The risk factors and clinical outcomes in hepatitis B seropositive and seronegative renal transplant patients.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is prevalent in Asia including Taiwan. We retrospectively evaluated the risk of HBV reactivation and clinical outcomes in HBV+ and HBV- kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: Patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2004 and December 2021 were reviewed. The outcomes of interest included risks of HBV reactivation and patient/graft survival. RESULTS: We identified 337 patients (47.5 ± 12 years) were enrolled in our final cohort. Fifty-two (15.4%) had HBsAg positive at the time of transplantation. Seventeen developed viral reactivations, with 41.2% of them accompanied by active hepatitis. The graft survival, acute rejection rate, and cancer development after kidney transplantation did not differ in terms of HBsAg status. The Cox multivariate analysis indicated the HBV reactivation risk was increased by a lack of pre-transplant anti-HBV medication [hazard ratio (HR), 5.95; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31-27.02; P = 0.021 or an absence of lifelong antiviral therapy [HR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.01-9.74; P = 0.047] Conclusion: Individuals, independent of HBsAg status, had similar prognosis in terms of patient and graft survival, acute rejection rate, and cancer development. The absence of either pre-transplant anti-HBV medication or lifelong antiviral therapy was significantly associated with an increased risk of HBV reactivation.

Long-term outcomes of liver transplantation for alcohol-related liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is being increasingly performed for alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). It is unclear whether the increasing frequency of LTs in ALD patients has a negative impact on deceased-donor (DDLT) allocation and whether the current policy of 6 months of abstinence before transplantation effectively prevents recidivism after transplantation or improves long-term outcomes. METHODS: A total of 506 adult LT recipients, including 97 ALD patients, were enrolled. The outcomes of ALD patients were compared with those of non-ALD patients. The 97 ALD patients were further divided into group A (6-month abstinence) and group N (nonabstinence) based on the pretransplant alcohol withdrawal period. The incidence of relapsed drinking and the long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of LT for ALD significantly increased after 2016 (27.0% vs 14.0%; p < 0.01), but the frequency of DDLT for ALD remained unchanged (22.6% vs 34.1%, p = 0.210). After a median follow-up of 56.9 months, patient survival was comparable between the ALD and non-ALD patients (1, 3, and 5 years posttransplant: 87.6%, 84.3%, and 79.5% vs 82.8%, 76.6%, and 72.2%, respectively; p = 0.396). The results were consistent irrespective of the transplant type and disease severity. In ALD patients, 22 of the 70 (31.4%) patients reported relapsed drinking after transplantation, and the prevalence in group A had a higher tendency than that in group N (38.3% vs 17.4%, p = 0.077). Six months of abstinence or nonabstinence did not result in a survival difference, and de novo malignancies were the leading cause of late patient death in ALD patients. CONCLUSION: LT achieves favorable outcomes for ALD patients. Six months of abstinence pretransplant did not predict the risk of recidivism after transplantation. The high incidence of de novo malignancies in these patients warrants a more comprehensive physical evaluation and better lifestyle modifications to improve long-term outcomes.

Repeated loco-regional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with inferior outcome after living donor liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for defined stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients. Loco-regional therapy (LRT) may be considered before transplantation to prevent the disease progression and the patient from dropping out of the waiting list. This study aims to evaluate the impact of repeated pretransplant LRTs on the long-term outcomes in HCC liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2019, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients with viable HCC on the explant livers were enrolled. Uni- and multivariate analysis was performed with the Cox regression model to stratify the risk factors associated with HCC recurrence and patent survival after LDLT. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were enrolled, in which 65.3% (n = 81) were Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification stage B or D and 89% (n = 110) had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis on the explanted livers. After a median follow-up of 41 months (IQR: 24-86.5), there were 18 cases (13.7%) of HCC recurrence. Univariate analysis showed that the model of end-stage liver disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, pretransplant alpha-fetoprotein value (>500 ng/ml), repeated pretransplant LRTs (N > 4), increased tumor numbers and maximal size, presence of microvascular invasion, and the histological grading of the tumors are risk factors of inferior outcomes. In multivariate analysis, only repeated pretransplant LRTs (N > 4) had a significant impact on both the overall- and recurrence-free survival. The impact of pretransplant LRT was consistently significant among subgroups based on their LRT episodes (N = 0, 1-4, >4 respectively). CONCLUSION: Repeated LRT for HCC can be associated with the risk of tumor recurrence and inferior patient survival after LDLT in cirrhotic patients. Early referral of those eligible for transplantation may improve the treatment outcomes in these patients.

Safe Strategy to Initiate Total Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Stepwise Approach From a Laparoscopy-Assisted Method.

BACKGROUND: Total laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (TLDRH) for adult living liver donors has been reported by a few experienced centers, but with limited cases, its safety and feasibility remain controversial. We report our experience initiating TLDRH using a stepwise approach to gradually convert laparoscopy-assisted donor right hepatectomy (LADRH) to TLDRH. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 61 LADRHs, 56 conventional open donor right hepatectomies (CODRHs), and 3 TLDRHs performed between March 2014 and June 2018. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes between donors undergoing LADRH and CODRH, except for a slight elevations in the operative time (436.5 vs 392.9 min, p < 0.001) and the graft warm ischemic time (5.4 vs 4.0 min, p < 0.001) in the LADRH group. The recipients' posttransplant one-year survival rates in the LADRH and CODRH groups were also similar (93.2% and 94.6%, p = 0.384). For three donors in whom TLDRH was converted from LADRH in a stepwise manner, the average operative time and blood loss were 570 min and 316.7 ml, respectively. Donors were discharged on postoperative day 10 without any surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: LADRH can be performed routinely on liver living donors. A stepwise approach could be adopted to "covert" suitable donors from LADRH to a total laparoscopic procedure to maximize donor safety. This strategy is reliable and could be reproduced in most LDLT centers.

The Benefit of Ultrasound in Deciding Between Tube Thoracostomy and Observative Management in Hemothorax Resulting from Blunt Chest Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Hemothorax is most commonly resulted from a closed chest trauma, while a tube thoracostomy (TT) is usually the first procedure attempted to treat it. However, TT may lead to unexpected results and complications in some cases. The advantage of thoracic ultrasound (TUS) over a physical examination combined with chest radiograph (CXR) for diagnosing hemothorax1 has been proposed previously. However, its benefits in terms of avoiding non-therapeutic TT have not yet been confirmed. Therefore, this study is aimed to evaluate the severity of hemothorax in blunt chest trauma patients by using TUS in order to avoid non-therapeutic TT in stable cases. METHODS: The data from 46,036 consecutive patient visits to our trauma center over a four-year period were collected, and those with blunt chest trauma were identified. Patients who met any of the following criteria were excluded: transferred from another facility, with an abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score ≥ 2 for any region except the chest region, with a documented finding of tension pneumothorax or pneumothorax >10%, younger than 16 years old and with indications requiring any non-thoracic major operation. The decision to perform TT for those patients in the non-TUS group was made on the basis of CXR findings and clinical symptoms. The continuous data were analyzed by using the two-tailed Student's t test, and the discrete data were analyzed by Chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients met the criteria for inclusion in the final analysis, with TT having been performed on 42 (50%) of those patients. The mean volume of the drainage amount was 860 ml after TT. The TT drainage was less than 500 ml in 12 patients in the non-TUS group (40%), while none was less than 500 ml in the TUS group (p = 0.036, Fisher's exact test). In terms of the positive rate of subsequent effective TT, the sensitivity of TUS was 90% and the specificity was 100%. There were 3 patients with delayed hemothorax: 2 of the 58 (3.6%) in the non-TUS group and 1 of 26 (4.5%) in the TUS group (p > 0.05, Fisher's exact test). The hospital length of stay in the non-TUS group with non-therapeutic TT was significantly longer than in the TUS group without TT (8.2 vs. 5.4 days, p = 0.018). There were no other major complications or deaths in either group during the 90-day follow-up period. CONCLUSION: In the case of blunt trauma, TUS can rapidly and accurately evaluate hemothorax to avoid TT in patients who may not benefit much from it. As a result, the rate of non-therapeutic TT can be decreased, and the influence on shortening hospital length of stay may be further evaluated with prospective controlled study.