Impact of multiple primary cancers on overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

The increasing occurrence of multiple primary cancers (MPC) is a long-term trend, but the prevalence of MPC in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its impact on overall survival (OS) remains unknown. We retrospectively analyzed 497 patients with HCC treated at two tertiary centers. The cohort was divided into two subgroups - liver transplant (LT, 324 patients) and non-liver transplant (non-LT, 173 patients). We analyzed MPC occurrence, its impact on survival, and identified variables predicting unfavorable outcomes. The MPC were detected in 88 patients (18%). The most common MPC were prostate (17%), skin (15.9%), kidney (12.5%), and lung (10.2%). The median OS of the whole cohort and the LT and non-LT subgroups were 70, 116, and 17 months, respectively (p<0.0001). The median OS in patients with HCC only and HCC with another cancer was 77 (95% CI, 67-96) and 50 months (95% CI, 37-62), respectively (p=0.25). The OS of LT patients was significantly better than that of those in whom LT had been contraindicated owing to concomitant MPC (116 vs. 35 months, p<0.0009). Autoimmune etiology, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), HCC as the first diagnosed malignancy, and male sex were identified as factors significantly influencing the patients' outcomes (HR 0.43, 3.2326, 0.70, and 1.43, respectively). The MPC frequency was 18%. The impact of MPC on OS was not significant, except for individuals contraindicated for LT because of MPC. A better prognosis is associated with the autoimmune etiology of cirrhosis, and when HCC is diagnosed as the first malignancy. Male sex and NASH worsened the outcomes.

Alpha-1 Antitrypsin and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Cirrhosis: SERPINA1 MZ or MS Genotype Carriage Decreases the Risk.

Heterozygotes for Z or S alleles of alpha-1-antrypsin (AAT) have low serum AAT levels. Our aim was to compare the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with liver cirrhosis carrying the SERPINA1 MM, MZ and MS genotypes. The study groups consisted of 1119 patients with liver cirrhosis of various aetiologies, and 3240 healthy individuals served as population controls. The MZ genotype was significantly more frequent in the study group (55/1119 vs. 87/3240, p < 0.0001). The MS genotype frequency was comparable in controls (32/119 vs. 101/3240, p = 0.84). MZ and MS heterozygotes had lower serum AAT level than MM homozygotes (medians: 0.90 g/L; 1.40 g/L and 1.67 g/L; p < 0.001 for both). There were significantly fewer patients with HCC in the cirrhosis group among MZ and MS heterozygotes than in MM homozygotes (5/55 and 1/32 respectively, vs. 243/1022, p < 0.01 for both). The risk of HCC was lower in MZ and MS heterozygotes than in MM homozygotes (OR 0.3202; 95% CI 0.1361-0.7719 and OR 0.1522; 95% CI 0.02941-0.7882, respectively). Multivariate analysis of HCC risk factors identified MZ or MS genotype carriage as a protective factor, whereas age, male sex, BMI and viral aetiology of cirrhosis increased HCC risk.

PNPLA3 rs738409 G allele carriers with genotype 1b HCV cirrhosis have lower viral load but develop liver failure at younger age.

BACKGROUND: PNPLA3 rs738409 minor allele c.444G represents a risk factor for liver steatosis and fibrosis progression also in chronic hepatitis C (HCV). We investigated its impact on the timing of liver transplantation (LT) in patients with genotype 1b HCV cirrhosis. METHODS: We genotyped and evaluated 172 LT candidates with liver cirrhosis owing to chronic HCV infection, genotype 1b. One hundred patients needed LT for chronic liver failure (CLF) and 72 for a small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the cirrhotic liver without CLF. Population controls (n = 647) were selected from the Czech cross-sectional study MONICA. RESULTS: The CLF patients were younger (53.5 ± 7.2 vs. 59.6 ± 6.6, P < 0.001) with more advanced liver disease than HCC patients (Child-Pugh's score 9.1 ± 1.8 vs. 7.1 ± 1.9, P < 0.001, MELD 14.1 ± 3.9 vs. 11.1 ± 3.7, P < 0.001). PNPLA3 G allele increased the risk of LT for CLF in both allelic and recessive models (CG + GG vs. CC: OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.017-3.472, P = 0.045 and GG vs. CC + CG: OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.032-7.513, P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis identified younger age (P < 0.001) and the G allele (P < 0.05) as risk factors for CLF. The genotype frequencies between the CLF group and MONICA study significantly differed in both, allelic and recessive model (P = 0.004, OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.222-2.875; P < 0.001, OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.824-6.084, respectively). The OR values almost doubled in the recessive model compared with the allelic model suggesting the additive effect of allele G. In contrast, genotype frequencies in the HCC group were similar to the MONICA study in both models. Pretransplant viral load was significantly lower in GG than in CC + CG genotypes (median, IQR; 162,500 (61,550-319,000) IU/ml vs. 570,000 (172,000-1,595,000) IU/ml, P < 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that PNPLA3 rs738409 G allele carriage may be associated with a faster progression of HCV cirrhosis to chronic liver failure.

Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Ombitasvir Plus Dasabuvir Regimen in the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Patients with Severe Renal Impairment and End-Stage Renal Disease: a Real-Life Cohort.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) virus infection reactivates under immunosuppressive drugs and therefore has a negative impact on long-term survival of kidney transplant recipients. Treatment-induced clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in kidney transplant candidates prevents virus reactivation after transplantation. Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Ombitasvir with Dasabuvir (PrOD) represents a highly effective treatment regimen for HCV genotype 1 (GT1), also suitable for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Serious drug-drug interactions may represent a limiting factor of this regimen. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate safety, efficacy and drug-drug interactions management associated with PrOD treatment in the Czech real-world cohort. METHODS: Emphasizing concomitant medication adjustment, we described the treatment course with PrOD regimen in 23 patients (4 with CKD4 and 19 on maintenance haemodialysis) infected with HCV GT1 (21 GT1b, 2 GT1a), 18 males and 5 females with an average age of 53.7 years. Six patients had compensated liver cirrhosis and 3 of them were liver transplant recipients. RESULTS: All 23 patients completed the 12-week treatment and achieved sustained virological response 12 weeks after the treatment (SVR12 rate 100%). None of the patients presented with a significant decrease in haemoglobin level, white blood cell and platelet count during the treatment period. The most frequent adverse events were nausea, hypotension, diarrhoea, and hyperkalemia. Four patients presented with a serious adverse event unrelated to the antiviral drugs (salmonellosis, non-functional kidney graft rejection, early gastric cancer, renal cyst infection, initiation of haemodialysis). Concomitant medication had to be modified with the treatment initiation in 10 out of 23 (43.5%) patients (calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, statins, diuretics, tacrolimus); four patients required further adjustment of antihypertensive drugs or tacrolimus dosage on-treatment. CONCLUSION: PrOD regimen demonstrated an excellent efficacy and good tolerability. Both prospective adjustment of concomitant medication and further on-treatment adjustment allowed for a safe treatment course.