Unlocking the potential of synthetic patients for accelerating clinical trials: Results of the first GIMEMA experience on acute myeloid leukemia patients.

Artificial Intelligence has the potential to reshape the landscape of clinical trials through innovative applications, with a notable advancement being the emergence of synthetic patient generation. This process involves simulating cohorts of virtual patients that can either replace or supplement real individuals within trial settings. By leveraging synthetic patients, it becomes possible to eliminate the need for obtaining patient consent and creating control groups that mimic patients in active treatment arms. This method not only streamlines trial processes, reducing time and costs but also fortifies the protection of sensitive participant data. Furthermore, integrating synthetic patients amplifies trial efficiency by expanding the sample size. These straightforward and cost-effective methods also enable the development of personalized subject-specific models, enabling predictions of patient responses to interventions. Synthetic data holds great promise for generating real-world evidence in clinical trials while upholding rigorous confidentiality standards throughout the process. Therefore, this study aims to demonstrate the applicability and performance of these methods in the context of onco-hematological research, breaking through the theoretical and practical barriers associated with the implementation of artificial intelligence in medical trials.

Applicability of 2022 classifications of acute myeloid leukemia in the real-world setting.

The increasing knowledge of molecular genetics of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) necessitated the update of previous diagnostic and prognostic schemes, which resulted in the development of the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Consensus Classification (ICC), and the new European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations in 2022. We aimed to provide a real-world application of the new models, unravel differences and similarities, and test their implementation in clinical AML diagnosis. A total of 1001 patients diagnosed with AML were reclassified based on the new schemes. The overall diagnostic changes between the WHO 2016 and the WHO 2022 and ICC classifications were 22.8% and 23.7%, respectively, with a 13.1% difference in patients' distribution between ICC and WHO 2022. The 2022 ICC "not otherwise specified" and WHO "defined by differentiation" AML category sizes shrank when compared with that in WHO 2016 (24.1% and 26.8% respectively, vs 38.7%), particularly because of an expansion of the myelodysplasia (MDS)-related group. Of 397 patients with a MDS-related AML according to the ICC, 55.9% were defined by the presence of a MDS-related karyotype. The overall restratification between ELN 2017 and ELN 2022 was 12.9%. The 2022 AML classifications led to a significant improvement of diagnostic schemes. In the real-world setting, conventional cytogenetics, usually rapidly available and less expensive than molecular characterization, stratified 56% of secondary AML, still maintaining a powerful diagnostic role. Considering the similarities between WHO and ICC diagnostic schemes, a tentative scheme to generate a unified model is desirable.