Effect of Chemotherapy, Laparoscopy, and Cytology on Stage IC Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Long-Term, Single-Center Study.

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is the second common histology of epithelial ovarian cancer in Taiwan. Stage IC is common, especially during minimally invasive surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IC OCCC is unavoidable, and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy in Taiwan is self-paid. However, surgical spillage from minimally invasive surgery as a cause of unfavorable prognosis is still uncertain. The information of patients with stage IC OCCC, corresponding to a period of January 1995 to December 2016, was retrospectively collected following a chart and pathology review. Data regarding surgical methods, cytology status, regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy, survivorship, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) period were analyzed. In total, 88 patients were analyzed, and 64 and 24 patients were treated with paclitaxel- and nonpaclitaxel-based chemotherapy, respectively. Recurrence was identical between the two groups: PFS (47.5 ± 41.36 versus 54.0 ± 53.9 months, p = 0.157) and OS (53.5 ± 38.14 versus 79.0 ± 49.42 months, p = 0.070). Of the 88 patients, 12 had undergone laparoscopy for histological confirmation before complete open staging surgery; however, their PFS (49.5 ± 46.84 versus 49.0 ± 35.55 months, p = 0.719) and OS (56.5 ± 43.4 versus 51.0 ± 32.77 months, p = 0.600) were still comparable. Cytology results were only available for 51 patients, and positive washing cytology results seemed to worsen PFS (p = 0.026) but not OS (p = 0.446). In conclusion, adjuvant nonpaclitaxel chemotherapy and laparoscopic tumor spillage before the staging operation did not worsen the outcome in stage IC OCCC. Positive washing cytology has a negative effect on PFS but not on OS.

Is conization once following by simple hysterectomy sufficient for all clinical stage IA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma?

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to assess the feasibility of simple extrafascial hysterectomy for patients with clinical stage IA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after once conization regardless of any pathologic risk factor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All cases with T1a1, SCC lesion in their cervical cone specimen were retrospectively collected after chart and pathology review for the period between January 2002 and December 2009. All cases underwent subsequent hysterectomies within a month of diagnosis. Pathologic risk factors of conization, surgical scale of hysterectomy, residual lesion of the uterus, necessity of adjuvant radiation therapy, complications, and survival were analyzed in this study. RESULTS: Eighty-one cases were identified from the registry. Most were managed by simple hysterectomy (SH; 60/81, 74%), and the remaining 21 cases underwent modified radical hysterectomy (MRH). All cases without any risk factors in their cone specimens demonstrated residual lesion ≤T1a1 in both SH and MRH groups, whereas those with existing risk factor were confirmed positive for residual lesions ≤T1a1 [SH, 95.8% (46/48) vs. MRH, 75% (15/20)]. Only two cases in the SH group received adjuvant radiation for residual lesions >T1a1. On the contrary, 15 cases in the MRH group can receive smaller scale surgery than MRH. All cases were recurrence-free without any permanent treatment-related complication by the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Extrafascial simple hysterectomy may be recommended for clinical T1a1 cervical SCC regardless of the pathologic risk factor.