Migration patterns of acetabular cups: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RSA studies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RSA studies to investigate the early and long-term migration patterns of acetabular cups and the influence of implant factors on cup migration over time. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases to identify all RSA studies of cup migration following primary total hip replacement (THR). Proximal migration at 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were considered for analysis. Implant factors investigated included fixation type, head size, bearing surface, uncemented coating design, and the decade of RSA introduction. RESULTS: 47 studies reported the proximal migration of 83 cohorts (2,328 cups). Besides 1 threaded cup design, no implant factor investigated was found to significantly influence proximal migration. The mean pooled 2-year proximal migration of cemented cups (0.14 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.20) was not significantly different from uncemented cups (0.12 mm, CI 0.04-0.19). The mean pooled proximal migration at 6 months was 0.11 mm (CI 0.06-0.16) and there was no significant increase between 6 months and 2 years (0.015 mm, CI 0.000-0.030). 27 of 75 cohorts (36%) reported mean proximal migration greater than 0.2 mm at 2 years, which has previously been identified as a predictor of implants at risk of long-term loosening. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the majority of cup migration occurs within the first 6 months. With one exception, no implant factors influenced the 2-year proximal migration of acetabular cups. 36% of studies with 2-year migration were considered at risk of long-term loosening. Further investigation and comparison against long-term survivorship data would validate 6-month and/or 1-year proximal migration measurements as an earlier predictor of long-term loosening than the current 2-year threshold.

Risk factors of de novo hyperextension developed after posterior cruciate ligament substituting total knee arthroplasty: a matched case-control study.

PURPOSE: To investigate factors contributing to the de novo hyperextension after posterior cruciate ligament substituting (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Through a retrospective case-control study, de novo hyperextension patients were compared with patients without hyperextension after primary PS TKA. Eighty-five hyperextension patients were compared with 85 patients in a control group matched by age, sex, surgeon and implant. The clinical and radiographic parameters, including the mechanical axis (MA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA), posterior condylar offset (PCO), and the gamma angle, were evaluated preoperatively and immediate postoperatively. Comparisons between the two groups and logistic regression analysis were performed to investigate factors contributing to de novo hyperextension. RESULTS: Among the clinical factors, preoperative flexion contracture was less (5° ± 6° vs. 11° ± 6°, p < 0.001) and the range of motion was greater (125° ± 12° vs. 118° ± 5°, p = 0.041) in the de novo hyperextension group than in the control group. Among the radiographic parameters, preoperative and postoperative JLCA were greater (8.1° ± 4.4° vs. 6.1° ± 3.5°, p < 0.001, 1.0° ± 1.3° vs. 0.2° ± 0.8°, p = 0.002, respectively), postoperative PTSA was greater (3.7° ± 2.0° vs. 3.3° ± 1.6°, p < 0.001) and preoperative and postoperative PCO were less in the hyperextension group than in the control group (26.3 mm ± 3.3 mm vs. 29.1 mm ± 3.2 mm, p < 0.001, 26.4 mm ± 3.2 mm vs. 29.1 mm ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.001, respectively), whereas, change in PCO was greater in the hyperextension group (1.1 mm ± 7.7 mm vs. - 0.1 mm ± 3.3 mm, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the degree of medial soft tissue release [odds ratio (OR) 2.83, p = 0.003], flexion contracture [OR 0.86, p = 0.028], postoperative JLCA [OR 2.45, p = 0.004], preoperative PCO and a change in PCO [OR 0.74, p = 0.002, OR 1.89, p = 0.001, respectively] were the factors associated with de novo hyperextension. CONCLUSIONS: An increased degree of medial soft tissue release, small preoperative flexion contracture, increased postoperative JLCA, decreased preoperative PCO and increased change in PCO were risk factors of de novo hyperextension. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.