Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aust Crit Care ; 37(1): 193-201, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37709655

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) frequently occur after cardiac surgery and may lead to adverse patient outcomes. Traditional diagnostic tools such as auscultation or chest x-ray have inferior diagnostic accuracy compared to the gold standard (chest computed tomography). Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an emerging area of research combating these issues. However, no review has employed a formal search strategy to examine the role of LUS in identifying the specific PPCs of atelectasis, consolidation, and/or pneumonia or investigated the ability of LUS to predict these complications in this cohort. The objective of this study was to collate and present evidence for the use of LUS in the adult cardiac surgery population to specifically identify atelectasis, consolidation, and/or pneumonia. REVIEW METHOD USED: A scoping review of the literature was completed using predefined search terms across six databases which identified 1432 articles. One additional article was included from reviewing reference lists. Six articles met the inclusion criteria, providing sufficient data for the final analysis. DATA SOURCES: Six databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, CENTRAL, and PEDro. This review was not registered. REVIEW METHODS: The review followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. RESULTS: Several LUS methodologies were reported across studies. Overall, LUS outperformed all other included bedside diagnostic tools, with superior diagnostic accuracy in identifying atelectasis, consolidation, and/or pneumonia. Incidences of PPCs tended to increase with each subsequent timepoint after surgery and were better identified with LUS than all other assessments. A change in diagnosis occurred at a rate of 67% with the inclusion of LUS and transthoracic echocardiography in one study. Pre-established assessment scores were improved by substituting chest x-rays with LUS scans. CONCLUSION: The results of this scoping review support the use of LUS as a diagnostic tool after cardiac surgery; however, they also highlighted a lack of consistent methodologies used. Future research is required to determine the optimal methodology for LUS in diagnosing PPCs in this cohort and to determine whether LUS possesses the ability to predict these complications and guide proactive respiratory supports after extubation.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Pneumonia , Atelectasia Pulmonar , Adulto , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumonia/diagnóstico por imagem , Atelectasia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Atelectasia Pulmonar/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA