Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 49(8): 2746-2755, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744705

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To perform a comparative analysis of surgically resected mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) of pancreas and branch-duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) considering clinico-radiological high-risk predictors for malignant tumors using the current management guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 224 patients who underwent surgical resection and had histopathologically confirmed MCNs (benign 73; malignant 17) or BD-IPMNs (benign 110; malignant 24) and had pre-operative CT or MRI were retrospectively reviewed. Tumors classified as either high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma were considered malignant, whereas those with low-grade dysplasia were considered benign. Imaging features were analyzed by two radiologists based on selected high-risk stigmata or worrisome features proposed by prevalent guidelines except tumors with main pancreatic duct dilatation (> 5 mm) were excluded. RESULTS: MCNs and BD-IPMNs showed significant differences in aspects like tumor size, location, the presence and size of enhancing mural nodules, the presence of wall or septal thickening, and multiplicity. Multivariate analyses revealed tumor size (OR, 1.336; 95% CI, 1.124-1.660, p = 0.002) and the presence of enhancing mural nodules (OR, 67.383; 95% CI, 4.490-1011.299, p = 0.002) as significant predictors of malignant MCNs. The optimal tumor size differentiating benign from malignant tumor was 8.95 cm, with a 70.6% sensitivity, 89% specificity, PPV of 27.6%, and NPV of 96.9%, demonstrating superior specificity than the guideline-suggested threshold of 4.0 cm. For malignant BD-IPMNs, the presence of enhancing mural nodules (OR, 15.804; 95% CI, 4.439-56.274, p < 0.001) and CA 19 - 9 elevation (OR, 19.089; 95%CI, 2.868-127.068, p = 0.002) as malignant predictors, with a size of enhancing mural nodule threshold of 5.5 mm providing the best malignancy differentiation. CONCLUSION: While current guidelines may be appropriate for managing BD-IPMNs, our results showed a notably larger optimal threshold size for malignant MCNs than that suggested by current guidelines. This warrants reconsidering existing guideline thresholds for initial risk stratification and management of MCNs.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adulto , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patologia , Meios de Contraste
2.
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi ; 83(1): 168-172, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36237347

RESUMO

Tailgut cysts are known to originate from the remnants of the embryonic hindgut. They occur exclusively in the retrorectal and presacral spaces. There have been limited reports of tailgut cysts occurring in the left perirenal space. The present case features a huge tailgut cyst extending from the right perirenal to the perivesical space. We believe that this case report will help to further elucidate the characteristics of perirenal and perivesical tailgut cysts.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA