Aquatic therapy following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair enables faster improvement of Constant score than land-based therapy or self-rehabilitation therapy.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and functional outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair over a period of 2 years using three postoperative rehabilitation modalities: aquatic therapy, land-based therapy, and self-rehabilitation therapy. The null hypothesis was that aquatic therapy would provide no difference in Constant score compared to land-based therapy and self-rehabilitation therapy. METHODS: A prospective study was performed on subjects scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2012 and 2017 that complied with the following criteria: (i) small to medium sized symptomatic supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon tears, (ii) low to moderate tendon retraction according to Patte, and (iii) fatty infiltration stage ≤2. Patients were allocated to perform either aquatic therapy, land-based therapy, or self-rehabilitation therapy for 2-4 months. Independent observers blinded to the study design collected Constant score, SSV, and patient satisfaction at 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. STUDY DESIGN: Level III, cohort study RESULTS: At 2 months follow-up, patients performing aquatic therapy had significantly higher Constant scores (p < 0.001) and SSV (p < 0.001) compared to those performing land-based therapy or self-rehabilitation therapy. At 3 months follow-up, patients performing aquatic therapy had significantly higher Constant scores (p < 0.001), and SSV (p < 0.001), both of which exceeded the respective minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of 10.4 and 12. Patients performing aquatic therapy continued to have significantly higher Constant scores and SSV at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. CONCLUSION: Aquatic therapy has a very limited positive effect on clinical outcomes at 3 months after surgery, but yields no relevant improvements on function or satisfaction at 1 to 2 years follow-up.

Repositioning of the humeral tuberosities can be guided by pectoralis major insertion.

In complex proximal humerus fractures, positioning of the tuberosities can be a challenge. This study demonstrates the constant angle between the pectoralis major (PM) and the medial lip of the bicipital groove (BG) on the horizontal axial plane. This angle can be used to determine the rotation, as well as the positioning of the tuberosities, when planning a hemiarthroplasty or a reconstruction. Thirty-one shoulder MRIs were reviewed by three independent observers. The measurements were taken by superposing the axial cut of the proximal humerus, at the level of the distal bicipital groove, and the cut at the top of the PM insertion. By aligning the centers of rotation, we could determine the arcs of rotation between the insertion of the PM and the lips of the medial and lateral bicipital groove (MBG and LBG). Both angles were compared in terms of reliability, reproducibility, and precision. The mean PM-MBG angle was 3.7° [standard deviation (SD) 14.7°] and 27.4° (SD 14.4°) for the PM-LBG angle. We obtained good and very good intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) results for inter- (0.675) and intra-observer (0.793) reliabilities on the medial angle, plus excellent results for the lateral angle (inter-observers 0.962 and intra-observer 0.895). This study demonstrates that the repositioning of humeral tuberosities can be guided by pectoralis major insertion. This will help achieve proper positioning of the metaphysis in relation to the diaphysis during surgery for complex proximal humerus fractures.

Can surgeons predict what makes a good hemiarthroplasty for fracture?

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were (1) to identify the risk factors for tuberosity complications and poor functional outcomes and (2) to compare a standard humeral stem with a fracture-specific humeral stem in hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 60 consecutively operated patients (61 shoulders) using radiographs and computed tomography scans. There were 56 displaced four-part and 5 three-part fractures. The technique was standardized for prosthesis positioning in height and retroversion and for tuberosity fixation. A conventional standard stem was implanted in the first 31 shoulders (group A), and a specific fracture stem was implanted in the next 30 shoulders (group B). The sample size needed for comparison was predetermined with an a priori power analysis. The mean follow-up period was 64 months (range, 24 to 150 months). RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the greater tuberosity was healed in an adequate (anatomic) position in 45% of the patients in group A (14 of 31) and 87% of those in group B (26 of 30) (P = .0001). Active forward elevation, active external rotation, and the Constant score were significantly better with fracture stems (136°, 34°, and 68 points, respectively) than with conventional stems (113°, 23°, and 58 points, respectively) (P < .0001). Regardless of the type of implant used, patients aged 75 years or older and women had significantly lower functional results and higher rates of tuberosity complications (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Good functional outcomes can be anticipated after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures if the greater tuberosity is anatomically positioned (ie, lateral to the stem) and healed around the prosthesis. The use of a specific fracture stem allows to double the rate of tuberosity healing compared to a conventional stem (87% vs. 45%), decreases complications and improves shoulder function. Risk factors associated with poor functional results and anatomic failures are (1) patient age (≥75 years), (2) patient gender (women), and (3) use of a conventional (bulky) stem.

Stress radiography and posterior pathological laxity of knee: comparison between two different techniques.

Stress radiographs have been recommended in order to obtain a better objective quantification of abnormal compartment knee motion. This tool has showed to be superior in quantifying a posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) lesion compared to clinical or arthrometer evaluation. Different radiographic techniques have been described in literature to quantify posterior pathological laxity. In this study we evaluated the total amount of posterior displacement (PTD) and side to side difference (SSD), before and after surgical reconstruction of PCL or PCL and posterolateral complex (PLC), using two different stress radiography techniques (Telos stress and kneeling view). Twenty patients were included in this study. We found a statistical significant difference about both total PTD and SSD among the two techniques preoperatively and at follow-up, with greatest values occurring using the kneeling view. Although stress radiographies has been introduced to allow an objective quantification of laxity in ligamentous injured knee, we believe that further studies on a large numbers of subjects are required to define the relationship between PTD values, measured with stress knee radiography, particularly using kneeling view, and ligamentous knee injury, in order to obtain a real useful tool in the decision making process, as well as to evaluate the outcome after ligamentous surgery.

Ectopic insertion of the pectoralis minor: implication in the arthroscopic treatment of shoulder stiffness.

Although ectopic insertion of the pectoralis minor has been previously described in the literature, the role of such anatomical variations in producing shoulder symptoms (i.e., pain and/or stiffness) remains controversial. We describe here a case of shoulder stiffness in which an ectopic insertion of the pectoralis minor over the supraspinatus tendon was found to be the main reason for severe contracture in external rotation and anterior thoracic pain. During arthroscopy, external rotation could not be restored despite anterior and inferior capsulotomy and release of the capsule of the rotator interval. Complete restoration of the passive external rotation was obtained only after complete release of the pectoralis minor from the supraspinatus. This observation underlines the importance of recognising such an anatomical variation when performing an arthroscopic arthrolysis in a stiff shoulder.

Open elbow arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness.

OBJECTIVES: The elbow joint is vulnerable to stiffness, especially after trauma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness. DESIGN: Cohort retrospective study. PATIENTS: Eighteen consecutive patients were evaluated by an independent observer at an average of 16 months (6 to 43) after open elbow arthrolysis was performed for posttraumatic stiffness. Initial traumas were: isolated fractures (11) or dislocation (1) and complex fracture-dislocations (6). Initial treatments were: nonoperative (3), radial head resection (1), and ORIF (14). Patients presented predominantly with mixed contractures (combined extrinsic and intrinsic contractures). INTERVENTION: Open elbow arthrolysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Elbow function and patient satisfaction were the principal outcome measures. At follow-up European Society for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (SECEC) elbow scores were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Three patients had minor postoperative complications: 1 partial wound dehiscence, 1 subcutaneous infection, and one seroma. None of these complications influenced the final result clinically. The mean total increase in range of motion was 40 degrees (13 to 112 degrees), with a mean gain in flexion of 14 degrees (0 to 45 degrees) and 26 degrees in extension (5 to 67 degrees). No patient showed signs of elbow instability. There was no radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis progression at follow-up. We did not find any correlations between the type of stiffness, the approaches used, and the results. However, patients with the greatest preoperative stiffness had significantly better improvement of mobility (P<0.001). The best results were obtained in patients who had arthrolysis done within 1 year after the initial trauma (P=0.008). The mean SECEC scores were 88 (52 to 100) for the injured elbows, and 96 (88 to 100) for the contralateral elbows. CONCLUSION: Open elbow arthrolysis for patients with posttraumatic stiffness improves joint function and provides patient satisfaction. The best results, in terms of gain of motion and patient satisfaction, were obtained in patients with severe stiffness who had operations within the first year after initial trauma.

Leg textiloma. A case report.

OBJECTIVE: To report and highlight the potential diagnostic pitfalls and consequences of leg textiloma. CASE REPORT AND INTERVENTION: A soft tissue pseudotumor of the left leg diagnosed in a 58-year-old man is described. The lesion was caused by a retained surgical gauze after surgery for varicose veins. The surgical gauze had remained in the subcutaneous tissue for 3 years and led to the formation of a 3-cm, well-circumscribed, pseudotumoral foreign body granuloma which appeared like a soft tissue tumor. A surgical intervention was performed and the mass was excised. During the procedure an old surgical gauze was found. The histologic examination revealed that a large foreign body granuloma (pseudotumor) had developed in contact with foreign material birefracting under polarized light (gauze). No sign of malignancy was noted. CONCLUSION: Although no fatal complications have been described in the musculoskeletal localization, the diagnosis is difficult and costly. According to clinical presentation, a differential diagnosis should be made between a tumoral lesion, such as a sarcoma, or a pseudotumoral lesion, such as a gossypiboma. Focal myositis or infections should also be suspected.

Arthroscopic treatment of anterior shoulder instability using knotless suture anchors.

PURPOSE: In this study, we evaluated the results of arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder using knotless anchors and the lesions associated with anterior-inferior labrum avulsion. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective clinical study. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients affected with anterior unidirectional post-traumatic shoulder instability were treated with arthroscopic reconstruction using knotless anchors. During the surgical procedure, associated lesions such as superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) (15%) and rotator interval (15%) were repaired. The patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 43 months. RESULTS: Eighty percent of patients resumed sports activity without any limitation and 90% of patients were satisfied with the results of surgery. One patient (5%) had a recurrent dislocation; this patient resumed a contact sport activity despite medical advice. One patient (5%) related signs of shoulder insecurity at the extreme degree of abduction and external rotation; this patient had resumed sports activity with a moderate limitation and was the only patient who was not completely satisfied with the results of surgery. No significant difference was observed between the operated and the contralateral shoulder according to the Rowe and Constant scores. The mean loss of external rotation was 3 degrees . We did not have any cases of anchor loosening, nor did we find signs of shoulder degenerative osteoarthritis on the radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: The knotless anchor seems to be a viable alternative for arthroscopic labrum repair, allowing a good capsular shift. Arthroscopic management of shoulder instability allows us to diagnose and treat associated lesions, thus improving the success rate of this type of surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.