Age and Vasodilator Response to Different Hyperemic Agents: Adenosine versus Contrast Medium.

Background: Age-related remodelling has the potential to affect the microvascular response to hyperemic stimuli. However, its precise effects on the vasodilatory response to adenosine and contrast medium, as well as its influence on fractional flow reserve (FFR) and contrast fractional flow reserve (cFFR), have not been previously investigated. We investigate the impact of age on these indices. Methods: We extrapolated data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve (PROPHET-FFR) and The Multi-center Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Contrast MEdium INduced Pd/Pa RaTiO in Predicting (MEMENTO) studies. Only lesions with a relevant vasodilatory response to adenosine and contrast medium were considered of interest. A total of 2080 patients, accounting for 2294 pressure recordings were available for analysis. The cohort was stratified into three age terciles. Age-dependent correlations with FFR, cFFR, distal pressure/aortic pressure (Pd/Pa) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) were calculated. The vasodilatory response was calculated in 1619 lesions (with both FFR and cFFR) as the difference between resting and hyperaemic pressure ratios and correlated with aging. The prevalence of FFR-cFFR discordance was assessed. Results: Age correlated positively to FFR (r = 0.062, p = 0.006), but not with cFFR (r = 0.024, p = 0.298), Pd/Pa (r = -0.015, p = 0.481) and iFR (r = -0.026, p = 0.648). The hyperemic response to adenosine (r = -0.102, p ≤ 0.0001) and to contrast medium (r = -0.076, p = 0.0023) showed a negative correlation with age. When adjusted for potential confounders, adenosine induced hyperaemia was negatively associated with age (p = 0.04 vs p = 0.08 for cFFR). Discordance decreased across age terciles (14.64% vs 12.72% vs 10.12%, p = 0.032). Conclusions: As compared to adenosine, contrast induced hyperaemia appeared to be less affected by age. cFFR may be considered a more stable and reproducible tool to assess epicardial stenosis in elderly patients. Clinical Trial Registration: PROPHET-FFR STUDY, Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05056662).

Invasive versus medically managed acute coronary syndromes with prior bypass (CABG-ACS): insights into the registry versus randomised trial populations.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients are under-represented in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) trials. We compared characteristics and outcomes for patients who did and did not participate in a randomised trial of invasive versus non-invasive management (CABG-ACS). METHODS: ACS patients with prior CABG in four hospitals were randomised to invasive or non-invasive management. Non-randomised patients entered a registry. Primary efficacy (composite of all-cause mortality, rehospitalisation for refractory ischaemia/angina, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure) and safety outcomes (composite of bleeding, stroke, procedure-related MI, worsening renal function) were independently adjudicated. RESULTS: Of 217 patients screened, 84 (39%) screenfailed, of whom 24 (29%) did not consent and 60 (71%) were ineligible. Of 133 (61%) eligible, 60 (mean±SD age, 71±9 years, 72% male) entered the trial and 73 (age, 72±10 years, 73% male) entered a registry (preferences: physician (79%), patient (38%), both (21%)).Compared with trial participants, registry patients had more valve disease, lower haemoglobin, worse New York Heart Association class and higher frailty.At baseline, invasive management was performed in 52% and 49% trial and registry patients, respectively, of whom 32% and 36% had percutaneous coronary intervention at baseline, respectively (p=0.800). After 2 years follow-up (694 (median, IQR 558-841) days), primary efficacy (43% trial vs 49% registry (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.89)) and safety outcomes (28% trial vs 22% registry (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.46)) were similar. EuroQol was lower in registry patients at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with trial participants, registry participants had excess morbidity, but longer-term outcomes were similar. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01895751.

Invasive Versus Medical Management in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery With a Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of routine invasive management in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafts presenting with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes are uncertain because these patients were excluded from pivotal trials. METHODS: In a multicenter trial, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft were prospectively screened in 4 acute hospitals. Medically stabilized patients were randomized to invasive management (invasive group) or noninvasive management (medical group). The primary outcome was adherence with the randomized strategy by 30 days. A blinded, independent Clinical Event Committee adjudicated predefined composite outcomes for efficacy (all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for refractory ischemia/angina, myocardial infarction, hospitalization because of heart failure) and safety (major bleeding, stroke, procedure-related myocardial infarction, and worsening renal function). RESULTS: Two hundred seventeen patients were screened and 60 (mean±SD age, 71±9 years, 72% male) were randomized (invasive group, n=31; medical group, n=29). One-third (n=10) of the participants in the invasive group initially received percutaneous coronary intervention. In the medical group, 1 participant crossed over to invasive management on day 30 but percutaneous coronary intervention was not performed. During 2-years' follow-up (median [interquartile range], 744 [570-853] days), the composite outcome for efficacy occurred in 13 (42%) subjects in the invasive group and 13 (45%) subjects in the medical group. The composite safety outcome occurred in 8 (26%) subjects in the invasive group and 9 (31%) subjects in the medical group. An efficacy or safety outcome occurred in 17 (55%) subjects in the invasive group and 16 (55%) subjects in the medical group. Health status (EuroQol 5 Dimensions) and angina class in each group were similar at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the population experienced a serious adverse event. An initial noninvasive management strategy is feasible. A substantive health outcomes trial of invasive versus noninvasive management in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafts appears warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01895751.

The Multi-center Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Contrast MEdium INduced Pd/Pa RaTiO in Predicting FFR (MEMENTO-FFR) Study.

AIMS: Adenosine administration is needed for the achievement of maximal hyperaemia fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment. The objective was to test the accuracy of Pd/Pa ratio registered during submaximal hyperaemia induced by non-ionic contrast medium (contrast FFR [cFFR]) in predicting FFR and comparing it to the performance of resting Pd/Pa in a collaborative registry of 926 patients enrolled in 10 hospitals from four European countries (Italy, Spain, France and Portugal). METHODS AND RESULTS: Resting Pd/Pa, cFFR and FFR were measured in 1,026 coronary stenoses functionally evaluated using commercially available pressure wires. cFFR was obtained after intracoronary injection of contrast medium, while FFR was measured after administration of adenosine. Resting Pd/Pa and cFFR were significantly higher than FFR (0.93±0.05 vs. 0.87±0.08 vs. 0.84±0.08, p<0.001). A strong correlation and a close agreement at Bland-Altman analysis between cFFR and FFR were observed (r=0.90, p<0.001 and 95% CI of disagreement: from -0.042 to 0.11). ROC curve analysis showed an excellent accuracy (89%) of the cFFR cut-off of ≤0.85 in predicting an FFR value ≤0.80 (AUC 0.95 [95% CI: 0.94-0.96]), significantly better than that observed using resting Pd/Pa (AUC: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.91; p<0.001). A cFFR/FFR hybrid approach showed a significantly lower number of lesions requiring adenosine than a resting Pd/Pa/FFR hybrid approach (22% vs. 44%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: cFFR is accurate in predicting the functional significance of coronary stenosis. This could allow limiting the use of adenosine to obtain FFR to a minority of stenoses with considerable savings of time and costs.

Efficacy of contrast medium induced Pd/Pa ratio in predicting functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve: insights from the RINASCI study.

AIMS: The need of adenosine administration for the achievement of maximal hyperaemia limits the widespread application of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the real world. We hypothesised that Pd/Pa ratio registered during submaximal reactive hyperaemia induced by conventional non-ionic radiographic contrast medium (contrast medium induced Pd/Pa ratio: CMR) can be sufficient for the assessment of physiological severity of stenosis in the vast majority of cases. The aim of the present study was to test the accuracy of CMR in comparison to FFR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty patients with 104 intermediate coronary stenoses were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. CMR was obtained after intracoronary injection of 6 ml of radiographic contrast medium, while FFR was measured after administration of adenosine. Despite the fact that CMR values were significantly higher than FFR values (0.88 [IR 0.80-0.92] vs. 0.87 [IR 0.83-0.94], p<0.001), a strong correlation between CMR and FFR values was observed (r=0.94, p<0.001) with a close agreement at Bland-Altman analysis (95% CI of disagreement: -0.029 to 0.072). ROC curve analysis showed an excellent accuracy of CMR cut-off of ≤0.83 in predicting FFR value ≤0.80 (AUC 0.97 [95% CI: 0.91-0.99, specificity 96.1, sensitivity 85.7]). Moreover, no FFR value ≤0.80 corresponded to a CMR ≥0.88. CONCLUSIONS: CMR is accurate in predicting the functional significance of coronary stenosis. This could allow limiting the use of adenosine to obtain FFR to doubtful cases. In particular, we suggest considering a CMR value ≤0.83 to be significant, a CMR value ≥0.88 as not significant, and inducing maximal hyperaemia using adenosine for FFR assessment when CMR is between 0.84 and 0.87.

Endothelial progenitor cells in morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship among anthropometric indexes of adiposity (body mass index [BMI], waist circumference [WC]), endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients with morbid obesity, and the effect of diabetes and weight loss. METHODS AND RESULTS: BMI, WC, IMT and circulating EPC (defined as CD34+/KDR+/CD45- cells) were assessed in 100 patients (37 with diabetes). Fifty patients underwent bariatric surgery, and in 48 of them a complete re-assessment after an average follow-up of 252±108 days was carried out. In 29 of them subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue samples were obtained at the time of intervention and analyzed for the presence and number of EPC. EPC were directly correlated with weight, BMI, WC and insulin level, and inversely with mean IMT. All correlations were confined to non-diabetic patients. EPC were found in both subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue specimens. Circulating EPC significantly decreased after weight loss (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: EPC are positively related to markers of adiposity in severe obesity, when not complicated by diabetes. Weight loss is associated with decrease in EPC level. EPC are inversely correlated with IMT, confirming their protective role also in severe obesity. Diabetes has a negative modulating action.