Whey Peptide Alleviates Muscle Atrophy by Strongly Regulating Myocyte Differentiation in Mice.

Background and Objectives: Muscle atrophy occurs when protein degradation exceeds protein synthesis, resulting in imbalanced protein homeostasis, compromised muscle contraction, and a reduction in muscle mass. The incidence of muscle atrophy is increasingly recognized as a significant worldwide public health problem. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of whey peptide (WP) on muscle atrophy induced by dexamethasone (DEX) in mice. Materials and Methods: C57BL/6 mice were divided into six groups, each consisting of nine individuals. WPs were orally administered to C57BL/6 mice for 6 weeks. DEX was administered for 5-6 weeks to induce muscle atrophy (intraperitoneal injection, i.p.). Results: Microcomputer tomography (CT) analysis confirmed that WP significantly increased calf muscle volume and surface area in mice with DEX-induced muscle atrophy, as evidenced by tissue staining. Furthermore, it increased the area of muscle fibers and facilitated greater collagen deposition. Moreover, WP significantly decreased the levels of serum biomarkers associated with muscle damage, kidney function, and inflammatory cytokines. WP increased p-mTOR and p-p70S6K levels through the IGF-1/PI3K/Akt pathway, while concurrently decreasing protein catabolism via the FOXO pathway. Furthermore, the expression of proteins associated with myocyte differentiation increased noticeably. Conclusions: These results confirm that WP reduces muscle atrophy by regulating muscle protein homeostasis. Additionally, it is believed that it helps to relieve muscle atrophy by regulating the expression of myocyte differentiation factors. Therefore, we propose that WP plays a significant role in preventing and treating muscle wasting by functioning as a supplement to counteract muscle atrophy.

The Effect of Intervention for Improving Colonoscopy Quality Is Associated with the Personality Traits of Endoscopists.

Background/Aims: This study investigated whether the personality traits of endoscopists are associated with the effect of interventions for the improvement of colonoscopy quality. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, single-blind study was performed with 13 endoscopists in three health screening centers over a 12-month period. Quality indicators (QIs), including adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), and withdrawal time, were measured every 3 months. Consecutive interventions for the improvement of colonoscopy quality were conducted every 3 months, which included the personal notification of QIs, the in-group notification of QIs, and finally a targeted "quality education" session. The personality traits of each endoscopist were evaluated for perfectionism, fear of negative evaluation, and cognitive flexibility after the last QI assessment. Results: A total of 4,095 colonoscopies were evaluated to measure the QIs of the individual endoscopists for 12 months. The mean ADR, PDR, and withdrawal time of the 13 endoscopists were 32.3%, 47.7%, and 394 seconds at baseline and increased to 39.0%, 55.1%, and 430 seconds by the end of the study (p=0.003, p=0.006, and p=0.004, respectively). Among the three interventions, only quality education significantly improved QIs: ADR, 36.0% to 39.0% (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.63). The improvement of ADR and PDR by education was significantly associated with perfectionism (r=0.617, p=0.033 and r=0.635, p=0.027, respectively) and fear of negative evaluation (r=0.704, p=0.011 and r=0.761, p=0.004, respectively). Conclusions: Education can improve colonoscopy quality, and its effect size is associated with an endoscopist's personal traits such as perfectionism and fear of negative evaluation (Clinical-Trials.gov Registry NCT03796169).

Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is recommended for the resection of small colorectal polyps. However, few studies have investigated the efficacy of cold endoscopic mucosal resection (cold EMR) for small polyps. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of cold EMR compared with CSP for small colorectal polyps. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized trial conducted in three tertiary centers from January 2018 to February 2021. Patients with polyps sized 6-10 mm were randomized to CSP or cold EMR group. After polypectomy, two additional biopsies were performed to assess the completeness of resection. The primary outcome was complete polyp resection rate. Secondary outcomes were total procedure time and rate of adverse events such as immediate bleeding, delayed bleeding, and perforation. RESULTS: A total of 444 polyps in 327 patients were assessed and randomly assigned to each group. Of those, 425 polyps were finally analyzed based on pathology results. The complete resection rate was not significantly different between cold EMR and CSP groups (91.9% vs 89.8%, p = 0.24). However, the total procedure time was significantly increased in cold EMR (87.6 s vs. 45.8 s, p < 0.001). The rate of polypectomy adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups. No patient had massive bleeding or perforation. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in complete resection rate or adverse events between CSP and cold EMR. However, CSP reduced the total procedure time.

Comparison of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and 4 L Polyethylene Glycol in Elderly Patients Aged 60-79: A Prospective Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: The bowel-cleansing efficacy and safety of 2 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) with ascorbic acid (2L PEG + Asc) has rarely been studied in the elderly population. In this randomized trial, we compared the bowel cleanliness, safety, and tolerability of 2L PEG + Asc with those of 4 L PEG in an elderly population aged 60-79. METHODS: Study participants were randomized either to 2L PEG + Asc or 4L PEG. The primary endpoint was the success rate of bowel preparation, using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Before colonoscopy, all participants were questioned about adverse events and tolerability regarding purgative ingestion. RESULTS: A total of 347 individuals were enrolled (2L PEG + Asc, 174; 4L PEG, 173). Mean age in the 2L PEG + Asc and the 4L PEG was 69.3 ± 5.6 and 69.3 ± 5.0, respectively (P = 0.917). The rate for successful bowel cleansing was comparable between the 2L PEG + Asc (92%) and the 4L PEG (96%, P = 0.118). Total ingested liquid including purgative and water was lower in the 2L PEG + Asc group (2.9 L) than in the 4L PEG group (4.2 L, P < 0.001). The tolerability of purgative was superior in the 2L PEG + Asc (overall satisfaction, P < 0.001; willingness to reuse, P < 0.001). There were no serious adverse events during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: The bowel-cleansing efficacy of 2L PEG + Asc was comparable to that of 4L PEG. Tolerability was superior in the 2L PEG + Asc group. For older people, 2L PEG + Asc is an efficacious and safe bowel cleanser. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0004123).

Clinical Course of Patients with Intestinal Behçet's Disease According to Consensus-Based Diagnostic Categories.

Background/Aims: There have been few studies regarding the prognosis of intestinal Behçet's disease (iBD) patients according to consensus-based diagnostic categories, which reflects the typicality of intestinal ulcers, the presence of oral ulcers, and the accompanying systemic manifestations. Methods: The medical records of patients who had ileocolonic ulcers with a clinical impression of iBD were reviewed. The patients were categorized according to the diagnostic algorithm at the time of diagnosis. Adverse events were defined as major surgery or admission related to iBD deterioration. Results: A total of 163 patients were included in the study. The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.2, and the mean age at the time of diagnosis was 48.9±15.9 years. The numbers of patients who met the definite, probable, suspected, and nondiagnostic iBD criteria were 19 (11.7%), 61 (37.4%), 38 (23.3%), and 45 (27.6%), respectively. The event-free survival of patients with definite, probable, and suspected iBD was significantly shorter than that of patients with nondiagnostic iBD (p=0.026), while there was no significant difference among the definite iBD, probable iBD, and suspected iBD groups (p=0.596). After excluding patients with nondiagnostic iBD, multivariate analysis showed that anemia, fever, colonic involvement other than the ileocecum, and accompanying hematologic disorders at the time of diagnosis were significantly associated with the development of adverse events. Conclusions: The clinical course of patients with definite, probable, and suspected iBD is distinguished from that of patients with nondiagnostic iBD, but patients with definite, probable, and suspected iBD share similar clinical courses.

Safety of Endoscopy in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic procedures can provoke peritonitis in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). The aim of this study was to assess the development of peritonitis after endoscopic procedures in PD patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data from PD patients who underwent endoscopies in 3 tertiary hospitals between 2008 and 2018. The patients were grouped into nonprophylactic, prophylactic, and prior antibiotic therapy groups. The incidence of peritonitis within 7 days of endoscopy was assessed. We also examined the factors associated with peritonitis. RESULTS: There were 1,316 endoscopies performed in 570 PD patients. The peritonitis rate after endoscopy was 3.0%. Specifically, the peritonitis rate was 1.8% for esophagogastroduodenoscopies, 4.2% for the colonoscopy group, and 5.3% for the sigmoidoscopy group. The prior antibiotic therapy group showed a significantly higher risk of peritonitis (odds ratio = 4.6; 95% confidence interval: 2.2-9.6; P < 0.01). Prophylactic antibiotics were not associated with reducing peritonitis. Therapeutic colonoscopies such as polypectomy were associated with an increased risk of developing peritonitis (odds ratio = 6.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.6-25.9). However, biopsies were not associated with an increased risk of peritonitis. DISCUSSION: Prophylactic antibiotics did not reduce the risk of peritonitis after endoscopy in PD patients. Therapeutic colonoscopies such as polypectomy and prior antibiotic therapy before endoscopy were associated with an increased risk of peritonitis.

Effect of prophylactic clip application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding of large pedunculated colonic polyps: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prophylactic application of a hemoclip has been suggested as an alternative to the use of an endoloop for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB) when resecting large, pedunculated colorectal polyps. Therefore, this multicenter, randomized controlled trial investigated the efficacy of prophylactic hemoclip application to reduce PPB during the resection of large pedunculated polyps. METHODS: Large pedunculated polyps (≥10 mm in head diameter) were eligible for inclusion. Polyps were randomized into a study arm (where clips were applied before resection) and a control arm (without pretreatment). The primary outcome was the rate of PPB in each group. PPB included immediate PPB (IPPB) and delayed PPB (DPPB). IPPB was defined as blood oozing (≥1 minute) or active spurting occurring immediately after polyp resection. DPPB was defined as rectal bleeding, occurring after completion of the colonoscopy. RESULTS: In total, 238 polyps from 204 patients were randomized into the clip arm (119 polyps) or the control arm (119 polyps). Overall bleeding adverse events were observed in 20 cases (IPPB, 16; DPPB, 4). The rate of overall PPB, IPPB, and DPPB was 8.4%, 6.7%, and 1.7%, respectively, for all polyps. The rate of overall PPB (clip 4.2% vs control 12.6%, P = .033) and IPPB (clip 2.5% vs control 10.9%, P = .017) was significantly lower in the clip arm than the control arm. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic clipping before resecting large pedunculated polyps can reduce overall PPB and IPPB compared with no prior treatment. Therefore, prophylactic clipping may be considered before resection of large pedunculated polyps. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02156193.).

Propofol compared with bolus and titrated midazolam for sedation in outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective randomized double-blind study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The safest and most efficient method of sedation for outpatient colonoscopy remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of bolus administration of midazolam compared with titrated administration and propofol administration for patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy. METHODS: We randomly divided patients undergoing colonoscopy into the propofol group, bolus midazolam group, and titrated midazolam group. We compared total procedure time, induction time, recovery time, and discharge time among the 3 groups. We also compared patient satisfaction and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 267 patients (89 in each study group) were enrolled during the study period. Patients in the propofol group had a shorter total procedure time (39.5 vs 59.4 vs 58.1 minutes; P < .001), induction time (4.6 vs 6.3 vs 7.6 minutes; P < .001), recovery time (11.5 vs 29.5 vs 29.2 minutes; P < .001), and discharge time (20.6 vs 34.9 vs 34.7 minutes; P < .001) than patients in the bolus midazolam group and titrated midazolam group. Patients in the propofol group reported higher degrees of satisfaction than patients in the bolus or titrated midazolam plus meperidine groups (9.9 vs 9.6 vs 9.6 [P = .007] and 4.9 vs 4.7 vs 4.8 [P = .008], respectively). Adverse events were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, propofol was superior to bolus or titrated midazolam in terms of endoscopy unit efficiency and patient satisfaction during outpatient colonoscopy. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0002805.).

Pregnancy outcomes in women with inflammatory bowel disease: a 10-year nationwide population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Data relating to the association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and pregnancy outcomes are lacking in Korea. AIMS: To determine the incidence rates of pregnancy outcomes in women with IBD. METHODS: A nationwide population study was performed using the Korean National Health Insurance claims database. A total of 2058 women with IBD consisting of ulcerative colitis (UC, n = 1469) and Crohn's disease (CD, n = 589) were pregnant between 2007 and 2016. We compared their incidence of pregnancy outcomes with 20 580 age-matched controls without IBD. We also stratified the patients into those with quiescent to mild and moderate to severe IBD and compared the outcomes between them. RESULTS: The pregnancy rate of women with IBD was lower than that of women without (25.7% vs 32.3%, P < 0.001). Caesarean section (46.5% vs 38.8%, odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.75), and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) (3.0% vs 1.0%, OR 2.89, 95% CI: 1.59-5.26) were increased in CD patients than the controls. In regards to disease severity, there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between patients with quiescent to mild IBD and the controls. However, the live birth rate of patients with moderate to severe IBD was lower than that of the controls (65.0% vs 69.9%, OR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.66-0.94). In addition, moderate to severe IBD was significantly associated with spontaneous abortion (14.9% vs 11.9%, OR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04-1.68), caesarean section (46.4% vs 38.8%, OR 1.41, 95% CI: 1.14-1.74) and IUGR (3.4% vs 1.0%, OR 3.20, 95% CI: 1.75-5.84). CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of moderate to severe disease, the incidences of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with IBD are similar to that of the general population.

Cap-Assisted Chromoendoscopy Using a Mounted Cap Versus Standard Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection.

OBJECTIVES: Some neoplastic lesions remain undetected on colonoscopy. To date, no studies have investigated whether combining cap-assisted colonoscopy with chromoendoscopy increases the adenoma detection rate (ADR). This study aimed to compare cap-assisted chromoendoscopy (CAP/CHROMO) with standard colonoscopy (SC) with respect to their efficacy in detecting adenomas. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial included asymptomatic subjects aged 45-75 years who underwent colonoscopy for the first time at 14 university hospitals. Subjects were randomized to either the CAP/CHROMO group (with 0.09% indigo carmine spraying using a cap-mounted catheter at the tip of the colonoscope) or the SC group. All polyps were resected, but only histologically confirmed neoplastic lesions were considered for analysis. The primary outcome was ADR, defined as the proportion of subjects with at least 1 adenoma. RESULTS: A total of 1,905 subjects were randomized to the CAP/CHROMO (n = 948) or SC (n = 957) group at 14 centers. Subjects' demographic characteristics were similar between both groups. The CAP/CHROMO group had significantly higher ADR than the SC group (54.4% vs 44.9%, P < 0.001). Significantly, more subjects with at least 1 proximal colon adenoma were identified by CAP/CHROMO (38.6%) than by SC (31.2%) (P = 0.001). The proximal serrated polyp detection rate by CAP/CHROMO was significantly higher in the female subgroup vs SC. However, advanced ADR was not different between the CAP/CHROMO and SC groups (9.3% vs 7.6%, P = 0.180). DISCUSSION: CAP/CHROMO markedly improved the ADR and enhanced the detection of proximal adenoma. CAP/CHROMO is feasible for routine application and will allow for a more effective surveillance program.

Comparison of adenoma detection by colonoscopy between polypectomy performed during both insertion and withdrawal versus during withdrawal only: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In standard colonoscopy, the colonoscope is inserted into the cecum, and inspection of the colonic mucosa and polypectomy are performed during withdrawal. The colon configuration can differ between the insertion and withdrawal phases, and some polyps found in the insertion phase can be missed during withdrawal. A few single-center studies investigated whether detection of polyps during the insertion phase affects the adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, the effectiveness of this strategy is unknown because of conflicting results. We aimed to determine whether polypectomy together with careful inspection during insertion increases the ADR compared with standard colonoscopy. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, multicenter trial was conducted at three university hospitals. Patients aged 50 to 80 years were randomly assigned to the study group or control group. For patients in the study group, polypectomy was performed together with careful inspection during both colonoscope insertion and withdrawal. In the control group, polyps were inspected and removed only during colonoscope withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the ADR, which was defined as the percentage of patients with ≥ 1 adenoma. RESULTS: A total of 1142 patients were enrolled (study group, n = 571; control group, n = 571). The ADR was similar in the 2 groups (study group, 44.1%; control group, 43.1%; P = 0.72). In the control group, 12 polyps that had been detected during colonoscope insertion were not found during withdrawal (polyp miss rate: 2.1%, 12/571). CONCLUSION: Polypectomy and careful inspection during both colonoscope insertion and withdrawal did not improve the overall ADR compared with standard colonoscopy (NCT01925833).

Adenoma miss rate of polypectomy-referring hospitals is high in Korea.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated the miss rates of polyps, adenomas, and advanced neoplasia of polypectomy-referring hospitals and risk factors for missed adenomas. METHODS: We compared medical records and electronic images of initial colonoscopies from polypectomy-referring hospitals with those of corresponding therapeutic colonoscopies from Seoul St. Mary's Hospital obtained from May 2014 to February 2016. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients (56.6 ± 12.1 years, 37 females) were included. The mean number of polyps and adenomas detected on initial colonoscopy was 2.4 ± 1.7 and 1.7 ± 1.4, respectively. The mean number of additionally detected polyps and adenomas per patient during therapeutic colonoscopy was 1.4 ± 1.8 and 1.0 ± 1.5, respectively. Pooled miss rate for polyps, adenomas, and advanced neoplasia was 36%, 37%, and 11%, respectively. Pooled miss rate for adenomas was significantly higher for right-sided, non-pedunculated, and small (< 1 cm) adenomas (p = 0.031, p = 0.000, and p = 0.000, respectively). The miss rate of polyps, adenomas, and advanced neoplasia per patient was 60%, 49%, and 7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed age and number of adenoma on initial colonoscopy were significantly related with risk for adenoma-missing (p = 0.005 and p = 0.023, respectively). CONCLUSION: Among patients referred for polypectomy, adenoma is missed in one of two patients and advanced neoplasm is missed in one of 13. Patients with advanced age or multiple adenoma on initial colonoscopy have a higher possibility of missed adenoma. Total colon exploration should be performed carefully during therapeutic colonoscopy.

Risk factors for peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis who undergo colonoscopy: a retrospective multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is associated with a risk of peritonitis in patients on peritoneal dialysis. However, no study has yet described the risk factors in play. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicentre study. The medical records of patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) who underwent colonoscopy from January 2003 to December 2012 were analysed. We recorded demographic characteristics, colonoscopic factors, use of prophylactic antibiotics, and development of peritonitis. Colonoscopy-related peritonitis was defined as peritonitis developing within 1 week after colonoscopy. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between patients who did and those who did not develop peritonitis. RESULTS: During the study period, 236 patients on CAPD underwent colonoscopy, of whom 9 (3.8%) developed peritonitis. The rates of polypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection were significantly higher in the peritonitis group than in the no peritonitis group (66.7 vs. 23.4%, p = 0.009). Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed before colonoscopy in 65 patients; none developed peritonitis. No patient who developed peritonitis received prophylactic antibiotics (p = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced procedures including polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection increase colonoscopy-related peritonitis in patients on CAPD. Randomized controlled trials to investigate whether prophylactic antibiotics are needed to prevent peritonitis in all CAPD patients are warranted.

Cold Snare Polypectomy in Patients Taking Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Randomized Trial of Discontinuation of Thienopyridines.

INTRODUCTION: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe and effective method for removing polyps ≤10 mm. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of clinically significant bleeding and thromboembolic events after CSP between stopping and continuing thienopyridines in patients taking dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). METHODS: The study was a single-center, noninferiority, and randomized controlled study involving patients who received colonoscopy from October 2015 to October 2016. Patients receiving DAPT with polyps ≤10 mm were randomly assigned to either the DAPT group (patients continued DAPT) or the aspirin group (patients discontinued thienopyridines for 1 week). Primary outcome was clinically significant bleeding. Secondary outcomes included intraprocedural bleeding, nonsignificant hematochezia, and occurrence of thromboembolic events. RESULTS: Forty-two patients with 104 eligible polyps were allocated to the DAPT group, and 45 patients with 101 eligible polyps were allocated to the aspirin group. Patient demographic characteristics including size, location, shape, and pathology of the removed polyps were similar in the 2 groups. Intraprocedural bleeding and nonsignificant hematochezia rates were also similar between the 2 groups (4.8% vs 2.2%, P = 0.608; 19.0% vs 8.9%, P = 0.170). No thromboembolic event occurred in either group. Only 1 patient (2.4%) in the DAPT group showed clinically significant bleeding. No significant bleeding was found in the aspirin group. DISCUSSION: Clinically significant bleeding rate after CSP for polyps ≤10 mm in patients continuing to take DAPT was 2.4%. Therefore, CSP is a safe method for removing small polyps even in patients taking DAPT (ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT02865824).

Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety, Bowel Movement Kinetics, and Patient Tolerability of Same-Day and Split-Dose Bowel Preparation Using 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol: A Prospective Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: Split-dose bowel preparation is recommended for morning colonoscopy, although a same-day dose regimen is an alternative for afternoon colonoscopy. Same-day preparation for morning colonoscopy has rarely been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We compared the bowel cleansing efficacy, bowel movement kinetics, safety profile, and patient tolerability of split-dose and same-day preparation using 4-L polyethylene glycol. DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded study. SETTINGS: This study was performed at a tertiary center in Korea. PATIENTS: Study subjects were randomly assigned to the same-day or split-dose groups. For the same-day dose group, 4 L of polyethylene glycol were ingested on the day of colonoscopy starting at 5:00 AM for morning colonoscopy or 7:00 AM for afternoon colonoscopy. In the split-dose group, 2 L of polyethylene glycol were ingested at 9:00 PM the day before colonoscopy, and the remaining 2 L from 7:00 AM for morning colonoscopy or from 10:00 AM for afternoon colonoscopy. Colonoscopy was performed from 10:00 AM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The efficacy of bowel cleansing was evaluated using the Boston bowel preparation scale. The participants completed questionnaires asking about adverse events, bowel movement kinetics, and tolerability of the preparation before colonoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 339 subjects were included (same-day dose = 172; split dose = 167). One subject in each group did not undergo colonoscopy. The rate of successful cleansing did not differ between the groups (same-day dose = 98.8% vs split dose = 98.2%; p = 0.681). There were no instances of hemodynamic instability or aspiration in either group. Tolerability, including overall satisfaction and willingness to reuse, were comparable between the groups. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: The bowel cleansing efficacy, safety profile, and tolerability of same-day dosing with polyethylene glycol were comparable with those of split dose. Therefore, same-day dosing with 4 L of polyethylene glycol is a feasible bowel preparation method. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B44. COMPARACIÓN DE LA EFICACIA DE LA LIMPIEZA INTESTINAL, LA SEGURIDAD, LA CINÉTICA DEL MOVIMIENTO INTESTINAL Y LA TOLERABILIDAD DEL PACIENTE DE LA PREPARACIÓN INTESTINAL EN EL MISMO DÍA Y EN DOSIS DIVIDIDAS UTILIZANDO 4 L DE POLIETILENGLICOL: UN ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO ALEATORIZADO: Se recomienda la preparación del intestino en dosis divididas para la colonoscopia de la mañana, aunque un régimen de una sola dosis el mismo día es una alternativa para la colonoscopia en la tarde. La preparación de una sola dosis el mismo día para la colonoscopia matutina rara vez se ha evaluado.Comparamos la eficacia de la limpieza intestinal, la cinética del movimiento intestinal, el perfil de seguridad y la tolerabilidad del paciente de la dosis dividida y la preparación el mismo día utilizando 4 L de polietilenglicol.Este fue un estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado, cegado por el evaluador.Este estudio se realizó en un centro terciario en Corea.Los sujetos del estudio fueron asignados aleatoriamente a el grupo de una dosis en el mismo día o al grupo de dosis dividida. Para el grupo de dosis del mismo día, se ingirieron 4 L de polietilenglicol el día de la colonoscopia a partir de las 5 a.m. para la colonoscopia de la mañana o las 7 a.m. para la colonoscopia de la tarde. En el grupo de dosis dividida, se ingirieron 2 L de polietilenglicol a las 9 p.m. el día anterior a la colonoscopia, y los otros 2 L restantes a partir de las 7 a.m. para la colonoscopia de la mañana o desde las 10 a.m. para la colonoscopia de la tarde. La colonoscopia se realizó a partir de las 10 a.m.La eficacia de la limpieza intestinal se evaluó mediante la escala de preparación intestinal de Boston. Los participantes completaron cuestionarios preguntando sobre los eventos adversos, la cinética del movimiento intestinal y la tolerabilidad de la preparación antes de la colonoscopia.Se incluyeron un total de 339 sujetos (dosis el mismo día, 172; dosis dividida, 167). Un sujeto en cada grupo no se sometió a colonoscopia. La tasa de limpieza exitosa no difirió entre los grupos (dosis el mismo día, 98.8% versus dosis dividida, 98.2%; p = 0.681). No hubo casos de inestabilidad hemodinámica o aspiración en ninguno de los grupos. La tolerabilidad, incluida la satisfacción general y la voluntad de reutilización, fueron comparables entre los grupos.Este fue un estudio de centro único.La eficacia de la limpieza intestinal, el perfil de seguridad y la tolerabilidad de la dosificación en el mismo día con polietilenglicol fueron comparables con los de la dosis dividida. Por lo tanto, la dosificación en el mismo día con 4 L de polietilenglicol es un método factible de preparación intestinal. Vea el video del resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B44.

Validation of same-day bowel preparation regimen using 4L polyethylene glycol: Comparison of morning and afternoon colonoscopy.

A split-dose regimen is the recommended method of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. However, for colonoscopy performed in the afternoon, same-day preparation is recommended rather than a split-dose regimen. No study has compared the efficacy of same-day bowel-cleansing for morning colonoscopy (MC) and afternoon colonoscopy (AC). The aims of this study were to evaluate the bowel-cleansing efficacy, adverse events, and patient tolerability of same-day bowel preparation for colonoscopy using 4L polyethylene glycol (PEG).The medical records of consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy at our healthcare center over 3 months were retrospectively reviewed. Colonoscopy was performed between 10:00 and 16:00. Study subjects were assigned to the MC or AC group according to their colonoscopy start time (MC group, before 12:00; AC group, after 12:00). Study subjects were instructed to drink 500-mL PEG every 15 minutes. In the MC group, bowel cleansing was started at 05:00 and finished at 07:00. For the AC group, 2L PEG was consumed from 07:00, and the remaining 2L PEG was started 3 hours before colonoscopy. The composite safety profile included vital signs, laboratory test results, and questionnaire findings. Laboratory testing of subjects and completion of the questionnaire were performed before colonoscopy. The questionnaire asked about adverse events and tolerability of the bowel cleansing regimen. Bowel-cleansing efficacy was assessed using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS). Bowel-cleansing efficacy, tolerability, and safety profile were compared between the 2 groups.Two hundred and ninety-one subjects were included (MC group, 169; AC group, 122).The BBPS did not differ between the 2 groups (7.3 ±â€Š0.8 vs. 7.3 ±â€Š0.8, P = .68). There were no instances of electrolyte imbalance or hemodynamic instability in either group. The tolerability of the bowel-cleansing regimen did not differ between the 2 groups (P = .59).The bowel-cleansing efficacy, safety profile, and patient tolerability of MC and AC were comparable. A same-day dose of 4L PEG is a feasible bowel preparation method.

Treatment of benign perforations and leaks of the esophagus: factors associated with success after stent placement.

BACKGROUND: Self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) is effective and safe for the treatment of benign esophageal perforations or leaks. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with clinical success after SEMS placement. METHODS: Patients who received SEMS placement for treatment of benign esophageal perforations or leaks were retrospectively identified. These patients were analyzed for factors associated with clinical success and complications. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients underwent stent insertion for benign esophageal perforations (n = 11) or anastomotic leaks (n = 20). Clinical success was achieved in twenty-three patients (74.2%) after initial stent insertion. In multivariate analysis, early stent insertion within 1 day was identified as a significant independent predictor of successful sealing (Odds ratio = 3.14, 95% CI 1.36-7.24; p = 0.013). The anastomotic leak group needed a longer stent dwelling time (≥ 4 weeks) compared to the perforation group (75.0% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical success was significantly associated with early stent insertion. The dwelling time of stent was shorter for benign perforations compared to anastomotic leaks.

Risk Factors for Additional Surgery after Iatrogenic Perforations due to Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Objectives. Endoscopic resection (ER) is commonly performed to treat gastric epithelial neoplasms and subepithelial tumors. The aim of this study was to predict the risk factors for surgery after ER-induced perforation. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the data on patients who received gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) between January 2010 and March 2015. Patients who were confirmed to have perforation were classified into surgery and nonsurgery groups. We aimed to determine the risk factors for surgery in patients who developed iatrogenic gastric perforations. Results. A total of 1183 patients underwent ER. Perforation occurred in 69 (5.8%) patients, and 9 patients (0.8%) required surgery to manage the perforation. In univariate analysis, anterior location of the lesion, a subepithelial lesion, two or more postprocedure pain killers within 24 hrs, and increased heart rate within 24 hrs after the procedure were the factors related to surgery. In logistic regression analysis, the location of the lesion at the anterior wall and using two or more postprocedure pain killers within 24 hrs were risk factors for surgery. Conclusion. Most cases of perforations after ER can be managed conservatively. When a patient requires two or more postprocedure pain killers within 24 hrs and the lesion is located on the anterior wall, early surgery should be considered instead of conservative management.

Randomized clinical trial comparing 10- or 14-day sequential therapy and 10- or 14-day concomitant therapy for the first line empirical treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Whether concomitant therapy is superior to sequential therapy (ST) as first-line therapy of Helicobacter pylori in areas with high clarithromycin resistance remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of 10- or 14-day ST with 10- or 14-day concomitant therapy (CT). METHODS: This was a prospective randomized study comparing 10- or 14-day ST with 10- or 14-day CT. The ST-10 and ST-14 groups received pantoprazole 40 mg and amoxicillin 1 g twice a day for the first 5 and 7 days followed by pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg twice a day for the remaining 5 and 7 days, respectively. The CT-10 and CT-14 groups received pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 10 and 14 days, respectively. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-one patients were randomly allocated to the four groups. The modified intention-to-treat eradication rates of ST-10, ST-14, CT-10, and CT-14 were 91.7%, 91.2%, 94.2%, and 98.5%, respectively. The corresponding per protocol eradication rates were 91.4%, 91.0%, 95.6%, and 98.5%. There was no difference in compliance and adverse events in the four groups. Eradication rates increased sequentially with statistical significance in the following order: ST-10, ST-14, CT-10, and CT-14 (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: All four regimens achieved eradication rates >90% in per protocol analyses in a country with high clarithromycin resistance. There was no difference in tolerability among the four regimens.

[Solitary Neurofibroma of the Sigmoid Colon Presenting as a Subepithelial Tumor Successfully Removed by Endoscopic Resection].

Neurofibromas are benign, slow-growing nerve sheath tumors of the peripheral nervous system, arising from Schwann cells, and classically associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (Nf1, von Recklinghausen's disease). They occur rarely in the gastro-intestinal tract as isolated neoplasms, outside the classical clinical feature of neurofibromatosis. We herein present an isolated colonic neurofibroma without any systemic signs of neurofibromatosis. A 59-year-old female came to our hospital for constipation. On physical examination, general appearance showed no definite skin lesions. A subepithelial tumor measuring 0.8 cm was detected at the distal descending colon on colonoscopy. The lesion was removed completely by endoscopic resection. Microscopic examination showed proliferation of spindle cells in the mucosa and infiltration of inflammatory cells. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for S-100 protein. The above morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics were consistent with a diagnosis of a solitary neurofibroma of the sigmoid colon.