those without CBP (non-CBP, only the hepatic branch of the vagus nerve is preserved). METHODS: We searched the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases for papers published before October 2021. The primary results were evaluated by short-term and long-term postoperative complications, whereas the secondary outcomes included surgery-related parameters, recovery-related parameters and overall survival. Random-effects or fixed-effects model were used to estimate odds ratio, and weighted mean difference for the outcomes. The underlying publication bias was identified via funnel charts, Begg's test and Egger's test. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by removing the research one by one. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies consisting of 8 retrospective studies and one randomized control trial were included. The analysis included 1,109 patients, with 568 (51.2%) of patients receiving CBP and 541 (48.8%) patients who received non-CBP. The CBP group had a shorter time in terms of first flatus (weighted mean difference = -0.436, 95% confidence interval: -0.603 to -0.269; P < 0.001) and hospital stay (weighted mean difference = -0.456, 95% confidence interval: -0.874 to -0.037, P = 0.033) than the non-CBP group, but the time to the start of oral intake was comparable between the groups. Regarding short-term complications and surgery-related parameters, between CBP and non-CBP, no evident differences were observed in pancreatic complications, anastomotic leakage, postoperative bleeding, operation time, blood loss or lymph nodes examined. In terms of long-term complications, the incidence of gallstones in CBP was lower than that in non-CBP (odds ratio = 0.582, 95% confidence interval: 0.356-0.953, P = 0.031), and the incidence of bile reflux in CBP was lower than that in non-CBP (odds ratio = 0.473, 95% confidence interval: 0.280-0.800, P = 0.005). However, the prevalence rates of diarrhea, early dumping syndrome, esophageal reflux, and delayed gastric emptying were comparable between CBP and non-CBP. CONCLUSION: The present research showed that gastric cancer patients in the early stage under CBP were superior to those without CBP in terms of incidence of gallstones, bile reflux, time of first flatus and hospital stay. Furthermore, it is imperative to conduct randomized control studies with larger sample sizes to determine the oncological survival outcomes when preserving the celiac branch.

Type 2 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Successfully Treated via Hysteroscopy-Assisted Laparoscopy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of hysteroscopy-assisted laparoscopy as a treatment strategy for type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy at gestational age >8 weeks. DESIGN: Retrospective case series (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: A tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Eight women with type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy at a gestational age >8 weeks. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent hysteroscopy-assisted laparoscopic resection and isthmus repair of cesarean scar pregnancy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All patients underwent removal of the cesarean scar pregnancy and complete repair of the uterine scar defect. The median operative time was 123.0 minutes (range, 100-168 minutes), median blood loss was 65.0 mL (range, 20-100 mL), and median length of hospital stay was 9.1 days (range, 8-12 days). There were no adverse reactions. The mean time to serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-HCG) resolution was 22.9 days (range, 14-30 days), and menstruation resumed after 9 to 15 days with serum ß-HCG returning to nondetectable levels. There was no recurrence of cesarean scar pregnancy at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopy-assisted laparoscopy may be an effective treatment for patients with type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy at gestational age >8 weeks.