Androgen receptor regulates Cdc6 in synchronized LNCaP cells progressing from G1 to S phase.

We have shown previously that androgen receptor (AR) activity is required for the progression of cells from G(1) to S phase. In an attempt to elucidate the mechanism of androgen- and androgen-receptor-mediated proliferation of prostate cancer cells, we studied the effect of anti-androgen bicalutamide (Casodex) on the expression of cell-cycle regulatory genes in synchronized LNCaP cells progressing from G(1) to S phase. LNCaP cells were synchronized by isoleucine-deprivation. Expression of cell-cycle regulatory genes in S phase control cells versus Casodex-treated cells that fail to enter S phase was studied using a microarray containing cDNA probes for 111 cell-cycle specific genes. RT-PCR and Western-blots were used to validate microarray data. Casodex blocked synchronized LNCaP cells from entering S phase. Microarrays revealed downregulation of eight genes in cells prevented from entering into S phase by Casodex. Of these eight genes, only Cdc6, cyclin A, and cyclin B were downregulated at both the mRNA and protein level in Casodex treated cells as compared to control cells. The mRNA and protein levels of Cdc6 increased as synchronized LNCaP cells progressed from G(1) to S phase, and were attenuated in Casodex-treated cells failed to enter S phase. Cyclins A and B were detected when cells entered S phase, but not when they were in G(1) phase. Like Cdc6, the levels of both cyclins A and B were attenuated in Casodex-treated cells. AR may play an important role in the onset of DNA synthesis in prostate cancer cells by regulating the expression and stability of Cdc6, which is critically required for the assembly of the pre-replication complex(pre-RC).

Physical and functional interaction of androgen receptor with calmodulin in prostate cancer cells.

Ca(2+) and calmodulin (CaM) play a critical role in proliferation and viability of a wide variety of cells, including prostate cancer cells. We examined two prostate cancer cell lines, androgen-sensitive LNCaP and androgen-independent PC-3. Proliferation of LNCaP cells was six to eight times more sensitive to the inhibitory effect of the CaM antagonist N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthalenesulfonamide hydrochloride (W-7) than were PC-3 cells. Because LNCaP cell proliferation is sensitive to stimulation by androgen, we assessed the physical and functional interaction between androgen receptor (AR) and CaM. We observed tight binding of AR to CaM when LNCaP cell extracts were subjected to CaM-affinity column chromatography. AR binding to CaM was Ca(2+)-dependent and was inhibited by pretreatment of the cell extracts with W-7. Using immunofluorescence staining and confocal microscopy, we demonstrated colocalization of AR and CaM in the nucleus of LNCaP cells. Furthermore, the functional relevance of AR-CaM interactions in intact cells was revealed by the observation that W-7 was as effective as Casodex, an antiandrogen, in blocking AR-regulated expression of prostate-specific antigen in LNCaP cells. AR seems to interact with CaM directly because purified human AR could bind to CaM-agarose, and CaM could be detected in AR-immunoprecipitate prepared from purified soluble proteins. These studies provide direct evidence for physical and functional interaction between AR and CaM and suggest the potential usefulness of CaM antagonists in blocking AR activity in prostate cancer.

Synchronized prostate cancer cells for studying androgen regulated events in cell cycle progression from G1 into S phase.

Androgen-ablation is a most commonly prescribed treatment for metastatic prostate cancer but it is not curative. Development of new strategies for treatment of prostate cancer is limited partly by a lack of full understanding of the mechanism by which androgen regulates prostate cancer cell proliferation. This is due, mainly, to the limitations in currently available experimental models to distinguish androgen/androgen receptor (AR)-induced events specific to proliferation from those that are required for cell viability. We have, therefore, developed an experimental model system in which both androgen-sensitive (LNCaP) and androgen-independent (DU145) prostate cancer cells can be reversibly blocked in G(0)/G(1) phase of cell cycle by isoleucine deprivation without affecting their viability. Pulse-labeling studies with (3)H-thymidine indicated that isoleucine-deprivation caused LNCaP and DU145 cells to arrest at a point in G(1) phase which is 12-15 and 6-8 h, respectively, before the start of S phase and that their progression into S phase was dependent on serum factors. Furthermore, LNCaP, but not DU145, cells required AR activity for progression from G(1) into S phase. Western blot analysis of the cell extracts prepared at regular intervals following release from isoleucine-block revealed remarkable differences in the expression of cyclin E, p21(Cip1), p27(Kip1), and Rb at the protein level between LNCaP and DU145 cells during progression from G(1) into S phase. However, in both cell types Cdk-2 activity associated with cyclin E and cyclin A showed an increase only when the cells transited from G(1) into S phase. These observations were further corroborated by studies using exponentially growing cells that were enriched in specific phases of the cell cycle by centrifugal elutriation. These studies demonstrate usefulness of the isoleucine-deprivation method for synchronization of androgen-sensitive and androgen-independent prostate cancer cells, and for examining the role of androgen and AR in progression of androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cells from G(1) into S phase.

Resveratrol induces prostate cancer cell entry into s phase and inhibits DNA synthesis.

Resveratrol has an apoptotic effect on a variety of cancer cells. Changes in cell cycle regulatory processes contributing to the antiproliferative effect of resveratrol remain largely unknown. Our studies revealed that, in androgen-sensitive LNCaP cells, the effect of resveratrol on DNA synthesis varied dramatically depending on the concentration and the duration of treatment. In 1-h-treated cells, resveratrol showed only an inhibitory effect on DNA synthesis, which increased with increasing concentration (IC50 = 20 microM). However, when treatment duration was extended to 24 h, we observed a dual effect of resveratrol on DNA synthesis. At 5 to 10 microM it caused a 2- to 3-fold increase in DNA synthesis, and at > or =15 microM, it inhibited DNA synthesis. The increase in DNA synthesis was seen only in LNCaP cells, but not in androgen-independent DU145 prostate cancer cells or in NIH3T3 fibroblast cells. The resveratrol-induced increase in DNA synthesis was associated with enrichment of LNCaP cells in S phase, and a concurrent decrease in nuclear p21Cipl and p27Kip1 levels. Furthermore, consistent with the entry of LNCaP cells into S phase, there was a dramatic increase in nuclear Cdk2 activity associated with both cyclin A and cyclin E. Taken together, our observations indicate that LNCaP cells, treated with resveratrol, are induced to enter into S phase, but subsequent progression through S phase is limited by the inhibitory effect of resveratrol on DNA synthesis, particularly at concentrations above 15 microM. Therefore, this unique ability of resveratrol to exert opposing effects on two important processes in cell cycle progression, induction of S phase and inhibition of DNA synthesis, may be responsible for its apoptotic and antiproliferative effects.