Mechanisms of action behind the protective effects of proactive esophageal cooling during radiofrequency catheter ablation in the left atrium.

Proactive esophageal cooling for the purpose of reducing the likelihood of ablation-related esophageal injury resulting from radiofrequency (RF) cardiac ablation procedures is increasingly being used and has been Food and Drug Administration cleared as a protective strategy during left atrial RF ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In this review, we examine the evidence supporting the use of proactive esophageal cooling and the potential mechanisms of action that reduce the likelihood of atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) formation. Although the pathophysiology behind AEF formation after thermal injury from RF ablation is not well studied, a robust literature on fistula formation in other conditions (eg, Crohn disease, cancer, and trauma) exists and the relationship to AEF formation is investigated in this review. Likewise, we examine the abundant data in the surgical literature on burn and thermal injury progression as well as the acute and chronic mitigating effects of cooling. We discuss the relationship of these data and maladaptive healing mechanisms to the well-recognized postablation pathophysiological effects after RF ablation. Finally, we review additional important considerations such as patient selection, clinical workflow, and implementation strategies for proactive esophageal cooling.

Burns in the Elderly.

Burns in the elderly are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Frailty is an important indicator of patient health and physiologic reserve. Comorbidities and typical age-related changes significantly impact the outcomes of elderly burn patients and decisions made during their burn care. It is essential to have early and thorough discussions about the goals of care and rehabilitation plans. Physiologic changes that occur from aging cause slower wound healing and may make operative treatment more challenging, although techniques such as autographing, skin substitutes, and flaps may all play a role in treating this patient population.

Burn Patient Metabolism and Nutrition.

Following severe burns, patients have unique metabolic derangements that make adequate nutritional support imperative for their survival and recovery. Patients with burns have persistent and prolonged hypermetabolic states that lead to increased catabolism following injury. During rehabilitation, catabolism leads to increased muscle wasting and cachexia. Failure to adequately meet the patient's increased nutritional requirements can lead to poor wound healing, increased infections, and overall organ dysfunction. Because of these risks, adequate assessment and provision of nutritional needs are imperative to care for these patients.

Rapid development of squamous cell carcinoma at a split-thickness skin graft donor site.

The development of a Marjolin ulcer at the site of a split-thickness skin graft donor site is exceptionally rare. Here we describe the rapid development of squamous cell carcinoma at a split-thickness skin graft donor site in the setting of severe burn. We present a case of a 52-year-old male with no past medical history who presented with a 24% total body surface area burn caused by a flash flame. Four months after his initial excision and grafting, he presented for revision of a burn scar with an additional complaint of a rapidly developing skin lesion at his donor site, which arose over 2 weeks. The lesion was excised en bloc and found to be invasive squamous cell carcinoma. There are 5 previous cases of squamous cell carcinoma development at the site of split-thickness skin harvest in the setting of severe burn. While the typical Marjolin ulcer has a latency period of up to 30 years, lesions that arise in split-thickness skin graft donor sites appear to have a rapid onset of weeks to months. Squamous cell carcinoma at the site of split-thickness skin grafting is an uncommon but important sequelae of burn care.

Defining the Duty Hour for Surgical Trainees.

OBJECTIVE: Being mindful of duty hours has become an integral part of surgical training. Violations can lead to disciplinary action by the American Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), including probation or even withdrawal of accreditation. It is therefore crucial to ensure these hours are accurately reported. However, as these are often self-reported by the resident, what counts as a duty hour is at the discretion of the reporter. The goal of this study is to identify what trainees and faculty include in their definitions of a duty hour. We hypothesized that there would be discrepancies in faculty versus trainee definitions of the duty hour, and that there remains an unclear understanding of which nonclinical activities contribute to surgical trainee duty hours. DESIGN: An anonymous, voluntary survey was conducted at a single institution. The survey contained 14 scenarios, and participants answered either "yes" or "no" as to if they believed the scenario should be counted within duty hour reporting. Analysis of the results included evaluating overall responses to determine which scenarios were more controversial, as well as chi square analysis comparing trainee (residents and fellows) versus faculty responses to each scenario. SETTING: This survey was performed within the Department of Surgery at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, a large academic institution in Dallas, TX. PARTICIPANTS: There were 91 total faculty and trainee responses to the voluntary survey within the General Surgery Department and associated subspecialties, including 50 residents (54.9%), 4 clinical fellows (4.4%) and 37 faculty (40.7%). RESULTS: When analyzing total responses, the most controversial scenarios were taking a short period of home call (50.6% of all respondents included this as a duty hour), making a presentation for resident education (48.4%), making a presentation related to patient care (57.1%), and making a monthly call schedule (44.0%). The least controversial topic was transit to and from work (91.2% of all respondents did not include this as a duty hour). Additionally, there were statistically significant differences between trainee and faculty perceptions when it came to attending departmental curricula (96.2% trainees included as a duty hour v 81.6% faculty, p =0.02), participating in nonmandatory journal club (5.7% trainees v 23.7% faculty, p =0.01), and attending mentorship meetings (30.2% trainees v 52.6% faculty, p =0.03). CONCLUSIONS: There is no consensus as to what nonclinical activities formally count towards a duty hour. There are also significant differences identified between faculty and trainee definitions, which could have implications for duty hour reporting and ACGME violations. Further research is required to obtain a clearer picture of the surgical opinion on defining the duty hour, and hopefully this will reduce duty hour violations and better optimize surgical trainee education.

The Creation and Efforts of a Parental Task Force for Surgical Trainees.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIONS: Surgery training often coincides with the family planning and childbearing stages of the surgeon's life. This has become especially impactful with the sharp increase in female surgical trainees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To address important issues around family planning, our surgical department created a task force to make recommendations and create a framework as to how the department can be most supportive to surgery trainees who wish to become parents during training. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: This article describes the efforts of the task force, which include the creation of a departmental parental handbook, a family advocacy program and a novel meeting structure designed to facilitate the successful transition to and from parental leave status.

Skeletal muscle wasting after a severe burn is a consequence of cachexia and sarcopenia.

Muscle wasting is common and persistent in severely burned patients, worsened by immobilization during treatment. In this review, we posit two major phenotypes of muscle wasting after severe burn, cachexia and sarcopenia, each with distinguishing characteristics to result in muscle atrophy; these characteristics are also likely present in other critically ill populations. An online search was conducted from the PubMed database and other available online resources and we manually extracted published articles in a systematic mini review. We describe the current definitions and characteristics of cachexia and sarcopenia and relate these to muscle wasting after severe burn. We then discuss these putative mechanisms of muscle atrophy in this condition. Severe burn and immobilization have distinctive patterns in mediating muscle wasting and muscle atrophy. In considering these two pathological phenotypes (cachexia and sarcopenia), we propose two independent principal causes and mechanisms of muscle mass loss after burns: (1) inflammation-induced cachexia, leading to proteolysis and protein degradation, and (2) sarcopenia/immobility that signals inhibition of expected increases in protein synthesis in response to protein loss. Because both are present following severe burn, these should be considered independently in devising treatments. Discussing cachexia and sarcopenia as independent mechanisms of severe burn-initiated muscle wasting is explored. Recognition of these associated mechanisms will likely improve outcomes.

Resident Engagement in a Wellness Program in a Large Academic Residency: A Follow-Up After Two Years of Wellness.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of burnout among residents has reached an alarming level and negatively impacts learning, attrition, and patient care. We implemented a comprehensive Surgery Resident Wellness Program in a large academic program and aimed to assess the degree this initiative improved resident burnout based on validated burnout and well-being models utilizing voluntary surveys. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A voluntary survey was sent to surgical residents and included the Maslach Burnout Inventory and The Psychological General Well-Being Index. These were graded according to the respective validated scale for each test. The survey was administered prior to establishing a wellness program, and at 6 month- and 24 month-intervals following its establishment. These data were analyzed using univariate analysis based on survey data from each of the time points. RESULTS: The survey had a 51% response rate. The baseline, 6-month, and 24-month mean scores for MBI personal accomplishment were 32.80, 32.91, and 35.57, emotional exhaustion was 23.48, 23.0, and 24.42, and depersonalization were 10.94, 9.54, and 11.11. Resident burnout was present in 16 of 31 (51.61%), 14 of 33 (42.42%), and 12 of 27 (44.44%) residents at each time point. The rate of change in resident burnout was -17.8% at 6 months and -13.9% at 24 months. The averaged PGWBI global scores were 66, 73, and 83 among the participants who took the survey at each time interval. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusion Implementation of a structured wellness program was associated with a decrease in resident burnout and an increase in overall resident wellness.

The Fuel Gauge: A Simple Tool for Assessing General Surgery Resident Well-Being.

OBJECTIVE: Resident well-being is an increasingly relevant issue in medical education; however, there is no consensus on how to best measure well-being. The "fuel gauge," is a simple, easy-to-use tool developed to measure resident well-being and previously applied in an Internal Medicine Residency Program at our institution. The current study sought to evaluate its acceptability and usefulness in a surgery program. DESIGN: Weekly fuel gauge data was retrospectively collected from August 2017 through December 2018 along with resident Postgraduate Year designations. SETTING: This study was conducted at a single, large general surgery residency program that rotates through a variety of hospitals, including a University hospital, a large county hospital, a Veterans Affairs hospital, and a freestanding Children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Categorical general surgery residents at every level of training as well as preliminary interns and off service intern rotators from urology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, and otolaryngology were eligible for the study. Fuel gauge submissions which did not denote a score were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: Out of 130 residents, 103 (79.2%) completed at least 1 fuel gauge assessment with a weekly mean response rate of 41.5%. Low scores were submitted by 39.8% of resident participants. Narrative feedback was provided in 6.2% of submissions with increased length associated with decreased fuel gauge score. CONCLUSIONS: The fuel gauge was well accepted by a large general surgery program with no decline in participation rates over the study period. The tool provided residents with a direct line of communication with their program's administration, and a feasible way for the program director's office to monitor and identify residents who were struggling with regard to their well-being.

Analysis of operating room efficiency between a hospital-owned ambulatory surgical center and hospital outpatient department.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are frequently utilized; however some ambulatory procedures may be performed in hospital outpatient departments (HOPs). Our aim was to compare operating room efficiency between our ASC and HOP. METHODS: We reviewed outpatient general surgery procedures performed at our ASC and HOP. Total case time was divided into five components: ancillary time, procedure time, exit time, turnover time, and nonoperative time. RESULTS: Overall, 220 procedures were included (114 ASC, 106 HOP). Expressed in minutes, the mean turnover time (29.8 ±â€¯9.6 vs. 24.5 ±â€¯12.7; p < 0.01), ancillary time (32.2 ±â€¯7.0 vs. 22.2 ±â€¯4.5; p < 0.01), procedure time (77.4 ±â€¯44.9 vs. 56.2 ±â€¯23.0 p < 0.01), exit time (11.8 ±â€¯4.4 vs. 8.5 ±â€¯4.3; p < 0.01), and nonoperative time (62.9 ±â€¯21.9 vs. 48.7 ±â€¯15.0; p < 0.01) were longer at the HOP than at the ASC. CONCLUSION: ASC outpatient procedures are more efficient than those performed at our HOP. A system evaluation of our HOP operating room efficiency is necessary.

Assessment of general surgery resident study habits and use of the TrueLearn question bank for American Board of Surgery In-Training exam preparation.

BACKGROUND: Little information exists on the value of online question banks in preparing residents for the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE). METHODS: We reviewed surgical residents' use of an online question bank (TrueLearn) and compared it to their ABSITE performance. RESULTS: The 2016-2017 records of 44 PGY 2-5 general surgery residents were examined. The total number of TrueLearn questions answered significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with correct answers and percentile rank on the 2017 ABSITE. If a resident was to complete the entire online TL question bank consisting of 1000 questions, the overall percentage correct and overall percentile on the ABSITE is estimated to increase by 3% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the TrueLearn question bank is associated with an improved percentage of ABSITE questions answered correctly and improved PGY percentile scores.

Prospective validation of the safety of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy training paradigm featuring incremental autonomy.

BACKGROUND: Surgical training is under scrutiny for the effect increased resident autonomy may have on patient outcomes. We hypothesize that as laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) difficulty increases, there will be increased involvement by senior residents and attending physicians with no differences in complications. METHODS: Ten acute care surgeons were asked to fill out a postoperative questionnaire regarding surgical difficulty after every LC between 11/9/2016 and 3/30/2017. Either the Jonckheere-Terpstra test, Mantel-Haenzel chi square test, or ANOVA was used to test for the association between perioperative data and surgical difficulty. RESULTS: A total of 190 LCs were analyzed. PGY level, percent of surgery time with attending surgeon involvement, partial cholecystectomy rate, and length of operation all significantly rose with increasing level of difficulty (p < 0.001) with no significant differences in 60-day emergency room bounce-backs, readmission, or complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: We found that as LC difficulty increases, so does attending surgeon and/or senior resident involvement, without increased morbidity.

Prospective validation of the Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: The Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis (PGS) was developed as an intraoperative grading scale to stratify gallbladder (GB) disease severity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). We aimed to prospectively validate this scale as a measure of LC outcomes. METHODS: Eleven surgeons took pictures of and prospectively graded the initial view of 317 GBs using PGS while performing LC (LIVE) between 9/2016 and 3/2017. Three independent surgeon raters retrospectively graded these saved GB images (STORED). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) statistic assessed rater reliability. Fisher's Exact, Jonckheere-Terpstra, or ANOVA tested association between peri-operative data and gallbladder grade. RESULTS: ICC between LIVE and STORED PGS grades demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.8210). Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, difficulty of surgery, incidence of partial and open cholecystectomy rates, pre-op WBC, length of operation, and bile leak rates all significantly increased with increasing grade. CONCLUSIONS: PGS is a highly reliable, simple, operative based scale that can accurately predict outcomes after LC. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY: The Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis was found to be a reliable and accurate predictor of laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes. Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, surgical difficulty, incidence of partial and open cholecystectomy rates, pre-op WBC, operation length, and bile leak rates all significantly increased with increasing grade.

A comparison of cholecystitis grading scales.

BACKGROUND: Previously, our group developed the Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis (PGS) to stratify gallbladder (GB) disease severity that can be determined immediately when performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In prior studies, PGS demonstrated excellent interrater reliability and was internally validated as an accurate measure of LC outcomes. Here, we compare PGS against a more complex cholecystitis severity score developed by the national trauma society, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), which requires clinical, operative, imaging, and pathologic inputs, as a predictor of LC outcomes. METHODS: Eleven acute care surgeons prospectively graded 179 GBs using PGS and filled out a postoperative questionnaire regarding the difficulty of the surgery. Three independent raters retrospectively graded these GBs using PGS from images stored in the electronic medical record. Three additional surgeons then assigned separate AAST scores to each GB. The intraclass correlation coefficient statistic assessed rater reliability for both PGS and AAST. The PGS score and the median AAST score became predictors in separate linear, logistic, and negative binomial regression models to estimate perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: The average intraclass correlation coefficient of PGS and AAST was 0.8647 and 0.8341, respectively. Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis was found to be a superior predictor of increasing operative difficulty (R, 0.566 vs. 0.202), case length (R, 0.217 vs. 0.037), open conversion rates (area under the curve, 0.904 vs. 0.757), and complication rates (area under the curve, 0.7039 vs. 0.6474) defined as retained stone, small-bowel obstruction, wound infection, or postoperative biliary leak. Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis performed similar to AAST in predicting partial cholecystectomy, readmission, bile leak rates, and length of stay. CONCLUSION: Both PGS and AAST are accurate predictors of LC outcomes. Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis was found to be a superior predictor of subjective operative difficulty, case length, open conversion rates, and complication rates. Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis has the advantage of being a simpler, operative-based scale which can be scored at a single point in time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Single institution, retrospective review, level IV.

Trauma and emergency general surgery patients should be extubated with an open abdomen.

BACKGROUND: Open abdomen (OA) and temporary abdominal closure (TAC) are common techniques to manage several surgical problems in trauma and emergency general surgery (EGS). Patients with an OA are subjected to prolonged mechanical ventilation. This can lead to increased rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). We hypothesized that patients who were extubated with an OA would have a decrease in ventilator hours and as a result would have a lower rate of VAP without an increase in extubation failures. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all trauma and EGS patients managed at our institution with OA and TAC from January 2014 to February 2016. Patients were divided into cohorts consisting of those who were successfully extubated with an OA and those who were not. The number of extubation events and ventilator-free hours were calculated for each patient. Adverse events such as the need for reintubation with an OA and VAP were collected. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (20 trauma, 32 EGS) were managed with an OA and TAC during the study period. Twenty-five patients (6 trauma, 19 EGS) had at least one extubation event with an OA. Median extubation events per patient was 3 (interquartile range, 1-5). The median ventilator-free hours for patients who were extubated was 101 hours (interquartile range, 39.42-260.46). Patients that were never extubated with an OA had higher rates of VAP (30.8% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study provides much needed data regarding the feasibility of extubation in trauma and EGS patients managed with an OA and TAC. Benefits of early extubation may include lower VAP rates in this population. Plans for reexploration hinder the decision to extubate in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Inability to predict subprophylactic anti-factor Xa levels in trauma patients receiving early low-molecular-weight heparin.

BACKGROUND: Standard low-molecular-weight heparin dosing may be suboptimal for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. We aimed to identify independent predictors of subprophylactic Xa (subXa) levels in trauma patients treated under a novel early chemoprophylaxis algorithm. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of trauma patients from July 2016 to June 2017 who received enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily and had peak Xa levels drawn was performed. Patients were divided into cohorts based on having a subXa (<0.2 IU/mL) or prophylactic (≥0.2 IU/mL) Xa level. RESULTS: In all, 124 patients were included, of which 38 (31%) had subXa levels, and 17 (14%) had Xa levels greater than 0.4 IU/mL. Of the subXa cohort, 35 (92%) had their dosage increased, and the repeat Xa testing that was done in 32 revealed that only 75% reached prophylactic levels. The median time to the initiation of chemoprophylaxis was 21.9 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 11.45-35.07 hours). Patients who were defined as having lower risk of having a complication as a result of bleeding had a shorter time to starting prophylaxis than those at higher risk (18.39 hours [IQR 5.76-26.51 hours] vs. 29.5 hours [IQR 16.23-63.07 hours], p < 0.01).There was no difference in demographics, weight, body mass index, creatinine, creatinine clearance, injury severity score, type of injury, weight-based dose, time to chemoprophylaxis, or bleeding complications between the cohorts. No independent predictors of subXa level were identified on multivariable logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of trauma patients fail to achieve prophylactic Xa levels. Intrinsic factors may prevent adequate prophylaxis even with earlier administration and higher dosing of low-molecular-weight heparin. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV.

Impact of a Laser Service Line for Burn Scar on a Dedicated Burn OR's Flow and Productivity.

Our group began performing erbium-YAG 2940 wavelength fractional resurfacing of burn scar in our burn center's dedicated burn operating room (OR) in January 2016. The impact of these procedures on the performance of a mature, dedicated burn OR is unknown. All burn OR cases performed between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015 served as a pre-laser (PRE-LSR) historical control. A postintervention cohort of laser-only cases (LSR) performed between January 1, 2016 and August 17, 2016 was then identified. PRE-LSR and LSR cases were retrospectively reviewed for OR component times, and work relative value units (wRVU) billed. A total of 628 burn OR cases were done in 2015 (PRE-LSR), while 488 burn OR cases were done between January 1 and August 17, 2016. Of these 488, 59 cases were LSR (12.1%). Calculated on a monthly basis, significantly more cases were done per day in the LSR era (2.2 ± 0.4 cases/d) than PRE-LSR (1.6 ± 2.0 cases/d; P < .0001). The LSR group was significantly shorter than the PRE-LSR group for all OR component times (induction, prep, and procedure all P < .0001; transport out, P = .01; room turnover, P = .004). Aggregate OR component time was 79.2 ± 33.4 minutes for LSR and 157.5 ± 65.0 minutes for PRE-LSR (P < .0001). LSR yielded 6.9 ± 3.2 wRVU/h, while PRE-LSR generated 12.2 ± 8.9 wRVU/h (P < .0001). Despite significantly shorter OR component times and more cases being done per day, laser treatment of burn scar using a single 17108 Current Procedural Terminology code cuts wRVUs generated per hour in a mature burn OR roughly in half.

Prospective Evaluation of Operating Room Inefficiency.

Previously, they identified that 60 per cent of their facility's total operative time is nonoperative. They performed a review of their operating room to determine where inefficiencies exist in nonoperative time. Live video of operations performed in a burn operating room from June 23, 2017 to August 16, 2017 was prospectively reviewed. Preparation (end of induction to procedure start) and turnover (patient out of room to next patient in room) were divided into the following activities: 1) Preparation: remove dressing, position patient, clean patient, drape patient, and 2) Turnover: clean operating room, scrub tray setup, anesthesia setup. Ideal preparation time was calculated as the sum of time needed to perform preparation activities consecutively. Ideal turnover time was calculated as the sum of time needed to clean the operating room and to set up either the scrub tray or anesthesia (the larger of the two times as these can be done in parallel). They reviewed 101 consecutive operations. An average of 2.4 ± 0.8 cases per day were performed. Ideal preparation and turnover time were 16.6 and 30.1 minutes, a 38.3 and 32.5 per cent reduction compared with actual times. Attending surgeon presence in the operating room within 10 minutes of a patient's arrival was found to significantly decrease time to incision by 33 per cent (52.7 ± 14.3 minutes down to 35.7 ± 20.4, P < .0001). A reduction in preparation and turnover time could save $1.02 million and generate $1.76 million in additional revenue annually. Reducing preparation and turnover to ideal times could increase caseload to 4 per day, leading to millions of dollars of savings annually.