Real-world experience of ocrelizumab initiation in a diverse multiple sclerosis population.

BACKGROUND: Ocrelizumab (OCR) is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD20 positive B-lymphocytes. It was approved for use in 2017 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for both the relapsing-remitting and primary progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To provide real-world data for patients with MS treated with OCR in our center and evaluate both the safety and efficacy across different ethnic groups not studied in previous clinical trials. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational analysis of MS patients who were treated with OCR from March 31, 2017 to April 30, 2020. We collected data on patients who had received at least a one dose infusion of OCR at our MS center. Patient characteristics, including demographics, clinical disease course, and documented side effects, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were eligible for this study, of which 72% had relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 14% had primary progressive MS (PPMS), and 11% active/relapsing secondary progressive MS (SPMS). 22% of our patients were of African American descent, 61% Caucasian, and 17% of Hispanic descent. The mean age of starting OCR was 41 ± 11 years. 47% were treatment naïve when started on OCR, 24% were previously treated with one disease-modifying therapy (DMT), 14% were treated with two DMTs, and 15% were treated with more than two DMTs prior to OCR. 50% of patients had at least one adverse event while on OCR; 4.8% had adverse events requiring to OCR discontinuation, 36% had infusion-related reactions, and 7.3% had viral infections. We found two cases of severe babesiosis along with index cases of re-activation of lichen planus, agranulocytosis, severe lymphopenia, and ectopic pregnancy. There were no cases of malignancy, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, or death within our cohort. The mean time after OCR initiation was 17.3 months in the RRMS group, 22.2 months in the PPMS group, and 28.2 months in SPMS group. The annualized relapse rate reduced from 1.33 to 0.15 in the RRMS group. The mean extended disability status scale (EDSS) scores did not worsen across MS phenotypes and ethnic groups while being treated with OCR. CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse patient population, OCR was well-tolerated without significant adverse events. There were novel cases of severe babesiosis, re-activation of lichen planus, lymphopenia, agranulocytosis, and ectopic pregnancy. It is vital to consider geographic risk factors that may expose patients to Babesia microti (B. microti) when either considering or initiating OCR therapy. There were an additional six cases of severe B. microti cases associated with OCR that were reported to the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) along with multiple babesiosis cases associated with other DMTs, including rituximab. OCR was found in our cohort to be effective by decreasing relapse rates and maintaining EDSS scores. Our study extends the generalizability of OCR from clinical trials to a real-world setting consisting of a diverse population.

Babesia microti infection in a patient with multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab.

Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody approved for treatment of relapsing-remitting and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Rare parasitic infections have been reported in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders using rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 antibody used off-label for the treatment of MS. Here, we report a patient with MS on ocrelizumab with B-cell depletion who developed severe Babesia microti (B. microti) infection with neutropenia, hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytopenia. He recovered after prompt diagnosis and treatment. This case represents the first published occurrence of babesiosis in a patient with MS on ocrelizumab. It also adds to the accumulating evidence from databases of emergent severe or relapsing B. microti infection in patients receiving anti-CD20 antibodies. This presentation stresses the diagnostic vigilance required by MS neurologists in endemic areas to identify cases of babesiosis in patients on anti-CD20 therapy and to better counsel these individuals on their risks of B. microti infection.

Impact of aging on neurocognitive performance in previously antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected individuals on their first suppressive regimen.

BACKGROUND: Despite treatment with virologically suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART), neurocognitive impairment may persist or develop de novo in aging HIV-infected individuals. We evaluated advancing age as a predictor of neurocognitive impairment in a large cohort of previously ART-naive individuals on long-term ART. DESIGN: The AIDS Clinical Trials Group Longitudinal Linked Randomized Trials was a prospective cohort study of HIV-infected individuals originally enrolled in randomized ART trials. This analysis examined neurocognitive outcomes at least 2 years after ART initiation. METHODS: All participants underwent annual neurocognitive testing consisting of Trail making A and B, the wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised Digit Symbol and Hopkins Verbal Learning Tests. Uni and multivariable repeated measures regression models evaluated factors associated with neurocognitive performance. Predictors at parent study entry (ART naive) included entry demographics, smoking, injection drug use, hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C virus serostatus, history of stroke, ART regimen type, pre-ART nadir CD4 cell count, and plasma viral load and as well as time-updated plasma viral load and CD4 cell count. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 3313 individuals with median pre-ART age of 38 years, 20% women; 36% Black, non-Hispanic; 22% Hispanic. Virologic suppression was maintained at 91% of follow-up visits. Neurocognitive performance improved with years of ART. After adjusting for the expected effects of age using norms from HIV-negative individuals, the odds of neurocognitive impairment at follow-up visits among the HIV infected increased by nearly 20% for each decade of advancing age. CONCLUSION: Despite continued virologic suppression and neurocognitive improvement in the cohort as a whole, older individuals were more likely to have neurocognitive impairment than younger individuals.