Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Singapore Med J ; 57(8): 438-43, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27549227

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: With the increased use of filler and fat injections for aesthetic purposes, there has been a corresponding increase in the incidence of complications. Vision loss as an uncommon but devastating vascular side effect of filler injections was the focus of this paper. METHODS: A review committee, consisting of plastic surgeons, aesthetic medical practitioners, ophthalmologists and dermatologists from Singapore, was convened by the Society of Aesthetic Medicine (Singapore) to review and recommend methods for the prevention and management of vision loss secondary to filler injections. RESULTS: The committee agreed that prevention through proper understanding of facial anatomy and good injection techniques was of foremost importance. The committee acknowledged that there is currently no standard management for these cases. Based on existing knowledge, injectors may follow a proposed course of action, which can be divided into immediate, definitive and supportive. The goals were to reduce intraocular pressure, dislodge the embolus to a more peripheral location, remove or reverse central ischaemia, preserve residual retinal function, and prevent the deterioration of vision. Dissolving a hyaluronic acid embolus remains a controversial option. It is proposed that injectors must be trained to recognise symptoms, institute immediate actions and refer patients without delay to dedicated specialists for definitive and supportive management. CONCLUSIONS: Steps to prevent and manage vision loss based on current evidence and best clinical practices are outlined in this paper. Empirical referral to any emergency department or untrained doctors may lead to inordinate delays and poor outcomes for the affected eye.


Assuntos
Cegueira/prevenção & controle , Preenchedores Dérmicos/efeitos adversos , Ácido Hialurônico/efeitos adversos , Injeções/efeitos adversos , Cegueira/etiologia , Embolia , Estética , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica , Incidência , Oftalmologia , Singapura , Sociedades Médicas
2.
Lasers Surg Med ; 31(4): 257-62, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12355571

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Untreated varicose veins have significant morbidity and potential mortality. Treatment aims to relieve symptoms, improve appearance, and to prevent deterioration. Current therapeutic options include graduated compression stockings, sclerotherapy, ambulatory phlebectomy, surgical ligation, and stripping. Results of laser photocoagulation of vascular anomalies have been encouraging. Applying these concepts of laser-tissue interactions, we developed a new method of treatment for varicose veins of the lower extremities. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-nine patients with 252 varicose greater saphenous veins underwent endovenous laser photocoagulation (EVLP) from January 1996 to January 2000. Subject's age ranged between 23 years 9 months and 80 years 7 months with a mean age of 50 years 8 months. There were 122 females and 27 males. Only patients with primary varicose veins and saphenofemoral reflux documented by Duplex ultrasound were treated. All patients received surgical ligation of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ). EVLP was performed using the neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Nd:YAG) (1,064 nm) laser, delivered with a 600 microm optical fiber. Laser power was set at 10 or 15 W, delivered with a pulse duration of 10 seconds. The outcome was compared before and after EVLP, based on the score of severity of the varicose veins by Hach's classification. RESULTS: The range of total delivered energy is from 9,200 to 20,100 J. The entire procedure was completed in 95-175 minutes (mean 122.33 minutes) for bilateral procedures, and 65-100 minutes (mean 81.07 minutes) for unilateral procedures. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 28 months with a mean of 19 months. One hundred and forty-one patients with 244 legs involved (96.8%) demonstrated remarkable improvement (P < 0.05). Common early complications of EVLP are: local paraesthesia of the treated area in 92 legs (36.5%), ecchymosis and dyschromia in 58 legs (23.0%), superficial burn injury in 12 legs (4.8%), superficial phlebitis in four legs (1.6%), and localized hematoma in two legs (0.8%) at 3 weeks post-operatively. The final outcome showed no significant morbidity or mortality. All patients recovered completely. CONCLUSIONS: EVLP is a simple effective treatment modality for varicose veins. This less invasive method can minimize the complications of conventional surgery.


Assuntos
Fotocoagulação a Laser/efeitos adversos , Fotocoagulação a Laser/métodos , Fotocoagulação/efeitos adversos , Fotocoagulação/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Varizes/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Perna (Membro)/irrigação sanguínea , Perna (Membro)/patologia , Perna (Membro)/efeitos da radiação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Fatores de Tempo , Varizes/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA