Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 51
Filtrar
1.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 12(1): 141, 2017 Sep 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28962628

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to investigate the outcomes and safety of using percutaneous anterior C1/2 transarticular screw fixation as a salvage technique for odontoid fracture if percutaneous odontoid screw fixation fails. METHODS: Fifteen in 108 odontoid fracture patients (planned to be treated by percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation) were failed to introduce satisfactory odontoid screw trajectory. To salvage this problem, we chose the percutaneous anterior C1/2 transarticular screw fixation technique in treatment of these patients. The visual analogue score (VAS) of neck pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI) of all patients were scored at pre-operation, 3 months after operation, and final follow-up. Additional, technique-related complications were recorded and collected. RESULTS: Percutaneous C1/2 transarticular screw fixation was performed successfully in all 15 patients whose odontoid screw fixation failed. No technique-related complications (such as nerve injury, spinal cord injury, and esophageal injury) occurred. The VAS of neck pain and NDI score improved significantly (P = 0.000) after operation, and no significant differences were found when compared to 93 non-salvage patients who successfully performed the percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation. No screw loose or breakage occurred, all of the odontoid fractures achieve radiographic fusion, bony fusion bridge could be observed at the C1/2 lateral articular facet on 9/15 patients. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that percutaneous anterior C1/2 transarticular screw fixation is a good alternative salvage technique if percutaneous odontoid screw fixation failed, and it is a minimally invasive, feasible, and safe technique.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Processo Odontoide/lesões , Processo Odontoide/cirurgia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Parafusos Ósseos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Cervicalgia/diagnóstico por imagem , Cervicalgia/etiologia , Cervicalgia/cirurgia , Processo Odontoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Medição da Dor/métodos , Radiografia , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Biomed Res Int ; 2017: 8423638, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28154826

RESUMO

Purpose. To investigate the evidence of minimally invasive (MI) versus open (OP) posterior lumbar fusion in treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis from current prospective literatures. Methods. The electronic literature database of Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library was searched at April 2016. The data of operative time, estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) of both lower back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), SF-36 PCS (physical component scores) and SF-36 MCS (mental component scores), complications, fusion rate, and secondary surgery were extracted and analyzed by STATA 12.0 software. Results. Five nonrandom prospective comparative studies were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that the MI group had a significantly longer operative time than OP group, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. No significant difference was found in back pain, leg pain, ODI, SF-36 PCS, SF-36 MCS, complications, fusion rate, and secondary surgery between MI and OP groups. Conclusion. The prospective evidence suggested that MI posterior fusion for spondylolisthesis had less EBL and hospital stay than OP fusion; however it took more operative time. Both MI and OP fusion had similar results in pain and functional outcomes, complication, fusion rate, and secondary surgery.


Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Região Lombossacral/cirurgia , Espondilolistese/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Dor nas Costas/cirurgia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Duração da Cirurgia , Medição da Dor/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Escala Visual Analógica
3.
BMJ Open ; 6(11): e012103, 2016 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27852709

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes when the upper and lower thoracic regions were used as the site of proximal instrumentation to treat adult spinal deformity. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library searches were performed to identify studies that compared outcome measures when the upper and lower thoracic vertebrae (UTV and LTV, respectively) were used as the site of proximal instrumentation. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated for continuous outcomes, and the relative risk (RR) was calculated for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: Seven articles (n=554 patients) met the final inclusion criteria, and we compared the outcome measures of a long fusion extending to the upper and lower thoracic regions. The pooled analysis revealed that extending fixation into the upper thoracic region decreased the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) revision surgery (RR: 0.36, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.90, p<0.05). The operation time (WMD: 0.93, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.39, p<0.05) and estimated blood loss (WMD: 0.59, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.85, p<0.05) were significantly greater in the UTV group than in the LTV group. No significant differences were found in the Scoliosis Research Society pain, self-image, function, mental health, subtotal, satisfaction or total scores; the total number of complications or the total number of revision surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: Long posterior fixation extending into the upper thoracic region reduces the incidence of revision surgery related to PJK; however, it increased the operative level resulting in a longer operative time and greater estimated blood loss. This initial analysis indicates that extending fixation to the upper thoracic region is appropriate for patients who are likely to develop PJK following initial scoliosis correction.


Assuntos
Cifose/cirurgia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Humanos , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Br J Neurosurg ; 30(1): 86-90, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26313404

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine whether unilateral pedicle screw fixation is comparable with unilateral pedicle screw and contralateral percutaneous transfacet screw fixation in single-level lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were divided into either unilateral (n = 32) or unilateral pedicle screw and contralateral percutaneous transfacet screw fixation (n = 26) instrumentation groups. The operating time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, clinical outcomes, total lumbar scoliotic changes, and fusion and complication rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in blood loss, length of hospital stay, clinical results, total lumbar scoliotic changes, and fusion and complication rates. There were significant differences in duration of operating time between 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral pedicle screw fixation may be as effective as unilateral PS with contralateral percutaneous transfacet screw fixation for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disorders.


Assuntos
Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/patologia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Região Lombossacral/patologia , Parafusos Pediculares , Fusão Vertebral , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Região Lombossacral/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos
5.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 39(2): 234-9, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25659962

RESUMO

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique and clinical results of percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior transarticular fixation combined with limited exposure posterior C1/2 arthrodesis in patients with a high-riding vertebral artery. DESIGN SETTING: Zhejiang Spine Center, China. PARTICIPANTS: Five patients with a high-riding vertebral artery and an upper cervical fracture. INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with limited exposure posterior C1/2 wire fusion. OUTCOME MEASURES: Computed tomography scans were used to assess the high-riding vertebral artery and feasibility of anterior transarticular screw fixation preoperatively. A Philadelphia collar was used to immobilize the neck postoperatively. Anteroposterior (open-mouth) and lateral views were obtained at pre/postoperation and at the follow-up. RESULTS: The operation was performed successfully on all of the patients, and no intraoperative operation-related complications such as nerve injury, vertebral artery, and soft tissue complications occurred. The mean follow-up period was 33.8 months (range: 24 to 58 months). No screw breakage, loosening, pullout, or cutout was observed. Bone union was achieved in all patients at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our small case series results suggested that percutaneous anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with mini-open posterior C1/2 wire fusion is a technically minimally invasive, safe, feasible, and useful method to treat patients with a high-riding vertebral artery.


Assuntos
Articulação Atlantoaxial/cirurgia , Parafusos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Artéria Vertebral/patologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/efeitos adversos
6.
Cell Transplant ; 25(1): 141-57, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25924918

RESUMO

We did a clinical trial to determine whether olfactory mucosa lamina propria (OLP) transplants promote regeneration and functional recovery in chronic human spinal cord injury (SCI). The trial randomized 12 subjects to OLP transplants (n = 8) or control sham surgery (n = 4). The subjects received magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electromyography (EMG), urodynamic study (UDS), American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale (AIS), and other functional assessments. OLP-transplanted subjects recovered more motor, sensory, and bladder function compared to sham-operated subjects. At 3 years after OLP transplant, one patient improved from AIS A to C and another recovered from AIS A to B, two recovered more than three segmental sensory levels, two had less spasticity, two had altered H-reflexes and SSEP, two regained bladder and anorectal sensation and had improved bladder compliance on UDS. OLP-treated patients had partial or complete tissue bridges at the injury site compared to cavitary gaps in sham-operated patients. The limited recovery suggests that OLP transplants alone do not have significant benefits but may provide a rationale for larger randomized trials or combination therapies.


Assuntos
Mucosa Olfatória/transplante , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/terapia , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Demografia , Método Duplo-Cego , Eletromiografia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Estudos Prospectivos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Transplante Autólogo/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Urodinâmica , Adulto Jovem
7.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(15): e665, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25881841

RESUMO

The prevalence of cervical disc disease is high, and the traditional surgical method of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) carries with it the disadvantages of motion loss at the operated level, and accelerated adjacent level disc degeneration. Preliminary results of the efficacy and reoperative rate comparing TDA versus ACDF have been reported; however, the long-term outcomes of TDA versus ACDF still remain a topic of debate. This review was prepared following the standard procedures set forth by the Cochrane Collaboration organization, and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The only studies included were randomized controlled trials with a minimum of 4 years of follow-up data. The meta-analysis included the neck disability index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) of neck and arm pain, SF-36 physical component scores (SF-36 PCS), over success, neurological success, work status, implant-related complications, and secondary surgery events. Four randomized controlled trials meet the inclusion criteria. The long-term improvement of NDI, VAS of neck and arm pain, SF-36 PCS, over success, and neurological success favored the TDA group. The TDA group also had a lower incidence of secondary surgery for both the index level (RR: 0.45 [0.28, 0.72]) and adjacent level (RR: 0.53 [0.33, 0.88]). In this meta-analysis of 4 included RCTs with a minimum 4 years of follow-ups, total disc arthroplasty showed improvements over ACDF as measured by the NDI, VAS of neck and arm pain, and SF-36 PCS.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/estatística & dados numéricos , Substituição Total de Disco/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação da Deficiência , Humanos , Cervicalgia/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Substituição Total de Disco/efeitos adversos
8.
Spine J ; 15(5): 1141-5, 2015 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25681228

RESUMO

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgical stabilization is recommended for odontoid fractures with mechanical instability. Compared with C1-C2 fusion, percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation has the advantages of preserving C1/C2 motion and being a minimally invasive procedure. However, determining the optimal screw trajectory is often difficult. When an initial suboptimal K-wire hole is drilled, it is especially difficult to drill a second optimal K-wire trajectory because the initial hole will be entered inadvertently. PURPOSE: To design a novel device, two-hole guide tube, to make drilling a second optimal K-wire trajectory easier, and thus, avoid unnecessary additional surgical time and reduce the likelihood of needing to change the procedure to traditional open surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A technical report. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with odontoid fractures were treated by percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation in our hospital, and the initial K-wire trajectories of 16 cases (12 men and 4 women) among the 53 patients were imperfect. The two-hole guide tube was applied for drilling the second trajectory in each of these 16 cases. RESULTS: No complications associated with this technique occurred. Satisfactory results and good screw placement was achieved in all patients. Radiographic fusion was confirmed for 15 of 16 patients. None of the patients experienced clinical symptoms or screw loosening or breakage in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel device, two-hole guide tube, can be used to reduce the difficulty associated with redrilling an optimal K-wire trajectory if the initial trajectory is imperfect during percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation. Moreover, by referring to the initial misplaced K-wire, a more accurate trajectory for the second K-wire can be achieved.


Assuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Fios Ortopédicos , Processo Odontoide/cirurgia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/instrumentação
9.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 38(2): 245-8, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24673578

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study presents the successful posterior surgical reduction and fusion on a 26-month-old child with chronic unilateral locked facet joint and spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: A 26-month-old child with chronic unilateral locked facet joint and SCI treated by posterior surgical reduction and fusion. Plaster external fixation was applied and rehabilitation exercise was trained post-operatively. RESULTS: Chronic unilateral locked facet joint was reduced successfully and bone fusion of C4/5 was achieved 3 months after surgery. The function of both lower limbs was improved 1 year after surgery, aided with physical rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Unilateral locked facet joint in pediatric population is rare. Few clinical experiences were found in the literature. Non-surgical treatment has advantages of not being invasive and is preferred for acute patients; however, it may not be suitable for chronic unilateral locked facet joint with SCI, in which surgical intervention is needed.


Assuntos
Articulações/cirurgia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral , Pré-Escolar , Terapia por Exercício , Feminino , Humanos , Dispositivos de Fixação Ortopédica , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação
10.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 93(28): e242, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25526447

RESUMO

Anterior occiput-to-axis screw fixation is more suitable than a posterior approach for some patients with a history of posterior surgery. The complex osseous anatomy between the occiput and the axis causes a high risk of injury to neurological and vascular structures, and it is important to have an accurate screw trajectory to guide anterior occiput-to-axis screw fixation. Thirty computed tomography (CT) scans of upper cervical spines were obtained for three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction. Cylinders (1.75 mm radius) were drawn to simulate the trajectory of an anterior occiput-to-axis screw. The imitation screw was adjusted to 4 different angles and measured, as were the values of the maximized anteroposterior width and the left-right width of the occiput (C0) to the C1 and C1 to C2 joints. Then, the 3D models were printed, and an angle guide device was used to introduce the screws into the 3D models referring to the angles calculated from the 3D images. We found the screw angle ranged from α1 (left: 4.99±4.59°; right: 4.28±5.45°) to α2 (left: 20.22±3.61°; right: 19.63±4.94°); on the lateral view, the screw angle ranged from ß1 (left: 13.13±4.93°; right: 11.82±5.64°) to ß2 (left: 34.86±6.00°; right: 35.01±5.77°). No statistically significant difference was found between the data of the left and right sides. On the 3D printed models, all of the anterior occiput-to-axis screws were successfully introduced, and none of them penetrated outside of the cortex; the mean α4 was 12.00±4.11 (left) and 12.25±4.05 (right), and the mean ß4 was 23.44±4.21 (left) and 22.75±4.41 (right). No significant difference was found between α4 and ß4 on the 3D printed models and α3 and ß3 calculated from the 3D digital images of the left and right sides. Aided with the angle guide device, we could achieve an optimal screw trajectory for anterior occiput-to-axis screw fixation on 3D printed C0 to C2 models.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Simulação por Computador , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Parafusos Ósseos , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem
11.
PLoS One ; 9(7): e103065, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25058011

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) has been one of the most popular treatments for odontoid fractures. However, the true efficacy of AOSF remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to provide the pooled rates of non-union, reoperation, infection, and approach related complications after AOSF for odontoid fractures. METHODS: We searched studies that discussed complications after AOSF for type II or type III odontoid fractures. A proportion meta-analysis was done and potential sources of heterogeneity were explored by meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 972 references initially identified, 63 were eligible for inclusion. 54 studies provided data regarding non-union. The pooled non-union rate was 10% (95% CI: 7%-3%). 48 citations provided re-operation information with a pooled proportion of 5% (95% CI: 3%-7%). Infection was described in 20 studies with an overall rate of 0.2% (95% CI: 0%-1.2%). The main approach related complication is postoperative dysphagia with a pooled rate of 10% (95% CI: 4%-17%). Proportions for the other approach related complications such as postoperative hoarseness (1.2%, 95% CI: 0%-3.7%), esophageal/retropharyngeal injury (0%, 95% CI: 0%-1.1%), wound hematomas (0.2%, 95% CI: 0%-1.8%), and spinal cord injury (0%, 95% CI: 0%-0.2%) were very low. Significant heterogeneities were detected when we combined the rates of non-union, re-operation, and dysphagia. Multivariate meta-regression analysis showed that old age was significantly predictive of non-union. Subgroup comparisons showed significant higher non-union rates in age ≥ 70 than that in age ≤ 40 and in age 40 to <50. Meta-regression analysis did not reveal any examined variables influencing the re-operation rate. Meta-regression analysis showed age had a significant effect on the dysphagia rate. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCES: This study summarized the rates of non-union, reoperation, infection, and approach related complications after AOSF for odontoid fractures. Elderly patients were more likely to experience non-union and dysphagia.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição/fisiopatologia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Fraturas Maxilomandibulares/cirurgia , Osteíte/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Parafusos Ósseos , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteíte/etiologia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
PLoS One ; 9(5): e97142, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24809680

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dynamic interspinous spacers, such as X-stop, Coflex, DIAM, and Aperius, are widely used for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. However, controversy remains as to whether dynamic interspinous spacer use is superior to traditional decompressive surgery. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched during August 2013. A track search was performed on February 27, 2014. Study was included in this review if it was: (1) a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or non-randomized prospective comparison study, (2) comparing the clinical outcomes for interspinous spacer use versus traditional decompressive surgery, (3) in a minimum of 30 patients, (4) with a follow-up duration of at least 12 months. RESULTS: Two RCTs and three non-randomized prospective studies were included, with 204 patients in the interspinous spacer (IS) group and 217 patients in the traditional decompressive surgery (TDS) group. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference between the IS and TDS groups for low back pain (WMD: 1.2; 95% CI: -10.12, 12.53; P = 0.03; I2 = 66%), leg pain (WMD: 7.12; 95% CI: -3.88, 18.12; P = 0.02; I2 = 70%), ODI (WMD: 6.88; 95% CI: -14.92, 28.68; P = 0.03; I2 = 79%), RDQ (WMD: -1.30, 95% CI: -3.07, 0.47; P = 0.00; I2 = 0%), or complications (RR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.61, 3.14; P = 0.23; I2 = 28%). The TDS group had a significantly lower incidence of reoperation (RR: 3.34; 95% CI: 1.77, 6.31; P = 0.60; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: Although patients may obtain some benefits from interspinous spacers implanted through a minimally invasive technique, interspinous spacer use is associated with a higher incidence of reoperation and higher cost. The indications, risks, and benefits of using an interspinous process device should be carefully considered before surgery.


Assuntos
Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Estenose Espinal/cirurgia , Descompressão Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Reoperação , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Neurosurg Focus ; 35(2): E3, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23905954

RESUMO

OBJECT: This study aimed to investigate the incidence rate of heterotopic ossification (HO) after implantation of Coflex interspinous devices. Possible risk factors associated with HO were evaluated. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed patients who had undergone single-level (L4-5) implantation of a Coflex device for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient data recorded were age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, smoking habits, and surgical time. Heterotopic ossification was identified through lumbar anteroposterior and lateral view radiographs. The authors developed a simple classification for defining HO and compared HO-positive and HO-negative cases to identify possible risk factors. RESULTS: Among 32 patients with follow-up times of 24-57 months, HO was detectable in 26 (81.2%). Among these 26 patients, HO was in the lateral space of the spinous process but not in the interspinous space in 8, HO was in the interspinous space but did not bridge the adjacent spinous process in 16, and interspinous fusion occurred at the level of the device in 2. Occurrence of HO was not associated with patient age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, smoking habits, or surgical time. CONCLUSIONS: A high incidence of HO has been detected after implantation of Coflex devices. Clinicians should be aware of this possible outcome, and more studies should be conducted to clarify the clinical effects of HO.


Assuntos
Descompressão Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Ossificação Heterotópica/epidemiologia , Ossificação Heterotópica/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Substituição Total de Disco/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Longitudinais , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ossificação Heterotópica/diagnóstico por imagem , Próteses e Implantes , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estenose Espinal/patologia , Estenose Espinal/cirurgia , Tomógrafos Computadorizados
14.
Asian Spine J ; 7(2): 148-55, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23741556

RESUMO

The intravertebral vacuum cleft (IVC) sign in vertebral compression fracture patients has obtained much attention. The pathogenesis, image character and efficacy of surgical intervention were disputed. Many pathogenesis theories were proposed, and its image characters are distinct from malignancy and infection. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) have been the main therapeutic methods for these patients in recent years. Avascular necrosis theory is the most supported; PVP could relieve back pain, restore vertebral body height and correct the kyphotic angulation (KA), and is recommended for these patients. PKP seems to be more effective for the correction of KA and lower cement leakage. The Kümmell's disease with IVC sign reported by modern authors was incomplete consistent with syndrome reported by Dr. Hermann Kümmell.

15.
PLoS One ; 8(5): e63995, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23704968

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Posterior pedicle screw fixation has become a popular method for treating thoracolumbar burst fractures. However, it remains unclear whether additional fusion could improve clinical and radiological outcomes. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of fusion as a supplement to pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: MEDLINE, OVID, Springer, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared the clinical and radiological efficacy of fusion versus nonfusion for thoracolumbar burst fractures managed by posterior pedicle screw fixation. Risk of bias in included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We generated pooled risk ratios or weighted mean differences across studies. Based on predefined inclusion criteria, 4 eligible trials with a total of 220 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The mean age of the patients was 35.1 years. 96.8% of the fractures were located at T12 to L1 level. Baseline characteristics were similar between the fusion and nonfusion groups. No significant difference was identified between the two groups regarding radiological outcome, functional outcome, neurologic improvement, and implant failure rate. The pooled data showed that the nonfusion group was associated with significantly reduced operative time (p<0.0001) and blood loss (p  = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCES: The results of this meta-analysis suggested that fusion was not necessary when thoracolumbar burst fracture was treated by posterior pedicle screw fixation. More randomized controlled trials with high quality are still needed in the future.


Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Adulto , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Hospitalização , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Duração da Cirurgia , Viés de Publicação , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/fisiopatologia , Vértebras Torácicas/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 51(2): 147-51, 2013 Feb 01.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23711009

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical efficacy between discectomy and discectomy plus Coflex fixation for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: From December 2007 to August 2008, 50 patients (31 males and 19 females) were treated by surgery of discectomy and discectomy plus Coflex fixation. The average age was 52.5 years (range, 30 - 72 years). There were 24 cases in the group of discectomy plus Coflex fixation and 26 cases in the group of discectomy. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scales (VAS), Japanese Orthopadic Association (JOA) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded, as well as radiological index. And use a paired t-test and one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) statistical method to evaluate the Coflex dynamic stabilization system in value in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. RESULTS: Both groups received significant improvement of JOA, ODI and VAS (t = -33.2 - 64.5, P < 0.01), but the group of discectomy was found with deterioration of ODI at last follow-up, 12 months after surgery 6.7 ± 1.5 to 10.2 ± 2.3 (t = -19.3, P < 0.05). The group of discectomy plus Coflex fixation was found with significant increase of height of dorsal intervertebral discs (HD), distance across the two adjacent spinous processes (DS), distance of intervertebral foramina (DIF) and spinal canal area(SA) (t = -34.4 - 4.5, P < 0.05). In contrast, the group of discectomy was found with significant decrease of HD, DS, DIF and SA (t = 3.4 - 52.8, P < 0.05). Coflex fixed group in HD, DIF, DS significant difference with simple discectomy group, with a statistically significant (F = 14.1 - 25.6, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both discectomy and discectomy plus Coflex fixation are apparently effective when treating lumbar disc herniation. Coflex can significantly increase the HD and DIF when used for lumbar disc herniation, and it has positive influence for keeping height of lumbar vertebral space and treating the nerve root symptom of lumbar disc herniation. Discectomy plus Coflex is better than pure discectomy in preventing lumbar degeneration.


Assuntos
Fixadores Internos , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Eur Spine J ; 22(8): 1741-9, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23572345

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This is a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies comparing the clinical and radiological efficacy of minimally invasive (MI) and conventional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (open-TLIF) for degenerative lumbar diseases. METHODS: A literature search of the MEDLINE database identified 11 studies that met our inclusion criteria. A total of 785 patients were examined. Pooled estimates of clinical and radiological outcomes, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: The pooled data revealed that MI-TLIF was associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and a trend of better functional outcomes when compared with open-TLIF. However, MI-TLIF significantly increased the intraoperative X-ray exposure. Both techniques had similar operative time, complication rate, and re-operation rate. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, MI-TLIF for degenerative lumbar diseases might lead to better patient-based outcomes. MI-TLIF would be a promising procedure, but extra efforts are needed to reduce its intraoperative radiation exposure. More randomized controlled trials are needed to compare these two surgical options.


Assuntos
Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Feminino , Humanos , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Tempo de Internação , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Radiografia , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Eur Spine J ; 22(7): 1533-8, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23563573

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of mini-open anterior approach to the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) in cadaveric specimens. METHODS: Four adult fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were used for this study. On the cadaveric specimen, an osteotomy window was made in manubrium sterni to remove the bony obstacle. To bypass the vital vascular and neural structures over the operative field, we used the surgical corridor which was located medially by the brachiocephalic artery and laterally by the right brachiocephalic vein, or in combination with another surgical corridor between the ascending aorta and the superior vena cava. And we used a special self-retaining retractor system and an endoscope to facilitate the procedures. RESULTS: Surgical procedures performed on the four fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens to expose the CTJ through mini-open anterior approach were successful. The anterior surface of C6-T5 could be exposed, allowing complete decompression and application of locking plate and screws. The most caudal accessible vertebral body was T5 vertebral body in our study. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to expose the CTJ through this mini-open anterior approach.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Cadáver , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
19.
Orthopedics ; 35(12): e1822-5, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23218645

RESUMO

Lumbar interspinous devices are intended to unload the facet joints, restore foraminal height, lower intradisk pressure, and provide motion-preserving stabilization. They are an alternative treatment for patients with spinal degeneration and have increased in popularity in recent years. To the authors' knowledge, heterotopic ossification has not been previously reported around an interspinous device, and this is the first reported case of interspinous fusion after interspinous device placement.A 66-year-old man presented with a 3-year history of low back pain and a 4-month history of radiating pain down his left leg. A diagnosis was made of lumbar spinal stenosis and left disk herniation at L4-L5 after physical and imaging examinations. A dynamic interspinous device was implanted after the decompressive surgery. The patient's symptoms were relieved postoperatively. Thirty-two months later, he returned with back pain after being in a traffic accident. Lumbar radiographs showed a massive bony formation around the implant. Radiographs and a computed tomography scan 4.5 years later revealed that the implanted device segments were fused. No implant motion was seen on dynamic radiographs. Because the patient was symptom free, no interventions were performed.Heterotopic bone formation around a dynamic interspinous device may hamper motion preservation, and heterotopic ossification is a potential mid- and long-term complication.


Assuntos
Laminectomia/instrumentação , Vértebras Lombares/patologia , Ossificação Heterotópica/etiologia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Idoso , Descompressão Cirúrgica/instrumentação , Humanos , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Laminectomia/métodos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Ossificação Heterotópica/diagnóstico por imagem , Próteses e Implantes , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
20.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 50(9): 776-81, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23157950

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study indications and complications of interspinous process device Coflex for degenerative disk diseases. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients with degenerative lumbar disc diseases were underwent procedures of surgical decompression and additional fixation of Coflex between November 2007 and October 2010. Sixty-eight patients were male and the other fourty were female, and their average age was 53.5 years (range from 37 to 75 years). Fifty-nine patients were underwent surgery of excision of nucleus pulposus and Coflex fixation, 41 patients were underwent surgery of decompression by fenestration and Coflex fixation, 6 patients were underwent surgery of topping-off, and 2 patients were underwent surgery of Coflex fixation for two level. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scales (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded, as well as height of ventral intervertebral space (HV), height of dorsal intervertebral space (HD), height of intervertebral foramen (HIF) and segmental range of motion (ROM). One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. Surgical complications were also recorded. RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 28.8 months. All groups had apparent improvement of VAS and ODI, and maintained well to last follow-up (F = 6.16-25.92, P = 0.00). Statistical analysis showed that HD and HIF increased significantly in group with excision of nucleus pulposus and Coflex fixation and group with decompression by fenestration and Coflex fixation (F = 7.37 - 11.68, P < 0.05). Although both HD and HIF decreased one-year after surgery, they were still higher than those preoperatively (F = 6.31 and 7.05, P = 0.00). Preoperative segmental ROM was respectively 6.3° ± 1.8° and 6.2° ± 1.7° in group with excision of nucleus pulposus and Coflex fixation and group with decompression by fenestration and Coflex fixation, and 3.1° ± 0.6° and 3.0° ± 0.8° at last follow-up. Three cases were found with device-related complications and five with non-device-related complications, and all five cased were cured after appropriate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical method assisted with Coflex has significant clinical efficacy for degenerative disc disease, it can maintain segmental stability, simultaneously, partly reserve movement. It's key to strictly master indications and precisely choose patients.


Assuntos
Fixadores Internos , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Fixadores Internos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA