Impact of Level of Surgery on the Functional Outcomes in Patients with Lower Extremity Bone Tumors Undergoing Amputation Versus Limb Salvage Surgery.

Limb salvage surgery is the preferred treatment for bone tumors in the current surgical practice. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes between amputation and limb salvage surgery based on the level of surgery at two levels: knee and hip. A single institutional analysis of 137 patients with lower extremity bone tumors was done between 2014 and 2020. Eighty-seven patients treated with amputation were compared with 50 patients treated with limb salvage surgery based on following variables: age, gender, histology, anatomic site, and MSTS score. The mean MSTS scores were fairly better in patients who underwent surgery at knee level compared to those who underwent surgery at hip level. The mean MSTS score at 1-year follow-up was 22.0 in amputation group compared to 22.4 in limb salvage group, whereas at 2-year follow-up was 24.1 in amputation group compared to 25.1 in limb salvage group. At knee level, functional outcomes were similar after amputation and limb salvage. At hip level, patients undergoing amputation had poorer MSTS scores compared to limb salvage surgery at 2-year follow-up (p = 0.04). The functional outcomes for patients undergoing surgery at knee level were similar irrespective of type of surgery. At longer follow-up, patients undergoing amputation at hip level had a poorer functional outcome compared to limb salvage surgery. Although limb salvage was associated with similar MSTS scores when compared with amputation, it produced a better functional outcome especially for proximally located tumors.

Aberrant Promoter Hypermethylation of p16 and RASSF1a Genes in Colorectal Cancer - Significance in Young Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical profile of colorectal cancers (CRC) in India is different from that described in western countries. Microsatellite instability and APC mutation explain the molecular biology of up to 50% of colorectal cancers. Global genome hypermethylation may be the cause in at least 20% of cases. Few studies from India have examined the epigenetic profile of colorectal cancers. This study was designed to study aberrant promoter hypermethylation of two select tumour suppressor genes (p16, RASSF1a) in patients with colorectal cancer and their association with clinicopathologic features. METHODS: A total of 41 samples including controls were collected from colorectal cancer patients. DNA was isolated from tumour tissue, and methylation-specific PCR was performed for the 2 genes. RESULTS: p16 and RASSF1a promoter hypermethylation was found in 26% and 48% of CRC cases, respectively. RASSF1a promoter hypermethylation was more often seen in young CRC patients aged 40 years or less, and this was found to be statistically significant (p value = 0.037). CONCLUSION: RASSF1a hypermethylation is peculiar to rectal cancers and left-sided colonic tumours in young patients. Large-scale population-based studies with extensive genetic and epigenetic characterization are required for a better understanding and further validation of our findings. For individuals diagnosed with sporadic CRC, these studies on specimen might help predict prognosis and response to therapy.

Effect of Preoperative Biliary Stenting on Outcomes of Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Biliary drainage before pancreaticoduodenectomy was introduced to decrease morbidity from obstructive jaundice. Recent retrospective and randomised data show that preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) increases perioperative infectious complications. Most patients presenting to our tertiary care centre have undergone drainage procedures prior to surgical consultation. We analysed the impact of PBD, specifically endoscopic stent placement, on the postoperative outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy at our centre. A cohort of 87 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2012 to 2016 was identified. Data was collected retrospectively and a comparative analysis of stented and nonstented patients was done. Comparison of the 23 stented patients was done with 23 nonstented patients after matching them for age, sex and bilirubin levels. Median total bilirubin level in stented patients was 10.2 mg/dl versus 7.7 mg/dl in nonstented patients. The infectious complication rate in the stented group was 39.1% versus 12.7% in the nonstented group (P value < 0.05). There was no difference in the anastomotic leak rate between the two groups. Time to curative surgery in the stented group was significantly more than in the nonstented group. Stented patients are at a higher risk for postoperative infectious complications. Patients with obstructive jaundice awaiting surgery should undergo selective biliary drainage after careful planning and discussion between the operating surgeon and the endoscopist.

Contemporary Surgical, Oncological, and Survival Outcomes of Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours: a 5-Year Experience from Tertiary Cancer Center.

With advances in surgical management of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), mortality rate for PD has been reported to be less than 5%. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a major complication and morbidity after PD with incidence of up to 40%. This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PD in a tertiary cancer referral center in southern India. Data was collected for the patients operated during the period from Jan 2014 to Dec 2018. Surgicopathological, oncological, and survival outcomes were described. Of 76 patients presumed as operable, 16 were excluded and data analyzed for 60 patients. Forty-four percent underwent classical Whipple's PD and 56% pylorus-preserving PD. The most common postoperative complications were wound infection (25%); pneumonia (20%); clinically relevant POPF (13%); and delayed gastric emptying (19%). Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 5%, 90-day mortality was 8.3%, and fistula-related mortality was 1.6%. Ampullary cancer was the most common histology. Three-year survival rate was 23.3% with a mean overall survival of 33.2 months with significantly better survival in the node negative than positive group (41.3 vs 20.5 months, P = 0.003) and significantly lower survival in pancreatic head cancer than other tumor histologies (16.6 vs 37.3 months, P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis has shown pancreatic head histology (HR = 2.38, 95% CI (1.08-5.26), P = 0.033) and nodal positivity (HR = 2.38, 95% CI (1.27-4.44), P = 0.007) as poor prognostic factors. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a safe operation in experienced hands. Adhering to a meticulous adaptable reproducible anastomotic technique with standard perioperative management strategies significantly decreases the operative morbidity and mortality.

Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer.

Background There is a recent rise in the incidence of esophageal carcinoma in India. Surgical resection with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation is the current treatment modality of choice. Postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications, affect many patients who undergo open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) could reduce the pulmonary complications and reduce the postoperative stay. Methodology We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 114 patients with esophageal cancer in the department of surgical oncology at a tertiary cancer center in South India between January 2019 and March 2020. We included patients with resectable cancer of middle or lower third of the esophagus, and gastroesophageal junction tumors (Siewert I). MIE was performed in 27 patients and 78 patients underwent open esophagectomy (OE). The primary outcome measured was postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher within 30 days. Other outcomes measured include overall mortality within 30 days, intraoperative complications, operative duration and the length of hospital stay. Results A postoperative complication rate of 18.5% was noted in the MIE group, compared with 41% in the OE group ( p = 0.034). Pulmonary complications were noted in 7.4% in the MIE group compared to 25.6% in the OE group ( p = 0.044). Postoperative mortality rates, intraoperative complications, and other nonpulmonary postoperative complications were almost similar with MIE as with open esophagectomy. Although the median operative time was more in the MIE group (260 minutes vs. 180 minutes; p < 0.0001), the median length of hospital stay was shorter in patients undergoing MIE (9 days vs. 12 days; p = 0.0001). Conclusions We found that MIE resulted in lower incidence of postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications. Although, MIE was associated with prolonged operative duration, it resulted in shorter hospital stay.

Survival Outcomes in Patients with Thymoma after Thymectomy in an Indian Scenario.

Thymomas are relatively slow growing with late presentation. Because of rarity and underreporting in India, there is an unmet need for evaluating the patient characteristics and assessing the factors affecting survival for standardizing the ideal modality of treatment in Indian population. A retrospective analysis of 96 patients with thymoma was done between 1998 and 2018. Patient characteristics, histopathological characteristics, operative outcomes, local recurrences, and survival outcomes were recorded. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 (IBM). The incidence of thymoma was relatively high in 6th decade with no sex predilection. Common presenting symptoms were cough and dyspnea. Myasthenia gravis was noted in 30.2%, which resolved after thymectomy in 65.5% of patients. Most patients presented with Masaoka stages I and II, and predominant WHO histological types were B1 and AB. Complete resection was done in 69.8% cases, and local recurrence was noted in 15.6%. Median sternotomy was the most frequently used approach for thymectomy. The 5-year overall survival was 76%, with an excellent 5-year survival of 95% and 86% in stages I and II patients. Masaoka stage, WHO histologic type, completeness of surgery, and local recurrence did affect the survival significantly. Masaoka stages III and IV, histological type B3, incomplete resection during surgery, and presence of local recurrence did independently predict a worse overall survival.

Modified Heidelberg technique of pancreatic anastomosis postpancreaticoduodenectomy - 10 years of experience.

CONTEXT: Pancreatic fistula has forever been a dreaded complication after pancreatic anastomosis (PA). We present a retrospective analysis of 10 years of experience with the Modified Heidelberg technique (MHT) that has been recently described. AIM: The aim of the study is to establish postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rates after MHT. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study carried out at a tertiary cancer center in South India in the Department of Surgical Oncology. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and eight consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and PA with MHT for a variety of proximal pancreatic lesions from January 2008 to February 2018 were included in this study. The incidence of POPF was recorded by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula 2005 and 2016 definitions. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Epidemiological and clinical data are expressed in ratios and percentage and presented in table format. RESULTS: Between January 2008 and March 2016, 186 patients underwent PD, and MHT was used for PA. Five (2.7%) patients developed Grade A POPF whereas Grades B and C were seen in three (1.6%) patients each with one death. Between April 2016 and February 2018, 22 patients underwent PD. Two patients (9%) had biochemical leak whereas none of them developed clinically relevant POPF. No deaths were recorded in this period. Overall, Grade B and Grade C POPF rates were 1.4% each, whereas 30-day mortality was 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study indicate that MHT is a safe, reliable, easy to learn, and adopt technique of pancreatic reconstruction after PD.

Perioperative Mortality in Cancer Esophagus-a Case Control Study at a High-Volume Regional Cancer Center in South India.

Surgery for esophageal cancers carries high rates of morbidity and mortality despite improvements in perioperative care especially with increasingly safe anesthesia and postoperative ICU care. A case control study was conducted on 713 patients operated for esophageal cancer over a period of 8 years (2009-2016). Multiple preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical and laboratory parameters were compared between patients who succumbed to the surgery, i.e., 30-day mortality, and those who did not. Of the preoperative parameters, age > 58.5 years (p = 0.01), history of dysphagia with significant weight loss (p = 0.028), diabetes (p = 0.002), ischemic cardiac disease (p = 0.0001), low FEV1 < 69.5% (p = 0.036), preoperative length of hospital stay > 6.94 days (p = 0.001), involvement of gastroesophageal junction (p = 0.04), and ASA score > 2 (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with perioperative mortality. Intraoperatively, blood loss (p = 0.003), intraoperative (p = 0.015) and postoperative (p = 0.0001) blood transfusion, splenectomy (p = 0.0001), and excessive intraoperative intravenous fluids (p = 0.003) were associated with mortality. Decreased postoperative day 1 serum albumin level < 2.38 mg/dl (p = 0.0001), increased ICU stay > 7.32 days (SD+/- = 6.28, p = 0.03), number of positive lymph nodes > 2.97 (SD+/- = 4.19, p = 0.013), conduit necrosis (p = 0.0001), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (p = 0.013), pulmonary venous thromboembolism (p = 0.0001), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (p = 0.0001), LRTI (p = 0.0001), arrhythmia (p = 0.005), sepsis (p = 0.0001), and ARDS (p = 0.0001) were the postoperative complications that were significantly associated with mortality. Comprehensive patient care involving preoperative optimization, improved surgical skills, rigorous intraoperative fluid management, and dedicated intensive care units will continue to play a major role in further minimizing mortality and morbidity associated with esophageal cancer surgeries.

Is there difference between anastomotic site and remnant stump carcinoma in gastric stump cancers?-a single institute analysis of 90 patients.

BACKGROUND: Little has been reported regarding differences between malignancies that develop at the anastomotic site (ASC) and those that develop at the remnant stump (RSC) in gastric stump carcinomas (GSC). The purpose of our study was to compare clinical, pathological and survival characteristics of ASC patients with those of RSC patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for GSC between January 2005 and December 2017 were analyzed. Of the total 112 patients, 22 patients were excluded from the study due to extensive loss of data. Ninety patients underwent curative resection and were evaluated based on anatomic site at which they developed malignancy, i.e., ASC and RSC. Clinical, pathological and survival characteristics were assessed. RESULTS: As per Lauren's classification, diffuse and intestinal variety were significantly associated with ASC (P=0.0001) and RSC (P=0.0001) respectively. RSC was associated with lower pT [pT2, 15/33 (45.5%), P=0.0002]. ASC was significantly associated with higher pN [pN3, 30/57 (52.6%), P=0.0013], stage [stage III, 48/57 (84.2%), P=0.0022], positive mesenteric nodes (P=0.006) and poor 3-year survival (10.5% versus 36.4%, P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: ASC is substantially different than RSC. ASC is more aggressive disease compared to RSC and has different pathophysiology, higher rates of nodal involvement (both primary and mesenteric), presents with higher stage and has significantly poor 3-year survival.

Mesopancreas in pancreatic cancer: where do we stand - review of literature.

Pancreatic cancer is associated with poor prognosis and surgery remains the main modality of treatment. Negative resection margin is an important prognostic factor for survival. Retropancreatic margin or the medial margin is the most common site of positive resection margin. Mesopancreas was proposed in analogy with mesorectum, which is considered as a fusion fascia formed embryologically during the development of pancreas. This mesopancreas lies posterior to the pancreas and contains pancreaticoduodenal vessels, lymphatics, nerve plexus and loose areolar tissue. Various technical modifications were proposed for better dissection of mesopancreas like posterior approach and artery first approach. There is an increased rate of R0 resection by these technical modifications but whether this will turn to increase in survival rates is yet to be established.