Some Drugs Have Two Faces: Paradoxical Colitis in a Patient with Psoriatic Arthritis Previously Treated with Etanercept and IL-17 Inhibitors.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors are among the most potent treatments for inflammatory arthropathies including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and spondyloarthropathies. The availability of these biologic agents have revolutionized the management of these conditions and improved patient outcomes. Though generally safe, these biologics may contribute to the induction or exacerbation of colitis. This paradoxical colitis has been observed in patients on TNF-α inhibitor etanercept and IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab and ixekizumab). We report a case of a 46-year-old female with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis who presented with gastrointestinal symptoms after treatment with etanercept and IL-17 inhibitors. She was later diagnosed with paradoxical indeterminate colitis that was masked and treated by subsequent biologics given for her RA and psoriatic arthritis. In this report, we will discuss the importance of considering paradoxical colitis in the differential diagnosis for patients even several years after TNF-α/IL-17 inhibitor initiation and explain why careful consideration must be made when initiating these colitis-inducing agents to treat patients with inflammatory disorders.

Impact of mode of delivery on outcomes in patients with perianal Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) often affects women during the reproductive years. Although several studies have examined the impact of pregnancy on luminal disease, limited literature exists in those with perianal CD. Decision regarding mode of delivery is a unique challenge in such patients due to concerns regarding the effect of pelvic floor trauma during delivery on preexisting perianal involvement. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with CD with established perianal disease undergoing either vaginal delivery or caesarean section (C-section) at our institutions. We examined the occurrence of symptomatic perianal disease flares within 5 years after delivery in such women compared with nonpregnant CD controls. We also compared the occurrence of such flares between the 2 modes of delivery in women with established perianal CD. RESULTS: We identified 61 pregnant patients with CD with established perianal disease (11 vaginal delivery, 50 through C-section) and 61 nonpregnant CD controls with perianal disease. One-third of the C-sections were primarily for obstetric indications. Six of the vaginal deliveries were complicated. Approximately, 36% of cases had a symptomatic perianal flare within 1 year after delivery. This was similar across both modes of delivery (P = 0.53) and similar to nonpregnant patients with CD. There was no difference in the rates of perianal surgical intervention or luminal disease flares in our population based on mode of delivery or between pregnant patients with CD and nonpregnant CD controls. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no difference in risk of symptomatic perianal flares in patients with established perianal CD delivering vaginally or through C-section.

A play in four acts: Staphylococcus aureus abscess formation.

Staphylococcus aureus is an important human pathogen that causes skin and soft tissue abscesses. Abscess formation is not unique to staphylococcal infection and purulent discharge has been widely considered a physiological feature of healing and tissue repair. Here we present a different view, whereby S. aureus deploys specific virulence factors to promote abscess lesions that are distinctive for this pathogen. In support of this model, only live S. aureus is able to form abscesses, requiring genes that act at one or more of four discrete stages during the development of these infectious lesions. Protein A and coagulases are distinctive virulence attributes for S. aureus, and humoral immune responses specific for these polypeptides provide protection against abscess formation in animal models of staphylococcal disease.