Osteotomy around the painful degenerative varus knee has broader indications than conventionally described but must follow a strict planning process: ESSKA Formal Consensus Part I.

PURPOSE: The European consensus was designed with the objective of combining science and expertise to produce recommendations that would educate and provide guidance in the treatment of the painful degenerative varus knee. Part I focused on indications and planning. METHODS: Ninety-four orthopaedic surgeons from 24 European countries were involved in the consensus, which focused on the most common indications for osteotomy around the knee. The consensus was performed according to an established ESSKA methodology. The questions and recommendations made were initially designed by the consensus steering group. And 'best possible' answers were provided based upon the scientific evidence available and the experience of the experts. The statements produced were further evaluated by ratings and peer review groups before a final consensus was reached. RESULTS: There is no reliable evidence to exclude patients based on age, gender or body weight. An individualised approach is advised; however, cessation of smoking is recommended. The same applies to lesser degrees of patellofemoral and lateral compartment arthritis, which may be accepted in certain situations. Good-quality limb alignment and knee radiographs are a mandatory requirement for planning of osteotomies, and Paley's angles and normal ranges are recommended when undertaking deformity analysis. Emphasis is placed upon the correct level at which correction of varus malalignment is performed, which may involve double-level osteotomy. This includes recognition of the importance of individual bone morphology and the maintenance of a physiologically appropriate joint line orientation. CONCLUSION: The indications of knee osteotomies for painful degenerative varus knees are broad. Part I of the consensus highlights the versatility of the procedure to address multiple scenarios with bespoke planning for each case. Deformity analysis is mandatory for defining the bone morphology, the site of the deformity and planning the correct procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, consensus.

Surgical strategy and complication management of osteotomy around the painful degenerative varus knee: ESSKA Formal Consensus Part II.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the European consensus was to provide recommendations for the treatment of patients with a painful degenerative varus knee using a joint preservation approach. Part II focused on surgery, rehabilitation and complications after tibial or femoral correction osteotomy. METHODS: Ninety-four orthopaedic surgeons from 24 countries across Europe were involved in the consensus, which focused on osteotomies around the knee. The consensus was performed according to the European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy consensus methodology. The steering group designed the questions and prepared the statements based on the experience of the experts and the evidence of the literature. The statements were evaluated by the ratings of the peer-review groups before a final consensus was released. RESULTS: The ideal hinge position for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW HTO) should be at the upper level of the proximal tibiofibular joint, and for lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LCW DFO) just above the medial femoral condyle. Hinge protection is not mandatory. Biplanar osteotomy cuts provide more stability and quicker bony union for both MOW HTO and LCW DFO and are especially recommended for the latter. Osteotomy gap filling is not mandatory, unless structural augmentation for stability is required. Patient-specific instrumentation should be reserved for complex cases by experienced hands. Early full weight-bearing can be adopted after osteotomy, regardless of the technique. However, extra caution should be exercised in DFO patients. Osteotomy patients should return to sports within 6 months. CONCLUSION: Clear recommendations for surgical strategy, rehabilitation and complications of knee osteotomies for the painful degenerative varus knee were demonstrated. In Part 2 of the consensus, high levels of agreement were reached by experts throughout Europe, under variable working conditions. Where science is limited, the collated expertise of the collaborators aimed at providing guidance for orthopaedic surgeons developing an interest in the field and highlighting areas for potential future research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, consensus.

CPAK classification cannot be used to determine segmental coronal extra-articular knee deformity.

PURPOSE: While the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification serves as a useful guide in personalising total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the extent of its correlation with segmental coronal extra-articular knee deformities remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate the potential correlation between CPAK matrix groups and segmental coronal extra-articular deformities in prearthritic knees, shedding light on the relationship between these two factors that seems to be both essential to perform personalised TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A radiological assessment of 1240 nonarthritic knees was performed by evaluating lower limb measurements following the protocol established by Paley et al. Subsequently, all knees were classified into their respective CPAK matrix groups. In our quest to discern any correlation between the CPAK matrix groups and the presence of segmental coronal extra-articular knee deformities, nine potential coronal extra-articular deformity phenotype (CEDP) groupswere identified based on medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA). Neutral values for MPTA and mLDFA were set at 90.0° ± 3.0° and then at 87.0° ± 2.0°. Each CPAK matrix group underwent detailed coronal morphology analysis and then, segmental coronal extra-articular deformities were assessed by comparing them with the CEDP groups. RESULTS: The study revealed a mean hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) of 178.6° ± 4.4°, mLDFA of 86.9° ± 2.5°, MPTA of 85.4° ± 2.4°, arithmetic HKA of -1.4° ± 3.2° and joint line obliquity of 172.5° ± 3.7°. The varus CPAK groups (I/IV/VII) included 435 patients, the neutral groups (II/V/VIII) comprised 630 patients and the valgus groups (III/VI/IX) had 175 patients. Notably, CPAK matrix groups were not distinctly associated with specific coronal extra-articular deformity phenotype (CEDP) groups. Particularly among the most common CPAK matrix groups (I/II/III/IV/V), there was a significant variation in segmental coronal extra-articular deformity patterns. Moreover, when neutral MPTA/mLDFA values were set at 87.0° ± 2.0°, the CPAK matrix groups exhibited even greater variability in coronal extra-articular deformities. CONCLUSION: The CPAK matrix groups do not exhibit a direct correlation with a specific extra-articular deformity pattern (CEDP), thus rendering them unsuitable for determining segmental coronal extra-articular knee deformities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective diagnostic study.

The tipping point in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy relates to the shape of the proximal tibia more than to lower limb alignment correction.

PURPOSE: The tipping point (TP) of the knee joint is the centre of rotation of the joint in the coronal plane. This study aimed to define the TP in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). METHODS: Data from 154 consecutive patients with varus knee malalignment, who underwent MOWHTO between 2017 and 2021, was retrospectively reviewed. The degree of preoperative osteoarthritis (OA), using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system, was recorded. Long-leg standing radiographs were used to record the alignment parameters, including the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and the joint line obliquity (JLO) angle. Postoperative Tegner activity scores, Western Ontario and McMaster University Scores and patients' satisfaction were recorded. To define the TP, the relationship of all variables to Δ JLCA (absolute difference between preoperative to postoperative JLCA values) was analysed. Linear regression was employed for Δ JLCA to preoperative JLCA and postoperative and Δ MPTA (absolute difference between preoperative and postoperative values). K-means clustering was used to partition observations into clusters, in which each observation belongs to the cluster with the nearest mean serving as a prototype of the cluster, and analysed if there was any specific threshold influencing Δ JLCA. After defining the TP, further subanalysis of the TP based on the preoperative KL OA grade and analysis of variance of this TP to the KL OA grade was performed. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients (77.9% males and 22.1% females) were included. The mean age was 48.2 ± 11 years, and the mean body mass index was 27.1 ± 4 kg/m2. Preoperatively, 26 (16.9%) patients had KL grade IV OA. The mean preoperative and postoperative JLCA and the significance of their relation to Δ JLCA were 2.6° ± 1.8° (p < 0.0001) and 1.9° ± 1.8° (p = 0.6), respectively. The mean Δ JLCA was 1.4° ± 1.5°. The mean pre- and postoperative MPTA and the significance of their relation to Δ JLCA were 84.6 ± 2.2 (p = 0.005) and 91.8 ± 2.5 (p < 0.0007), respectively. The mean Δ MPTA was 7.2 ± 2.3 (p = 0.3). The mean preoperative and postoperative HKA and the significance of their relation to Δ JLCA were 174.6 ± 2.5 (p = 0.2) and 181.9 ± 2.4 (p = 0.7), respectively. The overall linear regression for Δ JLCA was statistically significant for preoperative JLCA (R2 = 0.3, p < 0.0001) and postoperative MPTA (R2 = 0.09, p = 0.0001) and statistically insignificant for Δ MPTA (R2 = 0.01, p = 0.2) and postoperative HKA (R2 = 0.04, p = 0.7). MPTA > 91.5° was the optimal threshold dividing this series data set between substantial and nonsignificant Δ JLCA. CONCLUSION: In this study, the main predictive factors for intra-articular correction (Δ JLCA) after MOWHTO were the preoperative value of JLCA and the postoperative value of MPTA. A value of 92° for postoperative MPTA is potentially the optimal threshold to predict intra-articular correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

No clinical outcome difference between varus phenotypes after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy at 2 years follow-up.

PURPOSE: Clinical studies regarding medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) often analyse a large group of mechanical varus knees rather than differentiating for its primary varus-inducing component. This study aims to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of the most prevalent varus malalignment phenotypes using the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. METHODS: MOWHTO cases with minimal 2-year clinical follow-up were retrospectively selected from a knee osteotomy database (2016-2020). Based on the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), subjects were allocated to the correct CPAK phenotype pre- and postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were the numeric rating scale (NRS), the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and the therapeutic response rate (TRR) at 2-year follow-up. Inter-observer correlation coefficient (ICC) and unpaired student t test were performed for cross-phenotype comparison. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five (135) subjects were found eligible (53.0 years old ±9.6 [19-77], 72% male, 53% left-sided). The most prevalent preoperative phenotype was CPAK 1 (n = 70 (52%)) and the postoperative phenotype was CPAK 6 (n = 66 (49%)). All CPAK phenotypes improved significantly relative to baseline but cross-phenotype comparison yielded no significant differences in clinical outcome. The TRR at 2 years was 67% for CPAK 1, 69% for CPAK 2 and 87% for CPAK 4. The TRR for CPAK 6 was 64% compared with 80% for CPAK 9, which was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: At 2-year follow-up, no clinically significant differences are observed between different CPAK phenotypes. Accurate MOWHTO corrections provide significant clinical improvement even in the femoral-driven varus knee and the constitutional varus knee dominated by intra-articular wear. The clinical indication for MOWHTO performance should not be reduced to the medial arthritic varus knee with underlying tibial varus alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective comparative study.

The position of the lateral tibial spine and the implications for high tibial osteotomy planning.

The lateral tibial spine (LTS) is frequently proposed as a correction target in high tibial osteotomy (HTO), although little is known about its exact radiographic position. This study primarily aims to define the position and variance of the LTS. Secondly, this study wants to investigate the relevance of the LTS position on the mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA°) while planning and postoperatively landing the weight-bearing line (WBL) on this landmark. The LTS position was studied on preoperative full-leg standing radiographs (FLSR) and computed tomography (CT) scans in 70 cases. 3D models of the tibia were created in Mimics 23.0 and measurements were conducted in 3-matic 15.0 (Materialise, Leuven®). Next, 100 HTO cases were retrospectively planned with the WBL through the LTS according to Dugdale's method on FLSR. Finally, 55 postoperative FLSR which had the WBL on the LTS (±2%) were assessed for mTFA° outcome. Statistics were conducted in GraphPad 8.0. The LTS was located at 58.3%±1.9 [55-63%] in 2D and 57.3%±2.2 [53-63%] in 3D showing a high correlation (r=0.77 [0.65 to 0.85]). The planned mTFA on the LTS was 181.8°±0.3 (181.3°-182.5°). On postoperative FLSR, the mTFA was 182.2°±0.6 (180.9°-183.1°). The lateral tibial spine is located at 57-58% on the tibial plateau with a 10% maximal variation range. Good agreement was found between 2D and 3D imaging modalities while evaluating its position in the coronal plane. When aiming the WBL through the LTS during valgus-producing HTO, a consistent realignment of 181-183° mTFA can be expected when performing accurate surgery.

Impacted bone allograft personalised by a novel 3D printed customization kit produces high surgical accuracy in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Contemporary medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) still seems to struggle with inconsistent accuracy outcomes. Our objective was to assess surgical accuracy and short-term clinical outcomes when using 3D planning and a patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) kit to prepare customized bone allografts. METHODS: Thirty subjects (age 48y ± 13) were included in a double-center prospective case series. A low-dose CT-scan was performed to generate 3D bone models, a MOWHTO was simulated, and PSI was designed and 3D printed based on the complementary negative of the planned osteotomy gap. Clinical outcome was assessed at two, four, 12 weeks and one year using NRS, KOOS, UCLA activity score, EQ-5D and anchor questions. A linear-mixed model approach was implemented for data analysis. RESULTS: Preoperative 3D values were 175.0° ± 2.2 mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA), 85.0° ± 3.0 medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and 94.1° ± 3.4 medial posterior tibial slope (MPTS). Target planning ranged from slight varus to the lateral tibial spine (slight valgus). Postoperative 3D analysis showed an accuracy of 1.1° ± 0.7 ΔMPTA (p = 0.04) and 1.2° ± 1.2 ΔMPTS (p = 0.11). NRS decreased from baseline 6.1 ± 1.9 to 2.7 ± 1.9 at four weeks (p < 0.001) and 1.7 ± 1.9 at one year (p < 0.001). KOOS increased from 31.4 ± 17.6 to 50.6 ± 20.6 at 12 weeks (p < 0.001) and to 71.8 ± 15.6 at one year (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that 3D printed instrumentation to personalize structural bone allograft is a viable alternative method in MOWHTO that has the benefit of optimizing surgical accuracy while providing early and consistent pain relief after surgery.

IC-Type Electric stimulation for delayed bone healing: monocentric evaluation over eight years of experience.

Electrostimulation is suggested to positively influence bone healing for delayed unions of both fractures and osteotomies. This monocentric series aims to retrospectively assess the outcome of electrostimulation treatment for delayed union after traumatic fractures or knee osteotomy. Patients treated with electrostimulation for delayed union (no bony union on radiographic imaging at 90 days after osteotomy or fracture treatment) over an 8-year period were screened. The delay of treatment, success rate, revision rate and demographic data (age, sex, location of fracture, presence of osteosynthesis materials) were investigated. A questionnaire assessed objective (nicotine abuse, NRS pain assessment, activity levels) and subjective (comfort, usability, cost-effectiveness) aspects. Electrostimulation delivered radiographic healing in 75% of the fracture group and 66% of the osteotomy group. No statistical significant difference (N=136) in success rate was found for age, sex, presence of osteosynthesis material, delay or fracture location. Success rate did differ significantly with pain, activity level and smoking (p<0.05). Reflective questions to patients were answered mostly positively. The use of electrostimulation for the delayed union of fractures and knee osteotomies delivers high healing rates avoiding the burden of surgical reintervention. It is generally well received by the patient. No difference in success rate was found between sex, age or fracture location, nor did the delay of therapy onset or presence of osteosynthesis material seem to affect the success rate. Smoking had a negative influence on the efficacy of bone electrostimulation.

Athletes with an ACL reconstruction show a different neuromuscular response to environmental challenges compared to uninjured athletes.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that neuromuscular alterations in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are rooted in neurocognitive and proprioceptive deficits. The aim of this study was to assess neuromuscular control of athletes with ACLR under increased cognitive and environmental challenges. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do athletes with ACLR show a different neuromuscular response to cognitive and environmental challenges relative to controls? METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Twenty athletes who had an ACLR (age: 23.7 ±â€¯4.3 years, 14 males, time post-surgery: 258.6 ±â€¯54 days) and twenty uninjured controls (age: 21.4 ±â€¯1.5 years, 14 males) performed a stepping down-task in four environmental conditions: no additional challenges, while performing a cognitive dual-task, while undergoing an unpredictable support surface perturbation, and with the cognitive dual-task and unpredictable perturbation combined. Muscle activations of the vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis, hamstrings medialis (HM), hamstrings lateralis (HL), gastrocnemius medialis, gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) and gluteus medius were recorded with surface EMG. A three-way ANOVA with main effects for group, dual-task and perturbation was used to compare muscle activations. RESULTS: Athletes with ACLR show larger HM (ES = 0.45) and HL activation (ES = 1.32) and lower VM activation (ES = 0.72), compared to controls. Athletes with ACLR show a significantly smaller increase in VM (ES = 0.69), VL (ES = 0.53) and GL activation (ES = 0.52) between perturbed and unperturbed tasks compared to controls. Furthermore, under cognitive loading a significantly larger decrease in HM activation (ES = 0.40) and (medial) co-contraction (ES = 0.75) was found in athletes with ACLR compared to controls. SIGNIFICANCE: Athletes with ACLR show an altered neuromuscular response which might represent an arthrogenic muscle response. They show less additional adaptation to perturbed tasks compared to controls, potentially as result of altered proprioceptive input. Furthermore a larger influence of increased cognitive loading on the neuromuscular control was found in athletes with ACLR, indicating that also neurocognitive limitations may contribute to altered neuromuscular control.

Changes in knee joint line orientation after high tibial osteotomy are the result of adaptation of the lower limb to the new alignment.

BACKGROUND: Changes in knee joint line orientation (KJLO) resulting in excessive joint line obliquity are a well-known consequence of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) procedures and could lead to degenerative changes. The precise effect of the correction on final KJLO changes is poorly understood. The goal of this study was to identify radiographical parameters that could help to explain the size of KJLO changes after HTO surgery. METHODS: A total 117 HTO patients were radiographically examined preoperatively and three months postoperatively. Radiographic parameters were KJLO, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), hip-knee angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA), knee joint line congruence angle (KJLCA), ankle joint line congruence angle (AJLCA) and ankle joint line orientation (AJLO). Four new radiographic parameters were introduced to describe knee and foot position on long-leg X-ray: malleolar distance to midline (MDTM), intermalleolar distance (IMD), condylar distance to midline (CDTM) and intercondylar distance (ICD). Correlations of these parameters and changes in KJLO were assessed. RESULTS: Strong correlations are found between KJLO changes and MDTM (r = 0.709), IMD (r = 0.691), CDTM (r = 0.711) and ICDM (r = 0.702), in contrast to weak correlations between changes in KJLO and MPTA (r = -0.342). These results suggest an important impact of foot and knee position changes on the final alteration of KJLO after HTO. CONCLUSIONS: The final change of KJLO after HTO is the effect of adaptation of the lower limb, which is driven by the (maximum) alterations of foot and knee position rather than the size of correction of the procedure.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Anterolateral Ligament and the Iliotibial Band in Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Associated With Segond Fractures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of Segond fractures, including the structures attached to the avulsed fragment, the integrity of anterolateral ligament (ALL) and iliotibial band (ITB), and fragment size and location. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study with MRI scans from 2016 to 2019 with the term "Segond" in the reports, signs of acute trauma, and a bony anterolateral tibial avulsion (Segond) fracture. Two experienced observers accessed images to evaluate fragment dimensions (anteroposterior, mediolateral, and craniocaudal) and distances from anatomic landmarks (Gerdy's tubercle, articular surface, and posterolateral tibial corner). ALLs and ITBs also were evaluated, both for integrity and for attachment to the avulsed bony fragment. Data were statistically evaluated for significant correlations. RESULTS: Forty-eight knee MRIs of patients suffering from a combined anterior cruciate ligament and Segond injury were evaluated. The ALL presented with edema in 28 cases (58.3%) and was torn in 3 cases (6.3%). The ALL was attached to the bone fragment in all cases and the ITB also was attached in 25 cases (52.1%). Receiver operating characteristic curves also demonstrated that the larger each of the dimensions and the volume of the fragment, the greater the probability of ITB fibers being inserted. Also, the narrower the distance from the fragment to the center of Gerdy's tubercle, the greater the probability of iliotibial band fibers being attached. Interobserver correlation varied from 0.87 to 0.97 for all measurements. CONCLUSIONS: In all combined ACL injuries and Segond fracture MRI cases, the complete ALL inserted on the avulsed bony fragment, whereas the posterior part of the ITB was only attached in 52.1% of the cases. Segond fracture fragment size was predictive for the structures attached to it. The ALL was abnormal in 64.5% of cases and presented a clear discontinuity in 6.3%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case Series, Level IV.

Structural allograft impaction enables fast rehabilitation in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a consecutive case series with one year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Painful and slow recovery are the presumed disadvantages after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and play a role in favouring arthroplasty as treatment for moderate isolated medial knee arthritis. The primary study objective was to investigate the effect of press-fit structural impacted bone allograft with locking plate fixation on early ambulation, postoperative pain levels, and resumption of daily-life activities in opening-wedge HTO. METHODS: A prospective consecutive opening-wedge HTO case series was conducted, including 103 patients with final follow-up at 1 year. Weight-bearing was allowed from the day after surgery "as tolerated" by the patient. Clinical assessment included the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm score. Additionally, the Knee Society Score (KSS) was assessed during consultation at 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively with special attention for clinical anchor questions. Required sample size was calculated and a linear mixed-effect model was used for repeated measures over time of the clinical scores. RESULTS: The NRS decreased by 1.5 at 1 month (p < 0.01) and 2.1 at 3 months (p < 0.01), while KOOS pain significantly improved with 19.2 (p < 0.01) by this time compared to baseline. Under reduced pain levels, 98% were able to walk > 500 m without support, while all patients were able to climb up and down the stairs 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The study strongly supports the initial hypothesis that applying structural triangular bone allograft in HTO leads to low postoperative pain levels, early ambulation, and excellent short-term clinical outcomes. Study results have the potential to alter the general perception about HTO being a painful procedure with painstakingly slow recovery and consequently encourage the consideration of HTO as a highly valuable joint-preserving option, while treating unicompartmental knee arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (case series).

The anterolateral complex of the knee: results from the International ALC Consensus Group Meeting.

The structure and function of the anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee has created much controversy since the 're-discovery' of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and its proposed role in aiding control of anterolateral rotatory laxity in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured knee. A group of surgeons and researchers prominent in the field gathered to produce consensus as to the anatomy and biomechanical properties of the ALC. The evidence for and against utilisation of ALC reconstruction was also discussed, generating a number of consensus statements by following a modified Delphi process. Key points include that the ALC consists of the superficial and deep aspects of the iliotibial tract with its Kaplan fibre attachments on the distal femur, along with the ALL, a capsular structure within the anterolateral capsule. A number of structures attach to the area of the Segond fracture including the capsule-osseous layer of the iliotibial band, the ALL and the anterior arm of the short head of biceps, and hence it is not clear which is responsible for this lesion. The ALC functions to provide anterolateral rotatory stability as a secondary stabiliser to the ACL. Whilst biomechanical studies have shown that these structures play an important role in controlling stability at the time of ACL reconstruction, the optimal surgical procedure has not yet been defined clinically. Concern remains that these procedures may cause constraint of motion, yet no clinical studies have demonstrated an increased risk of osteoarthritis development. Furthermore, clinical evidence is currently lacking to support clear indications for lateral extra-articular procedures as an augmentation to ACL reconstruction. The resulting statements and scientific rationale aim to inform readers on the most current thinking and identify areas of needed basic science and clinical research to help improve patient outcomes following ACL injury and subsequent reconstruction.Level of evidence V.

One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in cases with excessive tunnel osteolysis. Results of a new technique using impaction bone grafting.

BACKGROUND: This level IV study describes a new one-stage procedure for revision ACL reconstruction in cases with extreme tunnel widening. METHODS: Eight consecutively treated subjects requiring ACL revision and presenting with excessive tunnel widening (87.5% to 250% tunnel enlargement) were included in this study. The graft-tunnel mismatch was resolved in this one-stage revision procedure by the use of custom-made eight to 10 mm cylindrical shaped bone allografts in a press-fit construct with the ACL-graft in combination with the usual fixation devices for ACL-reconstruction. All subjects were evaluated pre-operatively and at a minimum follow-up of one year by the IKDC objective and subjective scores, KOOS, and Tegner activity scale. RESULTS: Mean improvement was 24.8 ±â€¯16.1 on the KOOS evaluation (P-value 0,006) and 38.1 ±â€¯16.8 on the IKDC subjective score (P-value 0,001). The objective IKDC scores improved significantly with an average of one grade (P-value 0,038). Anterior laxity as determined on the KT-1000 arthrometer improved with an average of 3.63 mm compared to the situation before primary reconstruction, and the Pivot-shift test was negative in all but one patient after the revision procedure while positive in all patients before primary reconstruction. CONCLUSION: This new surgical technique using eight to 10 mm allograft bone cylinders for the management of excessive tunnel enlargement at single stage revision ACL reconstruction delivers excellent results after minimum one year of follow-up. The results of this study have the potential to lower the threshold for one-stage surgery in ACL revision complicated by extreme tunnel widening.

Mechanical Analysis of Extra-Articular Knee Ligaments. Part two: Tendon grafts used for knee ligament reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide information about the mechanical properties of grafts used for knee ligament reconstructions and to compare those results with the mechanical properties of native knee ligaments. METHODS: Eleven cadaveric knees were dissected for the semitendinosus, gracilis, iliotibial band (ITB), quadriceps and patellar tendon. Uniaxial testing to failure was performed using a standardized method and mechanical properties (elastic modulus, ultimate stress, ultimate strain, strain energy density) were determined. RESULTS: The elastic modulus of the gracilis tendon (1458±476MPa) (P<0.001) and the semitendinosus tendon (1036±312MPa) (P<0.05) was significantly higher than the ITB (610±171MPa), quadriceps tendon (568±194MPa), and patellar tendon (417±107MPa). In addition, the ultimate stress of the hamstring tendons (gracilis 155.0±30.7MPa and semitendinosus 120.1±30.0MPa) was significantly higher (P<0.001, respectively P<0.05), relative to the ITB (75.0±11.8MPa), quadriceps tendon (81.0±27.6MPa), and patellar tendon (76.2±25.1MPa). A significant difference (P<0.05) could be noticed between the ultimate strain of the patellar tendon (24.6±5.9%) and the hamstrings (gracilis 14.5±3.1% and semitendinosus 17.0±4.0%). No significant difference in strain energy density between the grafts was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Material properties of common grafts used for knee ligament reconstructions often differ significantly from the original knee ligament which the graft is supposed to emulate.

International Perspective on Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: What Have We Been Missing?

Primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common orthopaedic procedure. A graft failure rate of 5% to 10% after primary ACL reconstruction has resulted in an increased need for revision ACL reconstruction. ACL reconstruction failure etiologies include trauma, technical errors, and biologic factors. Based on the current literature, the outcomes of revision ACL reconstruction are clearly inferior compared with those of primary reconstruction. A thorough patient evaluation, including surgical history, a physical examination, and imaging studies, is crucial in the assessment of a failed ACL reconstruction. Tunnel malposition, which is a technical error, is the most common reason for ACL reconstruction failure. Tunnel positioning and widening are important factors to consider in the decision to perform either one-stage or two-stage revision ACL reconstruction. Other concomitant factors such as malalignment, pathologic posterior tibial slope, and meniscal or ligamentous deficiency (in particular, deficiency of the anterolateral ligament) must be considered and addressed to achieve an optimal outcome. Patients who have a positive pivot shift test and rotational instability may require extra-articular anterolateral ligament reconstruction. In addition, patients who have severe pathologic tibial slope and anterior tibial translation may require a tibial deflexion osteotomy.

The Anterolateral Ligament Has Similar Biomechanical and Histologic Properties to the Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament.

PURPOSE: To characterize the tensile and histologic properties of the anterolateral ligament (ALL), inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL), and knee capsule. METHODS: Standardized samples of the ALL (n = 19), anterolateral knee capsule (n = 15), and IGHL (n = 13) were isolated from fresh-frozen human cadavers for uniaxial tensile testing to failure. An additional 6 samples of the ALL, capsule, and IGHL were procured for histologic analysis and determination of elastin content. RESULTS: All investigated mechanical properties were significantly greater for both the ALL and IGHL when compared with capsular tissue. In contrast, no significant differences between the ALL and IGHL were found for any property. The elastic modulus of ALL and IGHL samples was 174 ± 92 MPa and 139 ± 60 MPa, respectively, compared with 62 ± 30 MPa for the capsule (P = .001). Ultimate stress was significantly lower (P < .001) for the capsule, at 13.4 ± 7.7 MPa, relative to the ALL and IGHL, at 46.4 ± 20.1 MPa and 38.7 ± 16.3 MPa, respectively. The ultimate strain at failure was 37.8% ± 7.9% for the ALL and 39.5% ± 9.4% for the IGHL; this was significantly greater (P = .041 and P = .02, respectively) for both relative to the capsule, at 32.6% ± 8.4%. The strain energy density was 7.8 ± 3.1 MPa for the ALL, 2.1 ± 1.3 MPa for the capsule, and 7.1 ± 3.1 MPa for the IGHL (P < .001). The ALL and IGHL consisted of collagen bundles aligned in a parallel manner, containing elastin bundles, which was in contrast to the random collagen architecture noted in capsule samples. CONCLUSIONS: The ALL has similar tensile and histologic properties to the IGHL. The tensile properties of the ALL are significantly greater than those observed in the knee capsule. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The ALL is not just a thickening of capsular tissue and should be considered a distinct ligamentous structure comparable to the IGHL in the shoulder. The tensile behavior of the ALL is similar to the IGHL, and treatment strategies should take this into account.

Contributions of the anterolateral complex and the anterolateral ligament to rotatory knee stability in the setting of ACL Injury: a roundtable discussion.

Persistent rotatory knee laxity is increasingly recognized as a common finding after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While the reasons behind rotator knee laxity are multifactorial, the impact of the anterolateral knee structures is significant. As such, substantial focus has been directed toward better understanding these structures, including their anatomy, biomechanics, in vivo function, injury patterns, and the ideal procedures with which to address any rotatory knee laxity that results from damage to these structures. However, the complexity of lateral knee anatomy, varying dissection techniques, differing specimen preparation methods, inconsistent sectioning techniques in biomechanical studies, and confusing terminology have led to discrepancies in published studies on the topic. Furthermore, anatomical and functional descriptions have varied widely. As such, we have assembled a panel of expert surgeons and scientists to discuss the roles of the anterolateral structures in rotatory knee laxity, the healing potential of these structures, the most appropriate procedures to address rotatory knee laxity, and the indications for these procedures. In this round table discussion, KSSTA Editor-in-Chief Professor Jón Karlsson poses a variety of relevant and timely questions, and experts from around the world provide answers based on their personal experiences, scientific study, and interpretations of the literature. Level of evidence V.