Surgical outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for vaginal vault prolapse prevention: 10 years review.

AIMS: To study the non-recurrent prolapse rate after vaginal hysterectomy colpoperineorrhaphy and sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) with or without anterior colporrhaphy, with or without posterior colpoperineorrhaphy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, during January 1, 2012-December 31, 2021. The inclusion criteria were Thai women diagnosed with uterovaginal prolapse and undergone vaginal hysterectomy, with or without anterior colporrhaphy, with or without posterior colpoperineorrhaphy, with SSLF and had the complete pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) information at the 12 months follow up. The recurrent case was defined as any compartment prolapse ≥ stage II by POP-Q classification at 1, 3, 6, 12 months follow up. RESULTS: Of 71 cases included, 20 cases had recurrent prolapse at 12 months. The incidences of non-recurrent prolapse rate at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 70/71 (98.59%), 65/70 (92.86%), 58/65 (89.23%), and 51/58 (87.93%). The overall PHVP prevalence at 12 months was 2/71 (2.81%). The anterior compartment prolapse were 18/71 (25.35%) at 12 months. The most common postoperative complications were the urinary tract infection (4.23%). There were one case of nerve entrapment and one case of stitches exposure that required stitches removal. CONCLUSION: SSLF at the time of vaginal hysterectomy is safe and effective in post hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse prevention. But there are high recurrence rate of anterior compartment prolapse at 12 months. Preoperative counseling and long-term follow up after SSLF is advocated.

Patient-reported goal achievements after pelvic floor muscle training versus pessary in women with pelvic organ prolapse. A randomised controlled trial.

The aim was to assess the achievement by self-determined goals in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) participants receiving pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared to vaginal pessary. Forty participants with POP stage II to III were randomly allocated to pessary or PFMT. Participants were asked to list up 3 goals they expected from treatment. Thai version of Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised (PISQ-IR) were completed at 0 and 6-week period. At 6-week post-treatment, they were asked if their goals had been achieved. The totally achieved goals in the vaginal pessary group were 70% (14/20) significantly higher than PFMT group at 30% (6/20) (p = 0.01). The mean ± SD of the post-treatment P-QOL score in the vaginal pessary group was significantly lower than the PFMT group (13.90 ± 10.83 vs 22.04 ± 5.93, p = 0.01), but not different in all PISQ-IR subscales. Pessary treatment for POP yielded better total goal achievements and better quality of life than PFMT for POP treatment at a 6-week follow-up.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can severely affect the quality of life, causing physical, social, psychological, occupational, and/or sexual dysfunction. Individual patient goal setting and goal achievement scaling (GAS) offers a new method of patient-reported outcome measurement (PRO) in therapeutic success such as pessary or surgery in patient with POP. But there is no randomised controlled trial comparing pessary vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) using GAS as the outcome measurement.What do the results of this study add? The results showed that women with POP stage II to III who received vaginal pessary had higher totally goal achievements and better quality of life than the women received the PFMT at 6-week follow up.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The information about the better goal achievements by using pessary can be used as the tools for counselling for patients with POP for selecting the choices for the treatment in the clinical setting.

POP stage II to III patients treatedwith vaginal pessary had higher totally goal achievements and better quality of life than treated by PFMT.

Effect of vaginal estrogen in postmenopausal women using vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Evidence and recommendations for the use of intravaginal estrogen for prevention of bacterial vaginosis and pessary-related complications are limited and controversial. We hypothesized that adding intravaginal estrogen to pessary use would decrease the incidence of bacterial vaginosis and other pessary-related complications. METHODS: A single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel study was conducted between April 2018 and August 2020. Participants were randomized to either receive intravaginal estriol 0.03 mg plus Lactobacillus acidophilus 100 million viable cell vaginal tablets or have no treatment. The Amsel criteria, normal flora index, visual analog scale, Thai version of the ICIQ-VS (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal symptoms) questionnaire, vaginal abrasions and vaginal bleeding were evaluated at entry and at 2- and 14-week follow-up. RESULTS: Seventy-eight women were included and randomized to two groups (39 women per group). At 2-week follow-up, one participant in the intervention group and two participants in the control group were diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis (2.7% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.609). At 14-week follow-up, two participants in the intervention group and two participants in the control group were diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis (5.7% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.926). Normal flora index was significantly different at 2-week follow-up [8 (6.3) vs. 5 (6.0), p = 0.032]. There was no significant difference in the visual analog scale, Thai version of the ICIQ-VS, vaginal abrasions and vaginal bleeding between the 2- and 14-week follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows no benefit of intravaginal estrogen in reducing bacterial vaginosis, vaginal abrasions, vaginal bleeding and pain in postmenopausal women using a vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse treatment.

Gynecologic Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Is Universal Screening Mandatory?

This study is aimed at evaluating the results of the universal preoperative screening for COVID-19 in gynecologic cases operated on during its outbreak in a tertiary care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. A retrospective descriptive study was done on all patients who underwent elective or emergency gynecologic surgeries during the pandemic period in Thailand (April 15 to June 5, 2020). The COVID-19 screening results by symptom-based screening, risk-based screening, and RT-PCR for COVID-19 were collected from the electronic medical records. Among 129 patients who underwent gynecologic surgeries, none had a positive RT-PCR for COVID-19. Symptom-based screening found no patients with positive symptoms for COVID-19. Risk-based screening found 4 patients (3.1%) who were in contact with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases and 4 patients (3.1%) who were healthcare personnel. In conclusion, routine preoperative RT-PCR for COVID-19 may need to be reconsidered among asymptomatic individuals in a low-prevalence country during the well-controlled COVID-19 situation. Larger studies are required to ascertain the benefit of universal preoperative COVID-19 testing.