Patients With First-Time or Recurrent Patellar Dislocation Have a Similar High Rate and Extent of Articular Cartilage Injury Observed on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Purpose: To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to compare the prevalence of articular cartilage damage in patients with a single patellar dislocation versus those with multiple dislocations and to compare the locations and severity of chondral injury between the groups. Methods: Patients with patellar dislocation between January 2017 and July 2021 were retrospectively identified. Patients with a documented history of patellar dislocation and an MRI scan of the affected knee were included. Patients with articular cartilage injury prior to the dislocation event were excluded. Articular cartilage injury was graded using a validated system: AMADEUS (Mean Total Area Measurement and Depth & Underlying Structures). Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI) scores and Dejour classifications of trochlear dysplasia were also collected. Data were calculated by performing t tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and χ2 or Fisher Exact tests to calculate P values for categorical data. Results: In total, 233 patients were included: 117 with primary dislocations and 116 with recurrent dislocations. Articular cartilage injuries were present in 51 patients with primary dislocations (43.6%) and 68 patients with recurrent dislocations (58.6%, P = .026). On comparison of the groups, the recurrent group contained a significantly larger proportion of female patients (65.5% vs 46.2%, P = .004). There was no difference in lesion size, subchondral bone defect, presence of bone edema, or total AMADEUS score between groups (P = .231). Caton-Deschamps Index scores were not significant when comparing between groups; however, the Dejour classifications showed higher grades in the recurrent group (P = .013 for A-D grading scale and P = .005 for high/low grading scale). Subgroup analysis revealed that when cartilage damage was present, patients from the primary group had significantly more full-thickness lesions (P < .001) and lower AMADEUS scores (P = .016). Conclusions: There was a similarly high prevalence of cartilage injury seen on MRI after both a primary patellar dislocation and a recurrent patellar dislocation. Chondral injury primarily affected the medial and lateral patellar facets and the lateral femoral condyle in both the primary and recurrent dislocation groups. However, the primary group showed an increased number of full-thickness lesions. There was no difference in lesion size, subchondral bone defect, presence of bone edema, or total AMADEUS score between the primary and recurrent groups. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic investigation.

In Vivo Effect of Partial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tear Location on Ulnohumeral Joint Gapping With Stress Ultrasound in Baseball Pitchers.

BACKGROUND: Stress ultrasonography (SUS) has provided clinicians with an alternative means of evaluating ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury by dynamically assessing ulnohumeral joint space gapping under applied valgus stress. However, 3 previous cadaveric studies have evaluated the biomechanical effect of partial UCL tears at different anatomic locations with conflicting results. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to use in vivo data from patients with magnetic resonance (MR)-confirmed partial UCL tears to determine if anatomic partial tear location influenced the resultant stability of the elbow in terms of ulnohumeral joint gapping on SUS. It was hypothesized that no difference would be seen in the amount of ulnohumeral joint gapping based on MR-identified anatomic partial UCL tear location. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with elbow injury from 2015 to 2020 were screened to identify competitive baseball pitchers with a partial UCL tear who received an SUS. Partial UCL tear was diagnosed via surgeon and radiologist interpretation of elbow MR imaging (MRI) as well as confirmation at the time of surgery as documented in the operative report. Demographic, injury, and treatment data were collected from the clinic notes, MRI reports, and stress ultrasound reports. Ulnohumeral joint gapping on SUS was calculated as the difference between ulnohumeral joint gapping without valgus stress versus ulnohumeral joint gapping with valgus stress (delta) as performed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. RESULTS: Overall, 60 male baseball pitchers (age, 19.2 ± 2.1 years), including 22 (37%) high school, 26 (43%) collegiate, and 12 (20%) professional pitchers, were evaluated. Regarding the location of partial UCL tears, 32 (53%) pitchers had proximal tears and 28 (47%) had distal tears. The mean delta value cohort was 2.1 ± 1.1 mm, and 34 pitchers (57%) had delta values >2.0 mm. Ulnohumeral joint gapping (high school [1.9 mm] vs collegiate [2.6 mm] vs professional [1.6 mm]; P = .004) and the percentage of pitchers with delta values >2.0 mm (45% vs 77% vs 33%; P = .017) differed based on level of competition. After controlling for age, body mass index, and level of competition in a multivariate linear regression, tear location was not related to ulnohumeral joint gapping (P = .499). CONCLUSION: No difference was observed in the amount of ulnohumeral joint gapping on SUS in symptomatic baseball pitchers with MR-identified partial UCL tears at differing anatomic locations. The findings of this study are contrary to previous cadaveric studies that have evaluated the effects of UCL tear characteristics on delta laxity.

Clinical Outcomes After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstructions With Concomitant Ulnar Nerve Transposition in Overhead Athletes: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Injury of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) has become increasingly common, particularly in overhead athletes. There is no consensus on management of the ulnar nerve in UCL reconstruction (UCLR) in patients with preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms, as literature supports both not decompressing the nerve as well as ulnar nerve transposition (UNT). HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare subjective clinical outcomes and return-to-sports (RTS) metrics between patients who received UNT during UCLR and a matched cohort who underwent UCLR alone. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in patient outcomes or RTS metrics between the cohorts. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Using an institutional database, patients who underwent UCLR with UNT between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively identified. These patients were matched based on sex, age at surgery (±3 years), and body mass index (±2 kg/m2) to a comparison group that underwent UCLR alone. Patients completed the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder & Elbow (KJOC) score, the Timmerman and Andrews elbow score, the Conway-Jobe scale, and custom patient satisfaction and RTS questionnaires. RESULTS: Thirty patients who underwent UCLR with concomitant UNT and 30 matched patients who underwent UCLR without UNT were available for follow-up at a mean of 6.9 (3.4-9.9) and 8.1 (3.4-13.9) years, respectively. The UNT group reported similar KJOC (78.4 in UNT vs 76.8; P = .780), Conway-Jobe (60% excellent in UNT vs 77% excellent; P = .504), Timmerman and Andrews (86.2 in UNT vs 88.8; P = .496), and satisfaction scores (85.3% in UNT vs 89.3%; P = .512) compared with UCLR group. In terms of RTS rate (84% in UNT vs 93% in UCLR; P = .289) and duration required to RTS (11.1 months in UNT vs 12.5 months in UCLR; P = .176), the 2 groups did not significantly differ. Finally, despite significant differences in preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (100% in UNT vs 7% in UCLR; P < .001), the 2 groups did not statistically differ in the proportion of patients who experienced postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (13% in UNT vs 0% in UCLR; P = .112). CONCLUSION: This matched cohort analysis showed no statistically significant differences in patient-reported outcomes and RTS between patients undergoing UCLR with and without UNT.

Increased Pitch Velocity Is Associated With Throwing Arm Kinetics, Injury Risk, and Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent, Collegiate, and Professional Baseball Pitchers: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between pitch velocity and throwing arm kinetics, injury, and ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLr) among high school, collegiate, and professional baseball pitchers. METHODS: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (2008-2019), and OVID/MEDLINE (2008-2019) were queried for articles that reported on pitch velocity predicting throwing arm kinetics, injury, or UCLr. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies checklist was used to evaluate the quality of all included studies. Descriptive statistics with ranges were used to quantify data where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies examining 2,896 pitchers, with Level of Evidence II-V were included. Intergroup analysis noted pitch velocity was significantly correlated with elbow varus torque in high school (R2 = 0.36), collegiate (R2 = 0.29), and professional (R2 = 0.076) pitchers. Elbow distraction force was positively associated with ball velocity in interpitcher analyses of high school (R2 = 0.373), professional (R2 = 0.175), and mixed-cohort evaluations (R2 = 0.624). Intragroup analysis demonstrated a strong association between pitch velocity and elbow varus torque (R2 = 0.922-0.957) and elbow distraction force (R2 = 0.910) in professional pitchers. Faster ball velocity was positively associated with a history of throwing arm injury (R2 = 0.194) in nonadult pitchers. In 2 studies evaluating professionals, injured pitchers had faster pitch velocity before injury compared with uninjured controls (P = .014; P = .0354). The need for UCLr was positively correlated with pitch velocity (R2 = 0.036) in professional pitchers. The consequences of UCLr noted little to no decrease in pitch velocity. CONCLUSIONS: Professional baseball pitchers with faster pitch velocity may be at the greatest risk of elbow injury and subsequent UCLr, potentially through the mechanism of increased distractive forces on the medial elbow complex. When a pitcher ultimately undergoes UCLr, decreases in pitching performance are unlikely, but may occur, which should encourage pitchers to caution against maximizing pitch velocity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

The influence of excessive ipsilateral trunk tilt on upper-extremity throwing mechanics: a newly characterized parameter for biomechanical evaluation in high school and professional pitchers.

BACKGROUND: Although contralateral trunk tilt has been recognized, the phenomenon of excessive ipsilateral trunk tilt, often observed during earlier portions of the pitch, has not been explored as a potential correlate with throwing-arm kinetics among baseball pitchers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate kinetic and kinematic parameters among high school and professional pitchers related to excessive ipsilateral and contralateral trunk tilt. METHODS: Professional and high school pitchers were assessed with a 3-dimensional motion capture system (480 Hz) while pitching. Pitchers were grouped as follows: excessive ipsilateral tilt at foot contact (FC), neutral, or excessive contralateral tilt at ball release (BR). Trunk and shoulder kinematics as well as throwing-arm kinetics were compared between subgroups via post hoc regression analysis. RESULTS: Professional pitchers (n = 287) had significantly higher ipsilateral trunk tilt at FC (P < .001) than high school pitchers (n = 59). High school pitchers with excessive contralateral trunk tilt at BR experienced significantly higher shoulder superior force (27.0% ± 7.4% body weight [BW] vs. 17.6% ± 5.1% BW, P < .001) and shoulder anterior force (39.6% ± 8.2% BW vs. 35.7% ± 5.4% BW, P < .001) compared with the ipsilateral trunk tilt cohort but had comparable ball velocity (30.2 ± 3.2 m/s vs. 30.4 ± 2.1 m/s, P = .633). For professionals, for every 10° increase in ipsilateral trunk tilt at FC, ball velocity increased by 0.2 m/s (B = 0.02, ß = 0.07, standard error [SE] = 0.005, P = .010) whereas elbow varus torque decreased by 0.1% BW × height (B = -0.01, ß = -0.08, SE = 0.002, P < .001) and shoulder internal rotation torque decreased by 0.1% BW × height (B = -0.01, ß = -0.07, SE = 0.002, P = .005). CONCLUSION: High school and professional pitchers with excessive ipsilateral trunk tilt at FC consistently demonstrated significantly decreased throwing-arm kinetics (shoulder anterior force and shoulder superior force for high school pitchers and shoulder internal rotation torque and elbow varus torque for professional pitchers) compared with pitchers with excessive contralateral trunk tilt at BR, with equivalent ball velocity. In addition, professional pitchers appeared to engage in significantly greater ipsilateral trunk tilt during early portions of the pitch when compared with high school pitchers, which may represent a kinetically favorable method adopted by pitchers at higher playing levels to maintain adequate ball velocity while concomitantly minimizing throwing-arm kinetics.

Return to Play Criteria Following Surgical Stabilization for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To identify and describe in the existing literature any criteria used for return to play following surgical stabilization for traumatic, anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: We performed a systematic review evaluating surgical stabilization for primary traumatic anterior shoulder instability in skeletally mature patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up using Level I to IV studies in PubMed and EMBASE from January 1994 to January 2017. RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies with at least 1 explicitly stated criterion for return to play were identified from a review of more than 5,100 published articles. Seven different categories of return to play criteria were identified, the most common of which were time from surgery (89.6%), strength (18.9%), and range of motion (13.8%). Pain, stability, proprioception, and postoperative radiographic evaluation were also used. As hypothesized, in 75.8% of the included studies (44/58), time was the only criterion explicitly used. The most commonly used time for return to play was 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review identifies 7 criteria that have been used in the available literature to determine when patients are ready to return to play; however, consistent with our hypothesis, 75% of studies used time from surgery as the sole listed criterion, with the most commonly used time point of 6 months postoperative. All of these criteria can be used in future research to develop a comprehensive checklist of functional criteria in hopes of reducing recurrent injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review.

Correlation of MRI to Arthroscopy in the Elbow: Thrower's Elbow and Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury.

One cannot overstate the importance of a thorough history and physical examination, supplemented with directed imaging, to help pinpoint the exact cause of the athlete's elbow pain. Although plain radiographs should not be overlooked, advanced imaging plays a critical role in diagnosis and management of pathology in the thrower's elbow, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and stress ultrasound. By judiciously combining these elements, the clinician can appropriately manage these injuries in order to successfully return the athlete to their preinjury level of play.

Elbow Injuries in Professional Baseball: Epidemiological Findings From the Major League Baseball Injury Surveillance System.

BACKGROUND: Elbow injuries cause significant disability for the throwing athlete. Scant data are available on the distribution and characteristics of these injuries in elite baseball players. No study exists that focuses solely on the epidemiological characteristics of elbow injuries in professional baseball players using a comprehensive injury surveillance system. HYPOTHESIS: Professional baseball players have a high occurrence of elbow injuries influenced by factors including length of time playing, time period within the annual baseball season, and specific position played. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological study. METHODS: Data on elbow injuries occurring during the 2011-2014 seasons were collected from Major League Baseball's Health Injury and Tracking System, a comprehensive injury surveillance system. Each specific type of elbow injury was evaluated with respect to overall injury rate, years as a professional player, mechanism of injury, treatment, average time lost, and return to play. RESULTS: During the study period, 3185 elbow injuries (n = 430 Major League; n = 2755 Minor League) occurred. The mean number of days missed and percentage requiring surgery were similar between Major and Minor League players. Overall, 20.0% (650/3185) of the injuries required surgical treatment. Pitchers were the most likely to incur an elbow injury (40.0% of injured athletes were pitchers), were the most likely to require surgery (34.2% of injured pitchers required surgery), and had the greatest mean number of days missed when treated nonsurgically (33.2 days). Medial injuries composed 42.1% (1342/3185) of all elbow injuries. Of all elbow surgeries performed during the study period, the highest percentage involved ligaments (372/650; 57.2%). CONCLUSION: Elbow injuries are a considerable source of disability in professional baseball players. Pitchers are most likely to incur these injuries, are most likely to require surgery, and have the highest mean number of days missed when treated nonsurgically. The most common injuries involve the medial elbow, with ligament injuries most often requiring surgery. This study represents the only investigation to date using a comprehensive injury surveillance system to examine elbow injuries in professional baseball players. It provides a basis for injury prevention and treatment recommendations, establishes the most thorough framework for determining elbow injury risk, and focuses continued research on elbow injury prevention in the elite baseball player.

Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction via Independent Tunnel Drilling: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Autografts.

PURPOSE: To collect the highest level of evidence comparing anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction via independent tunnel drilling using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts in terms of clinical outcome and failure rate. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of clinical trials that randomized patients to ACL reconstruction with either BTB or HT autografts with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Only trials using independent tunnel drilling, including outside-in and anteromedial portal techniques, for both autografts were eligible for inclusion, whereas all transtibial studies were excluded. Study design, demographics, surgical technique, rehabilitation protocol, and clinical outcomes were compiled. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Quality assessment was performed using the Coleman Methodological Scale (CMS). RESULTS: Six published studies reporting on 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. No study reported a difference in rerupture rate between BTB and HT. BTB-reconstructed knees experienced a greater incidence of anterior knee pain or crepitus in 2/7 trials and radiographic evidence of degenerative change in 3/7 trials. HT-reconstructed knees had increased instrumented laxity in 2/7 trials and less knee flexion strength postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This study collects all available Level I and II evidence for anatomic ACL reconstruction using BTB and HT grafts. According to the data presented in these studies, clinical outcome scores and failure rates showed no differences for anatomic reconstruction using either autograft. However, in some studies, BTB-reconstructed knees experienced a greater incidence of anterior knee pain and radiographic evidence of degenerative change, and in others, HT-reconstructed knees had increased laxity and less knee flexion strength. In our opinion, both BTB and HT autografts remain valid options for ACL reconstruction when using anatomic drilling techniques, providing a stable knee with reliable return to activity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Sensitivity of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography in detection of panlabral tears of the glenohumeral joint.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting combined lesions of the glenoid labrum involving tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum. METHODS: Preoperative MRI findings were available in 46 cases of arthroscopic repair of combined tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum (mean age, 31 years), including 23 noncontrast MRI studies and 24 magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography studies (1 patient had both). MRI findings were compared with the status of the labrum at the time of arthroscopy, and the sensitivity of MRI was determined. RESULTS: MRI showed evidence of combined lesions of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum in only 10 of 47 studies (21.3%). Only 2 of 23 (8.7%) tears were detected by noncontrast MRI, compared with 8 of 24 (33.3%) by MR arthrography (P = .07). Non-contrast MRI showed evidence of labral pathology in more than one direction in 10 of 23 studies (43.5%), compared with 20 of 24 MR arthrography studies (83.3%) (P = .006). Noncontrast MRI showed no evidence of a labral tear in 3 of 23 patients (13.0%), whereas no MR arthrogram was completely negative for a labral tear (0%) (P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: Combined tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior glenoid labrum are infrequent injuries that are typically not completely defined by either noncontrast MRI or MR arthrography. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Outcomes of arthroscopic repair of panlabral tears of the glenohumeral joint.

BACKGROUND: Combined lesions of the glenoid labrum involving tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum have been infrequently reported in the literature. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair of these lesions in a general population using validated scoring instruments, presence of complications, and need for revision surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients who had arthroscopic labral repair of tears involving the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum (defined as a panlabral repair) were identified at our institution by retrospective review. All patients underwent arthroscopic labral repair with suture anchor fixation by a uniform approach and with a standardized postoperative protocol. Forty-four patients had a minimum 16-month postoperative follow-up. Outcomes were assessed postoperatively by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and the Penn Shoulder score. Complications were also documented, including need for revision surgery. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of surgery was 32 years (range, 15-55 years) in the 44 patients. Presenting shoulder complaints included pain alone (40%), instability alone (14%), or pain and instability (45%). Mean number of anchors per repair was 7.9 (range, 5-12). Mean follow-up was 42 months (range, 16-78 months). Mean ± standard deviation ASES score at final follow-up was 90.1 ± 17.7 (range, 22-100), and mean Penn Shoulder score was 90.2 ± 15.3 (range, 38-100). Three of the 4 patients with outcome scores of 70 or less at final follow-up had undergone prior surgery. Thirteen postoperative complications (30%) occurred, with 3 (7%) requiring a second surgery. Five patients (11%) had an instability event following panlabral repair, but only 1 of these patients (2%) required revision surgery for a recurrent labral tear. CONCLUSION: Combined tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior glenoid labrum represent a small but significant portion of labral injuries. Arthroscopic repair of these injuries can be performed with good postoperative outcomes and a low rate of recurrent labral injury.

The prevalence of articular cartilage changes in the knee joint in patients undergoing arthroscopy for meniscal pathology.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of articular cartilage changes in the knee joint and to analyze predictive factors for these changes in patients undergoing arthroscopy for meniscal pathology. METHODS: Between March 2005 and June 2009, 1,010 patients underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy or meniscal repair by the senior author. During surgery, a precise diagram was used to carefully note the presence, location, size, and Outerbridge grade of changes to the articular surfaces of the knee joint. The prevalence of articular cartilage changes was calculated for 6 age groups: younger than 20 years, 20 to 29 years, 30 to 39 years, 40 to 49 years, 50 to 59 years, and 60 years or older. Demographic data including gender, ethnicity, smoking status, and body mass index (BMI) were acquired from patient charts. RESULTS: Overall, 48% of patients showed changes to the medial compartment, 25% to the lateral compartment, and 45% to the patellofemoral compartment. Eighty-five percent of patients aged 50 to 59 years and 86% of patients aged 60 years or older showed articular cartilage changes to at least 1 knee compartment. In contrast, only 13% of patients aged younger than 20 years and 32% of patients aged 20 to 29 years showed changes to at least 1 compartment. A significant relation was found between age and the development of articular cartilage changes in each of the 3 compartments (P < .0001). BMI was also significantly related to articular cartilage changes in the medial and patellofemoral compartments (P < .0001) but not the lateral compartment (P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a high prevalence of articular cartilage damage as defined by the Outerbridge classification in patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery for meniscal pathology. Risk factors that correlate with articular cartilage damage include increasing age, elevated BMI, medial compartment pathology, and knee contractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Factors affecting patient selection of graft type in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess factors associated with patient selection of graft type for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 1,038 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction over a 5-year period. Surgery was performed by 5 different surgeons. A questionnaire was sent to patients at a minimum of 24 months' follow-up to determine which type of graft was used, why they chose that graft, whether they were satisfied with their graft and outcome, and whether they would choose another graft and, if so, which one; it also included a visual analog scale to rate their recovery. RESULTS: Questionnaires were received from 240 patients. The mean follow-up from the time of surgery was 41.3 months (range, 24 to 96 months). There were a variety of allografts and autografts used. Overall, allograft was used in 63.3% of patients and autograft in 35.4%. The most common factor influencing graft selection was physician recommendation (74.2%). Patients rated their recovery on average as 8.48 (+/-1.8) out of 10 on the visual analog scale (range, 0 to 10). Of the patients, 93% were satisfied with their graft selection. Only 12.7% would choose another graft if in the situation again. Of these patients, 63.3% would change from an autograft to allograft. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the most important factor for a patient choosing a graft for ACL reconstruction is physician recommendation. Our study has shown an increasing trend in our group toward the use of allograft materials for ACL reconstruction (63.3% of all graft materials selected). Of the individuals who were dissatisfied with their graft, 63% who originally chose autograft would choose allograft as a source in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic case-control study.

Diagnosis and treatment of medial epicondylitis of the elbow.

Although limited literature exists on medial epicondylitis of the elbow, this disorder is an injury affecting many athletes at every level, especially throwing athletes. Care must be taken in diagnosing medial epicondylitis to distinguish it from other possible pathologies of the medial elbow, which may exist concurrently. The large majority of patients diagnosed with medial epicondylitis will respond to a well-structured, nonsurgical program; however, patients with persistent or recurring symptoms can be treated surgically, which yields high patient satisfaction and ultimately a reliable return to preinjury levels of activity.