Docetaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and use of a geriatric assessment: Lessons from a prematurely closed Hellenic Oncology Research Group randomized phase III study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare first-line treatment with docetaxel plus gemcitabine (DG) versus gemcitabine (G) in elderly patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with inoperable stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, ≥70years, with an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0-2 were enrolled. Patients were stratified by PS and disease stage and randomized to either DG (docetaxel 30mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 900mg/m2 i.v.) or G (gemcitabine 1200mg/m2 i.v.) on days 1 and 8, every 3weeks. The study's primary end-point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In this prematurely closed study, 106 patients with a median age of 75years (range, 70-92) were enrolled (DG: n=54; G: n=52); 77 (73%) had stage IV disease and 18 (17%) a PS of 2. There was no difference in terms of median OS (14.6 vs 12.2months; p=0.121), progression-free survival (PFS) (3.4 vs 2.6months; p=0.757) and overall response rate (26.0% vs 15.4%; p=0.233) between DG and G arm, respectively. Patients with an Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score<7 had significantly lower median OS (7.6 vs 15.4months; p=0.002) and median PFS (1.7 vs 4.4months; p=0.009) than patients with higher IADL score. The regimens were well tolerated with no significant difference in severe toxicity. CONCLUSION: DG and G demonstrated comparable efficacy in elderly patients with NSCLC and high IADL score was correlated with superior clinical outcome.

A Paternally Inherited BRCA1 Mutation Associated with an Unusual Aggressive Clinical Phenotype.

This report highlights the necessity of genetic testing, at least for BRCA1 mutations, of young females diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer, even in the absence of or limited family history. A 34-year-old female with a locally advanced, triple negative tumour, which perforated the skin, is described. At the time of diagnosis, the patient had already multiple lung metastases and although chemotherapy was started immediately, she died with rapid systemic disease progression. The patient was found to carry the BRCA1 p.E1060X mutation, which is located on exon 11 of the gene. The high penetrance of BRCA1 gene is not represented in the patient's family, since the mutation was paternally inherited. It is evident that females belonging to small families, along with paternal inheritance of pathogenic BRCA mutations that predispose for breast cancer, in most cases will probably be genetically tested only after being diagnosed with cancer.

Docetaxel vs. vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non--small-cell lung cancer: a hellenic oncology research group randomized phase III study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This study compared front-line treatment with docetaxel or vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with inoperable stage IIIB and stage IV NSCLC who were > 65 years of age with performance status (PS) of 0-2 were enrolled. Patients were assigned to receive either docetaxel 38 mg/m(2) or vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) by intravenous (I.V.) infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred thirty elderly patients were enrolled in the study (docetaxel n = 66 and vinorelbine n = 64 patients). The objective response rate was 12.1% and 14.1% in patients treated with docetaxel and vinorelbine, respectively (2P = .799). The median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 2.33 and 1.9 months (2P = .298) and the median overall survival (OS) was 6.07 and 3.87 months (2P = .090) in the docetaxel and vinorelbine arms, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 4.5% and 29.7% of patients in the docetaxel arm and vinorelbine arm, respectively (2P < .001). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 1.5% and 1.6% of patients in the docetaxel arm and the vinorelbine arm, respectively (2P = .950) and the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was more frequent in patients treated with vinorelbine (37.1% vs. 22.5%; 2P < .001). There were no deaths from toxicity. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel has an efficacy comparable to that of vinorelbine as first-line treatment in elderly patients with NSCLC and has an acceptable toxicity profile. The trial was closed prematurely because of low accrual, thus limiting the strength of the conclusions derived.

Second-line paclitaxel/carboplatin versus vinorelbine/carboplatin in patients who have advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with non-platinum-based chemotherapy: a multicenter randomized phase II study.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the activity and toxicity of the paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) doublet versus vinorelbine/carboplatin (VC) doublet as second-line treatment in patients who have advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Patients pretreated with front-line docetaxel and gemcitabine were randomized to receive either PC (n = 75), which consisted of paclitaxel at a dose of 140 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC3), or VC (n = 78), which consisted of vinorelbine at a dose of 45 mg/m(2) orally and carboplatin AUC3; both drugs were administered on days 1 and 15. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 18.6% (95% confidence interval, 9.85%-27.49%; one complete and 13 partial responses) in the PC arm and 7.7% (95% confidence interval, 1.78%-13.61%; one complete and five partial responses) in the VC arm (P = .056). Median time to tumor progression was 3.5 months (range, 0.3 - 23.73 months) and 3.07 months (range, 0.37-18.5) in the PC and VC arm, respectively (P = .287). Median overall survival was 7.83 months (range, 0.3-45.03 months) and 7.60 months (range, 0.5-30.27 months) for PC and VC arms, respectively (P value = .633). Chemotherapy was well-tolerated and grade III/IV toxicities were relatively infrequent. No toxic deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Platinum-based doublets with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC pretreated with front-line docetaxel/gemcitabine show comparable efficacy when used in the second-line setting.

FEC versus sequential docetaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with axillary node-positive early breast cancer: a randomized study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG).

A randomized multicenter phase III study was conducted to compare the sequential docetaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide combination with that of FEC regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with axillary node-positive early breast cancer. Seven hundred and fifty-six women with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer were randomized to receive either 4 cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) followed by 4 cycles of epirubicin (75 mg/m(2)) plus cyclophosphamide (700 mg/m(2)) (experimental arm) or 6 cycles of FEC (epirubicin 75 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 700 mg/m(2), and 5-fluorouracil 700 mg/m(2); control arm). All regimes were administered every 3 weeks. The primary end point was five-year disease-free survival (DFS). After a median follow-up period of 5 years, 233 (30.8%) relapses had occurred (108 and 125 in the experimental and control arms, respectively; P = 0.181). The five-year DFS was 72.6% (95% CI 63.8-81.3%) and 67.2% (95% CI 58.0-76.4%) for women randomized in the experimental and control arms, respectively (P = 0.041; log rank test). There was no difference in the overall survival between the two arms (83.8 and 81.4% in the experimental and control arms, respectively; P = 0.533). The experimental arm was associated with increased neutropenia requiring administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in 90.5% of the patients as compared with 74.1% in the control arm (P = 0.0001). The sequential docetaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide adjuvant chemotherapy regimen resulted in improved five-year DFS in women with axillary node-positive early breast cancer at the expense of increased but manageable myelotoxicity.

Pooled analysis of elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with front line docetaxel/gemcitabine regimen: the Hellenic Oncology Research Group experience.

INTRODUCTION: Thirty to 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are older than 70 years and rarely are enrolled in clinical trials. Moreover, in clinical practice, > 75% of patients older than 65 years with metastatic NSCLC never receive any kind of chemotherapy. PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the impact of age on efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with the docetaxel-gemcitabine combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pooled data from six clinical trials of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group were analyzed. According to their age, patients were divided into two groups: those with age < 70 years and those with > or = 70 years. RESULTS: A total of 858 patients were included in this analysis. Six hundred sixty-six (77.6%) patients were younger than 70 years, whereas 192 (22.4%) patients where > or = 70-year-old. Overall response rate was 30.3% and 30.2% for patients < 70 years and > or = 70 years, respectively (p = 0.974). The median time to tumor progression was 4.1 and 4.5 months for patients < 70 years and > or = 70 years, respectively (p = 0.948). Median overall survival was 9.9 and 9.2 months for patients < 70 and > or = 70, respectively (p = 0.117). The multivariate analysis revealed performance status (PS) (p = 0.0001) and stage (p = 0.0001) as independent factors with significant impact on the hazard of death. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, but the incidence of grade III/IV mucositis was significantly higher in elderly patients (0.2% versus 1.5% for patients < 70 versus > or = 70 years, respectively; p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The docetaxel/gemcitabine regimen has a comparable efficacy and tolerance in young (< 70 years) and elderly (> or = 70 years) patients.