Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hematol Oncol ; 39(4): 473-482, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34347909

RESUMO

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma featuring overexpression of MYC and B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (double expressor lymphoma, DEL) is associated with poor outcomes. Existing evidence suggesting improved outcomes for DEL with the use of more intensive regimens than R-CHOP is restricted to younger patients and based on limited evidence from low patient numbers. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of intensive frontline regimens versus R-CHOP in a multicenter analysis across 7 academic medical centers in the United States. We collected 90 cases of DEL, 46 out of 90 patients (51%) received R-CHOP and 44/90 (49%) received an intensive regimen, which was predominantly DA-EPOCH-R. Treatment cohorts were evenly balanced for demographics and disease characteristics, though the intensive group had a higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, 326 vs. 230 U/L p = 0.06) and presence of B-symptoms (50% vs. 22%, p = 0.01) compared to the R-CHOP cohort. There was no difference in PFS (median 53 vs. 38 months, p = 0.49) or overall survival (67 vs. not reached months, p = 0.14) between the R-CHOP and intensive therapy cohorts, respectively. On multivariate analysis, intensive therapy was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.35 (95% CI 0.74-7.41), though this was not statistically significant. Additionally, a subgroup analysis of intermediate high-risk lymphoma defined by IPI ≥3 did not identify a difference in survival outcomes between regimens. We conclude that in our multi-center cohort there is no evidence supporting the use of intensive regimens over R-CHOP, suggesting that R-CHOP remains the standard of care for treating DEL.


Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Struct Funct Genomics ; 12(1): 27-32, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21153711

RESUMO

The conserved Lipoprotein-17 domain of membrane-associated protein Q9PRA0_UREPA from Ureaplasma parvum was selected for structure determination by the Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, as part of the Protein Structure Initiative's program on structure-function analysis of protein domains from large domain sequence families lacking structural representatives. The 100-residue Lipoprotein-17 domain is a "domain of unknown function" (DUF) that is a member of Pfam protein family PF04200, a large domain family for which no members have characterized biochemical functions. The three-dimensional structure of the Lipoprotein-17 domain of protein Q9PRA0_UREPA was determined by both solution NMR and by X-ray crystallography at 2.5 Å. The two structures are in good agreement with each other. The domain structure features three α-helices, α1 through α3, and five ß-strands. Strands ß1/ß2, ß3/ß4, ß4/ß5 are anti-parallel to each other. Strands ß1and ß2 are orthogonal to strands ß3, ß4, ß5, while helix α3 is formed between the strands ß3 and ß4. One-turn helix α2 is formed between the strands ß1 and ß2, while helix α1 occurs in the N-terminal polypeptide segment. Searches of the Protein Data Bank do not identify any other protein with significant structural similarity to Lipoprotein-17 domain of Q9PRA0_UREPA, indicating that it is a novel protein fold.


Assuntos
Lipoproteínas/química , Proteínas de Membrana/química , Ressonância Magnética Nuclear Biomolecular , Ureaplasma/metabolismo , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Cristalografia por Raios X , Modelos Moleculares , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Mycoplasma/metabolismo , Conformação Proteica , Dobramento de Proteína , Estrutura Terciária de Proteína , Soluções
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA