Was It Worth It? Critical Evaluation of a Novel Outcomes Measure in Oncologic Palliative Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patient selection for palliative surgery is complex, and appropriate outcomes measures are incompletely defined. We explored the usefulness of a specific outcomes measure "was it worth it" in patients after palliative-intent operations for advanced malignancy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of a comprehensive longitudinal palliative surgery database was performed at an academic tertiary care center. All patients who underwent palliative-intent operation for advanced cancer from 2003 to 2022 were included. Patient satisfaction ("was it worth it") was reported within 30 days of operation after palliative-intent surgery. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were identified, and 81.7% self-reported that their palliative surgery was "worth it." Patients who reported that their surgery was "not worth it" were significantly older and were more likely to have recurrent symptoms and to need reoperation. There was no significant difference in overall, recurrence-free, and reoperation-free survival for patients when comparing "worth it" with "not worth it." Initial symptom improvement was not significantly different between groups. Age older than 65 years (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.80, p = 0.03), family engagement (hazard ratio 6.71, 95% CI 1.49 to 31.8, p = 0.01), and need for reoperation (hazard ratio 0.042, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.16, p < 0.0001) were all independently associated with patients reporting that their operation was "worth it." CONCLUSIONS: Here we demonstrate that simply asking a patient "was it worth it" after a palliative-intent operation identifies a distinct cohort of patients that traditional outcomes measures fail to distinguish. Family engagement and durability of an intervention are critical factors in determining patient satisfaction after palliative intervention. These data highlight the need for highly individualized care with special attention paid to patients self-reporting that their operation was "not worth it."

Integrated postoperative care model for older colorectal surgery patients improves outcomes and reduces healthcare costs.

BACKGROUND: Older surgical patients have an increased risk for postoperative complications, driving up healthcare costs. We determined if postoperative co-management of older surgery patients is associated with postoperative outcomes and hospital costs. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected for patients ≥70 years old undergoing colorectal surgery at a community teaching hospital. Patient outcomes were compared between those receiving postoperative surgery co-management care through the Optimization of Senior Care and Recovery (OSCAR) program and controls who received standard of care. Main outcome measures were postoperative complications and hospital charges, 30-day readmission rate, length of stay (LOS), and transfer to intensive care during hospitalization. Multivariable linear regression was used to model total charge and multivariable logistic regression to model complications, adjusted for multiple variables (e.g., age, sex, race, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI], American Society of Anesthesiologists score, surgery duration). RESULTS: All 187 patients in the OSCAR and control groups had a similar mean CCI score of 2.7 (p = 0.95). Compared to the control group, OSCAR recipients experienced less postoperative delirium (17% vs. 8%; p = 0.05), cardiac arrhythmia (12% vs. 3%; p = 0.03), and clinical worsening requiring transfer to intensive care (20% vs. 6%; p < 0.005). OSCAR group patients had a shorter mean LOS among high-risk patients (CCI ≥3) (-1.8 days; p = 0.09) and those ≥80 years old (-2.3 days; p = 0.07) compared to the control group. Mean total hospital charge was $10,297 less per patient in the OSCAR group (p = 0.01), with $17,832 less per patient with CCI ≥3 (p = 0.01), than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: A co-management care approach after colorectal surgery in older patients improves outcomes and decreases costs, with the most benefit going to the oldest patients and those with higher comorbidity scores.

Predicting Anastomotic Leak After Elective Colectomy: Utility of a Modified Frailty Index.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak is the most dreaded complication following colonic resection. While patient frailty is increasingly being recognized as a risk factor for surgical morbidity and mortality, the current colorectal body of literature has not assessed the relationship between frailty and anastomotic leak. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the relationship between patient frailty and anastomotic leak as well as patient frailty and failure to rescue in patients who experienced an anastomotic leak. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database from 2015 to 2017. PATIENTS: Patients with the diagnosis of colonic neoplasia undergoing an elective colectomy during the study time period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Anastomotic leak, failure to rescue. RESULTS: A total of 30,180 elective colectomies for neoplasia were identified. The leak rate was 2.9% (n = 880). Compared to nonfrail patients, frail patients were at increased odds of anastomotic leak (frailty score = 1: OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10-1.63; frailty score = 2: OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04-1.68; frailty score = 3: OR = 2.41, 95% CI 1.47-3.96). After an anastomotic leak, compared to nonfrail patient, a greater proportion of frail patients experienced mortality (3.4% vs 5.9%), septic shock (16.1% vs 21.0%), myocardial infarction (1.1% vs 2.9%), and pneumonia (6.8% vs 11.8%). Furthermore, the odds of mortality, septic shock, myocardial infarction, and pneumonia increased in frail patients with higher frailty scores. LIMITATIONS: Potential misclassification bias from lack of a strict definition of anastomotic leak and retrospective design of the study. CONCLUSION: Frail patients undergoing colectomy for colonic neoplasia are at increased risk of an anastomotic leak. Furthermore, once a leak occurs, they are more vulnerable to failure to rescue. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B784. PREDICCIN DE LA FUGA ANASTOMTICA DESPUS DE UNA COLECTOMA ELECTIVA UTILIDAD DE UN NDICE DE FRAGILIDAD MODIFICADO: ANTECEDENTES:La fuga anastomótica es la complicación más temida después de la resección colónica. Si bien la fragilidad del paciente se reconoce cada vez más como un factor de riesgo de morbilidad y mortalidad quirúrgicas, la bibliografía colorrectal actual no ha evaluado la relación entre la fragilidad y la fuga anastomótica.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la relación entre la fragilidad del paciente y la fuga anastomótica, así como la fragilidad del paciente y la falta de rescate en pacientes que sufrieron una fuga anastomótica.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTE:Base de datos del Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica del Colegio Estadounidense de Cirujanos de 2015 a 2017.PACIENTES:Pacientes con diagnóstico de neoplasia de colon sometidos a colectomía electiva durante el período de estudio.PRINCIPAL MEDIDA DE RESULTADO:Fuga anastomótica, falta de rescate.RESULTADOS:Se identificaron 30.180 colectomías electivas por neoplasia. La tasa de fuga fue del 2,9% (n = 880). En comparación con los pacientes no frágiles, los pacientes frágiles tenían mayores probabilidades de fuga anastomótica para (puntuación de fragilidad = 1: OR = 1,34, IC del 95%: 1,10-1,63; puntuación de fragilidad = 2: OR = 1,32, IC del 95%: 1,04- 1,68; puntuación de fragilidad = 3: OR 2,41; IC del 95%: 1,47-3,96). Después de una fuga anastomótica, en comparación con un paciente no frágil, una mayor proporción de pacientes frágiles experimentó mortalidad (3,4% frente a 5,9%), choque séptico (16,1% frente a 21,0%), infarto de miocardio (1,1% frente a 2,9%) y neumonía (6,8% vs 11,8%). Además, las probabilidades de mortalidad, choque séptico, infarto de miocardio y neumonía aumentaron en pacientes frágiles con puntuaciones de fragilidad más altas.LIMITACIONES:Posible sesgo de clasificación errónea debido a la falta de una definición estricta de fuga anastomótica, diseño retrospectivo del estudio.CONCLUSIÓN:Los pacientes frágiles sometidos a colectomía por neoplasia de colon tienen un mayor riesgo de una fuga anastomótica. Además, una vez que ocurre una fuga, son más vulnerables a fallas en el rescate. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B784.

Lymphopenia following pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with pancreatic fistula formation.

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Post-operative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) are a major source of morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study aims to investigate if persistent lymphopenia, a known marker of sepsis, can act as an additional marker of POPF with clinical implications that could help direct drain management. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent PD in a single hospital network from 2008 to 2018. Persistent lymphopenia was defined as lymphopenia beyond post-operative day #3. RESULTS: Of the 201 patients who underwent PD during the study period 161 patients had relevant laboratory data, 81 of whom had persistent lymphopenia. 17 patients with persistent lymphopenia went on to develop a POPF, compared to 7 patients without. Persistent lymphopenia had a negative predictive value of 91.3%. Multivariate analysis revealed only persistent lymphopenia as being independently associated with POPF (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.07-6.643, p=0.039). Patients with persistent lymphopenia were more likely to have a complication requiring intervention (56.8% vs 35.0%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent lymphopenia is a readily available early marker of POPF that holds the potential to identify clinically relevant POPF in patients where no surgical drain is present, and to act as an adjunct of drain amylase helping to guide drain management.

Improving the value of palliative surgery by optimizing patient selection: The role of long-term survival on high impact palliative intent operations.

BACKGROUND: In order to better characterize outcomes of palliative surgery (PS), we evaluated patients that experienced top quartile survival to elucidate predictors of high impact PS. METHODS: All PS performed on advanced cancer patients from 2003 to 2017 were identified from a PS database. RESULTS: 167 patients were identified. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the ability to rise from a chair was independently associated with top quartile survival (HR 7.61, 95% CI 2.12-48.82, p=0.008) as was the need for re-operation (HR 2.81, 95% CI 1.26-6.30, p=0.0012). Patients who were able to rise from a chair had significantly prolonged overall survival (320 vs 87 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although not the primary goal, long-term survival can be achieved following PS and is associated with re-operation and the ability to rise from a chair. These patients experience the benefits of PS for a longer period of time, which in turn maximizes value and positive impact. SUMMARY: Long-term survival and symptom control can be achieved in highly selected advanced cancer patients following palliative surgery. The ability of the patient to independently rise from a chair and the provider to offer a re-operation when indicated are associated with long-term survival following a palliative operation.

The Resident Outcome Project: Increased Academic Productivity Associated with a Formal Clinical Research Curriculum.

PURPOSE: A formal 2-year clinical research project in conjunction with a system-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement curriculum was initiated for all residents in our program. Within the structure of this formal clinical research curriculum, residents are required to develop a research hypothesis, develop an appropriate study design, collect and analyze data, and present a completed project. METHODS: At the end of the PGY1 year, residents select a project with an emphasis on quality improvement or clinical outcomes. The first 6 months of the 2-year program are dedicated to the identification of a faculty mentor and submission of a formal proposal to both the departmental education committee and to the institutional IRB. Over the following 12 months, residents meet monthly for required group research meetings. The final 6 months are focused on data analysis and project completion. RESULTS: Seventy-five residents have successfully completed the clinical research program since it was initiated in 2002. Completed projects led to abstracts accepted at 33 national or regional meetings and 11 peer reviewed publications to date. In addition, 3 major hospital wide quality improvement measures were initiated based on project findings. Following the first peer reviewed publication associated with these research projects in 2006, there have been significant increases in not only the number of accepted abstracts from these resident projects (3/18 [17%] vs 30/57 [53%], p = 0.008) but also the total number of all accepted resident clinical research (mean accepted abstracts per year 7.9 vs 1.0, p = 0.009 and mean peer reviewed publications per year 6.8 vs 2.0, p = 0.003.) DISCUSSION: Increased academic productivity was observed after a formal resident clinical research program was initiated in our program. Resident research efforts extended beyond the specific initial outcome projects as skills gained allowed for future independent clinical research.

Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells (ILC2s) Are Key Mediators of the Inflammatory Response in Polymicrobial Sepsis.

Sepsis remains a major public health concern, characterized by marked immune dysfunction. Innate lymphoid cells develop from a common lymphoid precursor but have a role in orchestrating inflammation during innate response to infection. Here, we investigate the pathologic contribution of the group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) in a murine model of acute septic shock (cecal ligation and puncture). Flow cytometric data revealed that ILC2s increase in number and percentage in the small intestine and in the peritoneal cells and inversely decline in the liver at 24 hours after septic insult. Sepsis also resulted in changes in ILC2 effector cytokine (IL-13) and activating cytokine (IL-33) in the plasma of mice and human patients in septic shock. Of interest, the sepsis-induced changes in cytokines were abrogated in mice deficient in functionally invariant natural killer T cells. Mice deficient in IL-13-producing cells, including ILC2s, had a survival advantage after sepsis along with decreased morphologic evidence of tissue injury and reduced IL-10 levels in the peritoneal fluid. Administration of a suppressor of tumorigenicity 2 (IL-33R) receptor-blocking antibody led to a transient survival advantage. Taken together, these findings suggest that ILC2s may play an unappreciated role in mediating the inflammatory response in both mice and humans; further, modulating ILC2 response in vivo may allow development of immunomodulatory strategies directed against sepsis.

Outcomes in nursing home patients with traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability in the United States. In survivors, traumatic brain injury remains a leading contributor to long-term disability and results in many patients being admitted to skilled nursing facilities for postacute care. Despite this very large population of traumatic brain injury patients, very little is known about the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury survivors, including rates of discharge to home or risk of death in long-term nursing facilities. We hypothesized that patient demographics and functional status influence outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury admitted to skilled nursing facilities. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 and older discharged alive and directly from hospital to a skilled nursing facility between 2011 and 2014 using the prospectively maintained Federal Minimum Data Set combined with Medicare claims data and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Vital Status files. Records were reviewed for demographic and clinical characteristics at admission to the skilled nursing facility, including age, sex, cognitive function, ability to communicate, and motor function. Activities of daily living were reassessed at discharge to calculate functional improvement. We used robust Poisson regression with skilled nursing facility fixed effects to calculate relative risks and 99% confidence intervals for mortality and functional improvement associated with the demographic and clinical characteristics present at admission. Linear regression was used to calculate adjusted mean duration of stay. RESULTS: Overall, 87,292 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with traumatic brain injury were admitted to skilled nursing facilities. The mean age was 84 years, with 74% of patients older than age 80. Generally, older age, male sex, and poor cognitive or functional status at admission to a skilled nursing facility were associated with increased risk for poorer outcomes. Older patients (age ≥80 years) with traumatic brain injury had a 1.5 times greater risk of death within 30 days of admission compared with adults younger than 80 years (relative risk = 1.49, 99% confidence interval = 1.36, 1.64). Women were 37% less likely to die than men were (relative risk = 0.63, 99% confidence interval = 0.59, 0.68). The risk of death was greater for patients with poor cognitive function (relative risk = 2.55, 99% confidence interval = 2.32, 2.77), substantial motor impairment (relative risk = 2.44, 99% confidence interval = 2.16, 2.77), and patients with impairment in communication (relative risk = 2.58, 99% confidence interval = 2.32, 2.86) compared with those without the respective deficits. One year after admission, these risk factors continued to confer excess risk for mortality. Duration of stay was somewhat greater for older patients (30.1 compared with 27.5 average days) and patients with cognitive impairment (31.7 vs 27.5 average days). At discharge, patients with cognitive impairment (relative risk = 0.86, 99% confidence interval = 0.83, 0.88) and impairment in the ability to communicate (relative risk = 0.67, 99% confidence interval = 0.54, 0.82) were less likely to improve in physical function. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that among patients with traumatic brain injury admitted to skilled nursing facilities, the likelihood of adverse outcomes varies significantly by key demographic and clinical characteristics. These findings may facilitate setting expectations among patients and families as well as providers when these patients are admitted to skilled nursing facilities for rehabilitation after their acute episode.

Leukadherin-1 ameliorates endothelial barrier damage mediated by neutrophils from critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Multi-organ failure occurs during critical illness and is mediated in part by destructive neutrophil-to-endothelial interactions. The ß2 integrin receptor, CR3 (complement receptor 3; Mac-1; CD11b/CD18), which binds endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), plays a key role in promoting the adhesion of activated neutrophils to inflamed endothelia which, when prolonged and excessive, can cause vascular damage. Leukadherin-1 (LA-1) is a small molecule allosteric activator of CR3 and has been shown to promote adhesion of blood neutrophils to inflamed endothelium and restrict tissue infiltration. Therefore, LA-1 offers a novel mechanism of anti-inflammatory action by activation, rather than inhibition, of the neutrophil CR3 integrin. However, whether promotion of neutrophil-to-endothelial interaction by this novel therapeutic is of benefit or detriment to endothelial barrier function is not known. METHODS: Critically ill septic and trauma patients were prospectively enrolled from the surgical and the trauma ICU. Blood was collected from these patients and healthy volunteers. Neutrophils were isolated by dextran sedimentation and adhered to TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α)-activated human umbilical vein endothelial (HUVEC) monolayers in the presence or absence of fMLP (formylmethionine-leucine-phenylalanine) and/or LA-1. Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) and exposure of underlying collagen were used to quantify endothelial barrier function and permeability. RESULTS: Neutrophils from critically ill trauma and septic patients caused similar degrees of endothelial barrier disruption which exceeded that caused by cells obtained from healthy controls both kinetically and quantitatively. LA-1 protected barrier function in the absence and presence of fMLP which served as a secondary stimulant to cause maximal loss of barrier function. LA-1 protection was also observed by quantifying collagen exposure underlying endothelial cells challenged with fMLP-stimulated neutrophils. LA-1 treatment resulted in decreased migration dynamics of neutrophils crawling on an endothelial monolayer with reduced speed (µm/s = 0.25 ± 0.01 vs. 0.06 ± 0.01, p < 0.05), path length (µm = 199.5 ± 14.3 vs. 42.1 ± 13.0, p < 0.05), and displacement (µm = 65.2 ± 4.7 vs. 10.4 ± 1.3; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Neutrophils from patients with trauma or sepsis cause endothelial barrier disruption to a similar extent relative to each other. The CR3 agonist LA-1 protects endothelial barrier function from damage caused by neutrophils obtained from both populations of critically ill patients even when exposed to secondary stimulation.

Trauma morning report is the ideal environment to teach and evaluate resident communication and sign-outs in the 80 hour work week.

BACKGROUND: The 80h work week has raised concerns that complications may increase due to multiple sign-outs or poor communication. Trauma Surgery manages complex trauma and acute care surgical patients with rapidly changing physiology, clinical demands and a large volume of data that must be communicated to render safe, effective patient care. Trauma Morning Report format may offer the ideal situation to study and teach sign-outs and resident communication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgery Residents were assessed on a 1-5 scale for their ability to communicate to their fellow residents. This consisted of 10 critical points of the presentation, treatment and workup from the previous night's trauma admissions. Scores were grouped into three areas. Each area was scored out of 15. Area 1 consisted of Initial patient presentation. Area 2 consisted of events in the trauma bay. Area 3 assessed clarity of language and ability to communicate to their fellow residents. The residents were assessed for inclusion of pertinent positive and negative findings, as well as overall clarity of communication. In phase 1, residents were unaware of the evaluation process. Phase 2 followed a series of resident education session about effective communication, sign-out techniques and delineation of evaluation criteria. Phase 3 was a resident-blinded phase which evaluated the sustainability of the improvements in resident communication. RESULTS: 50 patient presentations in phase 1, 200 in phase 2, and 50 presentations in phase 3 were evaluated. Comparisons were made between the Phase 1 and Phase 2 evaluations. Area 1 (initial events) improved from 6.18 to 12.4 out of 15 (p<0.0001). Area 2 (events in the trauma bay) improved from 9.78 to 16.53 (p<0.0077). Area 3 (communication and language) improved from 8.36 to 12.22 out of 15 (P<0.001). Phase 2 to Phase 3 evaluations were similar, showing no deterioration of skills. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma Surgery manages complex surgical patients, with rapidly changing physiologic and clinical demands. Trauma Morning Report, with diverse attendance including surgical attendings and residents in various training years, is the ideal venue for real-time teaching and evaluation of sign-outs and reinforcing good communication skills in residents.

Predictors of 30-Day Pulmonary Complications after Outpatient Surgery: Relative Importance of Body Mass Index Weight Classifications in Risk Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Current literature is controversial regarding the importance of obese BMI classifications as a risk factor for pulmonary complications after outpatient surgery. The objective of the current investigation was to evaluate predictors of pulmonary outcomes after outpatient surgery and to assess the importance of BMI weight classifications in risk assessment. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with "outpatient" recorded as their inpatient/outpatient status in the 2012 to 2013 NSQIP database were included. The primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of a new pulmonary complication (eg pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, unplanned intubation, or ventilator-assisted respiration for greater than 48 hours) within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: There were 444,532 cases included in the final analysis. There were 996 (0.22%; 99% CI 0.21% to 0.24%) all-cause pulmonary complications. Binary logistic regression identified BMI as an independent predictor of a pulmonary complication, unadjusted odds ratio 1.091 (99.75% CI 1.026 to 1.160) per 5 kg/m2 change in BMI, p < 0.001. Adjusted odds of a pulmonary complication with a BMI of 35 to 39.99 kg/m2 was 1.44 (99.75% CI 1.01 to 2.06; p = 0.002) and with a BMI of 40 to 49.99 kg/m2 was 1.68 (99.75% CI 1.13 to 2.50; p < 0.001) compared with a BMI of 18.5 to 24.99 kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: Obese classes II and III were associated with an independent risk of a pulmonary complication. The risk associated with obesity was low compared with the risk associated with advanced age, prolonged surgical duration, and the risk of comorbidities including congestive heart failure, COPD, and renal failure.

Postoperative Infections are Associated with Increased Risk of Cardiac Events in Vascular Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in perioperative care, the rate of cardiac events in vascular patients remains high. We have previously shown that infections in trauma patients are associated with higher rates of subsequent cardiac complications, likely due to the additive effect of a second hit of an infection following the trauma. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is an association between postoperative infections and subsequent cardiac events in vascular patients. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective review of demographics, comorbidities, operative interventions, infectious, and cardiac events in all vascular patients who underwent an operative intervention at a single tertiary referral center was performed. In patients with clinical suspicion of myocardial injury, myocardial damage was defined as troponin >0.15 ng/mL and myocardial infarction (MI) as troponin >1 ng/mL. Pneumonia was diagnosed using bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and considered positive if BAL fluid culture contained >10,000 colony-forming units (cfu). Urinary tract infection (UTI) was diagnosed if the urine culture contained >100,000 cfu. All other infections were diagnosed by culture data. Regression analysis was performed to assess risk of cardiac events as a function of infections adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidities. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,835 vascular operative interventions with the mean age of the cohort 65.5 years (65.9% male). The overall infection rate was 13.2%, with UTI being the most common (60.3%). The overall rate of myocardial damage was 8.1% and the rate of MI 3.8%. Rates of both myocardial damage (15.5 vs. 7.7%; P = 0.0015) and MI (7.1 vs. 3.4%; P = 0.018) were significantly higher in patients with infections, compared to those without infections. Adjusting for age, gender, medical comorbidities, open versus endovascular cases as well as statin and steroid use, patients with UTI were more likely to subsequently develop either myocardial damage (odds ratio [OR] = 3.57 [95% confidence interval = 1.51-8.45]) or MI (OR = 4.20 [1.23-14.3]). A similar association was noted between any infections and either myocardial damage (OR = 2.97 [1.32-6.65]) or MI (OR = 4.31 [1.44-12.94]). CONCLUSIONS: We herein describe an association between postoperative infections, most commonly UTI, and subsequent cardiac events. Efforts should be made to minimize the risk of developing infections to ensure cardioprotection in vascular patients during perioperative period.

Improved survival after induction of sepsis by cecal slurry in PD-1 knockout murine neonates.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis and the ensuing immune dysfunction continue to be major contributors to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Neonatal sepsis also is associated with profound immune dysfunction. We have recently identified a role for a family of coinhibitory molecules that are altered in murine sepsis and in critically ill adult patients, which may be a target for development of novel therapies. There is, however, a paucity of data pertaining to the role of coinhibitory checkpoint proteins in the control and modulation of neonatal sepsis. METHODS: The cecal slurry model consists of harvesting the cecal content of an adult, wild-type, male mouse and combining it with 5% dextrose to create a cecal slurry with a concentration of 80 mg/mL (LD70 at 7 days). Neonatal mice (5-7 days of age) underwent intraperitoneal injection of the cecal slurry or 0.9% saline for the sham procedure. Wild-type (C57BL/6) or PD-1-/- mice were used; a 7-day survival study was undertaken. Cytometric bead array was used for cytokine expression. Blood and peritoneal fluid was cultured for bacterial burden. Flow cytometry was used to assess the peritoneal cavity cell populations. RESULTS: There was no mortality after the sham procedure in either wild-type or PD-1-/- pups. PD-1 markedly affected sepsis survival with significantly improved survival in the PD-1-/- pups (40% vs 80%; P < .01). This survival improvement was not associated with any difference in bacterial clearance. The bacterial burden was equivalent between wild-type and PD-1-/- pups at 24 hours after cecal slurry. However, PD-1-/- pups did display an increased circulating cytokine response to the cecal slurry compared with wild type, with increased expression of IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α levels. Within the peritoneal cavity, sepsis induced an influx of neutrophils, a finding that was increased in PD-1-/- pups. Although the T-cell response was unaffected by PD-1, it was noted that cecal slurry induced a loss of peritoneal B cells in WT, while the peritoneal B-cell population was preserved in PD-1-/- pups. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the checkpoint protein, PD-1, plays an important role in controlling the immune response to sepsis in the neonate, ultimately affecting sepsis-related mortality in this neonatal murine model of sepsis. Akin to adult studies, these data further emphasize the potential therapeutic target for PD-1 across a spectrum of septic patients.

Teaching leadership in trauma resuscitation: Immediate feedback from a real-time, competency-based evaluation tool shows long-term improvement in resident performance.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on how to develop resident leadership and communication skills during actual trauma resuscitations. METHODS: An evaluation tool was developed to grade senior resident performance as the team leader during full-trauma-team activations. Thirty actions that demonstrated the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies were graded on a Likert scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (exceptional). These actions were grouped by their respective core competencies on 5 × 7-inch index cards. In Phase 1, baseline performance scores were obtained. In Phase 2, trauma-focused communication in-services were conducted early in the academic year, and immediate, personalized feedback sessions were performed after resuscitations based on the evaluation tool. In Phase 3, residents received only evaluation-based feedback following resuscitations. RESULTS: In Phase 1 (October 2009 to April 2010), 27 evaluations were performed on 10 residents. In Phase 2 (April 2010 to October 2010), 28 evaluations were performed on nine residents. In Phase 3 (October 2010 to January 2012), 44 evaluations were performed on 13 residents. Total scores improved significantly between Phases 1 and 2 (p = 0.003) and remained elevated throughout Phase 3. When analyzing performance by competency, significant improvement between Phases 1 and 2 (p < 0.05) was seen in all competencies (patient care, knowledge, system-based practice, practice-based learning) with the exception of "communication and professionalism" (p = 0.56). Statistically similar scores were observed between Phases 2 and 3 in all competencies with the exception of "medical knowledge," which showed ongoing significant improvement (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Directed resident feedback sessions utilizing data from a real-time, competency-based evaluation tool have allowed us to improve our residents' abilities to lead trauma resuscitations over a 30-month period. Given pressures to maximize clinical educational opportunities among work-hour constraints, such a model may help decrease the need for costly simulation-based training. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level III.

Impact of Type of Health Insurance on Infection Rates among Young Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have described the detrimental effect of lack of health insurance on trauma-related outcomes. It is unclear, though, whether these effects are related to pre-injury health status, access to trauma centers, or differences in quality of care after presentation. The aim of this study was to determine if patient and insurance type affect outcomes after trauma surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data at the American College of Surgeons level 1 trauma registry in Rhode Island. All blunt trauma patients aged 18-45 observed from 2004 to 2014 were included. Patients were divided into one of four groups on the basis of their type of insurance: Private/commercial, Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured. Co-morbidities and infections were recorded. Analysis of variance or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate, was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of 8,018 patients were included. Uninsured patients were more likely to be male and younger, whereas the Medicare patient group had significantly fewer male patients. Rates of co-morbidities were highest in the Medicare group (28.1%) versus the private insurance (16.7%), Medicaid (19.9%), and uninsured (12.9%) groups (p < 0.05). However, among patients with any co-morbidity, there was no difference in the average number of co-morbidities between insurance groups. The rate of infection was highest in Medicaid patients (7.7%) versus private (5.6%), Medicare (6.3%), and uninsured (4.3%) patients (p < 0.05). Only Medicaid was associated with a significantly greater risk of developing a post-injury infection (odds ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.3). CONCLUSION: The presence of insurance, namely Medicaid, does not equate to diagnosis and management of conditions that affect trauma outcomes. Medicaid is associated with worse pre-trauma health maintenance and a greater risk of infection.

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program as a quality-measurement tool for advanced cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have shown the significantly increased post-operative morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing palliative operations. It has been proposed by some authors that the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database can be used reliably to develop risk-calculators or as an aid for clinical decision-making in advanced cancer patients. ACS-NSQIP is a population-based database that by design only captures outcomes data for the first 30-day following an operation. We considered the suitability of these data as a tool for decision-making in the advanced cancer patient. METHODS: Six-year retrospective review of a single institution's ACS-NSQIP database for cases identified as "Disseminated Cancer". Procedures performed with palliative intent were identified and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 7,763 patients within the ACS-NSQIP database, 138 (1.8%) were identified as having "Disseminated Cancer". Of the remaining 7,625 entries only 4,486 contained complete survival data for analysis. Thirty-day mortality within the "Disseminated Cancer" group was higher when compared to all other surgical patients (7.9% vs. 0.9%, P<0.001). Explicit chart review of these 138 patients revealed that 32 (23.2%) had undergone operations with palliative intent. Overall survival for palliative and non-palliative operations was significantly different (104 vs. 709 days, P<0.001). When comparing palliative to non-palliative procedures using ACS-NSQIP data, we were unable to detect a difference in 30-day mortality (9.4% vs. 7.5%, P=0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Calculations utilizing ACS-NSQIP data fail to demonstrate the increased mortality associated with palliative operations. Patients diagnosed with advanced cancer are not adequately represented within the database due to the limited number of cases collected. Also, more suitable outcomes measures for palliative operations such as pain relief, functional status, and quality of life, are not captured. Therefore, the sole use of thirty-day morbidity and mortality data contained in the ACS-NSQIP database is insufficient to make sound decisions for surgical palliation.

What Shape is Your Resident in? Using a Radar Plot to Guide a Milestone Clinical Competency Discussion.

OBJECTIVE: One of the challenges for program directors (PDs) is to sort and weight the tidal wave of assessments that training programs create in the modern Milestone era. We evaluated whether the use of a radar plot (RP) would be helpful in sorting data and providing a graphic representation of each resident's progress. DESIGN: Using at least 2 different types of assessments for each of the 16 surgical Milestones, the data were ranked and weighted by a predetermined method embedded in a computerized workbook (Excel). This process created a unique 16-spoked RP for each resident (Fig. below). The RP allowed the faculty to see areas of weakness (shown by concavity) and allowed an overall grade calculated as a ratio of the area of the smooth outer circle (faculty expectations, triangles) and the resident's unique radar shape (resident performance, squares). To help us validate our new tool, we looked at whether residents with recent remedial issues "looked" different from residents without remedial issues. RESULTS: Of our 30 categorical residents, 8 had significant areas of concavities, suggesting possible areas of improvement. Of these 8 residents, 4 had been on a remediation program in the last 18 months. The average ratio of performance/expectations was 0.709. The 4 residents on recent remediation had a ratio of 0.616 when compared with 0.723 for the residents without remedial issues (p < 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Many exciting challenges await PDs, as we evolve to a competency-based evaluation system. The use of an evaluation summary tool using RPs may aid PDs in leading clinical competency discussions and in monitoring a resident's progress over time.