Diabetic Retinopathy Screening at the Point of Care (DR SPOC): detecting undiagnosed and vision-threatening retinopathy by integrating portable technologies within existing services.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a low socioeconomic region of a high-income country, as well as determine the diagnostic utility of point-of-care screening for high-risk populations in tertiary care settings. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with diabetes attending foot ulcer or integrated care diabetes clinics at two Western Sydney hospitals (n=273). DR was assessed using portable, two-field, non-mydriatic fundus photography and combined electroretinogram/ pupillometry (ERG). With mydriatic photographs used as the reference standard, sensitivity and specificity of the devices were determined. Prevalence of DR and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) were reported, with multivariate logistic regression used to identify predictors of DR. RESULTS: Among 273 patients, 39.6% had any DR, while 15.8% had VTDR, of whom 59.3% and 62.8% were previously undiagnosed, respectively. Non-mydriatic photography demonstrated 20.2% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity for any DR, with a 56.7% screening failure rate. Meanwhile, mydriatic photography produced high-quality images with a 7.6% failure rate. ERG demonstrated 72.5% sensitivity and 70.1% specificity, with a 15.0% failure rate. The RETeval ERG was noted to have an optimal DR cut-off score at 22. Multivariate logistic regression identified an eGFR of ≤29 mL/min/1.73 m2, HbA1c of ≥7.0%, pupil size of <4 mm diameter, diabetes duration of 5-24 years and RETeval score of ≥22 as strong predictors of DR. CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of vision-threatening and undiagnosed DR among patients attending high-risk tertiary clinics in Western Sydney. Point-of-care DR screening using portable, mydriatic photography demonstrates potential as a model of care which is easily accessible, targeted for high-risk populations and substantially enhances DR detection.

An audit of the effect of SGLT2 inhibitor cessation in a pre-admission clinic before and after Australian Diabetes Society guidelines.

Perioperative ketoacidosis is an important adverse event related to the use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i). We compared perioperative outcomes in patients on SGLT2i, before and after protocolised pre-operative cessation of the drug. There were no cases of clinically detected diabetic ketoacidosis in the 96 patients included in the study. Withdrawal of SGLT2i did not appear to alter significantly pre-operative glycaemia.

Text messaging support for patients with diabetes or coronary artery disease (SupportMe): protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Low-cost interventions providing self-management support are needed for people with coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes. Mobile phone text messaging provides a potential vehicle for this. The SupportMe Trial aims to assess the feasibility of embedding a text messaging programme into routine clinical practice and will determine if this improves cardiovascular risk factor and diabetes control among patients with CAD or type 2 diabetes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SupportMe is a randomised controlled trial to be conducted within the framework of a health district-wide integrated care programme for people with CAD or type 2 diabetes mellitus. One thousand subjects will be recruited, with at least 500 in each group. Intervention subjects will receive four text messages a week for 6 months, which provide advice, motivation, information and support for disease management and healthy behaviour. The primary outcome is systolic blood pressure at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include body mass index, waist circumference, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, physical activity levels, dietary intake, quality of life, mood and smoking cessation, and for subjects with diabetes, glycosylated haemoglobin and fasting serum glucose. A process and economic evaluation will also be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (AU RED HREC/16/WMEAD/331). Results will be disseminated via the scientific forums including peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616001689460.