Tumor location matters, next generation sequencing mutation profiling of left-sided, rectal, and right-sided colorectal tumors in 552 patients.

Despite the introduction of new molecular classifications, advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) is treated with chemotherapy supplemented with anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF targeted therapy. In this study, 552 CRC cases with different primary tumor locations (250 left side, 190 rectum, and 112 right side) were retrospectively analyzed by next generation sequencing for mutations in 50 genes. The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 in left-sided tumors compared to right-sided tumors and BRAF in right-sided tumors compared to left-sided tumors. Mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF were not detected in 45% of patients with left-sided tumors and in 28.6% of patients with right-sided tumors. Liver metastases were more common in patients with left-sided tumors. Tumors on the right side were larger at diagnosis and had a higher grade (G3) than tumors on the left. Rectal tumors exhibit distinctive biological characteristics when compared to left-sided tumors, including a higher absence rate of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations (47.4% in rectal versus 42.8% in left-sided tumors). These rectal tumors are also unique in their primary metastasis site, which is predominantly the lungs, and they have varying mutation rates, particularly in genes such as BRAF, FBXW7, and TP53, that distinguish them from tumors found in other locations. Primary tumor location has implications for the potential treatment of CRC with anti-EGFR therapy.

Changes in survival of colorectal cancer patients in Swietokrzyskie Province (Southern Poland) from the second half of the 1990s to the early 21st century - a population-based study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: For years, the increase in cancer incidence and deaths has constituted a significant health and social problem. Variation in the burden in cancers in different regions of the world requires constant monitoring of the epidemiological situation in this regard. Assessing survival in cancer patients is a valuable source of information for patients and physicians alike, as well as for politicians who have a direct impact on the shaping of health policy and health systems. The aim of the present study was to assess the changes in the 5-year relative survival of colorectal cancer patients during 1995-2014. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 8,970 patients with colorectal cancer in the years 1995-2014, 5,033 males and 3,937 females aged 67.5 ± 11.7 from Swietokrzyskie Cancer Registry were used. Cases were classified according to the topographical codes ICD-O-3: C18.0-C18.9, C19.9, C20.9, C21.0-C21.2, C21.8. The end of follow-up was fixed at 31 December 2014. Four five-year calendar periods were defined. In each calendar period, relative survival rates using the Ederer II method were estimated separately for males and females. RESULTS: In 2010-2014 (against 1995-1999), the absolute increase in the 5-year relative survival in males and females with colon cancer was the highest and reached 9.8 percentage point (p.p.) and 9.6 p.p., respectively. Patterns of survival for both colon and rectal cancer patients according to gender and age were very similar. CONCLUSIONS: In 1995-2014, an increase in the value of relative survival rates of males and females with colorectal cancer was observed. Systematic increase in funding in health care was a chance for reducing the burden of colorectal cancer by more widespread and equal access of effective early detection and cancer treatment.

Radiotherapy versus radiochemotherapy with cisplatin in treatment of cervical cancer.

AIM: To compare effects of concomitant radiochemotherapy (RCTh) and radiotherapy (RTh) alone in patients with cervical carcinoma and with 36-months follow-up analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 106 stage IIA-IVA cervical carcinoma women were divided in two groups. RCTh group was treated with teleradiotherapy (50.4 Gy/T), intracavitary brachytherapy (46 Gy), and iv cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)). RTh group was treated with pelvic teletherapy (52-54 Gy/T) and intracavitary brachytherapy (50-55 Gy). RESULTS: In RCTh group absorbed radiation dose was significantly lower (50.4 vs. 52.7 Gy) and the duration of treatment was significantly shorter (45.1 days vs. 47.8 days). There were no statistical differences in both groups in survival (59% in RCTh group vs. 56% in RTh group), response to treatment (86% vs. 90%), local recurrence (42% vs. 49%) metastasis occurrence (21% vs. 17%), anemia (40% vs. 26%), early postradiation reactions in intestines (77% vs. 65%) and bladder (71% vs. 61%) as well as in incidence of rectovaginal (10% vs. 4%) and vesicovaginal formation of fistulas (6% vs. 4%), respectively. There were significant differences between two groups in: nausea (77% vs. 6%), vomiting (65% vs. 3.7%), leucopenia (69% vs. 26%) and thrombocytopenia (35% vs. 9%), and late postradiation bladder effects (94% vs. 74%). RCTh patients with anemia had lower 36-months survival rates (42% vs. 71%), more frequent local recurrences (77% vs. 31%) and metastasis-free survival rates (61% vs. 90%) than RCTh patients without anemia. CONCLUSIONS: RCTh gives better treatment results in patients without than in patients with anemia and higher overall survival rates than RTh in patients without anemia. The only clinical prognostic factor for advance cervical carcinoma is the clinical stage of the disease.

Comparison of embryological and clinical outcome in GnRH antagonist vs. GnRH agonist protocols for in vitro fertilization in PCOS non-obese patients. A prospective randomized study.

PURPOSE: Embryological and clinical efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and agonist stimulation protocols in non-obese women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) were compared. METHODS: A prospective randomized study. SETTING: Medical University Hospital. PATIENTS: 70 infertile PCOS patients; 33 in GnRH antagonist and 37 in GnRH agonist group. RESULTS: Similar mature metaphase II oocyte rate (76% vs. 76%) was observed in both protocols. Optimal pronuclear morphology zygotes dominated in both groups (64% vs. 66%). Transferred embryo quality did not differ in both protocols. No significant differences between both protocols were found in delivery rate (p = 0.481), pregnancy rate (p = 0.810), multiple pregnancy rate (p = 0.501), miscarriage rate (p = 0.154), fertilization rate (p = 0.388) and implantation rate (p = 1.000). Duration of stimulation and total follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dose were significantly lower in GnRH antagonist protocol (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: GnRH antagonist and agonist protocols in non-obese PCOS patients yield similar embryological and clinical outcomes. Shorter duration of treatment and lower FSH requirement in GnRH antagonist group may be financially beneficial and therefore attractive for patients.

Biotechnological and clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization in non-obese patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a hormonal and metabolic disorder which poses problems with controlled ovarian stimulation (COH). It has been also postulated that PCOS patients have oocytes and embryos with poorer quality which affects IVF results. AIM: To verify IVF outcome in non-obese patients with PCOS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IVF results of 71 non-obese PCOS patients with 243 non-obese non-POCS patients, regardless of stimulation protocol, from years 2004-2006 were compared. RESULTS: Biotechnological results of PCOS patients in opposition to non-PCOS patients were respectively as follows: higher average number (10.19 vs. 7.61; p=0.001) and percentage (82.34% vs. 76.25%; p=0.025) of retrieved mature M2 oocytes; similar (77.01% vs. 76.75%; p=0.835) fertilization rate with higher average number of embryos (7.633 vs. 5.650 p=0.003); higher average number (4.830 vs. 3.304; p=0.001) and percentage (65.66% vs. 60.57%; p=0.006) of embryos with optimal Z1 and Z2 pronuclei pattern according to Scott; higher average number of class Aembryos (3.57 vs. 2.34; p=0.001). Similar number of embryos were transferred in both groups (2.408 vs. 2.485, p=0.552). Clinical results in PCOS and non-PCOS patients were as follows: similar stimulation duration (10.53 days vs. 10.31 days; p=0.639) with significant less gonadotropin total usage (1866.54 IU vs. 2276.18 IU; p=0.001). Also clinical pregnancy per transfer (57.75% vs. 41.98%; p=0.021) and delivery per transfer (45.07% vs. 32.51%; p=0.066) were more often in PCOS patients with comparable miscarriages (12,68% vs. 6,58%; p=0.131) and ectopic pregnancy (0.00% vs. 2.06%; p=0.591) rates, respectively. CONCLUSION: PCOS in non-obese patients is linked with good biotechnological and clinical IVF outcome.