Association Between Bleeding and New Cancer Detection and the Prognosis in Patients With Myocardial Infarction.

Background Antithrombotic agents to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction can cause bleeding, which may reveal undiagnosed cancer. However, the relationship between bleeding and new cancer diagnosis and the prognostic impact is still unclear. Methods and Results We analyzed the new cancer diagnosis, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, and all-cause death of 10 364 patients with acute myocardial infarction without a history of previous cancer in a multicenter acute myocardial infarction registry. During a median of 4.9 years, 1109 patients (10.7%) experienced Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, and 338 patients (3.3%) were newly diagnosed with cancer. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding was associated with an increased risk of new cancer diagnosis (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 3.29 [95% CI, 2.50-4.32]). In particular, there were robust associations between gastrointestinal bleeding and new gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis (sHR, 19.96 [95% CI, 11.30-29.94]) and between genitourinary bleeding and new genitourinary cancer diagnosis (sHR, 28.95 [95% CI, 14.69-57.07]). The risk of all-cause death was not lower in patients diagnosed with new gastrointestinal cancer after gastrointestinal bleeding (hazard ratio [HR], 4.05 [95% CI, 2.04-8.02]) and diagnosed with new genitourinary cancer after genitourinary bleeding (HR, 2.79 [95% CI, 0.81-9.56]) than in patients newly diagnosed with cancer without previous bleeding. Conclusions Clinically significant bleeding, especially gastrointestinal and genitourinary bleeding, in patients with AMI was associated with an increased risk of new cancer diagnoses. However, the bleeding preceding new cancer detection was not associated with better survival. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02385682 and NCT02806102.

Activation of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor by ITE Improves Cardiac Function in Mice After Myocardial Infarction.

Background The immune and inflammatory responses play a considerable role in left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI). Binding of AhR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor) to its ligands modulates immune and inflammatory responses; however, the effects of AhR in the context of MI are unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the potential association between AhR and MI by treating mice with a nontoxic endogenous AhR ligand, ITE (2-[1'H-indole-3'-carbonyl]-thiazole-4-carboxylic acid methyl ester). We hypothesized that activation of AhR by ITE in MI mice would boost regulatory T-cell differentiation, modulate macrophage activity, and facilitate infarct healing. Methods and Results Acute MI was induced in C57BL/6 mice by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Then, the mice were randomized to daily intraperitoneal injection of ITE (200 µg/mouse, n=19) or vehicle (n=16) to examine the therapeutic effects of ITE during the postinfarct healing process. Echocardiographic and histopathological analyses revealed that ITE-treated mice exhibited significantly improved systolic function (P<0.001) and reduced infarct size compared with control mice (P<0.001). In addition, we found that ITE increased regulatory T cells in the mediastinal lymph node, spleen, and infarcted myocardium, and shifted the M1/M2 macrophage balance toward the M2 phenotype in vivo, which plays vital roles in the induction and resolution of inflammation after acute MI. In vitro, ITE expanded the Foxp3+ (forkhead box protein P3-positive) regulatory T cells and tolerogenic dendritic cell populations. Conclusions Activation of AhR by a nontoxic endogenous ligand, ITE, improves cardiac function after MI. Post-MI mice treated with ITE have a significantly lower risk of developing advanced left ventricular systolic dysfunction than nontreated mice. Thus, the results imply that ITE has a potential as a stimulator of cardiac repair after MI to prevent heart failure.

Effects of Smoking on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Lung Cancer in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Smoking is well-established as a risk factor for coronary artery disease. However, recent studies demonstrated favorable results, including reduced mortality, among smokers, which are referred to as the "smoker's paradox". This study examined the impact of smoking on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Patients with AMI undergoing PCI between 2004 and 2014 were enrolled and classified according to smoking status. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization. RESULTS: Among the 10,683 patients, 4,352 (40.7%) were current smokers. Smokers were 10.7 years younger and less likely to have comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, stroke, and prior PCI. Smokers had less MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.644; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.594-0.698; p<0.001) and cardiac death (HR, 0.494; 95% CI, 0.443-0.551; p<0.001) compared to nonsmokers during the 5 years in an unadjusted model. However, after propensity-score matching, smokers showed higher risk of MACE (HR, 1.125; 95% CI, 1.009-1.254; p=0.034) and cardiac death (HR, 1.190; 95% CI, 1.026-1.381; p=0.022). Smoking was a strong independent predictor of lung cancer (propensity-score matched HR, 2.749; 95% CI, 1.416-5.338; p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the unadjusted model, smoking is associated with worse cardiovascular outcome and higher incidence of lung cancer after adjustment of various confounding factors. This result can be explained by the characteristics of smokers, which were young and had fewer comorbidities.

Ticagrelor Does Not Improve Endothelial Dysfunction in Stable Survivors of Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor is an intriguing antiplatelet agent with a potentially beneficial impact on endothelial dysfunction and confers a mortality benefit beyond 1 month after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, little data exist on whether ticagrelor improves endothelial dysfunction in stable patients who survive the acute period and receive guideline-directed medical therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is a prospective, randomized, parallel, open-labeled study that enrolled 30-day survivors of non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). Forty patients with NSTE-ACS were randomly assigned to ticagrelor or clopidogrel groups. The primary end point was the change in the percentage brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (baFMD) from baseline. Baseline characteristics were not different between the 2 groups. The median time from the stent implantation to screening was 269 days. After 30 days of study medication administration, the change in the percentage baFMD value was similar between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (-0.08 [1.42] vs 0.30 [1.69], P = .66). There was no difference in the change in high-sensitive C-reactive protein (-0.61 [1.48] vs -0.01 [0.57], P = .28); however, the change in platelet inhibition significantly differed (P2Y12 reaction units, -140.5 [49.5] vs -3.9 [51.4], P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This dual time point baFMD study demonstrated that treatment with ticagrelor was not superior to clopidogrel for improving endothelial dysfunction in stabilized patients with NSTE-ACS.

Sirolimus-eluting stent is superior to paclitaxel-eluting stent for coronary intervention in patients with renal insufficiency: Long-term clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Renal insufficiency (RI) is an independent risk factor for the adverse cardiovascular events. Long-term clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with RI is unknown especially in the era of first generation drug-eluting stents (DES). This study aims at comparing clinical outcomes between sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) based on large scaled registry. METHODS: Patients who underwent PCI with DES from January 2004 to December 2009 in the Catholic University of Korea-PCI (COACT) registry were prospectively enrolled. A group of 1,033 patients with RI, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate under 60 mL/min, were analyzed. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) according to the type of stents were compared. RESULTS: Median follow-up period was 810 days (interquartile range: from 361 to 1,354 days). A group of 612 (59.2%) patients were treated with SES and 421 (40.8%) patients were treated with PES. The PES vs. SES group had significantly higher rate of MACE (35.9% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.01). In multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis, PES vs. SES group had significantly higher rate of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.64, p = 0.033), particularly pronounced by all-cause death (AHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.008-1.770; p = 0.044). In further analysis with propensity score matching, overall findings were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RI, PCI using PES provides poorer clinical outcomes than SES in terms of MACE and all-cause death.

Serum Osteoprotegerin Is Associated With Calcified Carotid Plaque: A Strobe-Compliant Observational Study.

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a kind of tumor necrosis factor, which is related to bone metabolism and vascular calcification. The increase of Osteoprotegerin concentration in serum is related to cardiovascular diseases in humans. The purpose of this study was to figure out the relevance between osteoprotegerin in serum and carotid calcification. Serum OPG concentrations were compared in 145 patients who underwent carotid sonography (average age: 68 ±â€Š9 years old, male: female = 81:64). A calcified plaque (CP) (37 people [27%]), a noncalcified plaque (NCP) (54 people [37%]), and a nonplaque (NP) (54 people [37%]) were classified for this study. No significant differences among 3 groups were demonstrated in the distribution of age, diabetes, high blood pressure, and hyperlipidemia. Serum osteoprotegerin concentrations were significantly increased in CP group rather than NCP group or NP group; (median [interquartile range], 4016 [1410] vs 3210 [1802] pg/mL, P < 0.05 and 4016 [1410] vs 3204 [1754] pg/mL, P < 0.05). Serum osteoprotegerin concentrations did not indicate a significant difference between NCP Group or NP Group. This study had proved that patient group accompanied with carotid calcification in carotid artery disease had an increased serum OPG concentration, so it could consider that OPG plays an important function on calcification related to arteriosclerosis.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Younger Korean Adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the clinical features, angiographic findings, and outcomes of younger Korean ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry from November 2005 to October 2010. The registered patients were divided into two groups; young age group (<65 years) and old age group (≥65 years). RESULTS: The young age group included 5281 patients (age, 53±7.8 years), and the old age group included 4896 patients (age, 74.3±6.5 years). Male gender, smoking, family history, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome were more frequently observed in the young age group than in the old age group (89.5% vs. 59.3%, p<0.001; 77.3% vs. 47.2%, p<0.001; 11% vs. 4.6%, p<0.001; 11.2% vs. 7.7%, p<0.001; 67.6% vs. 62.9%, p<0.001). Most of the young Korean adults with STEMI complained of typical chest pain (89.8%), and they had a shorter symptom-to-door time (12±53.2 hours vs. 17.3±132 hours, p=0.010). The young age group showed a favorable prognosis, which was represented by the MACE, compared with the old age group at one month (1.8% vs. 2.8%, p=0.028), six months (6.8% vs. 8.2%, p<0.001), and twelve months (10.1% vs. 11.9%, p=0.025). However, there was no significant difference in the adjusted MACE rate at one month {hazard ratio (HR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-1.51, p=0.828} and twelve months (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.68-1.10, p=0.233). CONCLUSION: Younger Korean adults with STEMI have clinical outcomes similar to old aged patients, and therefore, they should be treated intensively like the elderly patients.

Is carotid artery evaluation necessary for primary prevention in asymptomatic high-risk patients without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?

OBJECTIVE: Routine measurement of the carotid intima-media thickness is not recommended in recent clinical practice guidelines for risk assessment of the first atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event (the definition of which includes acute coronary syndromes, a history of myocardial infarction, stable or unstable angina, coronary or other arterial revascularization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral arterial disease presumed to be of atherosclerotic origin). The aim of the present study was to elucidate the role of carotid artery evaluation for primary prevention of ASCVD in asymptomatic high-risk patients visiting a teaching hospital. METHODS: Eight hundred seventy-three patients (487 male [55.8%], mean age 59.4±11.5 years) who were statin-naive and without ASCVD, which was proven by coronary angiography or coronary CT angiography, were enrolled in this study. The patients underwent carotid scanning in the Medical Department of St Mary's Hospital from September 2003 to March 2009. ASCVD outcomes were evaluated for median follow-up of 1,402 days. RESULTS: A total of 119 participants experienced ASCVD events. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR] =1.026, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.002-1.050, P=0.033), history of smoking (HR =1.751, 95% CI =1.089-2.815, P=0.021), statin therapy (HR =0.388, 95% CI =0.205-0.734, P=0.004), and carotid plaques (HR =1.556, 95% CI =1.009-2.400, P=0.045) were associated with ASCVD events. In middle-aged group (45≤ age <65, n=473), history of smoking (HR =1.995, 95% CI =1.142-3.485, P=0.015), statin therapy (HR =0.320, 95% CI =0.131-0.780, P=0.012), and carotid plaques (HR =1.993, 95% CI =1.116-3.560, P=0.020) were associated with ASCVD events. CONCLUSION: The presence of carotid plaques, history of smoking, and statin therapy might be important factors for primary prevention of ASCVD in asymptomatic high-risk patients, especially in middle-aged patients. Therefore, the results suggest that carotid artery parameters may have an additional predictive value for primary prevention of ASCVD in the middle-aged high-risk patients.

Comparative assessment of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: surmountable vs. insurmountable antagonist.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms of antagonism vary between the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs): insurmountable antagonism and surmountable antagonism. Recent retrospective observational studies suggest that ARBs may not have equivalent benefits in various clinical situations. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two categories of ARBs on the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: We analyzed the large-scale, prospective, observational Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry study, which enrolled 2740 AMI patients. They divided by the prescription of surmountable ARBs or insurmountable ARBs at discharge. Primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal MI, and re-percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft surgery. RESULTS: In the overall population, the MACEs rate in 1 year was significantly higher in the surmountable ARB group (14.3% vs. 11.2%, p=0.025), which was mainly due to increased cardiac death (3.3% vs. 1.9%, p=0.031). Matching by propensity-score showed consistent results (MACEs rate: 14.9% vs. 11.4%, p=0.037). In subgroup analysis, the insurmountable ARB treatment significantly reduced the incidence of MACEs in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 40%, with a low killip class, with ST segment elevation MI, and with normal renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, insurmountable ARBs were more effective on long-term clinical outcomes than surmountable ARBs in patients with AMI.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between octogenarians and non-octogenarians with acute myocardial infarction in the drug-eluting stent era: analysis of the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Octogenarians (age ≥ 80 years) with coronary artery disease constitute a high-risk group. However, octogenarian patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the drug-eluting stents (DES) era have not been widely reported. We aimed to identify clinical outcomes in octogenarian compared with non-octogenarian AMI patients. METHODS AND SUBJECTS: We retrospectively analyzed 9877 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) and who were enrolled in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR). They were divided into 2 groups, octogenarians (n=1494) and non-octogenarians (n=8383), in order to compare the incidence of 1-year all-cause death and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), where MACE included all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). RESULTS: The clinical status was significantly inferior in octogenarians compared to non-octogenarians: Killip class ≥ II (34.8% vs. 22.5%, p<0.001), multivessel disease (65.8% vs. 53.7%, p<0.001). Rates of 1-year all-cause death were significantly higher in octogenarians than in non-octogenarians (22.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). However, the rates of 1-year recurrent myocardial infarction (1.3% vs. 0.9%, p=0.68), TLR (2.4% vs. 3.1%, p=0.69), TVR (3.6% vs. 4.3%, p=0.96), and CABG (0.9% vs. 0.9%, p=0.76) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarian AMI patients have higher rates of mortality and MACE even in the DES era. According to KAMIR subgroup analysis, the TLR/TVR rates in octogenarians were comparable to those in non-octogenarian AMI patients.

Positive result in the early passive phase of the tilt-table test: a predictor of neurocardiogenic syncope in young men.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study elucidated the prognostic factors for neurocardiogenic syncope in males in their late teens and early twenties. METHODS: Tilt-table testing (TTT) was performed on 665 males (age range, 17 to 27 years) following the Italian protocol. The subjects were tilted head-up at a 70° angle on a table for 30 minutes during the passive phase. If the passive phase was negative, the subjects were given sublingual nitroglycerin and tilted to the same angle for 20 minutes during the drug-provocation phase. The subjects with positive results were followed without medication. We analyzed factors related to the recurrence rate of syncope. RESULTS: Of 305 subjects (45.8%) with positive results, 223 (age range, 18 to 26 years) were followed for 12 months. The frequency of previous syncopal episodes ≥ 4 (p = 0.001) and a positive result during the passive phase (p = 0.022) were significantly related to a high recurrence rate. A positive result during the early passive phase (≤ 12 minutes) was significantly related to a higher recurrence rate than was that during the late passive phase (> 12 minutes; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: A positive result during the early passive phase of TTT and frequent previous syncopal episodes were prognostic factors for neurocardiogenic syncope in men in their late teens and early twenties.

Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary bifurcation disease in the drug-eluting stent era.

OBJECTIVES: There are limited data on long-term outcomes (i.e., beyond 4 years) for patients with unprotected left main bifurcation disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era. This study therefore compared the treatment effects of PCI and CABG in unprotected left main bifurcation disease. METHODS: 865 patients with unprotected left main bifurcation disease treated with either PCI using DES (n=556) or CABG (n=309) were evaluated between May 2003 and December 2009. PCI-treated patients were further categorised into simple stenting (n=360) or complex stenting (n=196). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 4.2 years (IQR 2.9-5.2 years). After adjusting covariates with multivariate Cox hazard regression model and inverse probability of treatment weighting, the long-term cumulative rates of death (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.62 to 1.45) or composite of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or stroke (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.48) were not significantly different for patients undergoing PCI or CABG except for target-vessel revascularisation (TVR) (HR 4.42, 95% CI 2.39 to 8.18). The complex stenting group had similar long-term clinical outcomes compared with the simple stenting group except for TVR (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.10). In further analysis with propensity score matching, overall findings were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unprotected left main bifurcation disease, PCI using DES provides similar long-term (up to 5.2 years) clinical outcomes except for TVR compared with CABG. Complex and simple stenting yielded similar outcomes except for a higher TVR rate in complex stenting.

Safety of dental extractions in coronary drug-eluting stenting patients without stopping multiple antiplatelet agents.

BACKGROUND: The risk of excessive bleeding prompts physicians to stop multiple antiplatelet agents before minor surgery, which puts coronary stenting patients at risk for adverse thrombotic events. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that most dental extractions can be carried out safely without stopping multiple antiplatelet agents. METHODS: All dental extraction patients who had undergone coronary stenting and who were also on oral multiple antiplatelet agents therapy were enrolled. One hundred patients underwent dental procedures without stopping antiplatelet agents. All wounds were sutured and followed up at 24 hours, 1 week, and 1 month after the procedure. There were 2233 patients who had not taken oral antiplatelet agents from a health promotion center and had teeth extracted by the same method. After performing propensity-score matching for the entire population, a total of 100 matched pairs of patients were created. The primary outcome was a composite of excessive intraextraction blood loss, transfusion, and rehospitalization for bleeding, and the secondary outcome was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis within 1 month after the procedure. RESULTS: There were 2 excessive intraextraction bleeding cases that continued at the extraction site for 4 and 5 hours, respectively, in the coronary stenting patients, and 1 excessive intraextraction bleeding case that continued for 3 hours in the control patients. There were no cases of transfusion, rehospitalization for bleeding, or major cardiovascular events for the 2 propensity-matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that most dental extractions in coronary stenting patients can be carried out safely without stopping multiple antiplatelet agents.

Two cases of percutaneous intervention for coronary artery bypass graft anastomoses with Paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters.

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) intervention, particularly anastomosis site intervention, is challenging for interventional cardiologists. A paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter (SeQuent Please) is a recently-introduced device capable of delivering paclitaxel homogeneously into the targeted vessel wall. We herein report our experience with two cases. In the first case, coronary angiography showed significant stenosis at the site of anastomosis between the saphenous vein graft and the left anterior descending artery (LAD). In the second case, coronary angiography showed significant stenosis at the site of anastomosis between the left internal mammary artery and the LAD. We performed percutaneous intervention of these CABG anastomoses using paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters, and obtained favorable angiographic and clinical outcomes.

Comparison of paclitaxel-, sirolimus-, and zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and metabolic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), and zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with metabolic syndrome (MS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR; November 2005-December 2007), a total of 1,768 MS patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI were enrolled: The PES group was 634, SES group, 906, and ZES group, 228. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (all-cause death, re-myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) during 12 months follow-up. At 12 months, the cumulative incidence of primary endpoint in the PES, SES, and ZES groups was 10.9%, 9.1%, and 11.0%, respectively (P=0.086). Incidence of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization did not differ among the 3 groups. There were 7 episodes of acute (0.3% in PES group, 0.4% in SES group, and 0.4% in ZES group, respectively, P=0.773) and 18 episodes of cumulative stent thrombosis including late stent thrombosis (0.9% in PES group, 1.0% in SES group, and 1.3% in ZES group, respectively, P=0.448). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of SES, PES, and ZES in MS patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI provided comparable clinical outcomes in patients enrolled in KAMIR.

Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 5-year results from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry.

OBJECTIVES: We performed the long-term follow-up of a large cohort of patients in a multicenter study receiving left main coronary artery (LMCA) revascularization. BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on long-term outcomes for patients with unprotected LMCA disease who underwent coronary stent procedure or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: We evaluated 2,240 patients with unprotected LMCA disease who received coronary stents (n = 1,102; 318 with bare-metal stents and 784 with drug-eluting stents) or underwent CABG (n = 1,138) between 2000 and 2006 and for whom complete follow-up data were available for at least 3 to 9 years (median 5.2 years). The 5-year adverse outcomes (death; a composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], or stroke; and target vessel revascularization [TVR]) were compared with the use of the inverse probability of treatment weighted method and propensity-score matching. RESULTS: After adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors with the inverse probability of treatment weighting, the 5-year risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 1.44, p = 0.35) and the combined risk of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.37, p = 0.59) were not significantly different for patients undergoing stenting versus CABG. The risk of TVR was significantly higher in the stenting group than in the CABG group (HR: 5.11; 95% CI: 3.52 to 7.42, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in comparisons of bare-metal stent with concurrent CABG and of drug-eluting stent with concurrent CABG. In further analysis with propensity-score matching, overall findings were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: During 5-year follow-up, stenting showed similar rates of mortality and of the composite of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke but higher rates of TVR as compared with CABG for patients with unprotected LMCA disease.

Comparison of clinical outcomes following acute myocardial infarctions in hypertensive patients with or without diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is thought that patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a poor prognosis after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but the effect of diabetes on the outcomes of hypertensive patients with AMIs has not been elucidated in the Korean population. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of diabetes on long-term clinical outcomes following AMIs in patients with hypertension. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Using data from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (November 2005 to December 2006), 2,233 hypertensive patients with AMIs were grouped as follows based on the presence of DM: group I, diabetic hypertension (n=892, 544 men, mean age=66.2+/-10.9 years); and group II, non-diabetic hypertension (n=1341, 938 men, mean age=63.9+/-12.8 years). The primary study outcomes included in-hospital death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass surgery) at the 1 year follow-up. RESULTS: Hypertensive patients with DM were older and more likely to be women. The diabetic group had lower blood pressure (p<0.001), a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p<0.001), a more severe degree of heart failure (p<0.001), a longer duration of coronary care unit admission (p<0.001), and a higher incidence of hyperlipidemia (p=0.007). The N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level (4602.5+/-8710.6 pg/mL vs. 2320.8+/-5837.9 pg/mL, p<0.001) was higher and the creatinine clearance (62.4+/-29.9 mL/min vs. 73.0+/-40.8 mL/min, p<0.001) was lower in the diabetic group than the non-diabetic group. Coronary angiographic findings revealed more frequent involvement of the left main stem (p=0.002) and multiple vessels (p<0.001) in the diabetic group. The rate of in-hospital death was higher in the diabetic group (p<0.001). During follow-up, the rates of composite MACE at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months were higher in the diabetic group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In hypertensive patients with AMI, DM was associated with worse clinical and angiographic features, with a higher risk of development of severe heart failure, and an increased risk of MACE on long-term clinical follow-up.

Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have compared the treatment effects of coronary stenting and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, there are limited data regarding the long-term outcomes of these two interventions for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. METHODS: We evaluated 1102 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease who underwent stent implantation and 1138 patients who underwent CABG in Korea between January 2000 and June 2006. We compared adverse outcomes (death; a composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or stroke; and target-vessel revascularization) with the use of propensity-score matching in the overall cohort and in separate subgroups according to type of stent. RESULTS: In the overall matched cohort, there was no significant difference between the stenting and CABG groups in the risk of death (hazard ratio for the stenting group, 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.80) or the risk of the composite outcome (hazard ratio for the stenting group, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.62). The rates of target-vessel revascularization were significantly higher in the group that received stents than in the group that underwent CABG (hazard ratio, 4.76; 95% CI, 2.80 to 8.11). Comparisons of the group that received bare-metal stents with the group that underwent CABG and of the group that received drug-eluting stents with the group that underwent CABG produced similar results, although there was a trend toward higher rates of death and the composite end point in the group that received drug-eluting stents. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease, we found no significant difference in rates of death or of the composite end point of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or stroke between patients receiving stents and those undergoing CABG. However, stenting, even with drug-eluting stents, was associated with higher rates of target-vessel revascularization than was CABG.

Relation between flow reserve capacity of penetrating intramyocardial coronary arteries and myocardial fibrosis in hypertension: study using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare coronary flow reserve (CFR) capacity of penetrating intramyocardial coronary artery (PICA) using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and biochemical marker of myocardial fibrosis in hypertension (HTN). METHODS: In 58 patients (male:female ratio = 31:27; mean age 47 +/- 9 years) with chest pain and normal coronary angiogram findings, the width of color Doppler signal and peak diastolic velocity of PICA flow were measured in the myocardium just beneath the apical impulse window using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. PICA-CFR and PICA-width ratio were calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to baseline peak diastolic velocity and as the ratio of hyperemic to baseline width after the adenosine infusion (140 mug/kg/min), respectively. Serum carboxy-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I, as a biochemical marker, was measured and patients were divided into 3 groups: 19 with HTN and PICA-CFR less than 2.0 (group A); 23 with HTN and PICA-CFR of 2.0 or more (group B); and 16 who were normotensive with PICA-CFR of 2.0 or more (group C). RESULTS: Baseline peak diastolic velocity for group A was higher than the other two groups (P < .005 vs groups B and C). PICA-width ratio was higher than the other two groups (P < .005 vs groups B and C). Serum propeptide of type I was 137.1 +/- 16.6 ng/mL in group A, 96.2 +/- 13.7 ng/mL in group B, and 78.8 +/- 11.2 ng/mL in group C (P < .0001 vs group B and group C). PICA-CFR was closely related to serum propeptide of type I (P < .001, r = -0.723). CONCLUSION: The impaired PICA-CFR is related to myocardial fibrosis in patients with HTN, chest pain, and normal coronary angiogram results.

The impaired flow reserve capacity of penetrating intramyocardial coronary arteries in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Coronary flow reserve (CFR) capacity of penetrating intramyocardial coronary artery (PICA) in apical hypertrophic (AH) cardiomyopathy has not been studied yet. METHODS: We studied 65 patients with normal coronary angiogram results (mean age 56 +/- 10 years; 33 men, 32 women). Of these, 30 were normotensive without any left ventricular hypertrophy (control group), 24 had hypertension (HTN) without any left ventricular hypertrophy (HTN group), and 11 had AH cardiomyopathy (AH group). PICA-CFR and PICA-width ratio were calculated after the intravenous infusion of adenosine (140 microg/kg/min) just beneath the apical impulse window at a depth of 3 to 5 cm by using high-frequency transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: PICA-CFR was successfully measured in 59 (90.8%) of 65 patients. PICA-CFR was 1.65 +/- 0.49 in AH group, 2.50 +/- 0.77 in HTN group, and 2.42 +/- 0.73 in control group ( P < .005 vs HTN and control). PICA-width ratio was 1.45 +/- 0.42 in AH group, 2.14 +/- 0.72 in HTN group, and 1.81 +/- 0.55 in control group ( P = .025 vs HTN and control). PICA-CFR was closely related to width-ratio of PICA ( r = 0.448, P = .002). Conclusion PICA in AH has higher resting diastolic velocity, wider diameter, and impaired CFR compared with nonhypertrophied myocardium.