Evaluating the benefit of virtual surgical planning on bony union rates in head and neck reconstructive surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Virtual surgical planning (VSP) has gained acceptance because of its benefits in obtaining adequate resection, achieving cephalometric accuracy, and reducing operative time. The aim of this study is to compare the rate of union between VSP and free-hand surgery (FHS), identify predictors of non-union and evaluate the difference in operative time. METHODS: Post-operative CT were retrospectively reviewed for 123 patients who underwent maxillary or mandibular reconstruction between 2014 and 2021 using either VSP or FHS. Each apposition was graded as complete, partial or non-union. The rate of union, risk difference and inter-rater reliability were calculated. The difference in operative time was assessed. Predictors of non-union were identified using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 326 appositions were graded (VSP n = 150; FHS n = 176). The rates of complete and partial union were higher with VSP than FHS (74.7% vs. 65.3%; 18% vs. 15.9%, respectively, p = 0.01). Non-union was found at a higher rate with FHS than with VSP (18.7% vs. 7.3%). The non-union risk difference was 11.4. FHS, major complications and apposition at the native bone were predictors of non-union (OR 2.9, p = 0.02; OR 3.4, p = 0.01; OR 2.5, p = 0.05, respectively). The mean surgical time was shorter with VSP than with FHS (265.3 vs. 381.5 min, p < 0.001). The inter-rater agreement was high (k = 0.85; ICC = 0.86). CONCLUSION: VSP demonstrated significantly higher bony union rates and shorter operative time. FHS, development of major complications and apposition with native bone correlated with non-union.

Minimally Invasive Management of Neonatal Piriform Fossa Sinus Tract: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: In rare situations, neonates may present with respiratory distress and neck swelling from a piriform fossa sinus tract (PFST) lesion. Open surgical excision of PFST may be associated with higher complication rates, especially in neonates. Endoscopic treatment has been shown to have high success rates in older children, but neonatal outcomes appear to be less promising. The objective of this study was to review the existing literature on endoscopic treatment of PFST in neonates. REVIEW METHODS: PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews were employed. Medline and Embase databases were searched in accordance with a detailed search strategy. Nine studies met criteria for inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 21 neonates with PFST treated endoscopically were reviewed. Mean age at onset of symptoms was 11.6 days. Neck swelling was the most common presenting symptom (20/21, 95%), followed by respiratory distress (6/9, 66.6%). Success rate after initial endoscopic treatment was 57% (12/21); among those, seven patients required additional concurrent treatments such as neck/pharyngeal swelling decompression or sclerotherapy. Nine patients underwent a second intervention (43%) and three patients (14%) required three interventions. Notably, 90% of patients (19/21) achieved success with only minimally invasive approaches. Two patients underwent open salvage surgical excision after recurrence following initial endoscopic treatment. CONCLUSION: Neonates with PFST and cystic neck masses are prone to recurrence after initial minimally invasive endoscopic treatment; however, high success rate may be achieved after repeat interventions. Adjunctive measures to optimize outcome may include swelling decompression w/wo sclerotherapy to cause fibrosis and postoperative nasogastric tube feeding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 134:2585-2591, 2024.

The Macrotextured Implant Recall: Breast Implant-Associated-Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Risk Aversion in Cosmetic and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Practices.

BACKGROUND: The recall of Allergan Biocell (Irvine, CA) devices due to the association between anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and macrotextured breast implants means that plastic surgeons are faced with the challenge of caring for patients with these implants in situ. Cosmetic and reconstructive surgeons have been contacting affected patients to encourage them to follow up and discuss the most appropriate risk-reduction strategies. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate patient concerns about the risk of breast implant-associated ALCL (BIA-ALCL) and to compare management differences between cosmetic and reconstructive patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 432 patients with macrotextured implants who presented to clinic after being contacted (121 reconstructive and 311 cosmetic). These records were analyzed for their presenting concerns, surgery wait times, and management plans. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the cohorts, and odds ratios (ORs) were computed to determine the association between patient concerns and their choice of management. RESULTS: After consultation, 59.5% of the reconstructive cohort and 49.5% of the cosmetic cohort scheduled implant removal or exchange. The reconstructive population had a higher rate of ALCL concern (62.7%); however, both cohorts had a significant OR, demonstrating an expressed fear of ALCL likely contributed to their subsequent clinical management (OR cosmetic, 1.66; OR reconstructive, 2.17). CONCLUSIONS: Although the risk of ALCL appears to be more concerning to the reconstructive population, both cohorts were equally motivated to have their implants removed. Informing patients about their ALCL risk is crucial to ensure a patient-supported risk reduction plan.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Correlation Between Practice and Evidence.

BACKGROUND: The use of appropriate preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis decreases the risk of surgical site infections (SSI); however, the breadth of plastic surgery procedures makes it challenging to ensure appropriate use for each unique procedure type. Currently, plastic surgeons lack a cohesive and comprehensive set of evidence-based guidelines (EBG) for surgical prophylaxis. We sought to profile the perioperative antibiotic prescribing patterns for plastic surgeons in British Columbia to investigate if they are congruent with published recommendations. In doing so, we aim to determine risk factors for antibiotic overprescribing in the context of surgical prophylaxis. METHODS: A literature review identifying EBG for antibiotic prophylaxis use during common plastic surgery procedures was performed. Concurrently, a provincial survey of plastic surgery residents, fellows, academic and community plastic surgeons was used to identify their antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing practices. These findings were then compared to recommendations identified from our review. The compliance of the provincial plastic surgery community with current EBG was determined for 38 surgical scenarios to identify which clinical factors and procedure types were associated with unsupported antibiotic use. RESULTS: Within the literature, 31 of the 38 categories of surveyed plastic surgery operations have EBG for use of prophylactic antibiotics. When surgical procedures have EBG, 19.5% of plastic surgery trainees and 21.9% of practicing plastic surgeons followed recommended prophylaxis use. Average adherence to EBG was 59.1% for hand procedures, 24.1% for breast procedures, and 23.9% for craniofacial procedures. Breast reconstruction procedures and contaminated craniofacial procedures were associated with a significant reduction in adherence to EBG resulting in excessive antibiotic use. CONCLUSION: Even when evidence-based recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis exist, plastic surgeons demonstrate variable compliance based on their reported prescribing practices. Surgical procedures with low EBG compliance may reflect risk avoidant behaviors in practicing surgeons and highlight the importance of improving education on the benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis in these clinical situations.

HISTORIQUE: Une prophylaxie antibiotique préopératoire appropriée réduit le risque d'infections au foyer de l'opération (IFO), mais en raison de l'éventail des interventions de plasturgie, il est difficile d'en garantir la bonne utilisation pour chaque type d'intervention. À l'heure actuelle, les plasticiens ne possèdent pas d'ensemble de directives fondées sur des données probantes (DDP) cohésives et complètes à l'égard de la prophylaxie chirurgicale. Les chercheurs ont cherché à saisir les habitudes de prescription d'antibiotiques périopératoires des plasticiens de la Colombie-Britannique pour vérifier si elles concordent avec les recommandations publiées. Ce faisant, ils ont voulu déterminer les facteurs de risque de surprescription d'antibiotiques dans le cadre de la prophylaxie chirurgicale. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont effectué une analyse bibliographique faisant état des DDP relatives au recours à une prophylaxie antibiotique pendant des interventions de plasturgie courantes. Parallèlement, un sondage auprès des résidents, des associés, des scientifiques et des généralistes de la plasturgie a permis de déterminer les pratiques de prescription de prophylaxie antibiotique. Les chercheurs ont comparé ces observations aux recommandations relevées dans leur analyse. Ils ont établi l'adhésion du milieu provincial de la plasturgie aux DDP à jour dans 38 scénarios chirurgicaux pour déterminer les facteurs cliniques et les types d'intervention associés à l'utilisation d'antibiotiques non préconisés. RÉSULTATS: Dans les publications scientifiques, 31 des 38 catégories d'opérations de plasturgie sondées étaient assorties de DDP sur la prophylaxie antibiotique. Lorsque les interventions chirurgicales étaient ainsi associées à des DDP, 19,5% des stagiaires en plasturgie et 21,9% des plasticiens en exercice respectaient les recommandations relatives à l'utilisation de la prophylaxie. L'adhésion moyenne aux DDP s'élevait à 59,1 % dans le cas des interventions de la main, à 24,1 % dans celui des interventions mammaires et à 23,9 % dans celui des interventions craniofaciales. Les interventions de reconstruction mammaire et la contamination des interventions craniofaciales étaient liées à une diminution importante de l'adhésion aux DDP entraînant une utilisation excessive d'antibiotiques. CONCLUSION: Même en présence de recommandations fondées sur des données probantes relatives à la prophylaxie antibiotique, les pratiques de prescription déclarées par les plasticiens démontrent une adhésion variable aux DDP. Les interventions chirurgicales assorties d'une faible adhésion aux DDP pourraient refléter des comportements d'évitement risqués de la part des chirurgiens en exercice et font ressortir l'importance d'améliorer l'enseignement sur les avantages de la prophylaxie antibiotique dans ces situations cliniques.