Radical cystectomy versus trimodal therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Analysis of an other-cause mortality matched cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Comparative effectiveness studies comparing trimodal therapy (TMT) to radical cystectomy (RC) are typically hindered by selection bias where TMT is usually reserved to patients with poor overall health status. We developed a novel approach by matching patients based on their calculated other-cause mortality (OCM) risk. Using this homogeneous cohort, we tested the impact of TMT vs RC on cancer-specific mortality (CSM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) 2004-2018 database was queried to identify patients diagnosed with cT2-4N0M0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). A Fine-Gray competing-risk regression model calculating the 5-year OCM risk was used to create a 1:1 propensity-score matched-cohort of patients treated with RC or TMT. Cumulative incidence and competing-risk regression analyses tested the impact of treatment type (RC vs TMT) on CSM. Patients were further stratified according to clinical T stage (cT2 vs cT3-4) in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: We identified 6,587 patients (76%) treated with RC and 2,057 (24%) with TMT. The median follow-up was 3.0 years. In the unmatched-cohort, 5-year OCM and CSM rates were 14% and 40% for RC vs 23% and 47% in TMT group, respectively (all P < 0.001). Our matched-cohort included 4,074 patients, equally distributed for treatment type, with no difference in 5-year OCM (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.86-1.11, P = 0.714). In clinical-stage specific sensitivity analyses, 5-year CSM rate was significantly worse for cT2N0M0 patients treated with TMT (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.21-1.91, P < 0.001) than those treated with RC. For cT3-4N0M0 patients, there was no difference in CSM among the 2 approaches (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.63-1.52, P = 0.900). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate an oncologic advantage of RC over TMT for cT2 MIBC patients. Conversely, we did not find a cancer-specific survival difference for cT3-T4 MIBC patients, regardless of treatment.

The Impact of Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiation Therapy on Cancer-Specific Mortality for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: Analysis of an Other-Cause Mortality Matched Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Studies comparing radical prostatectomy (RP) to radiation therapy (RT) have consistently shown that patients undergoing RT have a higher risk of other-cause mortality (OCM) compared to RP, signifying poor health status of the former patients. We aimed to evaluate the impact of RP versus RT on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) over a cohort with equivalent OCM risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The SEER database was queried to identify patients with nonmetastatic PCa between 2004 and 2009. Patients were matched based on their calculated 10-year OCM risk and further stratified for D'Amico Risk Score and Gleason Grade. A Cox-regression model was used to calculate the 10-year OCM risk. Propensity-score based on the calculated OCM risk were used to match RP and RT patients. Cumulative incidence curves and Competing-risk regression analyses were used to examine the impact of treatment on CSM in the matched cohort. RESULTS: We identified 55,106 PCa patients treated with RP and 36,674 treated with RT. After match, 6,506 patients were equally distributed for RT versus RP, with no difference in OCM rates (P = .2). The 10-year CSM rates were 8.8% versus 0.6% (P = .01) for RT versus RP in patients with unfavorable-intermediate-risk (Gleason Score 4 + 3) and 7.9% versus 3.9% (P = .003) for high-risk disease. There was no difference in CSM among RT and RP patients for favorable-intermediate-risk (Gleason Score 3 + 4) and low-risk disease. CONCLUSIONS: In a matched cohort of PCa patients with comparable OCM between the 2 arms, RP yielded a more favorable CSM rate compared to RT only for unfavorable-intermediate- and high-risk groups.

The impact of cannabis use disorder on urologic oncologic surgery morbidity, length of stay, and inpatient cost: analysis of the National Inpatient Sample from 2003 to 2014.

PURPOSE: This study examined the impact of cannabis use disorder (CUD) on inpatient morbidity, length of stay (LOS), and inpatient cost (IC) of patients undergoing urologic oncologic surgery. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2003 to 2014 was analyzed for patients undergoing prostatectomy, nephrectomy, or cystectomy (n = 1,612,743). CUD was identified using ICD-9 codes. Complex-survey procedures were used to compare patients with and without CUD. Inpatient major complications, high LOS (4th quartile), and high IC (4th quartile) were examined as endpoints. Univariable and multivariable analysis (MVA) were performed to compare groups. RESULTS: The incidence of CUD increased from 51 per 100,000 admissions in 2003 to 383 per 100,000 in 2014 (p < 0.001). Overall, 3,503 admissions had CUD. Patients with CUD were more frequently younger (50 vs. 61), male (86% vs. 78.4%), Black (21.7% vs. 9.2%), and had 1st quartile income (36.1% vs. 20.6%); all p < 0.001. CUD had no impact on any complication rates (all p > 0.05). However, CUD patients had higher LOS (3 vs. 2 days; p < 0.001) and IC ($15,609 vs. $12,415; p < 0.001). On MVA, CUD was not an independent predictor of major complications (p = 0.6). Conversely, CUD was associated with high LOS (odds ratio (OR) 1.31; 95% CI 1.08-1.59) and high IC (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.12-1.59), both p < 0.01. CONCLUSION: The incidence of CUD at the time of urologic oncologic surgery is increasing. Future research should look into the cause of our observed phenomena and how to decrease LOS and IC in CUD patients.

Impact of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Pattern on Prostate Cancer Mortality Among Non-Hispanic Black and Non-Hispanic White Men: A Large, Urban Health System Cohort Analysis.

PURPOSE: Randomized studies assessing the effect of PSA screening on mortality in non-Hispanic Black (NHB) men are lacking. We aimed to assess the association between PSA screening and survival among NHB men in comparison to non-Hispanic White (NHW) men in a racially diverse real-world North American population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort included 6378 men who self-identified as NHB or NHW and were diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa). Patients received PSA screening and subsequent PCa treatment and follow-up at our institution. Patients were sorted based on PSA testing intensity for the 5 years prior to diagnosis, as follows: never, some (<1 test/y), and annual testing (1 test/y). The primary outcome was risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). Competing risk cumulative incidence curves estimated PCSM rates. Competing risk regression analyses examined the impact of PSA testing on PCSM. An interaction term was incorporated to assess the impact of race on the outcome. RESULTS: Median (IQR) age and PSA at diagnosis were 67 (60-73) years and 5.8 (4.4-9.6) ng/mL, respectively, and 2929 (46%) men were NHB (Kruskal-Wallis P values < .001). Annual PSA testing was more frequent in NHW (5%) than in NHB (3%) men (χ2 P value < .001). On cumulative incidence analysis, in the never, some, and annual PSA testing groups, the 10-year PCSM was respectively 12.3%, 5.8%, and 4.6% in NHW and 18.5%, 7%, and 1.2% in NHB patients (Gray's test P values < .001). At competing risk regression, PSA screening rate was associated with more favorable PCSM rates (HR: 0.47; 95% CI 0.33-0.68; P < .001). The interaction term for race did not show statistical significance (P = .2). CONCLUSIONS: PSA testing was associated with a reduced risk of PCSM in both NHB and NHW men diagnosed with PCa. Additionally, the positive impact of the screening rate seemed to be independent of race.

The Role of Baseline Prostate-specific Antigen Value Prior to Age 60 in Predicting Lethal Prostate Cancer: Analysis of a Contemporary North American Cohort.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Studies evaluating the role of baseline midlife prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a predictor of development and progression of prostate cancer relied predominately on cohorts from the pre-PSA screening introduction era. The aim of our study was to examine the role of baseline PSA prior to the age of 60 yr as a predictor of developing lethal prostate cancer using a contemporary North American cohort. METHODS: Our cohort included all men aged 40-59 yr who received their first PSA through our health system between the years 1995 and 2019. Patients were divided into four categories based on age: 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, and 55-59 yr. Baseline PSA was the predictor of interest. Lethal disease was defined as death from prostate cancer or development of metastatic disease either at diagnosis or during follow-up. Cancer-specific mortality and overall mortality were obtained by linking our database to the Michigan Vital Records registry. Competing-risk regression was used to evaluate the association between PSA and lethal prostate cancer. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 129067 men met the inclusion criteria during the study period. The median follow-up for patients free from cancer was 7.4 yr. For men aged 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, and 55-59 yr, the estimated rates of lethal prostate cancer at 20 yr were 0.02%, 0.14%, 0.33%, and 0.51% in men with PSA

Race has no impact on prostate cancer-specific mortality, when comparing patients with similar risk of other-cause mortality: An analysis of a population-based cohort.

BACKGROUND: Other-cause mortality (OCM) can serve as a surrogate for access-to-care. The authors sought to compare prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in Black versus White men matched based on their calculated OCM risk. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried for Black and White men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 to 2009, to collect long-term follow-up. A Cox regression was used to calculate the OCM risk using all available covariates. This calculated OCM risk was used to construct a 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) cohort. Then, a competing-risks multivariable tested the impact of race on PCSM. RESULTS: A total of 94,363 patients were identified, with 19,398 Black men and 74,965 White men. The median (IQR) follow-up was 11.3 years (9.8-12.8). In the unmatched-cohort at 10-years, PCSM and OCM were 5.5% versus 3.5% and 13.8% versus 8.4% in non-Hispanic Black (NHB) versus non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (all p < .0001). The standardized mean difference was <0.15 for all covariates, indicating a good match. In the matched cohort at 10-years, OCM was 13.6% and 10.0% in NHB versus NHW (p < .0001), whereas the PCSM was 5.3% versus 4.7% (p < .01). On competing-risks multivariable analysis on PCSM, Black men had a hazard ratio of 1.08 (95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.20) compared to White men with a p = .13. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed similar PCSM in Black and White patients, when matched with their calculated OCM risk. This report is the first to indicate at a population-based level that race has no impact on PCSM. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Prostate cancer is a very common cancer among men and it is associated with health disparities that disproportionately impact Black men compared to White men. There is an on-going discussion of whether disparities between these two groups stem from genetic or environmental factors. This study sought to examine if matching based on overall health status, a proxy for the impact of social determinants of health, mitigated significant differences in outcomes. When matched using risk of death from any cause other than prostate cancer, Black and White men had no significant differences in prostate cancer death.

Adequacy of prostate cancer prevention and screening recommendations provided by an artificial intelligence-powered large language model.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the appropriateness of ChatGPT in providing answers related to prostate cancer (PCa) screening, comparing GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. METHODS: A committee of five reviewers designed 30 questions related to PCa screening, categorized into three difficulty levels. The questions were formulated identically for both GPTs three times, varying the prompts. Each reviewer assigned a score for accuracy, clarity, and conciseness. The readability was assessed by the Flesch Kincaid Grade (FKG) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE). The mean scores were extracted and compared using the Wilcoxon test. We compared the readability across the three different prompts by ANOVA. RESULTS: In GPT-3.5 the mean score (SD) for accuracy, clarity, and conciseness was 1.5 (0.59), 1.7 (0.45), 1.7 (0.49), respectively for easy questions; 1.3 (0.67), 1.6 (0.69), 1.3 (0.65) for medium; 1.3 (0.62), 1.6 (0.56), 1.4 (0.56) for hard. In GPT-4 was 2.0 (0), 2.0 (0), 2.0 (0.14), respectively for easy questions; 1.7 (0.66), 1.8 (0.61), 1.7 (0.64) for medium; 2.0 (0.24), 1.8 (0.37), 1.9 (0.27) for hard. GPT-4 performed better for all three qualities and difficulty levels than GPT-3.5. The FKG mean for GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 answers were 12.8 (1.75) and 10.8 (1.72), respectively; the FRE for GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 was 37.3 (9.65) and 47.6 (9.88), respectively. The 2nd prompt has achieved better results in terms of clarity (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: GPT-4 displayed superior accuracy, clarity, conciseness, and readability than GPT-3.5. Though prompts influenced the quality response in both GPTs, their impact was significant only for clarity.

Testing the external validity of the POUT III trial (adjuvant platnium-based chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma) in a North American cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The European POUT III randomized controlled trial provided level-one evidence that adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care following nephroureterectomy (RNU) for locally invasive or node-positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We aim to assess this European randomized controlled trial's generalizability (external validity) to a North American cohort, using a nationwide database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To compare trial patients with those seen in real-world practice, we simulated the trial inclusion criteria using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We identified patients with histologically confirmed transitional cell carcinoma who underwent RNU. The available demographic characteristics of the NCDB cohort were compared with the POUT III trial cohort using Chi-squared test. RESULTS: The NCDB cohort (n = 3,380) had a significantly higher proportion of older patients (age ≥ 80: 23.5% vs. 5%), and more males (68% vs. 56.2%) than the POUT cohort (Table 1, both p < 0.001). Additionally, the rate of advanced nodal disease was higher in the NCDB (N1 9.6%, N2 9.3%) than in the POUT (N1 6%, N2 3%) cohort (p < 0.001). A more extensive lymph node dissection was performed in NCDB vs. POUT patients (node≥10 10.9% vs. 3%, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis removing all subjects with a Charlson Comorbidity Index > 0 did not change the significance of any results. CONCLUSIONS: While the primary disease stage was similar, the rate of advanced nodal disease was significantly higher in NCDB, which might be explained partially by the more extensive lymph node dissection performed in the latter. These differences warrant caution when applying the POUT III findings to North American patients.

Comparison of patient background between a real-world North American cohort and the Göteborg-2 trial.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the generalizability of the Göteborg-2 findings to a North American cohort. METHODS: We replicated the Göteborg-2 inclusion criteria in our Henry Ford Health (HFH) cohort, by identifying all patients 50-60 years old who had a PSA test from 2013 to 2018. The first PSA within the study period was considered PSA at entry, and included in the analysis. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables between the Göteborg-2 and HFH cohort, with a particular focus on Black men, who were also analyzed separately. RESULTS: The HFH patients included in the cohort were 49 456, of which 8562 were Black. In patients within the entire HFH cohort, HFH Black cohort, Göteborg Reference cohort, and Göteborg Experimental cohort, the rate of PSA ≥3 ng/mL was, respectively, 6.8%, 10.2%, 6.8%, and 6.6%. The rate of biopsy performed was, respectively, 1.8%, 4.1%, 5.8%, and 2.5%. PCa was found in, respectively, 1.4%, 3.0%, 2.3%, and 1.5%; Gleason score 3 + 3 in, respectively, 0.5%, 0.8%, 1.2%, and 0.6%; Gleason score > 3 + 3 in, respectively, 0.9%, 2.2%, 1.1%, and 0.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Our cohort had a lower biopsy rate and a lower incidence of non-csPCa diagnosis than both Göteborg cohorts, while still maintaining the same incidence of csPCa. This implies that the benefits of reducing non-csPCa diagnosis, as observed in the Experimental Göteborg cohort, are not necessarily replicable in U.S. "real-world practice" patients. Also noteworthy, we had a significantly higher percentage of Black men, who showed more aggressive disease.

Admission Rates, Healthcare Utilization, and Inpatient Cost of Radiation Cystitis in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence, cumulative healthcare burden, and financial impact of inpatient admissions for radiation cystitis (RC), while exploring practice differences in RC management between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. METHODS: We focused on 19,613 patients with a diagnosis of RC within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2008 to 2014. ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes were used. Complex-survey procedures were used to study the descriptive characteristics of RC patients and the procedures received during admission, stratified by hospital teaching status. Inflation-adjusted cost and cumulative annual cost were calculated for the study period. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the impact of teaching status on the high total cost of admission. RESULTS: Median age was 76 (interquartile range 67-82) years. Most of the patients were males (73%; P < .001). 59,571 (61%) patients received at least one procedure, of which, 24,816 (25.5%) received more than one procedure. Median length of stay was 5days (interquartile range 2-9). Female patients and patients with a higher comorbidity score were more frequently treated at teaching hospitals. A higher proportion of patients received a procedure at a teaching hospital (64% vs 59%; P < .001). The inflation-adjusted cost was 9207 USD and was higher in teaching hospitals. The cumulative cost of inpatient treatment of RC was 63.5 million USD per year and 952.2 million USD over the study period. CONCLUSION: The incidence of RC-associated admissions is rising in the US. This disease is a major burden to US healthcare. The awareness of the inpatient economic burden and healthcare utilization associated with RC may have funding implications.

Impact of lymphovascular invasion on survival in surgically treated upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a nationwide analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic ability of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) as a predictor of overall survival (OS) using a large North American cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our cohort included 5940 patients with clinical M0 UTUC who underwent a radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), between 2010 and 2016, within the National Cancer Database. The main variable of interest was LVI status, and its interaction with pathological nodal (pN) status. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to depict the OS also stratifying patients on LVI status. Cox regression analysis tested the impact of LVI status on OS after accounting for the available covariates. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at diagnosis was 71 (63-78) years and most patients had pathological T1 stage disease (48.6%). Nodal status was pN0, pN1 and pNx in 45.8%, 6.3% and 47.9%, respectively. Overall, 22.1% had LVI. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 32.6 (16.0-53.3) months. At the 5-year postoperative follow-up, the estimated OS rate was 28% in patients with LVI vs 66% in those without LVI (P < 0.001). When patients were stratified based on nodal status those rates were 32% vs 68% in pN0 patients (P < 0.001), 23% vs 30% in pN1 patients (P = 0.8), and 28% vs 65% in pNx patients (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the presence of LVI was associated with less favourable OS (hazard ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.60-1.99; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study assessed the impact of LVI on OS in patients with UTUC in a large North American nationwide cohort. Our series, as the largest to date, indicate that LVI is associated with less favourable survival outcomes in patients with UTUC after RNU, and this variable could be used in counselling patients about their prognosis and might be a useful tool for future trials to risk-stratify patients.

Variability of mpMRI diagnostic performance according to the upfront individual patient risk of having clinically significant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: To assess the variation of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) positive predictive value (PPV) according to each patient's risk of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) based exclusively on clinical factors. METHODS: We evaluated 999 patients with positive mpMRI (PI-RADS ≥ 3) receiving targeted (TBx) plus systematic prostate biopsy. We built a multivariable logistic regression analysis (MVA) using clinical risk factors to calculate the individual patients' risk of harboring csPCa at TBx. A second MVA tested the association between individual patients' clinical risk and mpMRI PPV accounting for the PI-RADS score. Finally, we plotted the PPV of each PI-RADS score by the individual patient pretest probability of csPCa using a LOWESS approach. RESULTS: Overall, TBx found csPCa in 21%, 51%, and 80% of patients with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions, respectively. At MVA, age, PSA, digital rectal examination (DRE), and prostate volume were significantly associated with the risk of csPCa at biopsy. DRE yielded the highest odds ratio (OR: 2.88; p < 0.001). The individual patient's clinical risk was significantly associated with mpMRI PPV (OR: 2.49; p < 0.001) using MVA. Plotting the mpMRI PPV according to the predicted clinical risks, we observed that for patients with clinical risk close to 0 versus patients with risk higher than 90%, the mpMRI PPV of PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 ranged from 0% to 75%, from 0% to 96%, and from 45% to 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: mpMRI PPV varies according to the individual pretest patient's risk based on clinical factors. These findings should be considered in the decision-making process for patients with suspect MRI findings referred for a prostate biopsy. Moreover, our data support the need for further studies to create an individualized risk prediction tool.

Added Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Selecting Prostate Biopsy Candidates Among Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and PI-RADS ≥3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Systematic Assessment by PI-RADS Score.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI; Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] scores of 3-5) have negative biopsy results. OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess all prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) values and identify an appropriate cutoff for identification of patients with positive mpMRI who could potentially avoid biopsy on the basis of their PI-RADS score. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included a cohort of 1341 patients with positive mpMRI who underwent combined targeted and systematic biopsies. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis (MVA) was used to assess the association between PSAD and the risk of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, grade group ≥2) after adjusting for confounders. We used locally weighted scatterplot smoothing to explore csPCa risk according to PSAD and PI-RADS scores. PSAD utility was observed only for patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions, so we plotted the effect of each PSAD value as a cutoff for this subgroup in terms of biopsies saved, csPCa cases missed, and clinically insignificant PCa (ciPCa, grade group 1) cases not detected. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 667 (50%) csPCa cases were identified. On MVA, PSAD independently predicted csPCa (odds ratio 1.57; p < 0.001). For PI-RADS ≥4 lesions, the csPCa risk was ≥40% regardless of PSAD. Conversely, among patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions, csPCa risk ranged from 0% to 60% according to PSAD values, and a PSAD cutoff of 0.10 ng/ml/cm3 corresponded to a threshold probability of 10% for csPCa. Using this PSAD cutoff for patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions would have saved 32% of biopsies, missed 7% of csPCa cases, and avoided detection of 34% of ciPCa cases. Limitations include selection bias and the high experience of the radiologists and urologists involved. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PI-RADS ≥4 lesions should undergo prostate biopsy regardless of their PSAD, while PSAD should be used to stratify patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions. Using a threshold probability of 10% for csPCa, our data suggest that the appropriate strategy is to avoid biopsy in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions and PSAD <0.10 ng/ml/cm3. Our results also provide information to help in tailoring an appropriate strategy for every patient with positive mpMRI findings. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated whether a cutoff value for PSAD (prostate-specific antigen density) could identify patients with suspicious prostate lesions on MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) who could avoid biopsy according to the PI-RADS score for their scan. We found that patients with PI-RADS ≥4 should undergo prostate biopsy regardless of their PSAD. A PSAD cutoff of 0.10 should be used to stratify patients with PI-RADS 3.

Oncological and perioperative outcomes of surgery with or without metastasis-directed therapy as part of a multimodal treatment in men with de-novo oligometastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility, safety, and oncological outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy (RP; either Robot-Assisted [RARP] or Open RP [ORP]) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPCa). Additionally, we assessed whether there was an added benefit of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in these patients in the adjuvant setting. METHODS: Overall, 68 patients with omPCa (≤ 5 skeletal lesions at conventional imaging) treated with RP and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2006 and 2022 were included. Additional therapies (androgen deprivation therapy [ADT] and MDT) were administered according to the treating physicians' judgment. MDT was defined as metastasis surgery/radiotherapy within 6 months of RP. We assessed Clinical Progression (CP), Biochemical Recurrence (BCR), post-operative complications and overall mortality (OM) of RP and the impact of adjuvant MDT + ADT versus RP + ADT alone. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 73 months (IQR 62-89). RARP reduced the risk of severe complications after adjusting for age and CCI (OR 0.15; p = 0.02). After RP, 68% patients were continent. Median 90-days PSA after RP was 0.12 ng/dL. CP and OM-free survival at 7 years were 50% and 79%, respectively. The 7-years OM-free survival rates were 93 vs. 75% for men treated with vs. without MDT (p = 0.04). At regression analyses, MDT after surgery was associated with a 70% decreased mortality rate (HR 0.27, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: RP appeared to represent a safe and feasible option in omPCa. RARP reduced the risk of severe complications. Integrating MDT with surgery in the context of a multimodal treatment might improve survival in selected omPCa patients.

Is Active Surveillance an Option for the Management of Men with Low-grade Prostate Cancer and a Positive Family History? Results from a Large, Single-institution Series.

BACKGROUND: Family history (FH) of prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with an increased risk of PCa and adverse disease features. However, whether patients with localized PCa and FH could be considered for active surveillance (AS) remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between FH and reclassification of AS candidates, and to define predictors of adverse outcomes in men with positive FH. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 656 patients with grade group (GG) 1 PCa included in an AS protocol at a single institution were identified. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed the time to reclassification (GG ≥2 and GG ≥3 at follow-up biopsies) overall and according to FH status. Multivariable Cox regression tested the impact of FH on reclassification and identified the predictors among men with FH. Men treated with delayed radical prostatectomy (n = 197) or external-beam radiation therapy (n = 64) were identified, and the impact of FH on oncologic outcomes was assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 119 men (18%) had FH. The median follow-up was 54 mo (interquartile range 29-84 mo), and 264 patients experienced reclassification. The 5-yr reclassification-free survival rate was 39% versus 57% for FH versus no FH (p = 0.006), and FH was associated with reclassification to GG ≥2 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-2.15, p = 0.002). In men with FH, the strongest predictors of reclassification were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAD), high-volume GG 1 (≥33% of cores involved or ≥50% of any core involved), and suspicious magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate (HRs 2.87, 3.04, and 3.87, respectively; all p < 0.05). No association between FH, adverse pathologic features, and biochemical recurrence was observed (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FH on AS are at an increased risk of reclassification. Negative MRI, low disease volume, and low PSAD identify men with FH and a low risk of reclassification. Nonetheless, sample size and wide CIs entail caution in drawing conclusions based on these results. PATIENT SUMMARY: We tested the impact of family history in men on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer. A significant risk of reclassification, but not adverse oncologic outcomes after deferred treatment, prompts the need for cautious discussion with these patients, without precluding initial expectant management.

Impact of prostate MRI central review over the diagnostic performance of MRI-targeted biopsy: should we routinely ask for an expert second opinion?

PURPOSE: There is substantial variability in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) protocols and inter-readers' agreement. We tested the effect of a central mpMRI review on the detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 364 consecutive men with a positive externally performed mpMRI (PI-RADS ≥ 3) who underwent a targeted biopsy (TBx) plus a systematic biopsy at a single tertiary referral center (2018-2020). Of those mpMRIs, 32% (n = 116) were centrally reviewed. We compared the detection of csPCa between the non-central-reviewed vs reviewed group. Multivariable logistic regression models (MVA) tested the relationship between mpMRI central review and the detection of csPCa at TBx. RESULTS: The detection of csPCa at TBx in non-central-reviewed vs central-reviewed group was 41 vs 63%, respectively (p = 0.001). The distribution of PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 at initial assessment vs after mpMRI central review was 0, 37, 47, and 16% vs 39, 9, 35, and 16%, respectively (p < 0.004). Of 43 patients with initial PI-RADS 3 score, respectively 67, 21, and 12, and 0% had a revised PI-RADS score of ≤ 2, 3, 4, and 5. At MVA, mpMRI central review (OR: 1.65, CI 0.85-0.98) was significantly associated with higher csPCa detection at TBx. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that a central review of external mpMRIs may decrease the overcall of equivocal lesions, namely PI-RADS 3, and should be considered to maximize the clinical benefit of TBx in terms of increasing the detection of csPCa and eventually decreasing the rate of unnecessary biopsies.

Assessing the need for systematic biopsies in addition to targeted biopsies according to the characteristics of the index lesion at mpMRI. Results from a large, multi-institutional database.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that systematic biopsies (SBx) value for clinically significant PCa (csPCa) detection, in addition to mpMRI targeted biopsies (TBx), may vary significantly according to mpMRI index lesion (IL) characteristics. METHODS: We identified 1350 men with an mpMRI suspicious lesion (PI-RADS ≥ 3), defined as IL, who underwent TBx and SBx at three referral centres. The outcome was SBx added value in csPCa (grade group ≥ 2 PCa detected at SBx and missed by TBx) detection. To this aim, we performed multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVA). Furthermore, we explored the interaction between IL volume and SBx csPCa added value, across different PI-RADS categories, using lowess function. RESULTS: Overall, 569 (42%) men had csPCa at TBx and 78 (6%) csPCa were identified at SBx only. At MVA PSA (OR 0.90; p < 0.05) and IL volume (OR 0.58; p < 0.05) were associated with SBx csPCa added value. At interaction analyses, a nonlinear correlation between PI-RADS and SBx csPCa added value was identified with a decrease from roughly 10 to 4% followed by a substantial plateau at 1.2 ml and 0.6 ml for PI-RADS 3 and 4, respectively. For PI-RADS 5 lesions SBx csPCa added was constantly lower than 4%. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing IL volume in PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions is associated with reduction in SBx csPCa added value. For diagnostic purposes, SBx could be omitted in men with IL larger than 1.2 ml and 0.6 ml for PI-RADS 3 and 4, respectively. Conversely, for PI-RADS 5, SBx csPCa added value was minimal regardless of IL volume.

Focal therapy for prostate cancer: what is really needed to move from investigational to valid therapeutic alternative?-a narrative review.

Background and Objective: The most widely accepted therapeutic alternatives for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa) are mainly represented by whole gland therapies such as surgery or radiotherapy. However, these treatments can carry in some cases profound functional side effects. With the improvement of risk assessment tools and imaging modalities, in particular with the introduction of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate, a fine topographic characterisation of PCa lesions within the prostatic gland is now possible. This has allowed the development of gland-sparing therapies such as focal therapy (FT) as a means to provide an even more tailored approach in order to safely reduce, where feasible, the harms carried by whole gland therapies. Unfortunately, adoption of FT has been considered so far investigational due to some unsolved issues that currently hamper the use of FT as a valid alternative. Here, we aim to identify the main aspects needed to move FT forward from investigational to a valid therapeutic alternative for clinically localized PCa. Methods: The literature discussing the evolution of focal therapy in the years and its current landscape was broadly searched to identify the factors hindering FT adoption and possible solutions. Key Content and Findings: There are three broad areas hindering FT as a valid therapeutic alternative: (I) Correct patient selection; (II) harmonising the different FT technologies; (III) the lack of oncological outcomes. Conclusions: By targeting the three aforementioned weaknesses of FT, greater adoption is expected, finally making FT a valid therapeutic alternative, potentially reshaping prostate cancer treatment and functional outcomes.

Not All Adverse Pathology Features Are Equal: Identifying Optimal Candidates for Adjuvant Radiotherapy Among Patients With Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Recent studies reported a potential benefit associated with adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with adverse pathology features of prostate cancer. We hypothesized that not all the patients with adverse features may benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy and, therefore, observation ± early salvage radiotherapy may still be considered in a subgroup of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 8,362 patients treated with radical prostatectomy at a single center between 1987 and 2020, 926 eligible patients with adverse pathology features (ie, grade group 4-5 with ≥pT3a stage and/or lymph node invasion) were identified. Cox models were used to assign a score to each feature. Patients were then stratified in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, and interaction term analyses tested the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy for each risk subgroup after adjusting for inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: Overall, 538 (58%) vs 89 (10%) vs 299 (32%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy vs early salvage radiotherapy vs observation. The 10-year overall survival rate was 90%. A significant interaction between adjuvant radiotherapy and high-risk group was recorded (HR 0.21, P = .04). After risk stratification and propensity-score weighting, survival analyses depicted comparable 10-year overall survival in low- and intermediate-risk patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy or observation ± early salvage radiotherapy. Conversely, in high-risk patients, adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with significant improvement in 10-year overall survival compared to observation ± early salvage radiotherapy (76% vs 63%, P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with adverse pathology features, we identified 3 subclassifications of risk. When testing the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy vs observation with or without early salvage radiotherapy on survival, only patients included in the high-risk group seemed to benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.