Lung allograft transbronchial cryobiopsy for critical ventilated patients: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy is an emerging technique for diagnosing pulmonary rejection. However, no prospective studies of this procedure for critically ill lung transplant recipients who require mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been performed. METHODS: From March 2017 to January 2020, we performed a prospective, randomised, comparative study to assess the diagnostic yield, histological quality and safety of transbronchial lung biopsy using biopsy forceps, a 1.9-mm cryoprobe or a 2.4-mm cryoprobe. RESULTS: 89 out of 129 consecutive transbronchial biopsy procedures (forceps group, 28 procedures; 1.9-mm cryoprobe group, 31 procedures; 2.4-mm cryoprobe group, 30 procedures) were randomised. Compared with lung samples from the forceps and 1.9-mm cryoprobe groups, lung samples from the 2.4-mm cryoprobe group allowed the most definitive diagnoses (p<0.01 and p=0.02, respectively), the most diagnoses of acute lung rejection (p<0.01 and p=0.01, respectively) and the most diagnoses of rejection severity (p<0.01 and p<0.01, respectively). These samples were larger (p<0.01 and p=0.04, respectively), had the most adequate alveolar tissue (p<0.01 and p=0.02, respectively), had more vessels per procedure (p<0.01 and p=0.01, respectively) and had no significant crush artefacts. Moderate bleeding was observed in 23% of cases (p=0.01 and p=0.08, respectively). No severe bleeding was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Transbronchial lung biopsy using a 2.4-mm cryoprobe allows the safe collection of lung tissue samples from critically ill lung transplant recipients who require mechanical ventilation in the ICU and has good diagnostic performance.

Comorbidities and mortality risk factors for patients with bronchiectasis.

Introduction: Comorbidities in patients with bronchiectasis are common and have a significant impact on clinical outcomes, contributing to lower quality of life, lung function, and exacerbation frequency. At least 13 comorbidities have been associated with a higher risk of mortality in bronchiectasis patients. Nonetheless, the kind of relationship between bronchiectasis and comorbidities is heterogeneous and poorly understood.Areas covered: different biological mechanisms leading to bronchiectasis could have a role in the development of the associated comorbidities. Some comorbidities could have a causal relationship with bronchiectasis, possibly through a variable degree of systemic inflammation, such as in rheumatic disorders and bowel inflammatory diseases. Other comorbidities, such as COPD or asthma, could be associated through airway inflammation and there is an uncertain cause-effect relationship. Finally, shared risk factors could link different comorbidities to bronchiectasis such as in the case of cardiovascular diseases, where the known link between chronic systemic inflammation and pulmonary infection could play a significant role.Expert opinion: Although different tools have been developed to assess the role of comorbidities in bronchiectasis , we believe that the implementation of current strategies to manage them is absolutely necessary and could significantly improve long-term prognosis in patients with bronchiectasis.

New opacities in lung allograft after transbronchial cryobiopsy.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of radiological opacities post-transbronchial cryobiopsy may pose serious difficulties in differential diagnosis and management of lung allografts. This prospective study evaluated the frequency, characteristics, and evolution of new lung opacities after performing transbronchial cryobiopsy. METHODS: From February 2018 to June 2018, 22 of 51 consecutive patients with an indication for transbronchial cryobiopsy underwent computed tomography (CT) of the thorax before and at 1, 4, and 8 weeks post-cryobiopsy. New CT images, required by the transplant team, were also evaluated during the next 6 months. Histological findings of transbronchial cryobiopsy and microbiological studies on bronchoalveolar lavage were evaluated as risk factors for opacities. RESULTS: After obtaining 112 cryobiopsy samples, 46 opacities >10 mm, including ground-glass, solid, cavitated, or a combination of these lesions were observed in 20 (91%) patients on post-cryobiopsy CT. All ground-glasses opacities on CT disappeared at 4 weeks. A single cavitated opacity persisted at 6 months. The remaining opacities disappeared or were decreased to <10 mm by 8 weeks. No correlations of the number, type, or evolution of opacities with the number or volume of cryobiopsy samples obtained, or with the histological diagnosis, type of transplant, or microbiologic culture results were observed. CONCLUSION: New pulmonary opacities >10 mm occur frequently after transbronchial cryobiopsy; a few may persist beyond 6 months. CT studies are recommended before implementing transbronchial cryobiopsy, whenever possible.

Sudan red dye: a new agent causing type-2 occupational asthma.

BACKGROUND: Sudan red or 1-[(2-methoxyphenyl)azo]-2-naphthol is a low molecular weight azoic agent widely used in industry, particularly in the production of hair dyes. The use of this product in the food industry is prohibited due to its potential carcinogenic effect, but no respiratory involvement has been reported to date. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 46-year-old female patient who had been working in a cosmetics packaging company for 20 years. The patient developed occupational asthma to a red azo dye known as Sudan red. The diagnosis was confirmed by specific bronchial provocation test. Induced sputum samples were obtained previously and in the 24 h following the procedure, with a rise in the percentage of eosinophils from 10 to 65%. CONCLUSIONS: This report describes the case of a patient who developed OA caused by exposure to an azoic dye called Sudan red. The clinical and analytical features suggest a type 2-related asthma; however, we are not yet able to confirm the specific pathophysiological mechanism. The extensive use of azo dyes in industry means that it is particularly important to describe their implications for health, which are probably underestimated at present.